90/365 Films of 2013
12 Angry Men (1957)
Rating: ★★★★★
Comment: Jack Klugman is just so amazing.
Twelve Angry Men (1957)
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON

JBB: An Artblog!

Andulka
Keni
dirt enthusiast
One Nice Bug Per Day
KIROKAZE

⁂
Not today Justin
taylor price
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosmic Funnies
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Sweet Seals For You, Always
todays bird

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
noise dept.

Kaledo Art
seen from Tunisia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
@godofthephilosophers
90/365 Films of 2013
12 Angry Men (1957)
Rating: ★★★★★
Comment: Jack Klugman is just so amazing.
Twelve Angry Men (1957)
My Name is Nobody (1974)
Final perfect happiness (beautitudo) can only come from the vision of the divine essence. To prove this, two points should be considered. First, man is not perfectly happy as long as something more remains to be desired or sought. Second, the perfection of any power is related to the characteristics of its object. But the object of the intellect is being, that is the essence of a thing. . .
Thomas Aquinas, The Summa of Theology (Qu. 3. “What is Happiness?”). The First Part of Part II (1269-1270)
“Love the Bible and wisdom will love you; love it and it will preserve you; honor it and it will embrace you. These are the jewels you should wear around your neck and on your ears.”
Montgomery Clift in From Here to Eternity (1953)
I am 20 years old. I fell in love with Søren Kierkegaard around the time I was about 18; an age which is oddly around the time which popular philosophers and thinkers admit to similarly "falling in...
An article I wrote for younger (or newer) readers of Kierkegaard.
If we could go on and talk about how a man must love himself, we must first examine how this relates to "being" (ontos) more generally. A philosophy of being may help us here, or perhaps some aid f...
An excerpt from Thomas Merton:
This matter of “salvation” is, when seen intuitively, a very simply thing. But when we analyze it, it turns into a complex tangle of paradoxes. We become ourselves by dying to ourselves. We gain only what we give up, and if we give up everything we gain everything. We cannot find ourselves within ourselves, but only in others, yet at the same time before we can go out to others we must first find ourselves. . . The only effective answer to the problem of salvation must therefore reach out to embrace both extremes of a contradiction at the same time. Hence that answer must be supernatural. That is why all the answers that are not supernatural are imperfect: for they only embrace one of the contradictory terms, and they can always be denied by the other. . .
Man is divided against himself and against God by his own selfishness, which divides him against his brother. This division cannot be healed by a love that places itself only on one side of the rift. Love must reach over to the both sides and draw them together. . .” (No Man Is An Island)
William Blake. Christ Appearing to the Apostles after the Resurrection. 1795.
William Blake. Jacob’s Dream. 1805.
To see a world in a grain of sand And a heaven in a wild flower, Hold infinity in the palm of your hand, And eternity in an hour.
William Blake, Auguries of Innocence (via london-burns)
Do not be too quick to condemn the man who no longer believes in God: for it is perhaps your own coldness and avarice and mediocrity and materialism and selfishness that have chilled his faith.
Thomas Merton, Seeds (via ramsesprashad)
Ordet (1955), Theodor Dreyer
Many movies, documentaries and books have familiarized us with some of the passengers of the Titanic, but one sticks out for writer Douglas Mize -- pastor John Harper, who ran person to person, passionately telling others about Christ as the boat sank. He even gave his life vest to an unbeliever.
The story of John Harper, evangelist aboard the Titanic.
Written by Douglas W. Mize (Apr. 13, 2012).
When the Titanic hit the iceberg, Harper successfully led his daughter to a lifeboat. Being a widower he may have been allowed to join her but instead forsook his own rescue, choosing to provide the masses with one more chance to know Christ. Harper ran person to person, passionately telling others about Christ. As the water began to submerge the "unsinkable" ship, Harper was heard shouting, "women, children, and the unsaved into the lifeboats." Rebuffed by a certain man at the offer of salvation Harper gave him his own life vest, saying, "you need this more than I do." Up until the last moment on the ship Harper pleaded with people to give their lives to Jesus.
The ship disappeared beneath the deep frigid waters leaving hundreds floundering in its wake with no realistic chance for rescue. Harper struggled through hyperthermia to swim to as many people as he could, still sharing the Gospel. Harper evidentially would lose his battle with hypothermia but not before giving many people one last glorious Gospel witness.
Four years after the tragedy at a Titanic survivor's meeting in Ontario, Canada, one survivor recounted his interaction with Harper in the middle of the icy waters of the Atlantic. He testified he was clinging to ship debris when Harper swam up to him, twice challenging him with a biblical invitation to "believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." He rejected the offer once. Yet given the second chance and with miles of water beneath his feet, the man gave his life to Christ. Then as Harper succumbed to his watery grave, this new believer was rescued by a returning lifeboat. As he concluded his remarks at the Ontario meeting of survivors he simply stated, "I am the last convert of John Harper."
What should have been our answer to Auschwitz? Should this people, called to be a witness to the God of mercy and compassion, persist in its witness and cling to Job's words: "Even if He slay me yet will I trust in Him" (Job 13: 15), or should this people follow the advice of Job's wife, "Curse God and die!" (Job 2: 9), immerse itself into the anonymity of a hundred nations all over the world, and disappear once and for all?
Abraham Joshua Heschel (1907-1972) on the holocaust.
Well, some people have a sense of humor…
Dummy head used by John Anglin to fool prison guards, Alcatraz. 1962
Presupposes religious knowledge? It is you who has presupposed religious knowledge. Saying "God, if he were truly such, wouldn’t conduct, act on, or do x" is to go by what the Bible and people like you say about this deity of yours. It has nothing to do with religious knowledge. It has more to do with religious hearsay. Atheists can say the same thing about other gods. In fact, you can too. Does that presuppose religious knowledge of those gods?
You raise a great question which calls for a needed point of clarification. If I had said, “To speak about X, one presupposes that X exists,” you would be correct in your criticism here. However, that is not what I am saying. Alvin Plantinga talked about this in his book God and Other Minds (1967), which the British philosopher A.J. Ayer also briefly mentions in his book Language, Truth and Logic (1952). You make a good point in that you rightfully side with Plantinga and not Ayer by objecting to my recent post.
Long story short and a bunch of philosophy-jargon skipped, I am rather saying that someone who wishes to object to God’s existence by using the “God if he were God would/would not do X” argument and they themselves hold to the belief that religious knowledge is not possible or truly ‘knowable’ (analogous to the way in which Kant thought man can not ‘know’ the noumenal realm, though it may exist), they are being inconsistent. If one were to make that argument as a religious skeptic, he must have a prior knowledge of what God would or would not do.
For example, if Sally has been alleged to murder another person and I object by saying, “No! Sally would never commit murder!” and I was asked to justify how I knew this, it would be absurd for me to reply, “I don’t know, I’ve never met nor seen Sally before in my life.”