anti-exclusionist/queer infighting, anti-terf, and pro-sw blog. posts rbed w/ explosion are meant to serve as a blocklist. i don't actively seek out explosion content, i just explode it, block, and move on for my mental health
In case anyone was wondering about the current state of transfeminism, one of the most praised transfeminist authors just boldly and unapologetically referred to someone as "tdickmatized".
We're supposed to take seriously the critiques of a woman who is coming up with new derogatory terms for transmascs in relation to their genitals.
i know multiple people that she has sexually abused, a lot of them ARE TRANS WOMEN. she literally made a "social contract" mandating that "trans women and their allies" never talk about their victimization if a trans woman abuses them so "vunerable trans women wont lose community," and then assaulted a bunch of trans women a long with her friends, and called them transmisogynistic (and racist) for talking about it. profoundly unserious movement
I just looked at one of ISFF's more recent posts on one of her alts
(link to the original post below and an Internet Archive link here)
Tumblr. Pure effervescent enrichment. Old internet energy. Home of the Reblogs. All the art you never knew you needed. All the fandoms you c
pretty standard post- hey, wait a fuckin second
WAIT JUST A FUCKIN SECOND I KNOW THAT HANDLE
(CW For physical and mental abuse. The descriptions are not particularly graphic, to be clear, but better safe than sorry)
(The Reddit link is to a video of Sophie talking further about her behavior. With other unpleasant people, like Kirachats/Badbunny, who has a history of bigoted comments)
To be charitable, she genuinely just may not have known about the accusations against Sophie. Given, to my knowledge, the fact that her entire online circle is leftist trans women, I find that to be somewhat unlikely.
So, noticed @androqueer-struggles has made a post in the tranandrophobia tag so I thought I’d take a moment to let everyone know that the person who runs that blog also runs ‘thisispaeamisia’ and has said some pretty fuck shit such as:
Don’t interact, don’t harass, just block, dont try to argue with this person.
Conveniently missing the part where, after yippee-bunnies called her out, and before the "crashout," people were spamming her asks with the n slur
Oh you mean that alt account that one of yay-bunny's followers reported for being racist that lead to the reveal that that was yay-bunny sending herself asks to paint yippee and his followers as racist?
I've been sent some information, and given that the allegations against Tara are very serious, I would like to start with a pattern of behavior rather than the accusations themselves.
Consent
"Against CC, Against Free Love: Toward a Dangerous Freedom" is an essay written by Tara and posted here. I'm only going to show an excerpt, but please read it for full context.
The legitimacy of Tara's claims here rest entirely on her use of hyperbole to make consent out to be something no one expects of it. Literal "documentation", "checklists", etc. are ridiculous claims on their face, which I'm sure is obvious to Tara as well. The purpose served by the exaggeration is making "consent culture" appear ridiculous, cumbersome, inhibiting to "intimacy", and therefor reasonably optional.
The highlighted claim is essentially "consent offers safety but removes passion" for those who don't speak faux intellectual. I don't have any interest in kinkshaming people, this is not framed as a statement on kink, it's framed as broadly applying to "intimacy" as a whole- so just all forms of sex. Decrying the practice of consent as a whole is pretty alarming.
The claim could be made that this statement is about kink, and forms of consensual non-consent. Even if this was the case (kink is not mentioned once in the entire essay) then it's also at best a complete misrepresentation, and at worse willfully removing the things that make cnc ultimately consensual. Cnc still requires consent via prior agreement (no, not necessarily signed, Tara) and safewords. Without these it is rape. Tara's statement on consent makes no room for such things. It makes no room for consent as a whole. What kind of person would advocate against consent?
Sexual Assault
Some of you might have already heard of the "social contract" Tara and other influencers signed. For those who are unaware, this "contract" (post containing the full thing linked here) contains agreements to never call out trans women publicly for any reason, never misgender them (obvious and cool rule), and controversially, never publicly accuse any trans woman of sexual assault.
Two people who will be notable later signed this contract as well: Eve (basedtransgirl) and Emily (ts_emilystone)
The first and third rule are predicated on the fact that talking privately is less harmful to people's reputations, and doesn't reinforce transphobic narratives.
I would like to note that trans woman aren't targeted because of any legitimate harm on their parts. To imply that there is any extent to which protecting the reputation of the community by holding it above the wants and needs of survivors will ever make trans woman safe, is ridiculous on account of trans woman not having to do anything to invoke the rights' abuse. In a world where no trans woman has ever done anything wrong, there would still be transphobes, because transphobia isn't trans people's fault.
The third rule does acknowledge the pain of being a survivor of violence from one within your own community, but this is immediately dismissed as irrelevant in the face of the community's reputation as a whole. I'm all for non-carceral justice, but notably this rule isn't just against taking someone to court, it's against publicly acknowledging they assaulted and/or raped you at all. If the argument then is that public shaming or even harassment is equivalent to the carceral state, I'm going to call bullshit.
The alternatives suggested are as vague as they are buzzwords. "Community preservation" seems to imply that survivors speaking out is damaging to the community, as opposed to an effort to protect it from rapists. "Healing" means nothing in the context of a demand for survivors to silently allow their abusers to go on finding victims. Even if one were to handle all of these things privately, even if everyone connected to the perpetrator in question cuts them off, this is a document written by and for influencers. People with followers that do not have access to inside information without being told publicly- exactly what this rule forbids. This is a demand for rapists to be allowed to keep their platforms. What kind of person would sign off on a contract that protects rapists?
The Evidence
Now there are the allegations. Several people (and apparently more privately to ghettogothdoll and others) have come forward and accused Tara and her former (?) friends of hosting parties in which primarily trans women were drugged and/or coerced into sexual acts, which is rape. There are also accusations that specific people one or more members of this friend group found attractive were brought to these parties for that purpose- sex trafficking.
The most substantial evidence in my opinion are Tara's own words to a former friend, Bonnie (bunnymeat on insta), in conversations she posted snippets of herself, so we know the messages are real.
What Tara says here is basically that sexual violence was very possible at her parties through her own negligence, but that she doesn't know that it occurred. This contradicts what she says here:
Bonnie claims that "Eve directed it, you helped. She's more guilty, but you're guilty too." Tara then agrees "yes I helped and I'm guilty[...] that is abuse nonetheless." So was Tara innocently unaware of the sexual violence that went on at her parties, or did she not only know, but help and by her own admission is guilty of abuse? I don't find the defense of not being a "fully individualized actor" to mean anything other than Tara is running from what she participated in. She basically says "it wasn't just me doing it, I was doing it as part of a group" as if that makes it defensible.
The claim Tara has made in response to these screenshots is not that they are doctored, but that she was lying about being guilty.
I do not find this believable. What exactly would an admission of guilt get from bunnymeat? If the accusations are false, Tara telling her they aren't wouldn't get an admission of that falsehood. There is no reason to lie about her guilt.
Here is how Tara has spoken about these parties publicly:
Tara names the two people involved with the parties who also signed the contract (Eve and Emily). Eve was earlier named by bunnymeat as one of the perpetrators at the parties, and Tara never denies this, instead admitting that she "helped" Eve with the abuse. The fourth creator mentioned (Steph), is acknowledged by Tara to be a predator (Tara also goes on to say this person raped her, which I see no reason to disbelieve).
The narrative being spun publicly by Tara is that she has no knowledge of abuse at the parties, and that only Steph is actually guilty. But according to Tara in private, at least herself and Eve are guilty of abuse.
There is also the matter of how Tara has spoken about Bonnie publicly vs privately.
Here, Tara acknowledges that she "smeared" Bonnie, but says that she didn't rape anyone. However, she did admit to helping Eve with abuse at the parties (notably, "abuse" is the word Tara uses). Abuse of a sexual nature can certainly be rape, and is at least sexual assault. Bonnie then says "you smeared me for my rapists". This is referring to Tara's selectively cropped screenshots of the above messages, which Bonnie then posted these full versions of.
Here is a segment of the smears in question:
Privately, Tara acknowledges at least Eve's (based.transgirl) abuse and doesn't refute Emily's. After doing so she publicly characterizes Bonnie as a "blackmailer" in defense of Eve and Emily. These are what Tara admits in the previous screenshot are smears- lies. This shows what Tara is willing to do to protect rapists.
The reason I began this post with the essay on consent and the social contract, is because I believe they speak to Tara's character. What is the utility of making out consent to be a cumbersome and harmful practice? What is the utility of demanding silence from survivors of sexual violence? What do these actions mean when taken with private acknowledgements of abuse on your part? With "helping" a rapist do what they did? What does it mean when you admit to smearing a survivor of people you defended? No one who takes these actions should claim to be a transfeminist. No one who takes these actions should have a platform.
My request is not that anyone harass or dox Tara. That is in no way helpful. What would be helpful is to stop following her and her former cohort, inform people who don't know to do so as well, and move on from this as a safer community.
Refusing to inform the public of the abusive actions of prominent people is anti transfeminist, anti survivor, pro abuse and pro rape culture. It does not protect us from the right, it does not protect us from anyone. I will reiterate: they hate queer people anyway. We need to disempower them, not do fucking PR. There is no amount of communal purity that will satiate transphobes. Transphobia is not the fault of trans people. Trans genocide is not the fault of trans people. Survivors are not participating in "carceral justice" by speaking out. Fuck everyone who signed that "contract", I don't care how much of a "meme" they say it was.
Hi! You can look at the tags and see they are destined to you! :) You see as a disabled transgender woman I have been isolated from my peers as a product of transmisogyny and ableism. You are being a horrible monster by implying this is a character flaw! You do not know me! You are a monster!
There's just something fucking horrid about using a disabled trans woman's isolation as a weapon against her. No it's not because I'm a creep or a sex pest or whatever it's because I'm not a cis white man and most people don't want to be around wierd trannies.
misstrogen girl i guarantee you boundary-violated and sexually harassed yourself into ostrasization. if how you act on here is any indication of your irl behavior, no one wants to be around a racist transphobic sex pest who supports pedophilia. And if so, your community has the right to protect themselves feom creeps like you. I hope those bans from ur local gay and kink bars are lifetime. fuck off please
that Rose motherfucker think she real slick coming into everybody's anons to cry and whine, reblogs the responses before blocking everybody, but them claims we are stalking and harassing when we screenshot shit, so pathetic and sad.
Oh pardon the fuck out of me????? You're stalking and harsssing people through anon, block and unblock us each time you directly reblog something AND you have multiple accounts under your rose alias??? And you think your little "uwu you're being so mean to me!!!" bullshit is gonna work on me when I watched you try to groom one of my moot's alters into an in-sys conflict so you could isolate them from us and abuse them further??? Get all the way the fuck out of here. You are just creating more evidence against yourself, but if you wanna do this goo goo ga ga age play victim card ass shit with me and expect it to work, go right ahead. Nothing to finish off a lovely day like a dumbass in my reblogs.
you're calling me horrible things and saying all of my blogs should be mass-reported, but the worst i've said is that you're being mean. if you really had proof it'd be easy to show
girl. i do completely understand where she's coming from with this, because yes false accusations are often levied against minority groups and yes this can have life-ruining and life-threatening consequences!
however you can't take that and turn it into the massive generalisation of 'if you believe people who say they were sexually assaulted you're a terf and a nazi'. are we really going to say it's bad to believe rape victims in the year 2026. are we really doing this.
labeling random nonbinary people as transmasc or transfem without asking for their preference is misgendering.
not all nonbinary people identify as transmasc or transfem. some people are both. some are neither. some use a different term (some examples: null, androgynous, neutral). some only call themselves "nonbinary".
whatever you think their agab was doesnt determine which box they fit into. agab doesnt determine gender quality or presentation.
let nonbinary people be nonbinary without being pushed into a brand new binary of "transmasc or transfem". thank you.
okay 'anti-c (🤨) paraphilia activist' / self-proclaimed child lover / proud owner of a Lot of pedophile 'pride' merchandise. this is so fucking worrying and insidious and sort of exemplifies a lot of the issues i have with this group's particular brand of activism. everyone hates you, all tme people hate you, all of the internet hates you but not us! so for your own safety you should cut everyone else off and only interact with us. i'm sure. i'm sure this could have no bad consequences for young transfems drawn into these circles.
Gee, it sure would be a shame if someone added her college's contact information so that they could be alerted about one of their student's behavior. Truly would be tragic if information she made publicly available was used to make her online actions have real world consequences
OOPS!
The Kirkwood Admissions Team works hard to show you what a warm, welcoming place Kirkwood is. You’re sure to see why Kirkwood is the best pl
like others in the tags have said i don't condone doxxing - but this is a pedophile actively seeking to make contact with children. all of this information was publicly available and she could genuinely endanger children with this.
yuuuuuup. she chose to list her college and home city publicly, just like she chose to openly identify as a pedophile, post her pedo/zoo/necro merch, and attempt to make contact with children. contacting her college could be incredibly important depending on her path of study
It is not longer a "fantasy" when you buy merch to rep it and MAKE A POST ENCOURAGING MINORS TO CONTACT YOU BY CONVINCING THEM THAT EVERYONE ELSE HATES THEM AND YOU'RE A SAFE PERSON.
She had so much fun fucking around and now she's panicking at the find out part.
ok yeah no now im actually woreied abt emma because these anons are getting so creepy. can lily and her goons pls fuck off, the timing of all this is too convenient
very possible this could also be someone in ISFF's circle (big overlap between the lily goons, but somewhat different enough), just with how much they fetishize violating plurals and how theyre bringing up its emotional enmeshment, either way its really weird and freaking me out
A beware to any bloggers in this circle: i am pretty sure that these people have a new tactic to take people down via lovebombing and manipulating whoever they can into turning against their communities/support systems. I've seen a slight uptick in it, and they typically attack people who associate themselves with Britt and/or Raf. I saw it happen to ash/surviving-the-internet, and another user, beware-of-zeylily. They both came out with these long rambling posts about how they regret "harrassing transfems" and how they're quitting and they deleted their blogs (or sideblogs related to these topics.)
Stand your ground, and take note; I'm sure it's because they're realising that taking advantage of people by using kindness is a more surefire manipulation & grooming tactic than attacking and demoralising people. I'd also suggest turning anons & dms off entirely.
I am 90% sure I took this screenshot around the time this happened and it does not have their username cause I did not want to bring direct attention to the users before BUT the file name has their username in it meaning the post was on their blog and it was the page I was on. They made this or reblogged it. (possibly made cause I was look at blogs directly in reaction to my post)
But last but not least:
Do not have full screenshot but it was an image of flags of "the big three" they were showing off (pedo, zoo, and necro)
This is after proudly coming out as a pedophile showing off their necklace and flags.
THIS IS ALL PUBLIC.
There reddit account, note its a lot of pornography and if its not porn its r/youthlib. Interesting...but i do not doubt youthlib subs have other pedos like r/teens does or r/proship, places that involve minors. So reporting might not go far, reddit has many pedophiles that have similar rhetoric like "coming out and want to be accepted". Pedophiles should be the LAST people leading children rights changes.
I have a suggestion: Stop seperating pedophilia and zoophilia from the harm it causes and try to water the terms down to cutesy
"if you conflate pedophilia and zoophilia with animal and child abuse" Beecause that's what it fucking IS??? This is how they're able to worm their way into proship and "youthlib" spaces.
"Well I'm a kiddie diddler and animal rapist but!!! i dont ACTUALLY diddle kids and rape animals!!! thats just what im called !!!! wh-why wont you accept me!!! terf!!! queerphobe!!!!"
and when you call them out suddenly you're the bad guy. It's DARVO. Deny, attack, reverse-victim-offender.
They are not victims. They are abusers. They did not get killed, socially murdered or lynched, their blogs got deleted. We are not a mob, we are decent fucking people on the internet who KNOW BETTER and actually WANT to protect kids and not abuse them.
okay 'anti-c (🤨) paraphilia activist' / self-proclaimed child lover / proud owner of a Lot of pedophile 'pride' merchandise. this is so fucking worrying and insidious and sort of exemplifies a lot of the issues i have with this group's particular brand of activism. everyone hates you, all tme people hate you, all of the internet hates you but not us! so for your own safety you should cut everyone else off and only interact with us. i'm sure. i'm sure this could have no bad consequences for young transfems drawn into these circles.
Gee, it sure would be a shame if someone added her college's contact information so that they could be alerted about one of their student's behavior. Truly would be tragic if information she made publicly available was used to make her online actions have real world consequences
OOPS!
The Kirkwood Admissions Team works hard to show you what a warm, welcoming place Kirkwood is. You’re sure to see why Kirkwood is the best pl
I've got further links involving the college. I did call and apparently Ellie is her not her name on the registrar, so getting specific may be an issue. However, there's further options for a concern.
Find resources for faculty and staff to help students in emergency and non-emergency situations.
Wanna do some good this black history month? You can help me stay alive! :) job hunting has been downright unfruitful and scary in my new place for 4 months and I would very much appreciate a signal boost to keep the mutual aid politics I aspire to alive and my housing stable.
I'm very sorry to report that I am 50 dollars deficit from zero. I'm so sorry about poor communication as I job hunt and pursue skill and writing plans.
Please don't forget about me.
Good news is that I only owe 100 for electric. I forgot I paid my phone bill a few times over and I'm most likely gonna look into much cheaper internet I can actually pay on time. (T mobile fucked me over)
My expenses are just my 450 rent, 110 electric bill (including past dues dw) and the 50 dollar PayPal debt that I accrued from urgent ubers from appointments and the er (mild asthma episode.)
I need 160 ASAP to stay warm.
Tldr: Goal is at 610, with urgency for 160 by the 20th
Cash and pay are both agenderdread
V_nmo is deejwalker365
Kofi Link <-
Hello, my name is DJ and I humbly ask my community for help securing studio electroni… Dj Walker needs your support for Support DJ's Journey
okay 'anti-c (🤨) paraphilia activist' / self-proclaimed child lover / proud owner of a Lot of pedophile 'pride' merchandise. this is so fucking worrying and insidious and sort of exemplifies a lot of the issues i have with this group's particular brand of activism. everyone hates you, all tme people hate you, all of the internet hates you but not us! so for your own safety you should cut everyone else off and only interact with us. i'm sure. i'm sure this could have no bad consequences for young transfems drawn into these circles.
Gee, it sure would be a shame if someone added her college's contact information so that they could be alerted about one of their student's behavior. Truly would be tragic if information she made publicly available was used to make her online actions have real world consequences
OOPS!
The Kirkwood Admissions Team works hard to show you what a warm, welcoming place Kirkwood is. You’re sure to see why Kirkwood is the best pl
like others in the tags have said i don't condone doxxing - but this is a pedophile actively seeking to make contact with children. all of this information was publicly available and she could genuinely endanger children with this.
yuuuuuup. she chose to list her college and home city publicly, just like she chose to openly identify as a pedophile, post her pedo/zoo/necro merch, and attempt to make contact with children. contacting her college could be incredibly important depending on her path of study
Yeah lmao. Also she just doesn't know what doxxing is! Making your info public of your own accord and it biting you in the ass is not doxxing. Also not even her home address. If we did, I'd be calling animal welfare and then sending her a glitter bomb
don't harass anybody seen here @iexplodedipshits - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
origamiaround
jacobvanloon
turnnoffyourmind
blakekathryn
kaledo-art
stormborns
yousharknotpass
