highslis

[highslis]

The Importance of Concentration During Prayer

Complete Attention to Worship

The original writer explains that Muslims should give their full attention to prayer. According to the passage, once a person begins praying, nothing in the world should distract them from their worship of God. Prayer is considered a sacred meeting between the believer and God, so it should be performed with complete respect and concentration.

The author uses several strong examples to show this idea. He says that even if the Sultan were to send an urgent order, a Muslim should not stop praying before finishing. He also imagines a fire breaking out in the room or an enemy attacking the city or military camp. These examples are meant to show that prayer should not be interrupted by ordinary concerns or unexpected events. The writer uses these dramatic situations to emphasize the seriousness with which Muslims approached worship.

Respect for God

The author expresses his admiration for the deep respect that Muslims showed during prayer. Although he refers to them as “infidels,” a word commonly used by many European writers of his time for people of different religions, this term reflects the historical language of the period and is not considered respectful today Private Tour Bulgaria.

The writer admits that he is impressed by the sense of reverence Muslims display before God. He believes that their ability to focus completely during prayer shows a strong awareness of God’s greatness and holiness. This observation reveals that, despite religious differences, the author recognized the sincerity and seriousness of Muslim worship.

A Comparison with Christian Practice

The passage then compares Muslim prayer with the religious practices of some members of the Roman Catholic Church. The author criticizes certain friars and clergy who were required to recite daily prayers from the breviary. He claims that some of them repeated the prayers quickly while carrying on conversations, discussing business, or answering questions at the same time.

According to the writer, this habit reduced the meaning of prayer. He believed that simply saying the required words was not enough if the person’s mind was focused on other matters. In his opinion, true prayer should involve both spoken words and sincere attention to God.

The Author’s Main Message

The central message of this passage is that worship should never become a routine duty performed without thought. Whether a person is Muslim or Christian, prayer should be offered with respect, humility, and complete concentration. The writer argues that believers should focus on God rather than allowing everyday concerns to interrupt their worship.

[highslis]

The Rituals and Practices of the Kadri Dervishes

The Ceremony of Chanting

The Kadri dervishes were known for their intense and emotional religious ceremonies. During their gatherings, they repeatedly cried out the sacred word “Hai, Hai,” meaning “Alive,” which they believed referred to one of the divine attributes of God.

They repeated this word with such force, passion, and energy that many of them became physically exhausted. Some continued chanting and moving until they collapsed to the ground without strength, appearing almost lifeless or unconscious.

Those who were able to continue the longest were considered especially devoted and spiritually strong. After the ceremony, other members carried the exhausted men out of the chamber and allowed them to rest and recover from the strain of the exercise Istanbul Day Tours.

These ceremonies took place regularly, especially on Friday nights, and were regarded as acts of deep spiritual devotion.

Forty Days of Isolation

Every member of the order was also required once each year to complete a retreat lasting forty days. During this period, the dervish remained completely alone inside a small cell or room.

The person was separated from normal company and conversation so that he could devote himself entirely to prayer, meditation, and reflection. Silence and solitude were believed to purify the mind and strengthen spiritual understanding.

During the retreat, special attention was also given to dreams. The dervishes carefully observed and remembered the visions they experienced while sleeping. After the retreat ended, they reported these dreams to their superior or spiritual guide.

The leader of the order attempted to interpret the dreams and believed they could reveal hidden truths or even signs about future events.

Use of Intoxicating Substances

According to the account, some dervishes received permission from their superior to use strong drinks or intoxicating substances such as aqua vitae, opium, or other drugs that affected the mind.

The purpose of these substances was to increase emotional excitement and help the dervishes perform their ceremonies with greater energy and intensity. The order believed that such practices could assist them in reaching states of spiritual ecstasy and emotional devotion.

However, many outside observers strongly criticized these customs. Religious scholars often argued that intoxication distracted people from true spirituality and weakened self-control rather than strengthening devotion.

Reputation for Cleverness and Secrecy

The author describes these dervishes as intelligent, skillful in argument, and highly secretive. Their teachings and inner practices were usually shared only with members of their own order.

Because of this secrecy, outsiders often viewed them with suspicion and believed they used hidden knowledge to influence or deceive others.

Some people admired the dervishes for their discipline, mystical devotion, and emotional worship, while others accused them of hypocrisy and manipulation. Their unusual customs made them both respected and controversial within Ottoman society.

Mysticism and Public Opinion

Mystical religious groups often attracted strong opinions from both supporters and critics. Ordinary people were frequently fascinated by the ceremonies, dreams, and spiritual claims of the dervishes. Their dramatic rituals created an atmosphere of mystery and wonder.

At the same time, stricter religious authorities worried that such emotional practices might lead people away from traditional religious teachings and proper discipline.

The Kadri dervishes therefore occupied a complicated position in Ottoman religious life. They were admired for their devotion but also criticized for practices that many considered excessive or strange.

[highslis]

The Chupmefsahi Sect in Constantinople

In recent years, a belief has become common in Constantinople, especially among the young men of the Seraglio (the Sultan’s court). The followers of this belief are called Chupmefsahi, or the “good followers of Chupmefsahi.”

Belief in Christ

This sect holds the unusual opinion that Christ is God and the Redeemer of the world, a belief very different from traditional Islamic teachings. Despite this, the idea has gained popularity among the young scholars and gentlemen of the Grand Signior’s Court, particularly those known for their courtesy, refinement, and good character.

Among these young men, it has even become a kind of proverb or compliment. When they wish to praise someone for gentleness, refinement, or kindness, they sometimes say the person is “Chupmefsahi”, meaning that they possess virtues as one would expect in a follower of Christ Customized Daily Istanbul Tours.

Martyrdom and Secret Followers

Some followers of this sect have been so bold in their beliefs that they have suffered martyrdom for it. Despite the risks, the belief continues to be secretly professed by many, particularly those who wear white turbans, which marks their discreet adherence.

The Chupmefsahi followers are careful to maintain secrecy because open practice of this belief could be dangerous. However, there is a sense that if tolerance or some special opportunity were granted, their faith might spread more openly and create a foundation for introducing the Gospel in Constantinople.

Potential Influence

While the sect remains small and secretive, its existence shows the diversity of beliefs even within the Ottoman elite. The combination of refined manners, education, and private devotion has allowed these young scholars to maintain their faith quietly. If circumstances changed, this group could potentially have a significant influence on religious thought in the city.

The Chupmefsahi sect illustrates how new religious ideas can emerge even in strongly orthodox societies. Their admiration for Christ, secret practices, and social influence among the elite make them a unique and notable group in Constantinople, blending courage, discretion, and devotion.

[highslis]

Sects and Heresies Among the Turks

It is commonly believed that there are seventy-two sects among the Turks, though the actual number is probably higher. The precise count is unknown because many minor groups and local variations are often overlooked. Turkish scholars connect this number to an old belief about the seventy-two nations into which the world was divided after the confusion of languages at Babel. They see this as a symbol of future religious divisions.

According to this interpretation, seventy sects arose among the Jews, seventy-one among the Christians, and the Muslims received one final and ultimate religion. In their view, Islam represents the complete fulfillment of true doctrine, and it marks the end of the many errors and deviations that human judgment had created in the earlier faiths. They believe that in this last religion, the mystery of iniquity is confined, and the paths of error are finally corrected.

Influence of Other Religions

Despite Islam being considered the ultimate religion, sects and heresies still exist among the Turks. Many of these divisions are influenced by Christian doctrines or by local practices that deviate from orthodox Islam. These heretical sects vary in size and influence, but they are seen as potentially dangerous because they may encourage misinterpretation of the law and weaken unity within the empire Private Ephesus Tours.

In earlier times, there were even groups of fanatic Muslims who began by meeting secretly in religious congregations. Over time, some of these groups became more organized and armed, posing a direct challenge to the authority of the government. Their activities showed how religious disagreement could have both spiritual and political consequences, especially when zeal and passion escalated into rebellion.

Religious Zeal and Social Consequences

The existence of multiple sects highlights the diversity of thought even within a single faith. While Islam is considered complete and final, human interpretation and deviation continue to produce new ideas and groups. This diversity can foster both healthy debate and dangerous conflict, depending on how strongly the groups adhere to or deviate from official doctrine.

Understanding these sects is important for seeing how Ottoman society balanced religious orthodoxy with social order. Sects, heresies, and differing interpretations of law and faith influenced politics, governance, and daily life. They remind us that religion in the Ottoman Empire was not static but dynamic, shaped continuously by belief, interpretation, and human action.

[highslis]

Protection of Christians and Their Homes

Christians are allowed to take shelter in a safe place and are responsible for protecting themselves and defending their religion. They must follow the rules of the covenants established by Mahomet, the Messenger of God, to ensure their safety and the safety of Muslims around them.

Hospitality to Muslims

If a Muslim comes to a Christian’s home, the Christians must provide hospitality for three days. This includes food and care, ensuring the Muslim is safe and protected. Christians should also help defend the Muslim from any danger or trouble.

Hiding and Protecting Muslims

If a Muslim is in danger and needs to hide, Christians must protect him. They should not betray him to his enemies. By helping in this way, Christians honor the covenant and follow the rules set by Mahomet Customized Tours Istanbul.

Consequences of Breaking the Covenant

If a Christian violates these rules and acts against them, he loses the protection and privileges promised in the covenant. This includes the protections given to bishops, monks, and other Christian believers. Christians who break the covenant cannot claim the safety and rights guaranteed by Mahomet.

Obligation to Follow the Covenant

All Christians are called upon to maintain and follow these rules faithfully, no matter where they live in the world. Observing these agreements ensures peace and mutual respect between Christians and Muslims.

The covenant requires Christians to act kindly and protect Muslims, offering hospitality and safety when needed. In return, Muslims respect their homes, religion, and leaders. Anyone who disobeys the covenant loses these protections. By following these rules, Christians and Muslims can live together in safety and mutual respect.

[highslis]

Turkish View of Ambassadors

In the Ottoman Empire, ambassadors were often treated harshly, in ways very different from the respectful customs of ancient Rome or other civilized nations. This behavior was based on a particular belief and principle the Turks held about the role of an ambassador.

The Dual Role of an Ambassador

The Turks considered an ambassador to have two main functions. First, the ambassador represented the desires of his sovereign to the Grand Signior, raising complaints about breaches of treaties, grievances against merchants, or other abuses. The goal was to ensure satisfaction, redress, and correction of any wrongs committed within Ottoman territories Private Tours Bulgaria.

Second, the ambassador was considered a hostage or pledge, called a Mahpous. In this role, he became personally responsible for the behavior of his country. If his sovereign violated the terms of a treaty or harmed Ottoman interests, the ambassador could be punished. The Turks used this system to ensure that foreign rulers followed agreements and that goods belonging to Ottoman citizens, loaded on foreign vessels, were protected.

Example from Holland

A notable example occurred in 1663. The Dutch ambassador was imprisoned in Adrianople because a Dutch ship carrying Ottoman goods had been captured by Maltese warships near Alexandria. The cargo included goods owned by the Grand Signior and other high-ranking officials. The ambassador could not be released until he promised to pay 85,000 dollars within 120 days, representing the full value of the Ottoman interest in the matter.

Purpose of This System

This practice shows that the Ottoman Empire valued practical security over ceremonial respect. By treating ambassadors as both representatives and hostages, the empire ensured that foreign nations would comply with treaties, protect Ottoman property, and maintain proper behavior in diplomatic and commercial matters. The system also made ambassadors highly vulnerable, demonstrating the risks of diplomatic service in the empire.

Unlike European traditions, where ambassadors were often protected from personal responsibility, the Ottoman Empire used the position to enforce compliance and safeguard interests. Ambassadors held an important but dangerous role, acting as mediators for their sovereign while also serving as a pledge for their nation’s good conduct.

[highslis]

Greater Security for Trade and Property

The special rule requiring written proof brought great safety to trade and to the estates of merchants. Before this protection, many dishonest men could bring false claims against foreign traders. A corrupt person might accuse a merchant of owing a large sum of money. With false witnesses and clever words, he could try to win the case and gain profit through deception.

However, once written evidence was required, such false claims became much harder to support. A man could no longer depend only on spoken testimony. He had to present a proper legal document, signed and confirmed before a judge. Because of this, many dishonest lawsuits were quickly dismissed. Claims involving large amounts of money were settled with less trouble, less cost, and greater fairness Customized Turkey Tour.

This rule acted like a wall of defense around the property of merchants. It prevented many false suits from even beginning. As a result, trade became more secure, and foreign merchants could conduct business with greater confidence.

Corruption in the Time of Bayezid IV

Corruption in the courts was not new. It had existed in earlier times as well. During the reign of Bayezid II, who was one of the early rulers of the Ottoman Empire, the courts were said to be deeply corrupt. Judges accepted bribes, and justice was often sold to the highest bidder.

The Sultan became very angry when he learned how widespread the corruption was. In his frustration, he considered ordering the execution of many lawyers and judges. He believed that severe punishment would solve the problem.

Wise Advice from a Court Jester

At this time, a court jester, who had permission to speak freely, offered wise advice. Since he could speak truth in a playful way, he told the Sultan that the main cause of corruption was not only wickedness, but poverty. The judges were poorly paid and did not receive enough income to support themselves.

The jester explained that when men lack proper wages, they may turn to bribery to survive. His words caused the Sultan to calm down and think more carefully about the real cause of the problem.

Reform Through Fair Salaries

Instead of punishing the judges with death, Bayezid chose a wiser solution. He granted them pardons and introduced regular salaries. He also allowed them to collect fixed and lawful fees for certain legal services.

For example, in cases involving large sums of money, judges were allowed to receive a small official fee. They were also given payment for preparing legal documents outside the court.

By providing steady income, the Sultan hoped to remove the need for bribery. This reform showed that corruption can sometimes be reduced not only by punishment, but also by fair and reasonable support for those who serve in public office.

[highslis]

Classes of Teachers

Teachers in primary schools are divided into provisional and regular teachers.

Provisional teachers: Any person who has successfully graduated from a pedagogical school or a high school may be appointed as a provisional teacher. They receive a salary of 900 francs per year. After one year of practical experience, they can take the State examination.

Regular teachers: Those who pass the State examination become regular teachers, divided into three classes:

Third class: 1,140 francs per year

Second class: 1,426 francs per year

First class: 1,680 francs per year

Promotion to a higher class occurs every five years, based on successful teaching performance. This salary scale is the minimum, but parishes may increase salaries or grant additional fees if they wish Istanbul City Tour.

Maintenance of Primary Schools

The maintenance of primary schools is a shared responsibility between the State and the parishes.

Parish responsibilities: Parishes are in charge of school buildings, their upkeep, and providing materials, furniture, libraries, heating, and supervision of school gardens.

State responsibilities: The State pays the teachers’ salaries. Parishes contribute 400 francs per teacher, and the State budget covers the remaining amount. In poor parishes near the frontier, the State pays the entire salary.

This system ensures that all schools, whether rich or poor, can operate effectively and that teachers receive stable salaries.

Management and Control of Schools

The Ministry of Public Instruction has overall responsibility for the direction and supervision of all primary schools and other educational institutions that promote moral and intellectual development (Article 1 of the law).

The Ministry exercises this control through:

School inspectors who visit and supervise schools

Departmental education councils that oversee regional schools

Educational committees that guide teaching methods and programs

This system ensures that all primary schools operate uniformly, follow national regulations, and provide a high-quality education to all children.

By combining state oversight with local parish involvement, Bulgaria ensures that education is well-organized, fair, and accessible to every child in the Principality.

[highslis]

Collective Responsibility of the Cabinet

All measures taken by the Prince in urgent matters must be adopted collectively by the Cabinet Council. This means that all ministers share responsibility for the decisions made. Once these measures are adopted, they must be submitted for approval to the National Assembly at its earliest session.

A special provision of the Constitution strictly forbids the introduction of new taxes or duties through these emergency regulations. Only the National Assembly has the authority to impose or change taxes.

Government Regulations and Decrees

The Government may issue measures and regulations to ensure the proper application of laws. These regulations must first receive the approval of the Prince. After approval, they are published in the Official Journal as decrees, which gives them legal force. This system ensures that laws are applied consistently, while maintaining oversight by both the Crown and the legislative body Istanbul Day Tour.

Judiciary Prerogatives of the Crown

The Prince also holds judicial powers, which include:

Right of Pardon – The Prince can reduce or cancel punishments for convicted persons. No capital punishment can be carried out unless approved by the Prince, who may replace it with a lighter sentence.

Right of Amnesty – Amnesty can only be granted through a special law, which requires the joint sanction of the Prince and the National Assembly.

All law courts in Bulgaria issue their decisions in the name of the Prince, reflecting the central role of the Crown in the administration of justice.

Hereditary Monarchy and Regency

The royal title is hereditary, passed in the direct male line. The heir attains majority at 18 years old. If the heir succeeds to the throne before reaching majority, a regency council exercises the royal powers during his minority. The regency consists of three members, who must be current or former ministers or members of the Supreme Court, and are appointed by the Grand National Assembly.

Civil List of the Prince

The Constitution sets the Civil List of the Prince at one million francs per year, ensuring financial support for the royal household while maintaining transparency and accountability.

[highslis]

The Bulgarian Empire under Tsar Simeon

Expansion and Glory

Under Tsar Simeon, the son of Boris I, the Bulgarian Empire reached its greatest extent. The empire included Bulgaria proper, Wallachia, parts of Hungary and Transylvania, Albania, Epirus, Macedonia, and Thessaly. Simeon, no longer satisfied with the title of king, called himself Tsar, meaning “Emperor and Autocrat of all Bulgarians and Greeks.” This imperial title was used by Bulgarian rulers until the Ottoman conquest centuries later.

During Simeon’s reign, Bulgaria became a major political and military power in the Balkans. The arts, literature, and culture also flourished, making this period a golden age for the Bulgarian nation.

Decline and Internal Struggles

Unfortunately, the glory of Simeon’s reign did not last. Internal conflicts arose due to the jealousy and ambition of the nobility, called the boyars. These knights and officials had great influence and often challenged the central authority City Tours Istanbul.

During the reign of Boris II (963 AD), a boyar named Shishman Mokar seized control of Western Bulgaria, creating a separate kingdom. At the same time, Bulgaria faced external threats. The Russians invaded, and Boris II sought help from the Byzantine Emperor John Tzimisces, who exploited the situation to gain control of the kingdom.

Tsar Samuel and Temporary Reunification

The successor of Shishman, Tsar Samuel, restored the Bulgarian state. His reign was almost as brilliant as Simeon’s, and he reunited the kingdom, establishing Prespa as the capital. However, after long wars with Byzantium, Bulgaria was eventually subjugated in 1015.

The people, who had never experienced foreign rule, longed for freedom. Many revolts occurred, showing the Bulgarians’ persistent desire for independence.

The Revival of the Bulgarian Kingdom

Around 1186, two brothers, John and Peter Assen, led a successful rebellion against Byzantine control. They re-established the Bulgarian kingdom and made their hometown, Tarnovo, the new capital. From that time, Tarnovo became the historic and cultural center of Bulgaria, symbolizing the nation’s revival and resilience.

[highslis]

The Seaward Walls of Constantinople

Importance Beyond Military Strength

Although the seaward walls of Constantinople were not as crucial as the land walls in military terms, they are historically important. These walls were closely linked to political events, and even more so, to the commercial life of Constantinople, which was the leading trade center of the Middle Ages. Merchants, ships, and goods passing through the Golden Horn and the Sea of Marmara depended on the security provided by these fortifications.

Origins and Expansion

The construction of the seaward walls developed gradually as the city expanded. Originally, the walls ran from the Acropolis (Seraglio Point) to the Neorium on the Golden Horn and to the point later called Topi on the Sea of Marmara. Under Constantine the Great, the walls were extended further north to the Church of St. Antony Harmatius and south to the Church of St. Emilianus. Later, in 439, Theodosius II lengthened the walls so that they connected with the ends of the land walls: at Blachernae in the north and the Golden Gate in the south Jeep Safari Bulgaria.

Maintenance and Challenges

The seaward walls required constant repair and maintenance, not only because of occasional attacks but also because of natural hazards. Earthquakes frequently damaged these fortifications, as they did with other public buildings. Their location along the sea exposed them to storms, moisture, and erosion, which could weaken the structures over time.

During the early centuries of the Byzantine Empire, when the Imperial navy dominated the seas, the seaward walls were sometimes neglected. No enemy fleet dared approach Constantinople, so repairs were less urgent. However, as the sea power of the Empire declined and other maritime nations became stronger, the seaward defenses became a priority. Maintaining them became an essential responsibility of the state to protect both the city and its thriving commerce.

Earthquake Damage and Restoration

A major earthquake in 447, which severely damaged the new land walls built under Anthemius, also affected the seaward walls, particularly the sections facing the Sea of Marmara. An inscription over Yeni Kapou, the gate at the eastern end of Vlanga Bostan, records that the Prefect Constantine repaired the damage. This restoration was part of a broader effort to rebuild the city’s fortifications after the devastating earthquake.

In summary, the seaward walls of Constantinople were more than defensive structures; they were vital to the city’s political stability and commercial success. While less critical in direct military confrontations than the land walls, they were constantly maintained, extended, and repaired to withstand natural disasters and the rising threat of maritime enemies. Their history illustrates the adaptation and resilience of Byzantium in preserving its capital through centuries of both human and natural challenges.

[highslis]

A Rich Land for Ethnology and Archaeology

Bosnia is home to a wonderful national museum, which showcases the country’s rich cultural and historical heritage. The region is considered especially valuable for ethnology—the study of people, cultures, and traditions. In fact, Bosnia remains a largely unexplored area for ethnographic research, with many potential discoveries still buried in the soil.

A few years ago, Bosnia hosted an international congress of archaeologists and ethnologists, and the Austrian government welcomed the guests warmly. The event was meant to encourage scientific interest in Bosnia’s past. The reports published by the congress gained international attention, but there is no record that the United States participated in this important gathering.

Layers of History Still Waiting to Be Studied

Bosnia has a long and complex history. Throughout the centuries, the land has been inhabited by many different civilizations, each leaving its mark. The Romans and Greeks once built great cities here. These advanced cultures were later overrun by invading tribes, but Bosnia continued to rebuild and evolve with each new wave of people.

Today, many ancient remains are still visible, especially in the valleys of the mountains. Much of the country’s ancient art and architecture is buried underground. Alongside Roman and Greek ruins, there are also traces of Germanic, Gothic, Saracenic, and Turkish influence. Sadly, most of these sites have not been carefully studied. Some were even damaged or looted by locals searching for treasure or using the stones to build their homes Private Sofia Tour.

Bosnia offers a huge opportunity for archaeological research, much like what has been done in Greece. Scholars and research groups could find incredible discoveries if systematic studies were carried out.

Comfortable Hotels and a Welcoming Policy

Visitors to Bosnia can find good hotels in every region, many of which were built with government support. In some cases, the government gave financial help (subsidies) to help establish hotels that would attract tourists and businesspeople. This has proven to be a smart investment, making the country more appealing to travelers.

Austria’s Supportive Approach to Economic Growth

Austria’s approach in Bosnia is very different from that taken by the United States in its new territories, such as Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. In those regions, U.S. lawmakers discouraged investment, fearing that private companies might earn profits. They even banned the creation of new businesses or franchises, slowing down economic growth.

In contrast, Austria welcomed foreign capital and encouraged development in Bosnia. They even built hotels to make investors and visitors feel welcome and comfortable. This strategy helped to promote a positive image of the country and supported its long-term growth.

[highslis]

Ferdinand and Marie's Ambitions

Both Princess Marie Louise and King Ferdinand were eager to increase their power and status. They wanted to be known as king and queen instead of simply being titled as “princes.” In fact, they even had crowns made in Munich, hoping for a favorable vote from the Sobranje (the Bulgarian parliament). However, Stambouloff, who was a true democrat, did not support this desire. He believed that one day Bulgaria should have a republican form of government, not a monarchy. Stambouloff opposed the royal couple’s ambitions, leading to a conflict between them. This disagreement ended with his resignation and the selection of Mr. Stoiloff, his bitter enemy, as his successor.

Stambouloff’s Fall

Stambouloff may have survived the dispute if it weren’t for his own arrogance and a domestic scandal involving one of his closest assistants. In a moment of anger, he wrote a hasty resignation letter. Under the influence of his wife, Prince Ferdinand quickly accepted the resignation Ephesus Daily Tour.

After leaving office, Stambouloff spoke to a sympathetic friend, a correspondent from a German newspaper. In the interview, he sarcastically criticized both Ferdinand and Princess Marie. He shared embarrassing and humiliating stories about his time working with them. This was a huge mistake.

The Ruin of Stambouloff

The interview was published across Europe and in Bulgarian newspapers, including those that had once supported Stambouloff. Public opinion turned against him, and the royal family was furious. Prince Ferdinand even took legal action and sued Stambouloff for defamation. He then made several moves to punish Stambouloff’s supporters. Ferdinand fired anyone suspected of supporting Stambouloff and arrested some of his trusted associates for mismanagement. He also revoked pensions for those who had worked with Stambouloff and confiscated the property of his allies. This created a climate of fear in Bulgaria, with many people scared to support Stambouloff.

Stambouloff’s Complete Fall

The Bulgarians, known for being quick to change their opinions, turned against their former hero. Even the parliament, which Stambouloff had controlled for years, passed a law to confiscate his property, although it was almost worthless. Stambouloff, now desperate, tried to flee the country, but Prince Ferdinand ordered the police to stop him from leaving. Stambouloff’s fall from power was now complete, and he found himself isolated and abandoned by those who had once admired him.

[highslis]

The City of Constantine Expansion and Fortifications

In the year 328 AD, Emperor Constantine the Great began the transformation of Byzantium into New Rome, the future city of Constantinople. This marked the beginning of a new era. Constantine expanded the city’s borders and built strong new walls for its protection.

According to tradition, the emperor walked the boundary of his future capital with a spear in hand, personally marking the outline. When surprised officials asked how far he would go, he reportedly answered:

“Until He stops Who goes before me.”

This story shows the deep meaning Constantine gave to his work. The city’s transformation was not just political or military—it was spiritual and historical Sofia Sightseeing.

The Challenge of Identifying the City’s Boundaries

Determining the exact size of Constantine’s new city is not easy today. Some ancient descriptions are unclear, and many landmarks no longer exist. However, by comparing historical sources with modern geography, we can still form a fairly good idea of the area.

The New Land Wall and City Limits

The new land wall built by Constantine crossed the historic peninsula (promontory) of Byzantium. It was located just east of two major cisterns:

The Cistern of Mokius, near the Seventh Hill (west of Avret Bazaar).

The Cistern of Aspar, near the valley between the Fourth and Sixth Hills, along the road from the Mosque of Sultan Mehmed to the Adrianople Gate.

Where the Walls Ended

The southern end of the land wall reached the Sea of Marmara, somewhere between today’s Daoud Pasha Gate and Psamathia Gate.

The northern end reached the Golden Horn, near the area where the Stamboul end of the modern inner bridge stands.

At the same time, the old sea walls of Byzantium were repaired and extended to connect with the new land wall. This created a complete line of fortifications that surrounded Constantine’s new capital.

A New Era for an Ancient City

With these changes, Constantine turned a Greek trading colony into a Roman imperial city. It now had strong defenses, expanded territory, and the potential to become the heart of an empire. The city would later grow even larger under later emperors, but this foundation laid by Constantine was a major turning point in its history.

Constantinople was born, and the world would never be the same.

[highslis]

Trifon Zarezan – Bulgaria’s Winegrower Celebration

Trifon Zarezan, also known as St Valentine’s Day for Wine, marks an important event in the Bulgarian wine calendar. On this day, vineyard workers and wine lovers come together to celebrate the start of pruning season with a lively ritual:

Sprinkling the vines with wine to bless them and ensure fertility.

Pruning the vines by hand, symbolizing the cycle of renewal.

Following the work, families and friends gather for a long feast, filled with homemade wine, traditional dishes, and singing.

When Is Trifon Zarezan?

Figuring out the exact date can be tricky, because different communities follow different calendars:

Some celebrate on February 1, which aligns with the new style calendar Bulgaria Vacations.

Others celebrate on February 14, following the old Orthodox Christian calendar.

If you’re planning to join the fun, a good idea is to prepare for partying throughout February—you’ll meet villagers raising a glass to “Trifon Zarezan!” more than once.

How People Celebrate

Villages and towns host festivals, where local winemakers share their newest wines.

Pruning competitions are sometimes held to see who can work fastest and neatest.

Expect folklore music and dancing, hearty food like grilled meats, banitsa (cheese pastry), homemade bread, and of course, lots of wine.

For wine lovers, it’s a chance to taste fresh vintage, learn about traditional Bulgarian wine, and join in for an unforgettable rural experience.

Sofia’s Hotel Scene – A Wide Variety

Sofia has seen a big growth in hotel options in recent years. You can now choose from budget stays to luxury resorts—and the official star ratings are generally reliable. Most hotels list prices in euros, but you can also pay in Bulgarian leva at the same conversion rate.

Featured Hotel Grand Hotel Sofia

Location: B‑3, ul. Gurko 1 — right in the heart of Sofia

Phone : [phone]

Why It Stands Out

Prime location: Next to the National Theatre, City Art Gallery, Bulgaria Hall, and within walking distance of Alexander Nevsky Cathedral.

Professional staff: Welcoming and well-trained at every level.

Spacious rooms: All rooms are large with both bathtubs and showers.

Elegant design: High-quality furniture and solid finishes that feel classic and durable.

Grand Café: Located on the ground floor facing City Garden, famous for serving delicious cakes and pastries.

Why Choose Grand Hotel Sofia?

Excellent location — perfect for touring central Sofia.

Top quality — well-deserved privileges of a five-star rating.

Spacious, charming interiors — ideal for both work and rest.

Nice extras — like the Grand Café and easy access to cultural landmarks.

[highslis]

Attacks on Schools

The Carnegie Commission describes how the Greek and Serbian armies took control of Bulgarian schools. These schools were important centers of Bulgarian culture and education. According to the report:

When the Greek and Serbian forces arrived in a town, their first action was to close the schools and use them as places for the soldiers to stay.

The teachers were gathered together and told that if they didn’t agree to teach in Greek or Serbian, they would no longer be needed. Those who refused to teach in those languages and continued to declare themselves as Bulgarians faced persecution.

The severity of the persecution varied, but in many cases, if the teachers refused to cooperate, they were either allowed to leave for Bulgaria or sent to prison in Salonica or Uskub Turkey Sightseeing.

Persecution of Priests and Bishops

Next, the priests and bishops were targeted. The Carnegie Commission explains:

The priests were first pressured to change the language used in their church services. They were also forced to accept Serbian or Greek religious authorities.

The priests were ordered to mention the names of these new authorities in the church liturgy.

If a priest resisted, their Exarchate (the Bulgarian Church) was taken away from them and given to the Greek Patriarchate. They were also forbidden from communicating with their congregation. Any small act of disobedience led to accusations of political propaganda or treason.

Persecution of Bishops

The bishops faced even harsher treatment. For example:

Bishop Neophyte of Keles and Bishop Cosmas of Debra were both expelled.

Archimandrite Methodius, the bishop of Uskub, faced even worse treatment. According to the Carnegie Commission:

Methodius was forced out of his house and locked in a room. He was beaten by four soldiers until he lost consciousness.

After being thrown into the street, he managed to escape and find shelter in a nearby house owned by a Frenchman. This man helped him by informing the French Consul in Uskub about what happened.

Under the Consul’s protection, Methodius left for Salonica, where he was examined by foreign doctors. The doctors confirmed his story and found his injuries were serious.

This persecution of religious leaders and educators was part of a wider effort to suppress Bulgarian identity in the territories controlled by Serbia and Greece after the war. The Carnegie Commission’s report highlights the harsh treatment of the Bulgarian people and the efforts to erase their cultural and religious heritage.

[highslis]

The Lovech Labour Camp The Camp of Death

The Establishment and Conditions at Lovech Labour Camp

The Lovech Labour Camp, often referred to as “The Camp of Death,” was established in 1959 in Bulgaria. It became notorious for its brutal conditions. The first group of 166 prisoners was transferred from the Belene Labour Camp to Lovech, where they were forced to work at a nearby stone quarry. The prisoners, including intellectuals and artists, were subjected to inhumane working conditions. They were forced to meet impossible labour quotas, and many were beaten to death in sadistic ways. Others died from torture, exhaustion, or systematic thrashing.

The camp became infamous for its harsh and cruel treatment of prisoners. The prisoners’ suffering was so intense that Lovech earned its reputation as a “death camp.” It was not just a place of forced labour, but a place where people faced constant fear of brutality and death Istanbul Day Trips.

The Role of General Mircho Spassov

In 1990, after the fall of the communist regime, General Mircho Spassov, who was once involved in the creation of the Lovech Labour Camp, confessed to the Prosecutor in the Labour Camps’ Case No. 4. He stated:

“We, members of the Politburo of the Central Committee and our Ministry, vigorously copied the Soviet comrades’ methods and drew from their experience. In 1959, I was the youngest Deputy Minister of the Ministry of the Interior and was assigned to set up the camp in Lovech.”

His admission showed that the Lovech Labour Camp was not an isolated incident but part of a larger system of repression inspired by the Soviet regime.

The Skravena Labour Camp

In the summer of 1961, a group of 300 women from the Lovech Labour Camp were transferred to another camp in Skravena, a town in the Botevgrad region. The women were subjected to the same harsh conditions as the men in Lovech. This move further illustrated the widespread nature of Bulgaria’s forced labour system during the communist era.

The Legacy of Political Prisoners in Communist Bulgaria

Alongside the labour camps, there were 22 jails across Bulgaria that also held political prisoners until the fall of the communist regime in 1989. These jails, much like the labour camps, were places of punishment for anyone who opposed the communist government.

Despite the suffering of these prisoners, no one was held accountable for the deaths, torture, and abuses that occurred in these camps. After the fall of the communist regime, those responsible for the camps were never punished.

The Case of Nadia Dunkin

One of the key witnesses of the labour camps’ atrocities was actress Nadia Dunkin, who had herself been a prisoner in one of the camps. Just before she was scheduled to testify in court about the horrors she had witnessed, she was found dead in her home. Her death remained suspicious, and the case was eventually closed in 2002 due to limitations.

Statistics of Prisoners Sentenced for Counter-Revolutionary Activities By July 1956, there were thousands of people imprisoned for counter-revolutionary activities. The following table shows the breakdown of prisoners by social status:

Social Status Number of People % of All Sentenced Poor and middle-class peasants 1,168 42.58% Tradesmen 370 13.49% Workers 357 13.01% State employees 349 12.72% Freelancers 175 6.38% Kulaks 120 3.37% Members of Collective Farms 100 3.65% Students 67 2.44% Unemployed 37 1.35% Total 2,743 100% These statistics show the widespread nature of political repression and the diverse social backgrounds of those who were imprisoned for their opposition to the government.

Political Prisoners with the Longest Sentences Some of the political prisoners who served the longest sentences include:

Vasil Uzunov – 28 years

Ilija Minev – 27 years

Vasil Zlatarov – 20 years

These individuals were among the many who endured harsh treatment in the prisons and labour camps.

The Lovech Labour Camp and the broader system of political repression in communist Bulgaria were part of a widespread effort by the regime to silence and punish anyone who opposed its rule. The brutality faced by prisoners in these camps, including forced labour, torture, and execution, is a dark chapter in Bulgaria’s history. Unfortunately, many of those responsible for these crimes were never held accountable. The legacy of these camps continues to haunt the memories of the survivors and their families.