The Dismantlement of Traditional School Art Manifesto
School art is a social construct that introduces the realm of art to the public. However, this engagement misconstrues the mind of the people and does not accurately display the potential of the student. In this manifesto, there are three tasks (and an aftermath). This brief examination exhibits how specific alterations can renovate the traditional approach of school art to be more productive and successful.
The introduction of art is very similar to when a newborn first meet people. If the baby’s first experience is abuse and abandonment, then it is going to be very hesitant with people after that. Its entire life will be built on fear and anguish; it will do whatever is necessary to never encounter it again. It will build barriers and use defense mechanisms to keep them from ever being that vulnerable. This is akin to many students’ first meeting with school art. Often times, it is loaded with shallow expectations, mind-numbing projects, and devaluing beliefs. This introduction establishes a weak foundation for the student to build on because their tainted perception. At this moment, their mind is isolated from any enriching experience and anything that comes close to it is a threat. Immediately, they are rebellious and they want to annihilate all that stands in front. This is known as the first task, Encounter. The teacher must challenge the student’s foundation and force them to explore new entities. This is necessary in order for the student to reach any level of fulfillment.
This bond between the students and this way of thinking is so strong because it is all they know. The teacher must be resourceful and adaptive. They must become flexible and wiling to transform into the proper aid the student needs. Once they make this change, they transform from teachers into Informative Guides. They are helping the student analyze the situation, articulate the proper solution, and perform the second task, Validation. They are no longer teaching the students to do anything; they are guiding them to higher point.
This task can be broken up into two objectives: Past and Present. These objectives are designed to make the student aware on their past experiences and enlighten them on their present state. The two objectives coexist to balance out one another. The Past objective allows the student to understand the foundation their art education is built on. This is not to point fingers or blame others for their misleads, but more of identifying the key ideas that influence the student’s thought process. Furthermore, the Present objective rebuilds the student’s mentality. It the development of the student’s new defined purpose. The title of objective evokes the idea of the existing state; however, this is not exclusive to future desires. It is a combination of visions that contribute to the student’s new direction. Together, the two objectives validate the importance of each aspect of the student’s life rather than selectively appreciating a few.
III. Maintenance and Reproduction
The Informative Guide’s destiny is now changed. In the third task, Maintenance and Reproduction, the Guides are now dedicated to supplying the student with the information to preserve their purpose and tools to recreate the process. These are essential to the progress of the student. First and foremost, knowledge is power. Without a strong basis, the student will lack the confidence to proceed and without tools, they lack the technical skill to navigate their new adventure. Also, comfort is a common crutch used after major changes. For example, the student was hesitant of the teacher because they were protective of becoming damaged. This defense became so comfortable that they became complacent with their current position, which prohibited them from moving forward. The Guides are assisting the student on their journey, so they can prosper at their on interval. They can self evaluate their location and dictate where they want to go. The Guides are liberating the student of ignorance and showering them in a bath of insight.
When approaching this manifesto, it appears to target the current system of school art. If the system was to reform, it could be perceived that this examination does not find a need to exist. Contrary, this lies as a proposal that identifies the role of school art and all who inhabit it. The only necessary amendment would be in the Encounter task. In the event the teachers choose to implement beliefs that have a positive influence on the foundation of the student, the need to challenge the foundation in the future would be eliminated. But overall, this manifesto is a eternal modification to the field of school art and what it is destined to accomplish.