When they argue for the oxymoronic āelongated imminenceā
I'd rather be in outer space šø
art blog(derogatory)

oozey mess
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Discoholic šŖ©
Game of Thrones Daily
h

romaā
cherry valley forever
KIROKAZE
wallacepolsom
One Nice Bug Per Day
Fai_Ryy

if i look back, i am lost
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
ojovivo

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism
noise dept.
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Denmark

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Algeria

seen from United States

seen from Thailand

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ihlfail-blog
When they argue for the oxymoronic āelongated imminenceā
When NIAC follows the fighter.
When you finally understand the difference between the authentic French version of Art. 43 Hague Reg. (1899 II & 1907 IV) and its common English translation.
When they try to make a customary IHL argument but cite only one stateāand not even that stateās actual practice.
When non-IHL lawyers hear your hypo about targeting a building with a kindergarten in the basement, an old-personsā facility on the second floor, and a command-and-control centre on the roof.
When yet another article begins by describing Common Article 3 as a āConvention in miniatureā.
When you finally nail your dance moves for the 30th anniversary of the Nicaragua decision.
That moment when you can finally explain the difference between the āoverall controlā test and the āeffective controlā test.
When a student asks if there are grounds in IHL for detention in NIAC.
When that student in class cites Tadic by the paragraph number.
When you have to convert from Bluebook to Oxford citations.
Awaiting the ICRCās new Commentary on the Geneva Conventions.
When you get Microsoft Word not to auto-correct opinio juris sive necessitatis.Ā
When you can finally explain the concept of usufruct to a n00b.
When they argue that conspiracy is a crime under IHL.
The first time you realise how much constructive ambiguity is entailed in the IHL principle of proportionality.Ā
When they argue that Security Council Resolution 2249 authorises any state to use lethal force in Syria.