“To fall in love is to be reminded of a frustration you didn’t know you had.” ~ Adam Phillips, Missing Out: In Praise of the Unlived Life
With countless aphorisms about love collected over thousands of years from literary works and media, it seems like we have a very comprehensive idea of what love is. Or at the very least, we have been able to describe many loves that have emerged over time. We have psychologists, neuroscientists, evolutionary biologists and philosophers who have made it a subject of academic discourse and on the other hand, we have oodles of empirical and experiential evidence documented in everything from songs and sculptures to BuzzFeed interviews. However, despite having access to this ever-growing repository, I do not believe that I know what love means.
I have grown up, as many of us have, with warped views on gender, sexuality and relationships - much of it formed under the pressures of religious indoctrination, patriarchal conditioning and a dysfunctional family. So, when I finally began to unlearn and disavow what I had previously clung to, I also gave up on two things that had been foundational to my life - faith and hope.
That led me to ask - what kind of love exists in the absence of faith and hope? I kept wondering about this over the course of the few relationships which gave me the privilege of being my whole self. To begin with, I could define what I meant by “I love you” as “I am glad that I can be my whole self with you and that you can be your whole self with me” But, how did this comfort and space to be oneself in a relationship distinguish it from an intimate friendship? Perhaps, if I were to account for my self to be dynamic, ever-changing and a sum of choices, actions and experiences then I could possibly tweak the definition by saying “I am glad that we can witness the choices and decisions that gave shape to who we are and together, accumulate more experiences and actions that will go on to shape us” By no means, will this suffice as a complete definition but it is one that captured what I knew of love.
Lacking faith and hope, I never concerned myself with what love could or would be. Growing up as a Christian, I was often reminded that faith was “the lively expectation of good things to come” and how unlike hope, faith meant seeing what you wanted to happen as if it had already happened. Having faith meant asserting your possession of what you claimed, irrespective of when it will come into your hands. And having often seen that our cultural messaging through romantic novels, shows and movies regarding love and relationships calls for a faith akin to this, I can’t help but think that however, I choose to define love, it must be empty without having this unshakeable faith ensconced within.
Now, upon contrasting this bundling of love and a lively expectation of good things to come - this “believing is seeing” - with the opening quote by Adam Phillips that falling in love reminded us of a frustration we didn’t know we had - we arrive at a neat collision of a lively expectation with an unknown frustration. Does love, then, coalesce into a constant conflict between our blossoming expectations and our inexplicable frustrations? What of our need to assert individualism colliding with the self-annihilation that we welcome as we fall in love and build a relationship?
An oft-quoted mantra that I had long accepted to be the function of love and a fulfilling relationship, has been that the act of loving draws out the best self of the lover. In spite of my inability to know what love truly meant, I have always held this to be the ultimate litmus test for my relationships. It seemed like the perfect compromise between that need to preserve the self, in all its dynamism and evolution, and the self-annihilation we must accept to forge a path with the beloved. The notion of the best self itself gave utmost importance to the elevation of the individual without privileging the ‘worst’ aspects of the self and so, they conveniently would get pruned in the process of self-annihilation. This was often echoed in some of the most memorable relationships in fiction and popular media from When Harry Met Sally to Garden State and La La Land. In fact, the now-common Manic Pixie Dream Girl (and, the rarer Manic Pixie Dream Boy) employs this two-pronged approach of elevation and annihilation for the personal development of the protagonist such as in (500) Days of Summer and Ruby Sparks (although the partners, in these cases, were almost always neglected in this boon of self-growth and often, limited in their agency to only act as catalysts for the protagonists).
Circling back to the core problem I have been grappling with, I have come to question both my understanding and assessment of love. Confronted with the abundance of dysfunctional relationships around me, starting with my family, and the aggressive messaging that dominates the cultural consciousness regarding love and relationships, I can’t fathom how to steady this see-saw of expectations versus frustration, individuality versus self-annihilation. Discarding faith and hope, I took my lovers as they came and loving them was underwritten by low expectations and an irreconcilable need for preserving my self.
I guess it says a lot that one of the things that frightens me the most, is an all-consuming love that ravages and ravishes until all I would see of myself would solely be contained in the union with the beloved. And once that love burned away like a leaf under a magnifying glass, an empty shell would remain where I once was. I’m terrified of being hollowed out emotionally until a permanent numbness settled in and being reduced to insipidity and helplessness. Thus, how could I ever be truly vulnerable and truly love without accepting the possibility of total self-annihilation?
And so, this is where I have arrived to find a new meaning for the love I have to give - an acceptance of possible total annihilation in order to bridge the space between the self and the other. A revolt against the tyranny of the self, fuelled by a faith and a hope that the act of love will not cage and demolish me. At the risk of confronting what terrifies me the most, my loving affords my beloved and I to freely unveil the whole self. More importantly, it beckons us to look outward and beyond the self, together.