To: steve.j.cobs.@/meeplecor.net
From: meadowcrawler_alt@/eservice.com
Forwarded to: j.j.sweet@/geeemail.org
Subject: Information Request regarding Mephone IOS 4.0.0-SH
Hello. This is Dr. █████ from Shrink Space Laboratories. We believe to have one of your mechanical works sighted around our labs. We do not want to cause harm to the model, as we presume you want to keep it in-tact. Could you send us information regarding the sensitive parts of this model so we can safely dispatch it back to you?
Ah, so good to hear from you again! You do know this isn't my business email, correct?
Anyways, I would appreciate it if we could talk about this over the phone, but it seems you have neglected to attach a number… how do I know you even are Dr. █████ anyways? The email you are sending this from doesn't look to be from ShrinkSpace, which closed down in Universe 27.9A in their year of 2013.
Now, usually I would disregard emails like these, but I have to ask;
How do you know about the model number of Project iOS4.0.0-SH.
This is strictly confidential information only shared with mutual associates, all of which have passed due to unprecedented accidents off-site.
The fact you have the exact number correct tells me that you either knew someone, or my files have been breached, and whoever did it flew completely under the radar.
My intention is to not cause harm to you or your products. I know very well that tampering with this can end up in a lawsuit. You can find my page linked here, verifying I am real.
We still go under ShrinkSpace Labs due to me, quietly buying the company and copyright after the bankruptcy and shutdown. I did so because I was interested in the line of work the staff had undergone, of which one very determined worker had discovered a breakthrough in their research, right before the shutdown. This is their alternative email that they let me use, as mine has been hacked into for the time being.
I would wait for my email to get back up to properly send it, without causing confusion, however I believe that, by then, the model we spotted would be far from us, and maybe possibly damaged.
Now. I ask again. Is there any way you can send us information regarding the sensitive machinery your… ‘mech’ possesses? We know you have been trying to track him down for quite some time now, and we would rather have it be fully in tact when we handle it to pass off to you.
Oof, this is going to sound weird.
I don't exactly… care how intact “he” is (any notions of Automation iOS models having gender is entirely baseless and up to the individual referring to it, therefore all models are genderless and should be referred to as an inanimate object(s), which they are as their programming does NOT include real artificial intelligence.).
Really, what were you thinking? It's an old, outdated model, for all we know its memory card is rusting as I type. I know I know I have so many of these things that you would think I want to keep them all nice and pretty and intact- well. Ok maybe there's ONE thing I want you to make sure you don't destroy in transit.
This is a MePhone Automaton Project iOS4.0.0-SH. It is the only model of it's kind. iOS4.0.0-SH is unique due to experimental technologies powering it. You know MeLife? Yes, it is the first model to be able to create things from it. However it is also the only Automaton model to be able to do this to the extent that it had. Initially what was going to happen was I would take the piece that operates MeLife, rip it out, and give it to the next model, but seeing as it decided to go rogue, this has only been a dream ever since. And after it, I have never been able to get a model to function quite like it with the pieces that meddle with MeLife functionality.
The beings generated by MeLife with current models are so less… lifelike. Something is missing from them, something that gives them that pizazz- character!
I have attached a PDF containing very confidential documents and blueprints of Automaton Project iOS4.0.0-SH.
I also ask that, in the case of it being put into a situation in which you see it use MeLife in action, you instead focus more on recording what happens instead of capturing it. It is known to also work very well in high stress environments with MeLife, something that other models will immediately shut off when under threat to preserve their internals.
We are grateful for the information you have given us, although now we have another question.
If, by chance, we were to run some… tests. Of our own with our technologies, of which have moved a bit away from the initial premise of ‘saving space’ by now, and report back to you the findings, would that be alright?
The pocket dimension that was created with an early version of the technology had turned into a dimension of it's own- either that or we discovered a dimension unknown to others through the subspace used by accident. However we haven't been able to record the sheer mass or environments very well due to very little… willing explorers.
Seeing how your machine is able to withstand a surprising amount of environmental stress than expected, it could be the perfect subject to help us.
You get what you want; more data on how this model uses MeLife, and we get what we want; more data on this unknown dimension.
Again I would officiate this, but my email has been hacked, and contacting official offices with this one can result in termination on my end due to the laws here.
Hmmm… intriguing. You know what? I'll allow it. I would prefer that it was in a more accessible dimension, but this experiment of yours could prove interesting.
But if I catch you sending any information regarding this outside of your labs or my company, I am not afraid to sue.
Understood. Pleasure doing business with you, Dr. Cobs.
