AWKWARD

todo lo que siempre has querido esta al otro lado del miedo.

[hi-peach]

[littleturttle]

Te quise tanto, que no me importó que no fuera correspondido. Solo quería estar contigo.

LittleTurtle

[billieeilishgifs]

“BITTERSUITE” HIT ME HARD AND SOFT, OUT MAY 17TH

[little-blurry]

[xeptum]

[nowayhome]

Sydney Sweeney as Cassie Howard Euphoria | 2x04: You Who Cannot See, Think of Those Who Can

[virtuallyinsane]

Miroslav Škopek

[mothurs]

friend: you look stressed me: haha yeah it’s the stress

[lesamis]

i don’t think native english speakers can ever fully appreciate the emotion i felt when i first found out that the vulnerable spot on the side of your forehead which is arguably the best spot to be kissed is called your temple 

[thewestcoastwolf]

[byrondchambers]

[reitsc-deactivated20221203]

[30000fps]

[miniature-stigmata]

this one’s for all the fat girls who’ve cried in dressing rooms 💗

[drst]

You’re fine. The clothes are made to be easy to manufacture on machines, not for bodies. The clothes suck, not you.

[darthmelyanna]

They’re also manufactured to look attractive on hangers, and very few of us are shaped like hangers. You’re fine.

[moodyehudi-deactivated20180519]

😱😰😭😭😭😭😭😭😭thank u please more of this type of body positivity I need it

[chickenonabicycle]

Legit though! I’m a hobbyist seamstress and these are my experiences when shopping mainstream:

For example, most H&M blouses these days don’t even have boobdarts. Which means they will sit awkwardly on literally anyone with boobs, no matter the size. But on hangers or when folded on display? They look fab as fuck. Because hangers don’t have boobs. And the models chosen to show them on the catwalk are usually chosen for their lack of boobage too (unless it’s for lingerie), other requirements including ridiculous size and weight requirements. As for the average (EU available) clothing shops, the worst offender I’ve encountered yet was Zara. Everything’s way too long and way too flat: clearly aimed to look good on the catwalk models but not intended for normal people. At all.

Also sizes are just numbers. Shopping online has taught me that I’m a European M, an American XS-S, and a Japanese L-XL. And then these sizes even vary from shop to shop in the same country: I’m an XL at Apples but an S at Lola&Liza, for example. They’ve also been reducing the sizes of these numbers throughout the years to make people feel bad about themselves and to sell more weight-loss products. Don’t let a number get you down, it does not define you.

So please don’t feel bad about yourself when shops refuse to cater to your size. The clothes they sell are not aimed at real human beings. They are the ones in the wrong here, not you!

[coffee-at-midnxght]

body posi posts are the ones 

[gaslightgallows]

I needed this after yesterday. :/

[prismatic-bell]

ALSO

ever wonder why clothes look amazing on celebrities, including fat celebrities, while you’re lucky to find something that kind of fits?

It’s because…

…THEY GET THINGS TAILORED.

They have the same problem you do. So they buy bigger and have it made to fit them. They have the money to do it and we don’t, unfortunately, but that is literally the reason why it works for them.

[imfemalewarrior]

They were also originally designed to look good on runway models who are still expected to be as thin as possible with few to no curves because that’s easier to design for and sew for.

I have to dress for my hips and shoulders, so things are too big every where else but if I try to dress for my waist i Rio the clothes apart and can’t get them on

Modern clothes are not designed for people, and they aren’t designed to last. That’s why stretch knits are so popular bc they can form to the body while still not making quality clothing or doing anything to make clothes actually fit properly

-FemaleWarrior ™

[wonting]

[drakessimblr]

me: *buys a computer for my sim to use*

every single sim that comes over:

[cantaloupemilk]