hesitating between "i need to rest a little :)" and "i need to be shot and left bleeding out in the woods for a week, lying on moss with glassy eyes open wide staring at the clouds like a dead deer. in a therapeutic way"

izzy's playlists!

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
almost home

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
KIROKAZE

Kiana Khansmith
Noah Kahan

Andulka
Interview Vampire Daily

Origami Around
Cosmic Funnies
No title available
Not today Justin
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Product Placement
Monterey Bay Aquarium
𓃗
One Nice Bug Per Day
occasionally subtle

No title available
seen from Malaysia

seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia

seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
@hzeri
hesitating between "i need to rest a little :)" and "i need to be shot and left bleeding out in the woods for a week, lying on moss with glassy eyes open wide staring at the clouds like a dead deer. in a therapeutic way"
OH MY FUCK WE BETTER GET PHILEMON
"it's just stress" oh thank god, it's just the silent killer that slowly kills you, perfectly harmless, no need to worry
severely deficient in whatever vitamin makes u a person
I think one of the funniest abortion stances I've heard was from my parents neighbor. He's a like, hard-core libertarian viking larper guy who is very tall and very fat and very bald.
He believes a fetus is human with a soul, but also its "basically attacking the woman's body" so if she wants to get rid of it, that's "basically self-defense". He compared it to shooting a home invader. So he supports abortion not as healthcare, but as killing a baby in self-defense
Y'know I'm so glad someone reminded me of this. Because this was also discussed.
My stepmother did NOT like the way her Libertarian Viking Neighbor framed pregnancy as the fetus "attacking the woman". She incredulously told him this was extremely disrespectful to expectant mothers to portray pregnancy as so violent and negative.
Libertarian Viking Neighbor's response was that people consensually hurt each other all the time, and "there's like a whole community about that, with the acronym the one that starts with a B" And his reasoning was that if the mother was consenting to bring attacked by the baby, it in fact wasn't violent and negative because there was consent.
He brought up people consensually hurting each other, didn't go for one of the obvious answers like boxing or body mods or something, no he went STRAIGHT TO BDSM and he DIDN'T EVEN REMEMBER THE ACRONYM
top notch interaction I had with the ambulance crew after my accident a couple years back:
paramedic: hi, I'm Allan
me: you told me. and your colleague is Jim, and the man who found me is Peter. guess my short-term memory is okay
Allan: ..are you doing a cognitive function test on yourself
bringing this to tumblr
hm.
link to video comparing the two end scenes (where the comparison and comment segment are from)
"it's not that deep" with the power of this shovel anything is possible
the term "objectification" feels so watered down, lately. it is used almost like a joke, an ostentatious bow on a horrific experience. how many movies have i seen where the single female, wearing barely-anything, snaps - don't objectify me. the joke is, i think, that the movie will continue to objectify her. that her complaint is vapid and ignorant. objectification is to be expected, it is innate.
it is casual dehumanization.
how many podcasts by men about a woman's value. as a lesbian, this is funny when it isn't heartbreaking. men listen to other men talk about how to "get bitches"; these men are known to be detested by said bitches. it seems their methodology is one of a numbers game: to obtain the bitch in question, one simply has to keep trying an infinite number of times - they are not looking for a particular person or personality. yet if a bitch does seem interested; their value is inherently lowered by that desire. after all, why would you want to date someone who you pick up at a bar? this bitch - you do not need to get to know her. she is an object for your sexual desire, and should be discarded. every other bitch that denies your advance is a real bitch and you should discard her as well, it's not worth your time.
the male loneliness epidemic, i'm told, has nothing to do with sexism. rather, it is actually the fault of women, who are neglecting an emotional labor that is unpaid and unrewarded. women are supposed to be a man's entire emotional support structure; their sole nurturer, teacher, therapist (regardless of the number of women who reply that feels like i'm his mom). if a woman does not want to adhere to this incredibly luxurious one-sided effort, that is her fault. she is encouraging his loneliness. and sure, true, these men have often been told to view other men as potential threats, as rivals. true, these men have been cautioned against ever actually trusting a woman.
but after all, how are you going to feel emotionally close to an object?
the term is candid in its approach, and maybe that is half of the problem. something in the honesty of the word itself (object-ification) has rendered it unable to translate the sheer desolation of the experience.
there's an incorrect idea that to be objectified, one must be beautiful. that the objectification is only about desire. any fat woman can tell you differently. any person who is not an able-bodied white male can tell you differently. the law at times will tell you differently - treating a useless clump of cells as being more important than your human life.
and it is so pervasive as to become almost subatomic. how many times have women said when i find out a guy friend has only been my friend because he wants to fuck me, it ruins me. how many times have women said i love him but he literally sees me as a piece of meat. how many times have women begged and cajoled and pleaded their case, even in the smallness of their personal lives. how many of us have said i feel like you have no idea who i am. you aren't listening.
it can be fun to play in this space, of course. who doesn't like putting on lingerie and reminding him what he is dating. still, later, in bed and sticky, you'll think - shit. why do i need to be an object in order to be sexy? there's a thrill in being wanted, certainly.
an object in comparison, kind of. the object of the female body is so pervasive as to not even register to other women. the other day while playing a mobile game, my brother let out a little cry of alarm at what he saw on my phone - i hadn't realized the ad that had loaded was a gambling app's almost-porn.
i was told once that the reason models are so skinny is that they are not supposed to exist. the idea is that they are objects, that since the clothes are the art on display, these human people are actually more akin to coat hangers. why is it that i have been taught all models are stupid and vapid? surely they have internal lives and experiences, right? there's maybe a level of attractiveness a woman is allowed to be before the assumption is that she's stupid (but pretty).
it is very often in my life that i find myself trying to figure out what degree of attractiveness will force people take me seriously. if you are attractive in the "right way," that is acceptable. to be too-attractive or not-attractive-enough is abhorrent. even in professional spaces: my acceptance as a human person is somewhat defined by the aesthetic of my body.
an object to sell cars. an object to sell the video game. an object to sell gambling apps. an object to decorate your house as a live-in mother/maid.
at a bar with a coworker, he tells me that he isn't like other men; he reads books and paints his nails (and good for him). he takes a moment to sip his beer and then adds, "but i mean, i'm not like crazy about it."
like a person can be crazy about feminism.
immediately after an interaction: i have GOT to get more normal oh god i need to get more normal immediately i have to get more normal or they're going to hunt me down they're going to hunt me down and flay me for sport
during an interaction: and why not put a little spin on it? why not add some conversational zest?
before someone else goes to get groceries: I Have no earthly desires 😌
when tbey come back with groceries: ummm did you not get me the Jumbo 18 Pack Novelty Choc Chip Cookies (With Real Sea Salt) - Limited Run & KNUCKLES
this too shall pass but the fuck was that for
For those that don't know, Richard Cameron is listed on the Villains Wiki. There's a lot of things on there that frustrate me but the one thing that sticks out the most to me is this.
There's room to be made listing Charlie, Knox, Pitts, Meeks and Todd, but Neil? Keating?
Cameron is in no way, shape, or form the enemy of those two. Neil died before any of the falling out happened, hell, his death is WHY the falling out happened. The last thing Neil ever saw of Cameron was him so genuinely happy and proud of his friend that of all the poets, he's the one that can't sit still. The last thing Neil ever saw of him was real, platonic, love.
Watch that scene again and then look me in the eyes and say he was EVER an enemy of Neil. In fact, I think Neil would be pissed if someone described them as such.
And Cameron, well, I'd say Cameron acted the way he did because he was so upset and grief stricken over Neil's passing that he just needed someone to blame (aside from Nolan and Mr. Perry because that would conflict Cameron's views on authority). He cared so deeply about Neil-- he could not be his enemy.
And then Keating? No, Keating understood Cameron. I can't see any world where he'd hold enough hatred within his heart for a child to be its enemy. Keating loved his boys, Cameron included. Watch the end scene of the movie again and then look me in the eyes and say Keating was looking at that kid with any resentment or contempt.
There's so much to be said about the Villains Wiki page but imo this is the worst thing on there because it misunderstands Cameron, Neil, AND Keating
The thing about how you will talk like a tumblr user for the rest of your life is that usually people won’t clock it but sometimes you’ll meet someone and you’ll actually be able to see a look of painful recognition in their eyes when you say some tumblypoo bullshit while everyone else just thinks you had an epic original thought. And it’s gonna make you a little bit sorry you were born
What if the poets had a task to read a midsummer’s night dream and couldn’t do it because all they could think about was Neil?
Get yoinked Meeks
Slide back into frame Meeks
the sign of a true favorite ship is when you don't think about them going on dates or having sex or even kissing. they're just a intangible amalgamation of emotions and concepts and symbolism bouncing around in your brain at all times