Discrimination is one of the common issue on our generation. Keeping or making distinction towards others according to their sex, gender identity, body shape, race, age, record, status, nationality, disability, religion, genetic characteristics, ethnicity or telling between right or wrong. It also feels like you are worse you think you are and some can also lead to depression, suicidal and other mental disorders that may cause you to be suicidal.
Discrimination has long been a fascinating and frustrating subject for social science. Fascinating because it is a powerful mechanism underlying many historical and contemporary patterns of inequality; frustrating because it is elusive and difficult to measure. Over a century of social science interest in the question of discrimination has resulted in numerous techniques aimed to isolate and identify its presence, and to document its effects. Below I consider some of the dominant methods used to study discrimination, examining their primary contributions as well as their possible limitations. In thinking about each of these methods, the primary question we seek to answer is: How do we really know when or where discrimination is at work?
To some, discrimination is as easy to spot as a train wreck in daylight. We notice subtle cues in the ways others are treated around us, or in the ways we ourselves are treated. The curt exchange with the shop clerk, the security guard who keeps a watchful eye, the cab driver who doesn’t stop. Whether due to age, gender, race, disability, sexual orientation, or any other stigmatized identity, most of us can think of at least one instance in which we, or someone close to us, was treated unfairly on the basis of a single status distinction. In these instances, it doesn’t take a social scientist to certify the case as discrimination.