Incredibles Life @indialifes - Tumblr Blog

Image of Samar Singh by Parth Pawar

1. Vide RTI application dated 01.11.2011 the appellant has sought information on issues as contained in his RTI Application 2. CPIO reply dated 30.11.2011, has given the information to the appellant. 3. The first appeal was filed on 26.12.2011 as the desired information was not provided by the CPIO. 4. Vide Order dated 18.01.2012; FAA upheld the decision of CPIO. 5. Grounds for the Second Appeal filed on 08.02.2012 are contained in the Memorandum of appeal. 6. HEARING Appellant opted to be absent despite of our due notice to him. Respondents appeared before the Commission personally and made the submissions at length. DECISION During the hearing of the appeal, it is submitted by the respondents that they have provided the complete information to the appellant as per his RTI application dated 01.11.2011 on the basis of their reply dated 30.11.2011. It is to be seen here that the appellant, vide his RTI Application dated 01.11.2011, sought some information from the respondents on five issues as contained therein. Respondents vide their response dated 30.11.2011, provided the required information to the appellant on all five issues. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid response, FA was filed by the appellant on 26.12.2011 before the FAA, who vide his order dated 18.01.2012, upheld the decision of CPIO. Hence, a Second Appeal before this Commission. .....2 On careful perusal of the case file, the Commission finds that appellant was denied the required information u/s 8 (1)(h) of the RTI Act 2005 and also relied upon this Commission's earlier common order dated 10.07.2007 dealt in CIC/AT/A/2007/00007, 10 & 11 & order 20.05.2011, dealt in CIC/AT/A/2010/000969/SS passed in similar cases. Thus, Commission finds no legal flaw in the order of FAA dated 18.01.2012. Therefore, the same is here upheld. In view of this, the appellant's appeal is dismissed out-rightly.

Shobhan Mittal M/s Greenply Industries Ltd. Unit 5A, 5th floor, Upper M6 Plaza, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi-110025

shobhan-mittal

The anti-dumping duty is in the range of USD 14.7-64.35 per cubic metre for fibre board with thickness of 6 mm and above, said Shobhan Mittal (Jt MD) GIL

indialifes

Shobhan Mittal

#shobhan mittal

shobhan-mittal

Centre seeks $1.55 bn from RIL, company seeks arbitration

The Centre issued a $1.55 billion claim from Reliance Industries and its partners for drawing natural gas belonging to state-owned ONGC in the KG Basin over the last seven years. The claim is in line with the recommendations of the one-man AP Shah committee set up to look into the matter. The committee’s report recommended that RIL pay the government compensation for extracting natural gas that…

View On WordPress

indialifes

By Shobhan Mittal

#shobhan mittal

shobhan-mittal

Terrorist’s diary may change the course of Uri case

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is basing its investigations on a “blue diary” recovered from one of the three Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorists who were killed while attempting to storm an Army camp in Kupwara on October 6. (more…)

View On WordPress

#shobhan mittal

shobhan-mittal

Bofors ghost finally buried, 155mm howitzers coming

The Bofors jinx has finally been broken after 30 years. After the infamous Bofors scandal of the mid-1980s torpedoed all its artillery modernisation plans, the Army will begin inducting its first modern 155mm howitzers from mid-2017 onwards. (more…)

View On WordPress

#shobhan mittal #war

shobhan-mittal

E-commerce firms see 30% decline in cash on delivery orders post demonetisation

E-commerce companies, including Snapdeal and Shopclues, have seen up to 30 per cent decline in cash on delivery (CoD) orders post the announcement to demonetise Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 denomination notes.

#shobhan mittal

shobhan-mittal

Shobhan Mittal, the CEO and joint MD of Greenply Industries Limited stated that he is expecting an eight to ten percent growth in revenues by end of financial year 2017.Shobhan Mittal has been spearheading Greenply Industries for over a long time

indialifes

Shobhan Mittal - Greenply Industries 2014

#shobhan mittal #https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74830599/

Samar Singh , Kavita Yadav - Dharavela Thresar - Bhojpuri Chaita by Parth Pawar

“Raat Bhar Saiyan Humar Bhadey Tamperature Tu Dharawela Tharesare, Tu Dharawela Tharesar “

Singer - Samar Singh and Kavita Yadav

samar singh parth pawar

#samar singh #samar singh parth pawar #bhojpuri

Shobhan Mittal M/s Greenply Industries Ltd.

Shri. Shobhan Mittal M/s Greenply Industries Ltd. Unit 5A, 5th floor, Upper M6 Plaza, Jasola District Centre

#shobhan mittal #https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74830599/

Shobhan Mittal - Indiankanoon.org

#shobhan mittal #https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74830599/

Shobhan Mittal M/s Greenply Industries Ltd.

1. Vide RTI application dated 01.11.2011 the appellant has sought information on issues as contained in his RTI Application 2. CPIO reply dated 30.11.2011, has given the information to the appellant. 3. The first appeal was filed on 26.12.2011 as the desired information was not provided by the CPIO. 4. Vide Order dated 18.01.2012; FAA upheld the decision of CPIO. 5. Grounds for the Second Appeal filed on 08.02.2012 are contained in the Memorandum of appeal. 6. HEARING Appellant opted to be absent despite of our due notice to him. Respondents appeared before the Commission personally and made the submissions at length.

DECISION During the hearing of the appeal, it is submitted by the respondents that they have provided the complete information to the appellant as per his RTI application dated 01.11.2011 on the basis of their reply dated 30.11.2011.

It is to be seen here that the appellant, vide his RTI Application dated 01.11.2011, sought some information from the respondents on five issues as contained therein. Respondents vide their response dated 30.11.2011, provided the required information to the appellant on all five issues. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid response, FA was filed by the appellant on 26.12.2011 before the FAA, who vide his order dated 18.01.2012, upheld the decision of CPIO. Hence, a Second Appeal before this Commission.

.....2 On careful perusal of the case file, the Commission finds that appellant was denied the required information u/s 8 (1)(h) of the RTI Act 2005 and also relied upon this Commission's earlier common order dated 10.07.2007 dealt in CIC/AT/A/2007/00007, 10 & 11 & order 20.05.2011, dealt in CIC/AT/A/2010/000969/SS passed in similar cases. Thus, Commission finds no legal flaw in the order of FAA dated 18.01.2012. Therefore, the same is here upheld. In view of this, the appellant's appeal is dismissed outrightly.

The appeal is dismissed accordingly.

Sd/- (M.A. Khan Yusufi) Information Commissioner Copy of this Decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Authenticated true copy (Tarun Kumar) Joint Secretary & Additional Registrar

1. Sh. Mohit Tewari, CPIO Central Zonal Unit, West Block no.8 Wing-3 1st floor, Sec-1, R K Puram New Delhi-66 2. Shri. Shobhan Mittal M/s Greenply Industries Ltd. Unit 5A, 5th floor, Upper M6 Plaza, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi-110025

#shobhan mittal #https://indiankanoon.org/doc/74830599/

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

Incredibles Life