can anyone whos looking at this profile please lowkey leave a discussion on my other non tags post (if you truly have something to say)
i know i can sound like a meanie but i promise i always calm down every time i rant
todays bird

Discoholic 🪩

titsay

if i look back, i am lost
Show & Tell
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

PR's Tumblrdome

Andulka
ojovivo
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Monterey Bay Aquarium
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
h

tannertan36
dirt enthusiast
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Not today Justin
cherry valley forever

ellievsbear

seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from TĂĽrkiye
@glassflavoredmint
can anyone whos looking at this profile please lowkey leave a discussion on my other non tags post (if you truly have something to say)
i know i can sound like a meanie but i promise i always calm down every time i rant
I KEEP REPLYING TO MY OTHER ACC WHY IS IT KEEP HAPPENING!???????!!!!!!!
its going to be revealed that mouse sensei is the key to solve seimei murder because he was either on the ceiling or inside douman's clothes the entire time the murder take place at
am i the only one who dont find it a big of a deal that seimei is dead? every time im on yohaji tiktok i keep seeing someone reminding to other fans that seimei is dead and thats supposed to be like a gotcha moment?
but its not like he completely disappear from the narrative and never appear again whether in flashback or spirit form.
like yeah hes dead thats definitely tragic but hes still there, hes still actively moving in the story. so i dont get why everyone always seems to be losing their mind whenever it got brought up
IT IS sad but i dont get how it always frame like he disappear into the story
its definitely not something fans would be happy about
but i lowkey love the idea that haruaki being seimei's reincarnation makes him act like him sometimes even without his actual influence like, it all just him
I hate the idea that intelligence-aki (or most called as tama-aki) is a separate person, because compare to haruaki-seimei stuff, tama-aki is ACTUALLY haruaki. straight up just him. hes haruaki that lacks compassion and only drive by logic but hes not a separate person, hes a piece of haruaki that just as important as the rest of the 4 soul pieces.
seperating him feels like a discredit to haruaki as a character and also what (I find) interesting about haruaki. this idea makes tama-aki a scapegoat, that haruaki is an innoncent baby who could never do any wrong and tama-aki is evil and haru has no autonomy of this whatsoever! !
what i find tama-aki interesting for haruaki is that it shows that haruaki is capable of malice, its what makes haruaki "not" much of a good person everyone thought him to be. haruaki is not just a kind guy who only flaw is he has a weird fetish, hes more than that but its not pretty and thats what i like about him, i like when a character has that side that could be considered them to be "bad person" its normal human being things. so taking that away feels like reducing haruaki's character and somewhat making him less human.
a very specific situation im hating on is a theory where tama-aki could take over haruaki the same way seimei does. its just...why. please spare haruaki, one entity that could take control over him is enough no need for another one
i have considered that haruaki's soul is forever damaged and actually just has multiple seperate personalities now, tama-aki actually gained its own sentient
I was lowkey a hater when this panel dropped by refusing to accept seimei is referring someone other than kuzunoha
"its douman-"
"its suzaku-"
WHY WOULD A MAN BE THERE WHY WOULD A MAN BE THERE (/ref)
alternatively:
"its kaguya" ...what the hell
i dont think its fair to blame seimei for the fox town arc.
i dont know i feel like no one consider that seimei is just as much of a victim as anyone else to tamamo's actions and i dont see anyone like pointing out that she literally ruined his life, his father gone missing when asked to investigate the plague that was caused by tamamo and his mother died because tamamo made the other foxes attack the human society in which led them fighting back and irrationally killing every single fox on sight.
he doesnt look like a victim because he doesnt make himself as this poor helpless child your typical villain backstory reveal and instead he fought back. but just because he refuse to become universe's punching bag, doesnt make him any less of a victim.
its not that he couldnt kill tamamo, its that he doesnt want to. just like ginko seeing kinko got "revived" and stop thinking about pushing the sealed tamamo into the sea. i dont think everyone ever consider how seimei felt seeing his mother suddenly alive and well but doesnt remember her memories that were spent with him and his father. tamamo is basically putting them in a tough spot.
and he also to some degree blame himself for everything that happens, he thinks that his existence bring misery, that being hated by almost everyone is justified (this part is an assumption).
so seeing his mother being alive again would probably makes him think that its for the better that he left her alone (by not killing tamamo). because he thinks that if hes not there then she will be fine.
this feels like everyone actually wanted him to be this emotionless nonchalant aura farmer that definitely wont feel a thing if his mother died again. (i do have thoughts about this but its going to be on another topic later or never)
but i must say this does not excuse him giving the task to haru tf girl? go possess haru again and end the source of all problems, your mom give you the permission too and go hug her while youre at it!
and lastly this is one is going off topic and just my personal gripe, but i do not agree that seimei really meant haruaki here
this kid just awakened his divine sight just few moments into the fight, theres no way he was seeing haruaki while fighting tamamo the whole time and conclude that strange man in his vision should be the one who do the last blow.
and im aware of the other panel but i wouldnt call tensei's word reliable either, he obviously twisting the implication just so he could make ginko do something in his favor, and he never even confirm anything what the hell.
you are not convincing me that this little 5 year old who just learned how to make many shikigami has planned a 1000 years plan through this one divination about this "child" we dont know the identity of.
sheesh i feel like i sound harsher than what i intended. I didnt mean for it to sound argumentative (probably i can be a bit annoyed of fandom's perception), if i just boil this whole ass paragraphs down it would just be:
seimei doesnt want to kill tamamo because his mother is there and he couldnt bear the thought of seeing her dead again. He is pretty much under the same circumtances as the other surviving fox.
also with that, he never meant to give the task to haruaki and really meant himself that deal with it later, but he didnt anticipate tamamo "reviving" everyone so he ended up leaving her alone (and eventually did left the task to haru for real LMAO)
i dont think its fair to blame seimei for the fox town arc.
i dont know i feel like no one consider that seimei is just as much of a victim as anyone else to tamamo's actions and i dont see anyone like pointing out that she literally ruined his life, his father gone missing when asked to investigate the plague that was caused by tamamo and his mother died because tamamo made the other foxes attack the human society in which led them fighting back and irrationally killing every single fox on sight.
he doesnt look like a victim because he doesnt make himself as this poor helpless child your typical villain backstory reveal and instead he fought back. but just because he refuse to become universe's punching bag, doesnt make him any less of a victim.
its not that he couldnt kill tamamo, its that he doesnt want to. just like ginko seeing kinko got "revived" and stop thinking about pushing the sealed tamamo into the sea. i dont think everyone ever consider how seimei felt seeing his mother suddenly alive and well but doesnt remember her memories that were spent with him and his father. tamamo is basically putting them in a tough spot.
and he also to some degree blame himself for everything that happens, he thinks that his existence bring misery, that being hated by almost everyone is justified (this part is an assumption).
so seeing his mother being alive again would probably makes him think that its for the better that he left her alone (by not killing tamamo). because he thinks that if hes not there then she will be fine.
this feels like everyone actually wanted him to be this emotionless nonchalant aura farmer that definitely wont feel a thing if his mother died again. (i do have thoughts about this but its going to be on another topic later or never)
but i must say this does not excuse him giving the task to haru tf girl? go possess haru again and end the source of all problems, your mom give you the permission too and go hug her while youre at it!
and lastly this is one is going off topic and just my personal gripe, but i do not agree that seimei really meant haruaki here
this kid just awakened his divine sight just few moments into the fight, theres no way he was seeing haruaki while fighting tamamo the whole time and conclude that strange man in his vision should be the one who do the last blow.
and im aware of the other panel but i wouldnt call tensei's word reliable either, he obviously twisting the implication just so he could make ginko do something in his favor, and he never even confirm anything what the hell.
you are not convincing me that this little 5 year old who just learned how to make many shikigami has planned a 1000 years plan through this one divination about this "child" we dont know the identity of.
speaking of seimei being tamamo's victim, im suprised i havent seen any fanworks of seimei being totally pissed off at tamamo.
even though i think seimei wouldnt pull 2015 fanon geno route sans rage, i still would like seeing art of it
i dont think its fair to blame seimei for the fox town arc.
i dont know i feel like no one consider that seimei is just as much of a victim as anyone else to tamamo's actions and i dont see anyone like pointing out that she literally ruined his life, his father gone missing when asked to investigate the plague that was caused by tamamo and his mother died because tamamo made the other foxes attack the human society in which led them fighting back and irrationally killing every single fox on sight.
he doesnt look like a victim because he doesnt make himself as this poor helpless child your typical villain backstory reveal and instead he fought back. but just because he refuse to become universe's punching bag, doesnt make him any less of a victim.
its not that he couldnt kill tamamo, its that he doesnt want to. just like ginko seeing kinko got "revived" and stop thinking about pushing the sealed tamamo into the sea. i dont think everyone ever consider how seimei felt seeing his mother suddenly alive and well but doesnt remember her memories that were spent with him and his father. tamamo is basically putting them in a tough spot.
and he also to some degree blame himself for everything that happens, he thinks that his existence bring misery, that being hated by almost everyone is justified (this part is an assumption).
so seeing his mother being alive again would probably makes him think that its for the better that he left her alone (by not killing tamamo). because he thinks that if hes not there then she will be fine.
this feels like everyone actually wanted him to be this emotionless nonchalant aura farmer that definitely wont feel a thing if his mother died again. (i do have thoughts about this but its going to be on another topic later or never)
but i must say this does not excuse him giving the task to haru tf girl? go possess haru again and end the source of all problems, your mom give you the permission too and go hug her while youre at it!
and lastly this is one is going off topic and just my personal gripe, but i do not agree that seimei really meant haruaki here
this kid just awakened his divine sight just few moments into the fight, theres no way he was seeing haruaki while fighting tamamo the whole time and conclude that strange man in his vision should be the one who do the last blow.
and im aware of the other panel but i wouldnt call tensei's word reliable either, he obviously twisting the implication just so he could make ginko do something in his favor, and he never even confirm anything what the hell.
you are not convincing me that this little 5 year old who just learned how to make many shikigami has planned a 1000 years plan through this one divination about this "child" we dont know the identity of.
this "anti youkai" power is actually terrifying to think about, like a human capable of that? and im not talking just haruaki/seimei, im also talking about douman and any humans that able to use it (ex: onmyouji).
because the thing is, it doesnt stop to youkai, it actually goes beyond to gods. does it not sound crazy? gods who supposedly a higher beings from humans can just,,get weakened by human? even if its not guarantee to knock them out completely like any other youkai, the fact is they could still get weakened
I hate the idea that intelligence-aki (or most called as tama-aki) is a separate person, because compare to haruaki-seimei stuff, tama-aki is ACTUALLY haruaki. straight up just him. hes haruaki that lacks compassion and only drive by logic but hes not a separate person, hes a piece of haruaki that just as important as the rest of the 4 soul pieces.
seperating him feels like a discredit to haruaki as a character and also what (I find) interesting about haruaki. this idea makes tama-aki a scapegoat, that haruaki is an innoncent baby who could never do any wrong and tama-aki is evil and haru has no autonomy of this whatsoever! !
what i find tama-aki interesting for haruaki is that it shows that haruaki is capable of malice, its what makes haruaki "not" much of a good person everyone thought him to be. haruaki is not just a kind guy who only flaw is he has a weird fetish, hes more than that but its not pretty and thats what i like about him, i like when a character has that side that could be considered them to be "bad person" its normal human being things. so taking that away feels like reducing haruaki's character and somewhat making him less human.
a very specific situation im hating on is a theory where tama-aki could take over haruaki the same way seimei does. its just...why. please spare haruaki, one entity that could take control over him is enough no need for another one
expanding that one part in tag where i mentioned tama-aki being similar to seimei. i do hate that too the idea that he's seimei himself especially because they look so alike(no shit),
but I think it works better if this idea is more directly on what haruaki could've been.
im combining this with the theory that haruaki is seimei's oc, his personality was deliberately created. tama-aki (intelligence) is the original soul while the 4 ones are not. basically seimei tampered with his own soul to create that original character instead of second him so he adds those 4 fucked up creatures to conceal him
I hate the idea that intelligence-aki (or most called as tama-aki) is a separate person, because compare to haruaki-seimei stuff, tama-aki is ACTUALLY haruaki. straight up just him. hes haruaki that lacks compassion and only drive by logic but hes not a separate person, hes a piece of haruaki that just as important as the rest of the 4 soul pieces.
seperating him feels like a discredit to haruaki as a character and also what (I find) interesting about haruaki. this idea makes tama-aki a scapegoat, that haruaki is an innoncent baby who could never do any wrong and tama-aki is evil and haru has no autonomy of this whatsoever! !
what i find tama-aki interesting for haruaki is that it shows that haruaki is capable of malice, its what makes haruaki "not" much of a good person everyone thought him to be. haruaki is not just a kind guy who only flaw is he has a weird fetish, hes more than that but its not pretty and thats what i like about him, i like when a character has that side that could be considered them to be "bad person" its normal human being things. so taking that away feels like reducing haruaki's character and somewhat making him less human.
a very specific situation im hating on is a theory where tama-aki could take over haruaki the same way seimei does. its just...why. please spare haruaki, one entity that could take control over him is enough no need for another one
I find some people in the fandom can be a bit hypocritical about what ship they consider "bad" and what not. one ship they deemed to be bad and how its fans are weird for it because of a reason but they themselves ship another pair where that reason could be applied to and way worse than what they considered that ship to be bad.
i feel like not many people realize that they could just. drop a ship. its totally fine to drop them.
but regardless of my opinion (in which im not implying my personal opinion about what ship i ship and what not in this post) i will cast aside this feeling and discuss other topics i find interesting to talk about to those people.
i dont care mostly.
I will not try to be actually negative here, i could sense something dangerous if i keep going