Censorship: Analysis of a peer-reviewed journal article
Reflection
Article: Should we ban books in schools? Arguments from the public history of Australian school text censorship. By David Hastie (2018). English in Australia, 53(3), 23-36
Book censorship in schools is an interesting topic and one I believed I had a thorough basic understanding of. When reading the article title, Should we ban books in schools? Arguments from the Public History of Australian School Text Censorship by David Hastie, I believed that educators and information professionals, with their years of training, would influence and be involved with censorship and book inclusion and exclusion decisions. Reading and analysing the article provided a deeper understanding of the role of groups who voice their concerns over particular books in schools, and the ethical issue of banning books.Â
Expecting an answer to the article’s ethical question of should books be banned in schools, I instead found reasons why books have been banned and groups who seek censorship. In Australia, there has been situations where people called for the burning of a book and the New South Wales police were involved in removing a book from the shelves of a bookstore. These events were unknown to me and I found the vehement stand of those seeking a censorship ban a little surprising. This is due to not having studied Australian censorship history, nor taking a deeper look at the reasons why groups want a book banned.
Some of the books that have caused controversy in Australia and were mentioned in the article I had not heard of. This may be due to books being banned before I was aware of, or paid attention to, current affairs. Or the banning occurred when I was not yet of an age to have heard of the book and understand what it could mean. I selected one banned book from the article and analysed, looking at the reasons for the banning at the time, and present views of the book. The Little Red School Book was first published overseas in 1969 and was written by school teachers in Denmark. Australia was quite quick to ban the book and it was removed from bookstores by New South Wales police. Now it is available to purchase, and readers on Amazon state that there are rude words and graphic content, but this is similar to what is available today in other books. I wonder and will have to consider if, as a society, are we desensitized now, or were we too sensitive when the book was banned?
A copy of the Qld Literature Board of Review annual report 71-72 containing details of the book banning is on the State Library of Queensland website Little Red School Book | State Library Of Queensland (slq.qld.gov.au). Also on the site are copies of newspaper clippings which express the concerns of particular groups at that time. They are interesting to read and provide insight into different views and how opinions affect censorship. Analysing the article, I wonder about how times change people’s views of what is and is not acceptable in text and on television. I thought of my high school required reading lists which contained King Lear and Waiting for Godot, I am David and Coonardoo. Very different books with different language and content. For me, each of these books produced strong feelings and thoughts. David Hastie (2018) says ‘I would cautiously suggest there exists a case for censorship’ and mentions this is to ensure student protection. Having analysed the article and reflecting upon books I was required to read in high school, I agree with cautious censorship for the protection of students, and I see how over time, views and what is appropriate can change as society changes.
Little Red School Book (Australian ed. 1972)The Little Red School Book was the work of two Danish schoolteachers, Soren Hansen and Jesper Je
References
Hastie, D. (2018). Should we ban books in schools? : Arguments from the public history of Australian school text censorship. English in Australia, 53(3), 23–36. https://search-informit-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/doi/10.3316/aeipt.222603
Knox, E.J.M. (2020). Books, censorship, and anti-intellectualism in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 101(7), 28-32 Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=142591713&site=ehost-live
Robert, K. (2022). Under the law: Banning books: Unlawful censorship, or within a school’s discretion? Phi Delta Kappan, 103(7), 62-64. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=156035966&site=ehost-live
















