hyacinth @halcyon-hyacinth - Tumblr Blog

Here’s the link to my carrd where you can find my socials.

about hyacinth

If you wanna go straight to my ao3, here she is:

An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works

#hyacinth speaks #last updated October 2025 #hyacinth writes

myevertyhing

Ariana and her whip at Eternal Sunshine Tour in Oakland, CA - 10/06/26

#Ariana grande #thank you god

gelphienation

I think one of the biggest mistakes people make is saying lestat is the Glinda. dead wrong. Louis is the Glinda like on a fundamental level they’re closeted, performative, and respected in their society but only as long as they play by the rules. Lestat doesn’t need to earn respect he just shows up and acts French and annoying. He’s like white stage fieryo. Also if Glinda is lestat that would mean Elphaba was Louis which could not be more wrong like Elphaba could not maintain a facade for a day in her life. Let alone fighting with her sibling to look tough? Absolutely not be serious

halcyon-hyacinth

I have been waiting for someone else to post about iwtv and gelphie. Thank you.

#love this analysis #gelphie #iwtv

velvetys

is it ok to hate lestat without having watched vampire interviewed

Yes please hate him with all of your heart and before you go to bed tonight pray that he kills himself

taesoon

Opened Instagram to a reel of TBIM captioned “she has no idea I shaved my whole body just in case”

#I have a tbim caption for my ig tour dump post tomorrow as well #lmao

theheartmold

unironically me

gelphienation

really interesting exchange here re: what is legible or “counts” as queerness and I’m also including the flag in that

gelphienation

Like all 3 of them are both right and wrong (to varying degrees) at the same time. again including the flag.

The flag is right in that she did make a statement that our culture would consider indicative of queerness. but the choice to include her in pride decorations might lead someone to believe that she is an openly queer figure who is transparent about her sexuality, which isn’t necessarily true.

Honeyari is technically incorrect becsuse ariana has seemingly never used the bisexual label for herself, but she HAS made made multiple statements about being attracted to men and women. So are her actions—which are queerly oriented—or her official label on her sexuality—which is nothing because she’s “unlabelled”—more useful/effective/true in describing how she moves through the world? What utility does applying the label serve? are there cases where it might be effective to apply a label that describes someone’s behaviour even if they don’t use it themselves? or is the inaccuracy of the claim and the choice to override Ariana’s official positionality overstepping too far?

Daniel’s extreme denial is a clear indicator that he is NOT acting in good faith, even if he is technically correct in saying that she has only publically acknowledged male relationships and hasn’t openly and legibly claimed bisexuality or any other form of queerness as a label for herself. BUT he fails to both acknowledge that she has made statements that would be considered queer (including the lyrics on the flag in the post) AND entirely fails to consider forces that might a) make someone hesitant to disclose a queer relationship or orientation to the public and b) lead the public to view straightness as default and discount significant evidence of her alignment with queerness—including lyrics, statements in interviews, titles and lyrics of unreleased music, and the choice to perform queer choreography at her shows—without explicit confirmation. So he is my sworn enemy here

#really digging this analysis oomf #Ariana grande