Misplaced Lens Cap
tumblr dot com
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Jules of Nature
⁂
DEAR READER
almost home
if i look back, i am lost
izzy's playlists!
JBB: An Artblog!
Stranger Things
Three Goblin Art
cherry valley forever
Show & Tell
Origami Around
Kiana Khansmith
Monterey Bay Aquarium
AnasAbdin
No title available
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Egypt
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ukraine
seen from Brazil
seen from Croatia
seen from Peru
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
@illwriteanything
please make a Dragon ball Z /DC comics ame-comi universe crossover fanfiction where goku gets transported to the ame-comi universe. (goku x huge massive gigantic harem with both female heroines and villainesses rated:m for sexual content and lemons)
I no longer submit to I’ll Write Anything. I realized I can charge money.
Conspiracy
Are you asking me to write something conspiracy related?
If the Internet Becomes a Governed Entity, I'm Done With It.
SOPA, CISPA, PIPA and ACTA are the latest attempts to turn the world wide web as we know it into a totalitarian cyber regime. Maybe some may feel there's a touch of exaggeration in said expression, but unfortunately, it is not so. CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) is back, at the time this is being written, which implies the war on freedom is nowhere near an end.
The internet is an interconnected network of communication, and perhaps the foundation of 21st century technological ingenuity. The world's youth relies heavily on the coherence and familiarity of technology. Placing boundaries on a cyber universe with infinite potential will inevitably limit and steer away internet regulars who favor open-source and free environments. These actions toward governing the net is aimed in favor of those who are unaware of what the internet is, what it can do and who the web is made up of. There are many factors to consider when publicizing such a vibrant act. While the past bills were successfully combated, the officials involved in pushing these restrictions do not sleep by any means. Freedom in general has gradually been dissipating since it was established. There are tall tale signs that the United States is in fact a fascist police state when compared with the qualities of Soviet Russia or Fascist Italy. It isn't too late to maintain the last bit of liberty that exists in the US, I hope.
This is a modern tale of Christopher Columbus, where the Newfoundland is the Internet, and Columbus is US congress. Columbus finds this previously inhabited land, then proceeds to destroy the lives of it's denizens and turns beauty into industry.
For those of us who prefer using diplomatic action to combat these takers of life, https://action.eff.org/o/9042/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9202
Internet Copyright; We can't all be happy
I don’t claim to be a professional or know the depth of legal complications in regards to stealing someone else’s work; however, never have I seen such a childish issue cause so many disputes and court cases. As a writer, if someone stole my work, I too would be upset at the audacity one has to claim ownership for something they had no part in, but I would also be flattered and understanding.
Day by day, we coexist with one another, privately and publicly, and then there is the internet: a large interconnected virtual network with infinite potential. Technology has become so prevalent in common life that there would be a feeling of emptiness and befuddlement if it were to somehow be removed from society, even temporarily. Computers are the modern way to obtain and share information; no doubt about it. So then, the conflict of recycling information comes about. Every so often, something gets quoted, used, shared, edited, insulted or harassed on the internet and the original creator of said content gets uptight about their work. A lot of people have this happen to them, especially on the internet. Most internet regulars have the same attitude and can easily brush off the mishap and continue with their daily lives, knowing they contributed to the internet’s liberal flow of new and recycled information.
Occasionally, the non-regular, or anal, user finds themselves in a similar situation and their reaction differs. One can empathize with this person as they are unaware of the rules and usual occurrences of the online world. It is they, however, who are the biggest threat to freedom of thought and appliance of knowledge. As much as we would all love to see our misfortunes brought to justice, the world cannot run like that. Justice is not just if it is at the cost of innocent people’s freedom.
In my country, the US justice system protects claims for owner’s rights when presented correctly. This law procedure (I’m assuming,) was the most pacifying way to keep the public satisfied. Many circumstances of copyright have resulted in lawsuit and even jail time. These instances are not limited to printed works and extend to the depths of the internet. Cases as negligible as telling unoriginal jokes without the permissive consent from its creator have brought lawsuits before. From an exterior perspective, this seems like not much more than corruption at its most ridiculous day. Only the petitioner and respondent really know what the truth was.
There is a bashing of heads when it comes to governing the boundaries of the internet. The line blurs when it comes to pirating, copyrighting and several other illegal online activities. The people who use the internet should be in charge of the internet. That would seem most logical and simple, but there are different opinions among the power-hungry. Though not exclusive to the internet, governing by ‘majority rules’ has one fatal flaw; the majority of people probably should have no part in government very well due to the bell curve. This is a separate issue, but it is somewhat relevant.
So then, I cannot account for the legal complexities of it all, but when it comes to the issue of easily neglected copyright claims on the internet, I have sympathy for the original creator but the sympathy is lost when (s)he takes it to the law. To preserve perfect internet equilibrium, sacrifices must be made. The internet is not alike anywhere or anything else, and thus, should not be controlled by minds who are unaware of its function and personality.
Marriage Equality Shouldn't Even Be An Issue
The primary reason there's an uproar of controversy about gay and lesbian marriage is ignorance. That's a very bold statement for me to make, especially seeing as how I've been raised, and maintained my faith, as a Christian. I can only speak for myself, but in any case, faithless or devout, the question of disallowing and allowing marriage seems simple, if you know what you believe in. The issue here is that most people don't know what they believe in. The movement for equality is gaining popularity internationally; however, in this case, I'm speaking subjectively about the United States of America.
Why should marriage be only between a man and a woman? "Becuz god sez so. He made it liek dat, so we cant change that." (<- Typical conservative response. )
Oh really? So, it's okay to disobey your god when he says divorce isn't allowed? Is it okay to disobey when he says not to work on Sunday? If I recall, God said not to judge because that's his job. (Matthew 7:1)
So, it must be okay to sinfully disobey if it means you get to ruin someone's life for being born differently, according to most conservative and old-fashioned attitudes toward the whole pride movement.
The whole 'God hates fags' things is the archetype of religous ignorance and bigotry. It's plain wrong. It's more insulting to God himself than to the homosexuals it attains to target. God never said he hated gay people (or cigarettes.)
If I recall correctly, all sin is equal, and once you've committed one sin, you've committed every sin in the book. So, everyone's in the same boat in that sense.
A story we hear often pertaining to the contending argument is the classic Sodom and Gommorah tale from the Old Testament in the bible. I understand that there was a lot of raunchy, sinful abominations; no question there, but that's not due to the fact that homosexuality exists.
Those are two separate occurrences.
There are far more wicked people who are heterosexual than the alternatives.
One idea more people should bring themselves to accept is that there are no gay, lesbian or straight people, only gay, lesbian and straight actions.
Some people simply are adapted to one type over the other.
So, with that said, consider all people equal. Sexuality, race, intelligence, background, ethics, morals are what make us individuals.
As a species, we are the same.
Being straight is as much a choice as being gay/lesbian.
Another point I'd strongly like to emphasize is that not all people are Christian. Those people are not subject to the bible's laws, according to the bible itself. People have free will, which allows them to choose what kind of life they want to live.
Jesus teaches to practice your beliefs in private (Matthew 6), which entails not publicly condemning anyone else's choices. No one should know that you feel a certain way unless they want your opinion.
The United States was never a Christian nation. No founding father ever claimed anything of the kind. What was claimed was a freedom to believe in any ideologies you so choose. Some of which have nothing against homosexuality. Free speech is supposed to give you the right to voice your opinion, not to be a hateful shrewd and tell others how to live.
Marriage equality is inevitable, whether by passive compromise, or fighting for what is right tooth and nail, and what's right, is minding your own damn business.
What will happen if gays are allowed to get married?
Nothing. Nothing will happen to you unless your gay/lesbian, which in that case would only benefit you.
As for myself and other straight people, nothing will change. Life will be exactly the same.
Gay/lesbian people haven't done anything, as a group, to deserve infamy.
If you're a Christian, there are bad people and there are bad people who are saved.
If you're not Christian, there are people; good, bad and indifferent.
In either case, the Christians are the bad people. (Only kidding.)
It's not about the sanctity of marriage; otherwise, divorce would be just as condemned.
The truth is that you may or may not like it, but it's here and it's not the sole cause for the destruction of anything. It's not going to affect you, and you have too much time on your hands if you're actively protesting anything prevalent to anti-civil rights.