This blog has moved!
This blog has a new home, powered by Octopress:
highvariance.net
Hope to see you there!

shark vs the universe
almost home
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

No title available
h

tannertan36
Misplaced Lens Cap

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

blake kathryn
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
hello vonnie

ellievsbear
One Nice Bug Per Day
ojovivo
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Janaina Medeiros
dirt enthusiast

Product Placement
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
@highvariance-blog
This blog has moved!
This blog has a new home, powered by Octopress:
highvariance.net
Hope to see you there!
Neighborhood Caroling
Our neighborhood is so awesome. For the last three years (at least) on the evening before Halloween nearly all the kids gather for the Pumpkin Parade. Everyone wears their costumes and brings their carved pumpkins in a wagon or a stroller and we all proceed to march around the block. Afterward we have hot cider and cookies and catch up with our friends.
This summer a new neighbor hosted the world’s greatest barbecue block party. There was terrific turnout and highlights included a hammock filled with up to 10 little girls at any given moment, a sunshine piñata, and a giant cannoli. The party gave birth to an email list which spawned a Facebook group which then led to last week’s first annual neighborhood Christmas caroling. We are positively swimming in social capital!
About 40 kids and grown ups arrived at Cathy and John’s house at 5:45 for cookies and hot cocoa and some warm up songs. R especially enjoyed belting out The Twelve Days of Christmas as she had been practicing it over dinner all week. Then we all walked and sang along the Pumpkin Parade route and finished with even more cookies and cocoa.
In the interests of making a super-fun event even better next year, I’ve done some thinking and I’ve got some ideas:
Plan on singing a lot of songs. We had a printout of about 7 that didn’t last long enough and folks weren’t ready to repeat them after the first round. And very few people knew more than the first verse of even the most popular carols.
Suggest that folks download a caroling app that has lyrics. I think the best one is Sing Along to 50+ Christmas Carols but it’s $4.99 which might be more than most folks (not me!) want to spend. It’s got the music and big fonts and karaoke style moving lyrics. A cheaper option is Christmas Carols for 99 cents that has they lyrics for more than 100 songs but no fancy graphics. The best part about having an app is that it only requires one hand–you don’t need a hand for the lyric printout and another for the flashlight.
Have someone in front that sets a slow pace. Our group quickly spread out such that the back couldn’t hear what the front was singing.
Put up signs so everyone in the neighborhood knows it’s happening. One of the best parts of the experience was when families would come out on their stoops to listen.
Pick a charity and collect money for it along the way. This might make some people uncomfortable, but I think it would be worth it. Certainly to the folks who would receive the donations would appreciate it and this seems like a great opportunity to exercise (not exorcise) the Christmas spirit.
Merry Christmas everyone!
Happy Blogoversary!
The first time I saw the World Wide Web, I was hunched over an 8 lb laptop using a text based browser and a 56k modem. There wasn’t much to see and it didn’t seem like a big deal. Then about three month’s later NCSA Mosaic (the first graphical browser) was released and I “got it.” Within a week we redefined our product line and turned a generic set of “network publishing” tools into a web server and a web authoring tool. Within a year we were purchased by America Online to show that they “got” the web too. My point is that I’ve been deeply embedded in the web for a long time.
And yet, not including my professional web-based resume/cv, I didn’t have my own website until exactly a year ago when High Variance was born. I’m not sure why it took me so long to get here, but after a year of any project, I think it’s important to step back and take stock to see if the original goals are being met. I had three:
Create more: As expected, the topics have been eclectic ranging from economic policy to kid book reviews to eighties pop music. The rate of production has been similarly irregular with a burst of activity last January (17 posts) and a summer hiatus. But the aggregate rate has been about one post per week. I’m happy with this.
Learn to write better and more comfortably: Perhaps my biggest surprise is how enjoyable the whole process has been. I don’t get anxious when I write here and my anxiety level when writing professionally has definitely decreased. When my mind is spinning about a topic, writing about it actually gets me to calm down and figure out what I actually think about it. As for the quality of the writing, I think I’m getting better, but it’s hard to tell.
Provide entertaining, useful, and/or inspiring content: My audience will need to be the judge of this, but I know I’ve given at least a few chuckles, a few bits of helpful advice, and even tugged on a few heartstrings. And in looking back on what I’ve written, much of the content seems to have aged well.
I suppose I should also say something about my readership. According to Google Analytics, over the past year I’ve have 2,070 unique visitors (5.7 per day) and 4,000 page views (11 per day). Not much, but if you squint at the chart, it does look like traffic is trending slightly up. There are even a few posts that get regular search engine traffic–zebras, pdf annotation on the iPad, and Mincer 1958 are the top three.
As I was about to blow out the candles on my birthday cake a few weeks ago I realized something very special: I didn’t have anything new to wish for. I have a wonderful wife and two lovely children. We’re all healthy and happy with our jobs and our house. I just want what I already have. That’s kind of true of this blog too. So here’s to another fun and fulfilling year!
Conflict and Sharing
I’ve been thinking a lot about conflict and sharing lately. First because we watch this Sesame Street video almost every night with the girls:
Youtube link
In case you’re video-averse and don’t want to watch the whole hilarious two minutes and seven seconds, Robin Williams and the two-headed monster “introduce” children to the word conflict. I put “introduce” in quotes because this is a concept with which every child older than 6 months is already intimately familiar. Some kids might use different terms–“fighting!” is quite popular in our house–but the concept is clear. The video also shows the two-headed monster doing something that’s a little less natural for kids: sharing.
Second, my blog-friend[1] Chris Blattman wrote recently about how they handle sharing at his daughter’s daycare. In a nutshell, they don’t push it and instead focus on developing a child’s sense of ownership. The idea is that when kids realize that their stuff won’t be rudely ripped away when friends express interest, they will start sharing voluntarily.
Of course, the biggest reason I’ve been thinking about this subject is the conflict and relatively smaller amount of sharing that happens at home with the girls (4 yrs and ~18 months). We have developed our own fairly complex tri-partite system of communal rights, partial rights, and exclusive rights. Most of the toys are communal property–there is no “mine” for these. When one kid is playing with a toy in this category and the other kid wants in, we try to get them to say “Can I have a turn?” and then enforce a reasonably short time limit.
A smaller group of toys have owners (e.g., birthday presents) but still must be shared. These often come in groups (like fairies or ponies) where it’s fun to play with the whole group, but neither kid owns the whole group. Dividing ownership in this way provides incentives to play together–if you share your own stuff, you get access to your sibling’s stuff too. This arrangement is also designed to break down R’s hoarding tendencies.
The last category is the smallest: pure property rights. R has a plush pony and a groovy girl in this group and her sister has a set of 6 small plush monsters. The girls are certainly allowed to share these (R rarely does) but sharing is never required. Occasionally one girl will pick up the other’s toy, but when owner notices and demands it back, it’s always given up immediately.
Our system isn’t perfect and may in fact be more complicated than the girls’ little brains can handle. My bet is that if we reduced the number of categories, we would also reduce the amount of conflict. But I’m not sure what category(ies) would go. I don’t want to assign an owner to every toy–that would be miserable to keep track of and wouldn’t promote a cooperative spirit. I like that they maintain some ownership of presents that they’ve received individually. And the most extreme group is where we see the least amount of conflict–the last thing I want is more fighting! So we’re going to keep the system we’ve got and hope that the kids are learning about both property rights and cooperation. Check back in twenty years to see if it worked.
A blog-friend is someone you know in real life but mostly interact with through their blog. It makes for awkward conversations as you always feel closer to them than they feel to you. ↩
Playing the Victim
The eighties are not known as a time of soul bearing honesty (see Iran-Contra, but eighties music is full of cheesy earnestness about love in its various messy forms. Eighties singers told the hard truths even when it made them look weak. Here are four great examples of eighties guys who weren’t afraid to play the victim:
Everything She Wants (by Wham, 1984): George Michael is having a rough time with a no-good money-grubbing girlfriend. I smile every time he finds out she’s pregnant and says “If my best isn’t good enough, how can it be good enough for two? I can’t work any harder than I do!” Maybe this was the incident that turned him off women forever? Not that there’s anything wrong with that!
I’ve Done Everything For You (Rick Springfield, 1981): Based on my analysis of his catalog, this guy seems like he was just a bad boyfriend. He lusted after his friend Jessie’s girl. He told his girl not to talk to strangers. And here he says “I’ve done everything for you; you’ve done nothing for me!” At least he was good looking!
Don’t You Want Me?(by The Human League, 1981) This is another case of a guy who did everything–“I picked you out, I shook you up, and turned you around” and she’s got the nerve to dump him. What’s unique in this song is that she gets the opportunity to tell her side of the story.
The Rain (by Oran Juice Jones, 1986): Here’s where we see that eighties male victimhood crossed race lines. The best part of the song is when we listen in on Mr. Jones confronting his cheating girlfriend and telling her “You gotta get on outta here with that alley-cat-coat-wearing, punch-bucket-shoe-wearing crumbcake I saw you with. Cause you dismissed!”
A Few Thoughts on MOOC's
MOOC is an acroynm for Massive Open Online Course. It’s a trendy name for packing up a course’s content (video lectures, problem sets, exams, a mechanism for peer interactions, etc.) and making it available to a large number of students over the internet without requiring significant live instructor input. It’s that last part that allows the system to scale and separates the idea from simple distance learning or a traditional online course.
The most exciting thing about MOOC’s is the expansion in availability of university-level content. At least three groups of top-tier universities in the US (edX, Coursera, and Udacity) are actively producing these kinds of online courses and making them available for free to anyone. It means that kids and adults from rural China to urban Brazil can watch and learn from the some of the best professors in the world and interact with each other about the material.
A second exciting thing about MOOC’s is that they promise to be a major disruptive innovation for existing institutions of higher education. Think about what happens in an average traditional college course. The professor stands up and gives a lecture taking occasional questions from the class. He/she assigns reading and homework and gives exams. They are somewhat available to answer questions in office hours or by email. A MOOC isn’t better on every dimension, but I believe they’ve recently crossed a line and the overall experience is actually better than the average college course.
As students become aware of MOOC’s, I think a few will decide to forego college and instead learn what they want to learn more cheaply and on their own schedule. Most students (and their future employers) however will want a credential (degree) that “proves” they have mastered a set of material. It’s only a matter of time before the big three (or someone new) comes along and is able to provide this. Online degrees exist today and I predict they will become more and more mainstream.[1] That said, the current college experience is more than courses and I think the market for that won’t be going away soon.
Students will also start demanding more of classes at existing universities and attending colleges that raise their game and start providing higher quality in-class experiences. That means colleges will have to leverage what they have that the MOOC’s will never have: live instructors/experts that are able to spend time either one-on-one or in small groups with students answering questions and having real time conversations. This is possible online, but it doesn’t scale up to massive numbers of students per instructor. Some faculty will start building on MOOC content–that is, they will replace their own lectures with those of the MOOC’s and add their own interactivity. And I’m happy to say that the he big live lecture will go the way of the horse and buggy–average professors just won’t be able to compete with the top professors in the world and their video lectures.
I was going to title this post “The Revolution’s Coming” but the revolution is already here.
This is exactly what happened with online dating over the last 10 years. ↩
Is Raising the Retirement Age Cruel?
I like Paul Krugman a lot–we’re both liberals and believe strongly in the value of big government and thougtful regulation. Unfortunately, he sometimes has strong opinions about things he hasn’t thought through. That’s my only explanation for his recent article on the “cruelty” of raising the Social Security retirement age–a policy I think is smart on almost every dimension.
The Social Security system was designed after the Great Depression to do two things: keep old people out of poverty and insure against disability that prevents people from working to support themselves. The disability insurance part of Social Security is less well-known than its retirement benefits but is very important and I have nothing to say about it today. You’ll note that I didn’t mention a third objective: funding a long retirement for most people after they’ve worked a sufficient number of years. The Social Security system is expected to provide this now, but it certainly wasn’t at the beginning.
In 1930, the average white 20 year old male could be expected to live to age 66 (source). If he made it to age 40, he could expect to live to age 69, and if he made it to age 50, his expected age of death increased to about 72 years. During the bulk of the years he contributed to Social Security, he was expecting a fairly short (1 to 7 year) period after age 65 when he could actually retire with full benefits. Even FDR didn’t see the goal as funding people’s “golden years”:
"We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life, but we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age." -- President Roosevelt upon signing Social Security Act
(source)
Contrast this with the experiences of people in 2004 (the latest year I could easily find data). A 20 year old expected to live to 77 years, a 40 year old to 78 years, and a 50 year old to 79 years. The expected duration of retirement ranged from 12 to 14 years. Krugman is right that the expected length of retirement upon reaching age 65 has not changed all that much (from 14 years to almost 20 years), but that’s irrelevant to people’s expectations during working life.
Other things have changed since the Social Security was enacted too. While original benefits were high enough to keep retirees out of poverty, modern levels replace a much larger fraction of income. Jobs are a lot less physically demanding today. In 1940, 26.7% of those employed worked on farms or did miscellaneous forms of physical labor relative to just 5.9% in 1990. And in 1940, only 21.3% of workers were managers, officials, clerical workers, or professionals. This ballooned to more than half the work force by 1990. (More detailed breakdowns here). Finally, I’m pretty sure physical health of those who do survive to 65 is better now than it has been in the past though I couldn’t easily find data to back that up.
Most people who reach 65[1] are strongly enouraged by the incentives in the Social Security system to retire even though they are perfectly capable of being highly productive members of the work force. I believe their experience is a huge untapped resource for the economy. But what of the people that Krugman is worried about: Those who worked physically stressful jobs for years and at age 65 don’t expect to live all that much longer. I have a heart and I worry about this group too. Suppose we let people retire at age 65 but capped their benefits at a relatively low level. This constraint would be unbinding for those who worked low paying (and more likely physically demanding) jobs. At the same time, it would encourage relatively wealthier (and healthier) folks to work until they were, say, 70 years old. If wealthier people really want to retire earlier, they can save more during their working lives and rely on Social Security for what it was designed: insurance against poverty in old age. We all win!
Currently the system allows people to retire with some benefits at 62 and higher benefits if they wait until the “full retirement age” of 65. The amounts are designed to make the people fairly indifferent between the two dates. In the next few years, the full retirement age will be going up to age 67 (details here). ↩
Kid Book Review: Halloween Edition
About a week before Halloween, R and I raided the library’s selection of Halloween-appropriate picture books. I’ve felt guilty before about skimming the cream but hopefully sharing what we learned will balance out the karma. Before I start, I know what you’re thinking: “It’s the middle of November! Who cares about Halloween? How about sharing something useful like the top 10 Thanksgiving picture books?” Don’t worry, that’ll be here before Christmas. In the meantime, bookmark this page and put a note on your calendar to check back on October 15, 2013 and then head to your local library. On with the show!
Franklin’s Halloween (by Paulette Bourgeois, illustrated by Brenda Clark) Franklin is one of my favorite recurring lovable-yet-flawed characters. He’s just a regular kid (turtle) who usually gets in some sort of minor trouble and learns from his mistakes. He’s kind of messy, not very athletic, and has even been known to tell a fib or two. In this book, he just has fun making his own Halloween costume and going to a party. There’s a great spooky twist at the end and he’s even generous to a sick friend. Hurray for Franklin!
Brooms Are for Flying (by Michael Rex) and Humbug Witch (by Lorna Bailin) Spoiler Alert! These two books are simple and cute. One is about a witch who turns out to be a girl at the end and the other is about a girl who turns out to be a witch at the end!
The Witch Who Lives Down the Hall (by Donna Guthrie, illustrated by Amy Schwartz) The mostly black and white illustrations (with touches of orange) are a great complement to a story about a boy who lives down the hall from a “strange” lady and her black cat. He’s convinced she’s a witch. Clever and funny to both kids and adults. Reminded me a lot of Mrs. Muffly’s Monster.
That Terrible Halloween Night (by James Stevenson) This is about as scary as you can get and still be appropriate for a three year-old. I loved it and R is still talking about it. Last night she told me our basement floor was covered with frogs! I liked the pen and pastel comic book layout too.
Cake Girl (by David Lucas) David Lucas is so good–all his books have such sweet characters, surreal stories, and pretty illustrations. This one is about a witch who learns about friendship.
A few comments on Apple's Big October Event
Apple’s big October product announcements are now behind us and I’ve read more blogger reactions than I care to admit. Even I’m surprised that I still have a few somewhat original thoughts of my own to share. Instead of simply being an “iPad mini” event Apple announced a whole slew of products. While some folks predicted some of the “extra” stuff, I don’t think anyone expected the sheer quantity we saw. That said, I’m most excited about two products Apple did not announce:
A new Thunderbolt display: The new iMac is beautiful and I can’t wait until they translate it into a stand-alone display. Less glare and pixels closer to the glass will be terrific. It will also give Apple a chance to add a few ports that they neglected on the first rev: USB 3 and analog audio out. And imagine how thin it will be when it doesn’t have to also house a whole computer?
The Fusion Drive: I know, I know, they DID announce this as an option for the new iMac and Mac Mini, but I’m hoping they will sell it separately so I can stick one in my 2010 iMac. I really like the idea of having the speed of an SSD and the size of a traditional HD without the hassle of managing the pair. We’ll have to wait for the iFixit teardown to see if it has a new interface (and is thus incompatible) and something tells me even if it has standard wiring, Apple will want to reserve this feature as reason for folks to upgrade their old (but perfectly usable) iMacs. I can still dream.
There’s been a lot of talk about how Apple is making a mistake by pricing the iPad mini at $329 and leaving breathing room for the other cheaper small tablets in the market. I think Apple priced the product as high as possible such that they will sell all the mini’s they can make before the holidays. If they didn’t, they would simply be leaving money on the table. When their supply chain gets up to speed some time in the spring, I predict they will drop the price below $300.
I have very mixed feelings about the new iMac. While it’s gorgeous and powerful, I’m not sure I agree with the sacrifices Apple had to make to achieve its super-model-thin curves. Most iMac owners spend the bulk of their time in front of their iMac where they never even see the curves–my own is right up against a wall, and I’d have to lean over and around my desk to appreciate the sides and back.
Apple loves to be first to cast old standards aside: Remember when the iMac dropped the floppy drive? I think they were the first PC maker to stop using special keyboard and mouse ports and just rely on USB. And just a month ago they said goodbye to the venerable Dock Connector. Now they want to do the same thing to the optical drive. For a notebook, this makes perfect sense: In the last year there was exactly one time when it would have been nice to mount a CD on my Air and that is certainly not enough to justify the added weight and bulk of a drive. At my desk, I do rip the occasional DVD or used CD. And I’m certainly not throwing my iMac in my bag when I head out on the town. But maybe Apple’s right. Maybe folks should just keep an ugly old SuperDrive in a drawer for those rare occasions when they need it. Then they can appreciate beautiful design every day. Even if it means leaning over their desks to do so.
Bathroom fan love letters
Two of my favorite bloggers (Marco Arment and Ben Brooks) recently published passionate love letters to the Panasonic WhisperCeiling bathroom fan, and in Marco’s case, a Leviton electronic timer switch. Since our downstairs bathroom has had no fan at all for more than a year, and our upstairs bathroom fan sounded like a jet engine (and took 20 minutes to de-fog a mirror), I took this as a sign that it was time to upgrade. It was harder than expected to find an electrician to install them, but today was the big day. It’s worked out pretty well for our upstairs bathroom, but not so much for the downstairs bathroom. In fact, I was surprised by three issues that were unmentioned in the “reviews” I read:
The Panasonic WhisperLite fan/light combo unit is approximately square and it doesn’t fit in our downstairs bathroom because we have a cast-iron drain pipe running 8.5" away from the stud where the fan has to be mounted. Drat.
The bulbs in the WhisperLite are compact-fluorescent and they send out a very white light. I like it, but my wife calls it “institutional” and she says it reminds her of a public restroom. This isn’t exactly where anyone wants to be taking a shower, and if she doesn’t acclimate, I’m hoping we can just change the bulbs to something a little softer.
The Leviton switch requires three wires (including a neutral) and our downstairs bathroom only has two. If I want a timer switch we either spend $200 to run a new line (I’m not that crazy) or we get one of those spring-loaded knobs that screams hotel sauna. For now, we’re sticking with the old manual switch.
To be fair, the new fan is very quiet and is working like a champ–our upstairs bathroom isn’t small and during a leisurely shower the mirror never fogged up. And the Leviton timer is far more reliable than I was about remembering to turn off the fan when it’s done its job. But I think there is a bigger lesson here: Some products that are perfect for some people (or bathrooms) are not perfect for others, and we shouldn’t let ourselves be blinded by the opinions of fan-bois.
Mythical Creatures
Basilisk/Cockatrice
Head and body of a cock, Its breath cracks rock. Leather wings--Whish! Serpent tail--Swish! A Basilisk--Hisss! No doodle-head this! (A Basilisk!--HISSS! Is also called--HISSS! A Cockatrice.) HISSSSSS! by Laura Whipple
As you may remember from my last post, my older daughter loves Greek mythology, but the stories are hopelessly age-inappropriate. We’ve been reading them anyway and I try to tone them down on the fly with limited success. What I’ve really wanted was something that could extract the magic and wonder of the creatures and leave the ultra-violence and the mixed moral messages behind. It turns out I owe Eric Carle an apology because he’s published exactly the book I was looking for.
Dragons, Dragons combines Eric Carle’s admittedly pretty collage pictures with poems about 30 mythical creatures from around the world. Many are from Greek myths (e.g., Cerberus, Pegasus, the Minotaur!) but they also hail from Japan (kappa), Africa (Okolo), the Americas (Quetzalcoatl), Australia (bunyip), the Middle East (manticore and roc), and other places. In some cases the artistic representations don’t match the images in my head (in addition to his lion’s head, the chimaera has a goat’s head sprouting out of his back!) but considering we don’t have any actual specimens to determine who is “correct,” I don’t mind.
My favorite part of the book is the poetry. Why should mythical creatures be constrained to prose? To accompany his illustrations, Mr. Carle has chosen work ranging from classic (William Blake and Elizabeth Barrett Browning) to poets I’ve never heard of but are a lot of fun (see Laura Whipple’s contribution above). R learns vocabulary when we read them and she definitely appreciates the vivid word pictures and rhymes. She’s already memorized a few of the poems and there’s even one (the Phoenix) that is written specifically for two voices.
I’m still not a fan of all of Eric Carle’s work, but this book is almost perfect.
Violence in Kid Books
My 3.5 year old daughter wants to be a minotaur for Halloween. She loves the idea of a person with a bull’s head. She knows that minotaurs live in labyrinths and eat humans. For her costume, she wants to carry an axe. And whenever we play minotaur, she wants me to be Theseus and she often wants to “fight to death!” Someday she’ll know what death is and understand the consequences of a real fight, but for now these are just fun words to say.
It all started more than a year ago when she was in a phase where she wanted me to tell her new stories all the time. And I mean about 25 times per day. I quickly ran out of kid stories and moved on to stories about my old pets and stories about my childhood. Then I remembered the Greeks had some good stories and started telling her about Daedalus and Icarus, Pandora’s Box, and the 12 Labors of Heracles. She thought they were great and I ordered a copy of Greek Myths for Young Children which was age inappropriate (despite the title) but at least jogged my memory for a few more stories.
About a month ago I brought out the book again and she loved it so much she asked for a new Greek myth as her bed-time story every night. She especially loved the vivid characters and creatures, and she can now tell you that Prince Bellerophon rode Pegasus, Cerberus has three heads, and a Chimaera has the body of a goat, head of a lion and a snake for a tail. The stories were violent, but the language was relatively tame.
I was ambivalent about the situation, but then we crossed a line when I picked up a few more “kids” mythology books at the library. Suddenly instead of just eating humans, the minotaur “had a taste for human flesh.” Centaurs were getting drunk and chasing bridesmaids and the sphinx was tearing apart unfortunate travelers and devouring them. I skipped a lot of this, but then the babysitter started reading the stories verbatim. It was bad.
Now some people might wonder what the big deal is. Weren’t old fairy tales really violent too? Didn’t Little Red Riding Hood’s grandmother get eaten by a wolf? Didn’t Hansel and Gretel get cooked in an oven? Indeed, they did. And those fairy tales werre written at a time when violence was a normal part of everyday life. Public life in the middle class United Stated is far far less violent today and we run a pretty pacifist household. Violent fairy tales are not “keeping it real” for us. I feel no need to expose my girls to realistic stories of violence until they’ve got the tools to understand and process it. I don’t want to violence to be normal. I don’t want them scared that if they go in the woods they will get eaten by a witch or a wolf. I don’t want them playing fighting games at school even if they seem fun or even funny.
The time will come when all the violence that exists in pop culture on tv, in the theater, at the movies, and in grown-up books will push through our walls and into their lives. And hopefully by that time they will be old enough to know that it’s serious business.
Does this mean we’re banning Greek myths from house? Not exactly. We’re trying a compromise solution. For now, I edit as I read. Theseus and the Minotaur fight, but not always to the death. Heracles has a simpler young adulthood where he does not “fly into a rage and kill all his children.” And Theseus’ father doesn’t leap off a cliff to his death because his son forgot to fly the white sail. When the girls are older they can read Bullfinch’s on their own and get maximum mayhem. Until then Theseus and the Minotaur can be friends who occasionally walk Cerberus around the block.
My Thoughts on the iPhone 5
So I got my iPhone 5 about a week ago (pre-ordered from AT&T) and have barely been able to brag about it to anyone since most of my local friends aren’t nearly as nerdy as I am. Then I remembered that I had a blog and decided the world needed hear all about my new device.
But first, a little background: Two years ago I started carrying an iPhone 4 and a year ago I was only slightly tempted to upgrade to a 4S. The camera was a little better, the cpu was a little faster, and it had Siri which I didn’t think I’d use much. And I would have had to pay the one year upgrade penalty. I passed. Fast-forward to this year and I was champing at the bit for something new.
And so, without further ado, here’s what I’d say if you saw me on the street and said “Ooh, is that an iPhone 5? How do you like it?”
Big Stuff:
Camera: It’s way better. Low light pictures look a lot better, but the thing I really notice is the speed. It launches quickly (the 4 was a dog), and you can tap away at the shutter seemingly several times a second. It’s a life-saver when you have an older daughter who loves funny faces and chewing on her own hair, but occasionally flashes the most beautiful smile you’ve ever seen.
Maps: I get it that if you live in a place where the coverage stinks, the new Maps app stinks too. But in New Haven, the coverage is fine. And it’s huge upgrade over IOS 5 both in terms of features and UI. Turn-by-turn voice directions are extremely well integrated–much nicer and more functional than either Tom Tom or Navigon. I love that you can flip back and forth between the 2D map of your route and the 3D rendering of where you are on the route. The vector-based tiles are prettier and faster to download too. I’m glad I have the Tom Tom app, which stores maps locally, for when I’m out of cell range, but let’s be honest: that hasn’t happened in years and it will be a while before it happens again.
CPU: It’s way faster. I have a shortcut on my home screen that launches OmniFocus and goes straight to “new task” screen. It used to take about 5 seconds, but now it’s less than a second. All sorts of other stuff loads and runs faster too.
64 GB flash: In this cloud-based age we live in, local storage isn’t supposed to matter since your apps should just be able to pull in what you need from the net as you need it. But as I’ve complained bitterly about already, Apple’s vision of cloud photography is currently Photo Stream. Ugh. With double the room on my device, both my wife and I can stop carefully deciding what pictures and home videos we have space for. Some day Adobe Revel might solve this more elegantly, but for now they don’t do video and they don’t have a Windows app.
Little Stuff:
The physical device: Yeah, it’s nice. But my eyes aren’t good enough to really appreciate the straight lines and shiny camfer. And it’s really thin, especially since I’m going caseless for now compared to my old rubber-clad 4. It feels great in the pocket but it’s surprisingly hard to pick up off a counter or desk! My wife thinks it feels a little like a Nano, and she’s right.
Screen: I can’t tell if the colors are more saturated or if the pixels are closer to the surface but supposedly they are. It’s nice to have more text on the screen in portrait mode, but this is partially offset by the awkwardness of moving my thumb to the opposite top corner. This has become easier with time, so I’m guessing I’ll completely adjust soon. The extra row of icons is useful as my home screen was getting a little cramped. I rarely venture to my other screens now, and that’s a good thing.
Lightning: I like it a lot–it’s durable, tiny, and easy since it’s double-sided. It’s a little annoying that I now need different cables for my phone and iPad, but Apple had to upgrade this connector eventually and I think we’ll have Lightning for a long time.
LTE: in some ways, this is the biggest new feature of the phone. When you’re near an LTE tower, it’s crazy fast–the other day SpeedTest gave me 28Mbps downstream and 12 Mbps upstream. That’s 3x and 8x faster than my U-Verse at home! Of course, per byte, it’s expensive and I’m on wifi 90% of the time. And right now, AT&T’s coverage isn’t that great.
Siri: We’re still just getting to know each other, but I like what I hear so far. It’s absolutely the fastest way to enter new appointments on my calendar. Last Friday I asked “What was the score in last night’s NFL game?” and got the box score in moments. I use it to set alarms. I expected to enjoy the novelty of it and then forget about it, but instead my usage seems to be increasing.
Final Thoughts:
This phone did not need a whole bunch of fancy new features (e.g., curved AMOLED display, NFC, giant screen) to be fantastic. The iPhone has been fantastic since they introduced it in 2007. I find it amazing that they’ve been able to make it incrementally better every year by refining and improving what it already does. And yet the tech press keeps wanting the next iPhone to be a quantum leap. That’s not how how it works. Truly revolutionary devices aren’t 5.0’s, they are 1.0’s.
In the age of the internet, original ideas are hard to come by
I think of myself as a reasonably creative guy. I’m not always coming up with particularly useful or imporant ideas, but I like to think they’re fairly unique. Unique in a small town or among your friends is one thing, but unique on the Internet is quite another. I thought it would be fun to share some ideas I had for posts that turned out be less original than I first thought.
Is height normal?
Adult height is one of the prototypical examples of a naturally occurring normal distribution, but if you look at real data, it’s not perfectly normal. First off, it’s a mixture of men and women who individually have pretty normal heights but quite different means (by about 5"). Second, the tails of the distribution are fatter than normal. That is, extremely short and tall people are far more common than predicted by a pure normal distribution. All this is explained very nicely explained in two 2008 posts (here, here, and here) by John D. Cook at The Endeavor.
Nietzsche and pop music
There aren’t very many 19th or 20th Century philosophers that inspire pop songs. The Cure turned Albert Camus’ The Stranger into “Staring at the Sea”, but up until a few weeks ago I thought that was it. How wrong I was! Kelly Clarkson’s “What Doesn’t Kill You” has been getting tremendous airplay on pop stations and it’s not much different from Christina Aguilera’s “Fighter” which also talks about how being beaten down just makes her “stronger”, “harder”, and “wiser”. And it turns out tons and tons of songs have been inspired by this Nietzsche quote. I thought it would be fun to see how many more of Nietzsche’s ideas (e.g., the Superman) have been translated into pop music (maybe “Sunshine Superman”?). Turns out Craig Schuftan has written a whole book about this called Hey! Nietzsche! Leave Them Kids Alone!: The Romantic Movement, Rock & Roll, and the End of Civilisation as We Know It.
The environmental impact of cleaning the Augean stables
The Fifth Labor of Heracles was to clean the Augean stables. They were so dirty and filthy that he had to divert two rivers through them to wash out the manure that 1000 cattle had produced over thirty years. This reminded me of what happened when hurricanes hit North Carolina a few years ago and pushed massive amounts of pig waste into the water supply. Wouldn’t it be interesting to write a quick environmental impact statement for Hercules’ act? A few people have noticed that the effects were probably pretty serious (The Punnery, this homework assignment for a class on Hazardous Waste Management) but no one has actually done any calculations to show how serious. Hmm….maybe I can contribute something here!
A sitcom about a woman with cancer.
Last month I had a strange dream about developing a sitcom that starred a woman who is diagnosed with cancer and goes through the whole treatment process. The story would have a full three year arc with cliff-hangers every year when she (or her new best friend who also has cancer) goes in for testing. The final episode would be her saying goodbye. The show would have lots of funny kids, hair loss jokes, and nausea jokes. She could also start a romantic relationship in the middle of the run. An awfully large number of people have either had cancer by now or had someone very close go through it. I really believe that a show like this would have a big audience of people who want to laugh about a serious thing. Showtime also believed this and started “The Big C” in 2010 and it’s entering its third season now. According to Wikipedia, it’s been very successful since the beginning!
Getting Things Done with Remember The Milk (i.e., GTD with RTM)
Every year or so I get cranky about my task management system and switch to something new. This year it’s particularly bad because I’ve been hearing the Siren Song of OmniFocus. I swear every nerd blogger I read uses it: e.g.,
Ben Brooks at The Brooks Review
David Sparks at MacSparky
Aleh Cherp at Macademic
I even believe John Gruber (Daring Fireball) uses it though he’s a little cagy since they are often a sponsor of his.
BUT, I strongly believe you shouldn’t switch systems unless you’re solving specific problems. That is, I invest in my systems and don’t want to switch just for fun. Hearing that some other piece of software is “really good” or even “better” than what you’re currently using isn’t good enough for me.
Last year when I made the switch from Google Tasks to Remember The Milk (RTM), I had some clear requirements:
Cross-platform: I was spending time on Mac, Windows, iPad, and iPhone and I needed to be able to access my tasks from all of them.
Rock solid invisible sync: I never wanted to think about which version of my task list I was working with. There should be just one master copy (preferably in the cloud) that gets seemlessly accessed and updated from various clients.
Power and flexibility: Google Tasks met the first two criteria, but it was just too simple. I wanted more than due dates and separate lists. I wanted to be able to attach priorities, contexts, durations, and other arbitrary tags. I wanted to dynamically create lists based on these characteristics that showed me just what I wanted (and was able) to do at any particular moment.
At the time, RTM was the best solution, but the world has changed since then. Omnifocus now provides highly regarded Sync Services. And I’ve shed my need for Windows now that I carry a MacBook Air with me everywhere i go.
Stepping up a level for a moment, the overall task management system you use is far more important than the particular tool you use to implement it. I’m a GTD (Getting Things Done) guy, though I’m not the most orthodox devotee you’ll meet. There are two things I love about GTD:
You get the mental to do list out of your head. Since you’re not constantly worrying that you’ll forget something, your mind is freed up for more interesting creative work. And you’re not forgetting things!
Once your tasks are organized, GTD provides a way to quickly see what you can and should be doing in any given context. This is exactly what I couldn’t do with Google Tasks.
After a year of experience (and tweeking), I’ve got an implementation of my GTD system in Remember The Milk that works pretty well. Before casting it aside for a new pretty young thing, I’m going to describe my system and what works and doesn’t work for me. It’s almost certainly not a perfect match for anyone else, but it might give you ideas for things to try or think about.
RTM is a simple system that lets you build complex systems on top of it. Basically, you just define a bunch of lists of tasks with characteristics. These characteristics include priorities, due dates, durations, locations, and arbitrary tags–exactly what I want. The power comes from defining Smart Lists that are basically saved searches based on these characteristics.
Projects
Even though RTM supports multiple lists, I keep almost all my tasks in the Inbox list and use other lists only for storing things like books I’d like to read or ideas for upcoming posts. I define my projects with tags. Home-related projects have tags starting with “ph-” (e.g., “ph-basement”) and work-related projects have tags starting with “pw-”. Most tasks that go into the system have either a project assigned or a simple “work” tag. If it’s a single task home project, I don’t take the time to assign a project tag at all.
Locations
I assign each task a single location tag: at-desk, at-phone, at-home, at-econoffice, at-errand, or at-wife. The last one is special: tasks that require consultation with my wife. Someone else that runs a lot of errands might find it worth their time to set up several locations that cause tasks to pop up when they go somewhere, but generally I go somewhere because I need to do something and so don’t need to get reminded.
Contexts
Coming up with the right set of contexts is critical to the system and it’s the hardest part. In The GTD Book, David Allen talks a lot about home, office, and phone. With smart phones, the set of things you can do “on the phone” is far larger than it used to be. Since I usually have my laptop with me and most of my resources are online, home office, work office, and even cafe are almost the same.
Right now I have four smart lists that define my contexts:
c-working
due:today or dueBefore:today or (list:Inbox and (tagContains:pw- or tag:work or tag:weekday) and (dueWithin:"5 days of today" or priority:1 or priority:2 or priority:3))
This is the context I look at during the work day or at night when I'm working. It includes everything due today or that's overdue so I don't miss deadlines. It also includes any tasks associated with work-related projects or that can only be done during the week (tag:weekday). The most interesting piece is where I drop all tasks that are due more than five days from now that have no priority assigned. These are the tasks I don't even want to think about until it gets closer to their due date.
c-weekend
due:today or dueBefore:today or (not tag:work and not tagContains:pw- and not tag:weekday and list:Inbox and (dueWithin:"5 days of today" or priority:1 or priority:2 or priority:3))
On weekends and any time I want to focus on the non-work part of my life I check this list. It's almost the inverse of my work context except that it also includes anything that's due or past due.
c-out
tag:at-errand or tag:at-phone
This is what I should and can do when I'm out and about.
c-easy
tag:fun or tag:easy or timeEstimate:"< 1 hour"
When I'm tired or just have a few minutes, I look at this list. It's my newest context, and I might eventually break it into a tired list and a separate quick-task list.
All four of these Smart Lists are sorted first by due date and then by priority. I often use high priority to mark that a task is the next action for a project. This way it’s always listed before other actions that I want to record but might not be ready to do. A while back I read another article about implementing GTD in RTM and it suggested using an na tag. My system allows me to complete a task for a project and have the other tasks still show up on the list. The last thing I want to do is to constantly be tagging new tasks as na as I complete other tasks.
There are plenty of times when I want to focus on a particular project and in those cases I simply look at the Tag view for the project and see all the tasks associated with the project no matter when they are due or what their priority.
Weekly Review:
Just as David Allen says, I’ve found that if I don’t do a weekly review, the information in the system drifts away from the information in my brain and loses its value. That’s when most folks fall off the wagon. So support for the weekly review process is super-important. Here’s what I do every week:
Look at my untagged Smart List (not isTagged:true list:Inbox) and assign project (if necessary) or location tags
Look at the tasks for each project:
Are any upcoming tasks missing?
Are priorities and due dates right?
Can I delete any tasks that are no longer needed?
Add any new projects that didn’t make it into the system during the week
Quickly look at all the tasks in the system (usually between 100 and 150)
Do I need to lower / raise any priorities?
Look at what I accomplished in last week (completedWithin:“1 week of today”)–good for setting feasible future expectations
One nice thing about this way of doing weekly reviews is that it can be done in chunks here and there –I don’t have to set aside the traditional 2–3 hour block.
Room for Improvement
On the whole, I’m pretty happy with my system, but that doesn’t mean there’s not lots of room for improvement.
First, my system isn’t that great for capturing or doing long range planning. I can’t specify task dependencies and I can’t even specify start dates for tasks. If I could, that would let me filter out tasks that I know I’m not starting for a while. I try to follow orthodox GTD practice and only use due dates for when things are really due. That way I don’t miss these things in a sea of stuff that I’d like to be done on that day.
Second, while the iOS apps are very good, I’m getting tired of the clunky RTM web interface. It’s functional, but pretty ugly. I use Fluid to make RTM a pop down menubar app, but I can’t get it to play well with multiple Spaces. That is, when I pop down the app, it pulls me back to the Space I first started it. And when RTM automatically logs me out of the website (more often than I’d like), I can’t use 1Password to log back bin. I’m still totally dumbfounded that no one has built a decent native Mac app for the service.
Third, entering new tasks requires me to click on the menubar app and then put the cursor in the new task text entry box. It sure would be nice to have a global hot key for this.
Bottom Line
Remember The Milk bugs me, but it also works for me. And maybe Omnifocus wouldn’t be uniformly better. I’m worried that it would try to force me into new ways of doing things that just don’t match my work flow. Maybe instead I need to check out Things…. Or maybe I just need to get back to work!
Got My Country On
There have been times in my life when I’ve listened to whatever music I wanted whenever I wanted, but these days, I have a lot more constraints. At work, I’m pretty underslept and need all the concentration I can get—that means a silent work environment. At home, I don’t feel right cranking up Swedish death metal or even Katy Perry in front of the kids. I get my classic rock fix while shopping in the supermarket late at night, and in the car, all the trashy dance music stations I like are full of static.
So I’ve started listening to 97.1, My Country. It comes in crystal clear and plays terrific new country. Trust me that I’m as surprised as you are as I’ve always been an “I don’t like country” guy. The twang and the stories and the guitar always bugged me. I’m not totally sure what’s changed, but over the last few weeks I’ve Shazamed several songs that I’ve had to buy on iTunes. Here are my current favorites:
“Country Must Be Country Wide” (by Brantley Gilbert): This is a straight-up country anthems and it’s so rockin I swear Bon Jovi could have recorded it in the mid 80’s. It’s got awesome guitar and great lines like “In every state there’s a station playing Cash, Hank, Willie, and Waylon”.
“Got My Country On” (by Chris Cable): Another anthem, this reminds me of all those rap songs that brag about being the biggest gangsta around. Except this gangsta is “Gonna do some chillin, chicken grillin and guitars”. He even says he’s “Trickin [his] truck like a Cadillac”.
“This” (by Darius Rucker): This song couldn’t be more earnest: “Thank God for all I missed Cause it led me here to this.” I’ve never been a Hootie and the Blowfish fan, but maybe I need to give them a chance. Yikes.
“Drink On It” (by Blake Shelton): This one is less sweet, but just as earnest. It’s about a country boy trying to get a girl drunk so he can sleep with her.
Maybe this will country thing be a fad for me. Or maybe I’ll be wearing Wranglers and cowboy boots by this time next year. I’ll definitely pass on the Skoal though.
PDF Annotation on the iPad in 2012
I’ve always wanted to live life efficiently. When I was in third grade I made a list of all the chores I had to do every morning (like make the bed) and timed myself doing them. I even made my mom assign quality grades to each task to make sure I wasn’t sacrificing on that margin for speed.
I don’t make my bed anymore, but I do grade a lot of papers and I like to give copious feedback. The returns to optimizing this process are big. That’s why I recently decided to try out several iPad PDF annotation apps to find the one that best fits my workflow.
My needs aren’t extreme. I mostly want to highlight, strike-through, and add colored text. Occasionally I want to underline, add a long note, or draw a shape. And since all my documents live on Dropbox, I want to easily sync whole folders. It turns out there are at least three apps that can do all of these things, but they have some important differences in how they get there. Here’s what I’ve found:
GoodReader 3.14
GoodReader has been my go-to annotation app for the last six months, and it sets the bar high. The only real annoyance is that you have to enter inline comments (i.e., use the typewriter tool) in a popup editing window before the app drops your words into the document. Once there, it’s easy to grab the comment (by holding a finger on it) and move or resize the text box. This is critical since you never know exactly where or how big the text box will be. You don’t have any control over the font for these inline comments and the one it chooses is cheesy typewriter, but I don’t mind.
Syncing folders with Dropbox is great although the sync button can get hidden way down in in the “Web Downloads” area are under a long list of “recent” downloads. In fact, the whole document management interface is functional, but messy and unintuitive–i.e., once you know your way around, you don’t waste a lot of time, but it’s never pretty and there is a learning curve.
One useful feature I haven’t found in the other apps is a Back button under the scroll bar that (obviously) puts you back where you were after you scroll somewhere else or move to a bookmark. This is great when you’re flipping between text and tables.
iAnnotate PDF 2.1
iAnnotate PDF has a clunky name and a cartoony interface. I think it’s been around the longest and it’s extremely configurable. People who use it swear it does everything they want but it takes a little work up front to set it up. I believe them. And when you add inline text, you do it in the page itself which is much more natural than typing into GoodReader’s disembodied text box.
On the downside, it’s been crashy for me. I’ve been using an original iPad, so maybe it’s more stable on newer hardware. It doesn’t have a scroll bar that lets you move directly to the end (or beginning) of your document. It doesn’t always highlight the spaces between words and I can’t get it to autocorrect when using the typewriter tool. But even if these things got fixed, I just find the ugly icons too distracting.
PDF Expert 4.0
Ah, we have a winner! PDF Expert is a breath of fresh air. It has everything I like about GoodReader (except the back button) in a package that’s just beautiful to look at. The document management UI is super-clean, fast, and intuitive. It even gives you thumbnails of the first page of each document. The icons in the document annotation UI are simple and classy. When browsing a pdf, the page turns are very fast.
On top of this, I don’t know how I lived without PDF Expert’s undo and redo commands. They not only keep you from inadvertently junking up your document, it means the UI doesn’t ever ask “Are you really sure?” when you delete something because you can always roll back to the previous state.
What’s not to like? Some people complain that it only opens one document at a time, but I find opening and closing to be fast enough that this isn’t a big deal. My biggest complaint (and it’s minor) is that you only have 9 colors to choose from for markup and they’re kind of brash. It’s like they were inspired by the available colors for Apple’s cheap Smart Covers.
Honorable Mentions
PDFpen has been around for quite a while on the Mac, and if Preview wasn’t as good as it was, I’d probably be using it there. But on the iPad, it’s the new kid on the block. None of the positive reviews on the app store compares it with the big three, and a few negative reviews say it’s crashy and has fewer features. It will probably improve over time, but considering it costs the most ($15) and seemingly does the least, I’m skipping it for now.
Notability is really a note-taking app that can also annotate PDF’s. When I’m in a meeting or seminar, I usually use Nebulous Notes and type right into a text file. If I have a copy of the slides or the paper being presented, I now take my notes right on them with PDF Expert. Notability is particularly strong with drawing, but I find even with my Cosmonaut stylus, the lag between moving the pen and seeing my picture is just too unnatural to replace pen and paper.
Bottom Line
PDF Expert is fantastic. I’m so glad I went through this exercise and have graduated from GoodReader! Of course, I could have just read Cynical Babblings’ recent review of same apps. I found it while I was in the middle of my evaluation process, and he’s much more thorough than I am. And he also likes PDF Expert best.