i wear my sunglasses at night
DO NOT REPOST MY ART
Monterey Bay Aquarium
will byers stan first human second
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
NASA

Kiana Khansmith
Keni
YOU ARE THE REASON
cherry valley forever
Stranger Things

pixel skylines
Claire Keane

oozey mess

⁂
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
hello vonnie
Cosimo Galluzzi
Xuebing Du
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

Kaledo Art

seen from Germany

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@gaysandgals
i wear my sunglasses at night
DO NOT REPOST MY ART
y'all know who this for
🌟🍑🌼🎙
You know I love it, so please don’t stop it You got me right here in your jean pocket (right now) Laying your body on a shag carpet (oh) You know I love it so please don’t stop it
Janelle Monáe – Make Me Feel
a lecture
“Soggy croissant” is the best insult.
acnh wallpapers - feel free to use!
ANYWAYS bi people aren’t “betraying” anyone by not immediately dislosing their sexuality to every single person they flirt with. acting like bisexual people have to out themselves to all of their tinder matches or some shit just because you, personally, have some weird and fucked up fear of accidentally dating a bisexual or whatever is something you need to get over on your own
likewise, trans people aren’t betraying anyone by not disclosing to people they flirt with that they are transgender!!! trans people do not have to disclose that they are trans EVER.
hunter schafer and her girlfriend massima desire
Oh, the hero is a straight-laced, charismatic, conventionally handsome, neurotypical, heterosexual white man who trusts the government and lives in a bland, flavorless relationship with a subserviant, less-talented woman whose life revolves around him, and I WASN’T supposed to like the villain more? My bad
Any villain: I too once believed in the ruling power, but when I put my faith in it to protect me I was betrayed. The people who did this faced no consequences for their actions, faced no trial, and as we speak continue to do more harm to others. Your justice is a pretty plan in theory, hero, but it is naive- the real world is messy and cruel and unfair, and I plan to rectify that. Too long I have tried other ways to make this system work- it is time to make a change
Conventional Heroman: Killing people is wrong and the government probably had good plans for this death ray
they do be vibing doe
An entire Manhattan village owned by black people was destroyed to build Central Park
Three churches, a school, and dozens of homes were demolished
^^^^Prominent abolitionist Albro Lyons and Mary Joseph Lyons were residents of Seneca Village.
The community, called Seneca Village, began in 1825 and eventually spanned from 82nd Street to 89th Street along what is now the western edge of Central Park. By the time it was finally razed in 1857, it had become a refuge for African Americans. Though most were nominally free (the last slave wasn’t emancipated until 1827) life was far from pleasant. The population of African Americans living in New York City tripled between abolition and complete emancipation and the migrants were derided in the press. Mordecai Noah, founder of The New York Enquirer, was especially well-known for his attacks on African Americans, fuming at one point that “the free negroes of this city are a nuisance incomparably greater than a million slaves.”
More than three-fourths of the children who lived in Seneca Village attended Colored School №3 in the church basement. Half of the African Americans who lived there owned their own property, a rate five times higher than the city average. And while the village remained mostly black, immigrant whites had started to live in the area as well. They shared resources ranging from a church (All Angels Episcopal), to a midwife (an Irish immigrant who served the entire town).
But in 1857, it was all torn down.
Even as the church was being built on 86th street, then painstakingly painted white, the original settlers fought for their lands in court. Andrew Williams was paid nearly what his land was worth, after filing an affidavit with the state Supreme Court. Epiphany Davis was not as fortunate, losing hundred of dollars.
By 1871, Seneca Village had largely been forgotten. That year, The New York Herald reported that laborers creating a new entrance to the park at 85th Street and 8th Avenue had discovered a coffin, “enclosing the body of a Negro, decomposed beyond recognition.” The discovery was a mystery, the paper reported, because “these lands were dug up five years ago, when the trees were planted there, and no such coffins were there at the time.” That’s unlikely, as the site was the graveyard of the AME Zion church.
Researchers from Columbia, CUNY, and the New York Historical Society have been working on excavating the site of Seneca Village since the early 2000s. The work has been slow, with excavation starting in 2011.
The only official artifact that remains intact on the site is a commemorative plaque, dedicated in 2001 to the lost village.
source
#BlackHistoryMonth
Reblog till my thumb falls the fuck off!!😡👊🏿✊🏿
People didn’t know about this? We learned about this in school bc the village welcomed and sheltered Irish immigrants during the Famine.
The authorities hated the place because the residents were highly politically active and had ties to the Underground Railroad.
A lot of people assume, because Manhattan was in The North[tm], that it must have been an abolitionist-friendly place (and that its residents then would have had as favorable view of Lincoln as residents today have of Obama).
But the truth is: much of the money flowing through Wall Street was profits from the cotton, sugar, rum and slave trade. The Power Brokers of NYC were solidly on the side of the slaveholders in the South.
if you understand the way that pansexuality is used in a biphobic context and that it was popularized by biphobes and ignorant people trying to be inclusive without actually understanding what bisexuality IS and you still just prefer to call yourself pan because its more comfortable and you feel it fits you more, thats whatever. thats fine.
but PLEASE analyse your bias and why you prefer pan over bi. because it feels more inclusive? biphobia. because you feel like bisexuality comes w baggage? biphobia. because bi means two and pan means all? biphobia. because you think pan is the new bi and bi is outdated? guess what. biphobia.
bi has always been what pan claims to be. they are the same identity. they are 100% the same and every argument that ive seen trying to separate them has been either wildly biphobic, transphobic or a mix of the two. theyre the same. if you call yourself pan and dont acknowledge that they are the same, you are a biphobe.
pansexual, omnisexual, polysexual, multisexual are ALL just different words for bi. bi is all of these experiences. call yourself what you want, but remember that these are the same thing.
pansexuality is not inherently more progressive and bisexuality is not inherently more regressive and both of these beliefs are biphobic, straight up. they are the same thing. if you put down bisexuality in favour of something that literally means the same thing, you are a biphobe. it is biphobia.
i agree there's negative history to unpack with the term pan, and that many people who ID as pan have internalized biphobia to deal with. but to me they are not 100% one and the same.
bisexuality covers attraction to multiple genders, period. that CAN be all genders, but it could also cover attraction to women and nonbinary people but not men, for example. pan is effectively a subgroup of bisexuality. saying they're 100% the same would be like saying birds and robins are 100% the same. like, sure, if you ignore all the birds that aren't robins.
im nonbinary and ID as bi, many of my friends are nonbinary and ID as pan. they just like having one word sum up "attraction to all genders" without further extrapolation. none of us take it as a personal affront that our experiences overlap but we describe them differently. hell another person who's attracted to women and nonbinary people but not men could be a lesbian. it's okay, it's fine, it's not my job to tell people what they are.
they are 100% the same and insisting otherwise is literally straight up wrong.
bisexuality is attraction to all genders, not just multiple. you cannot be bi and not be attracted to men, or women, or anything outside and in between. if you're a man and you say you're bi but you're not attracted to men, you're not bi. if you're a woman and you're not attracted to women, you literally cannot be bi.
all of this shit implies there's a set experience for bisexuality, or that it's based around preferences or specific genders, or worse, that it's not inherently inclusive of all genders. bisexuality already is what people insist that pansexuality is.
pan is a label defining HOW you experience attraction (as in, "pan people are attracted regardless of gender") rather than WHO and WHAT you're attracted to (so, genders.) and therefore is literally the exact same as bisexuality.
the popularity of pansexuality in recent years CAME from biphobia and transphobia, seeing bisexuality as regressive and trans people as an entirely separate gender. every sexuality includes attraction to trans people, including nb people.
bi IS attraction to all genders. pan and bi are the same and the only reasons for differentiating between the two are biphobia, trans people feeling it resonates better with their gender rather than their attraction, or people who literally just like the flag.
also this is ENTIRELY fucking relevant so you should say it with your chest instead of sticking it in the tags.
if you insist that pan and bi are different and you id as pan, you have internalized biphobia, because it is the same and you are effectively bi. you need to accept they're the same and work to dismantle the biphobic and transphobic shit in your community or you need to grow up and realise that the bi experience differs between every single person who ids as bi.
don't talk down to me on my own post.
African-American Hair Styles in Depth Row 1 & 2 Row 3, 4, & 6 Row 5
list of people who look good with really light/no eyebrows:
whoopi goldberg
fka twigs
rina sawayama
Elliana Vatel
Hunter Schafer
MJ Rodriguez
I’m begging people to read the bi manifesto just one time before saying that “yea bi just isn’t inclusive enough” bullshit. im sick of it i literally can’t deal