im literally in tears what the fuck
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

gracie abrams

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Noah Kahan
Misplaced Lens Cap
Cosimo Galluzzi
Today's Document
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
The Stonewall Inn

oozey mess
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
sheepfilms

shark vs the universe
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
Sade Olutola

pixel skylines

seen from France
seen from Morocco

seen from Singapore
seen from Slovakia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Norway
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Czechia
seen from Mexico
seen from Argentina
seen from Luxembourg

seen from Norway

seen from Egypt
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
@holybikinisbatman
im literally in tears what the fuck
what doesn’t kill you makes your nervous system more sensitive for the rest of your life
it has always been a dream of mine to relax
sorry i overreacted i had no idea everything would be fine
you have to post bull shit online. to fulfill your amazing digital purpose
the thing about copyright abolition is that. what makes theft bad is that something is taken away from its rightful owner. in this sense, copyright infringement is literally not theft, because making a copy of something doesn't tangibly cause the original owner to lose anything that they would otherwise have. copyright enforcement, on the other hand, does take away people's access to what should be theirs. anyone who makes art while employed by a corporation and is unable to sell their work because it does not belong to them, anyone who's been sued by a pop musician for making music that sounds vaguely similar if you don't allow the jury to listen to the actual songs, these people have far more in common with victims of theft than anyone whose copyright has been infringed
like the thing with the film rights to MLK's speeches being owned by spielberg / dreamworks, that's not actually an instance where copyright law failed to protect artists. that's the system working as intended. MLK's speeches were his intellectual property. when he died the rights to that intellectual property transfered to his family, and his family decided to sell those rights to dreamworks, thereby functionally preventing anyone else from legally using those speeches in a film for the next several decades. no crime was committed, nobody was tricked into anything, that's just how intellectual property rights work
you only like me for who I am
gundam dump again bc i keep forgetting to post here. My bad
most beautiful instagram account
there should be a rule u can’t get stressed for 30 minutes after u wake up. i just woke up. spawn invincibility please.
i feel like there is a sleep in me that needs to be slept but each time i sleep i don't sleep that sleep
explaining to my doctor that im getting artifacts in my vision but its not like floaters or anything i just keep seeing an ancient staff and a cursed dagger and shit wherever i look
I just got sent to jail & hell for playing a video game
harsh, but fair
speaking of font legality i remember back when helvetica was like. Trendy. to use on #aesthetic things (and in general it is a well designed sans serif font! there’s a reason it’s ubiquitous), but despite using apple’s mobile products i’ve always been a pc person. so as an aspiring graphic designer i went looking to see how much a license to use helvetica would cost and friends. romans. countrymen. the walt disney company is only the tip of the copyright bullshit iceberg
and for additional context, helvetica was developed in 1957; microsoft has been around since 1975 and apple since ‘76
it's totally ok to dislike things. right?
i have to go delete some posts