Image: François Duvalier on July 30, 1958 following the first serious coup attempt against his authority. Courtesy of:  HaĂŻti-RĂ©fĂ©rence.Â
Duvalier, power and symbolism : The case of the 1964 flag
Much mystery surrounds the adoption and the true colours elected for the would-be Haitian flag espoused by Dessalines at Arcahaie in May 1803. The often cited story of Dessalines theatrically ripping the white portion of the French tricolor and the remains being sewed back together by Catherine Flon has been interpreted in popular culture as the tale of an alliance between black and mulĂątres fractions to defeat the French. Each color represented a group and their joining together in the flag added both a metaphorical and literal meaning to the entreprise. This dramatic incident was to represent a formal agreement between the two factions committed to liberty or death. The Haitian flag therefore tells an important message about unity, anti-slavery and anti-colonialism. While scholars such as Philippe R. Girard (2009), known for his often controversial take on Haitian revolutionary figures, have more recently disputed this tale as a later fabrication (claiming instead that, given the timing of its adoption, the flag represented much less a symbol of unity between blacks and mulĂątres than an appropriation of French revolutionary iconography), the Haitian flag continues to be understood as a potent symbol in Haiti.
As President of Caribbean Republic between 1957 and 1971, François Duvalier utilised and appropriated various such symbols to defend his political programme. As argued by Haitian historian Wien Weibert Arthus (2012), both in forging a domestic and foreign agenda, Duvalier boosted his Noirist credentials. His move to change the Haitian flag in 1964 reveals much about his desire to manipulate popular emblems.
While scholars still debate the true genealogy of the Haitian flag, as expressed by Michael C. Reyes (2017), they generally concur that there exists âlimited historical support among contemporary historiansâ regarding the May 1803 events at Arcahaie (Reyes, p. 35). Similarly, while Girard (2009) may be overstating his argument regarding the French origins of the Haitian flag, he is correct in pointing out that the insurgent army, even before the final break for independence, adopted various flags and that some of these existed simultaneously. It is perhaps this confusion which opened the door, already in 1957, for Duvalier and his entourage to discuss a possible change to the Haitian national colours.
Haitian flag, 1964. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
In 1805, following his proclamation as emperor, it is widely believed that Dessalines altered the flag from blue and red bands placed horizontally to black and red vertical bands. (Nicholls, 1996 [1971], p. 234.) Henri Christophe fashioned a similar flag in his kingdom until his suicide in 1820. It was, however, the flag of Alexandre PĂ©tionâs Republic, now under Jean-Pierre Boyerâs control following PĂ©tionâs death in 1818, that would prevail in the reunited Haiti. This horizontal flag, featuring blue and red bands, was conferred legal status in the 1843 Constitution (Haiti-RĂ©fĂ©rence). By 1957, the newly elected Duvalier and some of the intellectuals his regimes seemed to have attracted argued that the âtrueâ colours of the Haitian flags were in fact black and red and efforts should be made to restore the national colours (Nicholls, p. 235). Although Nichollsâ work has been rightly criticised for the way it sometimes exaggerated the differences between blacks and mulĂątresand at times even seemed to suggest that class and colour were synonymous in Haiti (see for instance the essays in Politics and Power in Haiti [2013] edited by Kate Quinn and Paul Sutton), the British scholar was probably correct in asserting that Duvalierâs determination to alter the flag was part of his desire to affirm the Noirist calibre of his administration. Indeed, it represented a particular reading of Haitian history where Dessalines and Christophe, both black leaders, shared a greater legitimacy than the âmulĂątreâ President PĂ©tion. Duvalier therefore placed himself in continuity with the work of Haitian revolutionary figures. The 1957 proposal to the National Assembly for a change to the flag was eventually dropped but in 1964, a much stronger Duvalier who in the words of historian Matthew J. Smith (2009) had âsystematically uprooted his opposition through forced exile, torture, and murderâ (p. 187) felt confident enough to make such move. As most of the political opposition disappeared, often time literally, Duvalier could intact his ideas with much more leisure. 1964 was perhaps one of the most violent years in the history of the regime. In June of that year, as the flag was being amended, Duvalier was declared president-for-life. In August, as retribution for the assault of Jeune HaĂŻti, who had attempted to topple his regime, Duvalier proceeded to massacre their families in the infamous âMassacre des VĂȘpres jĂ©rĂ©miennes.â Entire families, including women and children, related to the members of the militant group in the JĂ©rĂ©mie region were slaughtered. In 1964, the regime entered a critical phase where Duvalier had mostly consolidated his power. While the conflict with the Catholic Church would prevail until 1966, it was already clear by 1964 that no sector of Haitian society had been left untouched by duvalierism and that little opposition would be permitted to exist. Â
Ultimately, Duvalierâs move to change the Haitian flag was yet another way in which he could present himself as an âauthentiqueâ and reassert his political supremacy. It showed the ease with which the Haitian president reinterpreted history, particularly the revolutionary period (1791-1804) to serve the purposes of his administration. Any allegiance to the national flag, a symbol which all Haitians could abide to, therefore implicitly also became a sign of loyalty to the president-for-life. In 1966, he was quoted declaring, âje suis le drapeau haiÌtien, un et indivisible. Dr François Duvalierâ or âI am the Haitian flag, one and indivisible. Dr François Duvalierâ (Arthus, 2011 p. 59). The story of the 1964 change of the Haitian flag therefore tells more than a political manoeuvre by an adept politician, it also forces a reflection on the psychological dimensions of duvalierism.  (âLVB)