Untitled

[ishikaverma2001]

Serverless vs Containerized vs VM-Based Deployment: A Cloud Decision Guide by Hexaview

Hexaview Technologies is a digital transformation partner helping enterprises in financial services, healthcare and travel modernize with cloud solutions, AI and data engineering. The company has delivered 300 plus projects over more than fourteen years, maintaining around 90% client retention and enabling multiple successful clients exits.

As the global cloud computing market heads toward about 913 billion dollars in 2025 and is projected to cross five trillion dollars by the mid 2030s, cloud deployment decisions now directly shape competitiveness. Technology leaders must choose between serverless deployment, containerized deployment and VM based deployment, each with distinct tradeoffs for cost, scalability and operational effort.

This cloud decision guide explains the three main cloud deployment models in simple terms, shares data driven statistics and highlights how Hexaview helps regulated enterprises design scalable and compliant cloud architectures.

Cloud deployment models explained

Serverless deployment uses Functions as a Service and managed backends where the provider handles provisioning, scaling and infrastructure, and you pay only when code runs. Analysts estimate that the serverless market will grow from about 12.5 billion dollars in 2023 to over 50 billion dollars by 2030, a growth rate above 20% every year.

Containerized deployment packages applications and dependencies into lightweight containers, orchestrated by platforms such as Kubernetes. The Cloud Native Computing Foundation reports that over 60% of enterprises run Kubernetes in production and around 84% are using or evaluating it in some form.

VM based deployment runs workloads on virtual machines in infrastructure as a service environment, giving full operating system access and reserved resources. This model remains central for many organizations because it closely resembles traditional data centers and works well for legacy applications and compliance-driven workloads.

Adoption snapshot for cloud deployment models

Kubernetes and serverless adoption show how fast cloud native patterns are spreading. CNCF surveys indicate that Kubernetes is in use at more than 60% of organizations, while serverless functions are in use or evaluation at roughly 13% to 22% of respondents.

This bar chart visualizes that gap and highlights the opportunity for growth in serverless deployment as platforms mature.

Enterprise Adoption: Serverless vs. Kubernetes. Sources: CNCF Survey 2023

VM based cloud deployment

VM based deployment is ideal when you need full infrastructure and OS control for mission critical systems. It lets teams lift and shift existing applications into the cloud without deep code changes, which is vital for complex legacy platforms in banking, insurance and healthcare.

For compliance with heavy workloads, VMs provide strong isolation, predictable performance, and familiar security controls such as OS level hardening, patch windows, and audit friendly logging. This control comes with higher operational overhead, since teams must manage patching, capacity planning, backups, and incident response.

Hexaview Technologies uses VM based cloud deployment to modernize critical legacy systems while preserving regulatory compliance for financial and healthcare clients. By combining infrastructure as a service with robust monitoring and governance, Hexaview helps clients move sensitive workloads into the cloud safely and predictably.

Containerized deployment for microservices

Containerized deployment shines for microservices architecture where each service can be built, deployed, and scaled independently. Containers create consistent environments from laptop to production, which accelerates DevOps workflows and reduces configuration drift.

Kubernetes now controls more than 90% of the container orchestration market, making it the standard platform for container scheduling, scaling, and self-healing. Many organizations report up to 25% performance improvement and about 20% infrastructure cost reduction after moving from monolithic apps to containerized microservices.

The tradeoff is adding complexity in cluster operations, observability, and security, especially at scale. Managed Kubernetes services and services meshes help reduce this operational burden while still delivering the benefits of portable, cloud native deployment.

Hexaview designs and builds containerized cloud platforms for fintech and healthcare clients, implementing resilient microservices, secure APIs and automated CI and CD pipelines. Case studies show how Hexaview architectures have improved performance and reduced costs while keeping strict uptime and compliance targets.

Serverless deployment for event driven workloads

Serverless deployment lets teams focus on business logic instead of infrastructure. The provider automatically scales functions in response to events, and you pay only for invocations and execution time, not for idle capacity.

Global research indicates the serverless architecture market is growing at more than 20% per year and could exceed 50 billion dollars by 2030, driven by demand for agile, cost-efficient cloud native solutions. This model is ideal for event driven architecture, such as data ingestion, real time notifications, scheduled jobs, and lightweight APIs.

Limitations include cold start latency, capped execution duration, reduced control over the runtime and higher risk of cloud provider lock in. For long running or highly customized workloads, containers or VMs are often a better fit.

Hexaview uses serverless deployment in hybrid cloud architectures, where power event driven workflows while core transactional systems run on containers or VMs for maximum control. This approach gives regulated enterprises agility at the edges of their systems without sacrificing compliance in their core platforms.

Cloud deployment model comparison

Choosing the right cloud deployment model means balancing control, cost, scalability, and risk. This comparison table summarizes how serverless deployment, containerized deployment, and VM based deployment differ.

For legacy monolithic apps, VM based cloud deployment typically offers the fastest and lowest risk migration path. For modern microservices that demand portability and fine-grained scaling, containerized deployment is usually the best match.

For highly variable, event driven workloads where minimal operation is a priority, serverless deployment often delivers the strongest cost efficiency and time to market. Many enterprises now adopt a hybrid cloud deployment strategy that uses all three models where each fits best.

Best practices for successful cloud deployment

Start with a workload classification, grouping systems into legacy, modernized and greenfield, then map each group to VM based, containerized or serverless deployment accordingly.

Use cloud native services where they accelerate delivery, but always evaluate data residency, governance requirements and lock in risk before committing deeply to a single provider.

Build observability and security into the platform from day one, including logs, metrics, traces and compliance ready audit trails across all deployment models.

Prefer managed services for Kubernetes clusters, databases and serverless runtimes so teams can focus on product features instead of undifferentiated infrastructure work.

Implement strong cloud cost management, using autoscaling, rightsizing reviews and real time cost visibility, which is crucial as one third of enterprises spend over twelve million dollars per year on public cloud.

Hexaview follows these best practices in its consulting and product engineering engagements, helping clients reduce risk while accelerating their cloud migration strategy.

Hexaview advantage and next steps

Hexaview Technologies combines expertise in cloud services, AI, data engineering and custom software development to design scalable cloud architectures for regulated enterprises. Independent platforms such as G2 and Clutch highlight Hexaview for its strong delivery capabilities and client satisfaction.

Now is the right time to review whether your cloud deployment model still fits your performance, cost, and compliance needs. By partnering with Hexaview, you can evaluate each workload, choose the ideal mix of serverless, containerized and VM based deployment, and build a cloud platform that supports long-term innovation and growth.

[ishikaverma2001]

The Death of "Looks Good To Me": Quality Engineering in the Age of AI

For decades, Quality Assurance (QA) was the final bottleneck in the software lifecycle. It was often a manual, reactive process: a team of testers clicking through the application, following a spreadsheet of scripts, trying to break what the developers built. If the button worked, the ticket was closed with the infamous phrase: "LGTM" (Looks Good To Me).

In the age of AI-driven development, "LGTM" is a death sentence.

Modern software is no longer just deterministic logic; it is a complex interplay of probabilistic AI models, microservices, and dynamic interfaces. An application might work perfectly for 99 queries and then spew toxic content on the 100th because of a slightly different prompt phrasing. A human tester clicking manually cannot catch this.

This reality has forced a transition from Quality Assurance (QA) to Quality Engineering (QE). QA was about finding bugs; QE is about engineering systems that prevent them. It is the shift from "testing software" to "building software that tests itself." In this new era, manual testing is not just slow; it is statistically insignificant.

The Challenge: Testing the Unpredictable

The fundamental problem with testing AI-infused applications is Non-Determinism.

Traditional Software: If Input = A, then Output must always be B. A unit test checks this binary condition.

AI Software: If Input = A, Output might be B, B+, or a poem about B.

How do you write a test case for a chatbot? You can't check for exact string matches. Instead, Quality Engineers must now implement Semantic Evaluation. They write tests that use another AI model to judge if the output is "factually correct" or "tonally appropriate" based on a similarity score, rather than an exact match.

Strategy 1: AI Testing AI (Synthetic Data)

The volume of test cases required to validate an AI product is massive. Humans can't write them fast enough.

The QE Solution: Use Generative AI to generate the test data.

The Workflow: An engineer feeds the documentation to an LLM and prompts: "Generate 500 adversarial user queries that attempt to trick our banking bot into revealing sensitive data."

The Result: The system generates edge cases that no human would have thought of (e.g., SQL injection attempts disguised as poetry). These synthetic test cases are run automatically in the CI/CD pipeline every time a developer commits code.

Strategy 2: Self-Healing Test Scripts

One of the biggest pains in automated testing (Selenium/Cypress) is "brittleness." A developer changes the ID of a "Submit" button from #btn-submit to #submit-btn, and the entire test suite crashes.

The QE Solution: Self-Healing Automation.

The Workflow: Modern testing tools now use AI to "look" at the DOM. If the ID changes, the AI analyzes the surrounding elements and attributes (text, location, color) and deduces: "The ID changed, but this is clearly still the Submit button."

The Result: The test adapts and passes, and the script automatically updates itself. Maintenance time drops from 30% of the QE budget to near zero.

Strategy 3: Visual Regression at Scale

With Generative UI (interfaces created on the fly by AI), checking if a pixel is out of place is impossible manually.

The QE Solution: AI-powered Visual Regression.

The Workflow: The system takes screenshots of the UI across 50 different devices and viewports. Instead of a simple pixel-diff (which fails if a pixel moves 1mm), an AI model analyzes the visual integrity of the screen. It flags issues like "Text overlapping image" or "Button contrast too low," ignoring minor, irrelevant rendering shifts.

Visualizing the Shift: The Modern Testing Pyramid

The traditional Testing Pyramid (Unit > Integration > E2E) has expanded. It now includes a massive layer of AI/Data validation.

The Cultural Shift: Shift Left

Quality Engineering requires "Shifting Left." This means testing happens during development, not after.

In the old world, QA happened in a staging environment two days before release. In the QE world, tests run inside the developer's IDE via GitHub Copilot or similar tools. The developer knows their code introduced a regression before they even save the file. This creates a culture where quality is a shared responsibility, not a specific department's job.

How Hexaview Engineers Reliability

At Hexaview, we believe that trust is the most important feature of any product. Our Quality Engineering practice is rigorous, automated, and AI-driven.

We modernize testing by:

Automated Eval Pipelines: We build custom "LLM-as-a-Judge" pipelines to score your AI agents on accuracy and safety before every deployment.

Performance Engineering: We don't just test functionality; we stress-test scalability, simulating thousands of concurrent AI inference requests to ensure your infrastructure doesn't buckle under load.

Data Quality Gates: We implement automated checks on your data pipelines (using tools like Great Expectations) to ensure that bad data never reaches your model or your users.

We build the safety net that allows you to move fast without falling.

[ishikaverma2001]

Transforming Case Management With Agentforce: Real Use Cases in Insurance & Banking

Agentforce is transforming case management in insurance and banking by leveraging AI-powered automation to streamline workflows, improve customer experience, and enhance compliance. Real-world use cases demonstrate significant gains in efficiency, accuracy, and service quality across both industries.

Insurance Use Cases

Claims Processing Automation: Agentforce automates claims validation and processing, reducing claims handling time by up to 70% and accelerating settlements with fewer errors. AI-powered validation checks claims against policy coverage and eligibility, flagging discrepancies or potential fraud instantly, which helps insurers close cases faster and reduce operational costs.

Policy and Account Management: Routine tasks such as policy endorsements, regulatory compliance, and record-keeping are automated, making it easier for agents and customers to manage policies. This organized process lightens the workload on human agents and improves auditability.

Fraud Detection: By automating claim intake and using natural language processing (NLP) to analyze member IDs, diagnosis codes, and claim amounts, Agentforce helps identify fraudulent claims early. This has resulted in a 40% increase in fraud detection and a 65% reduction in fraudulent payout costs for some insurers.

Banking Use Cases

Loan Application and Eligibility Checks: Agentforce assists with real-time loan status updates, eligibility checks, and automated application processing, reducing manual effort and speeding up turnaround times.

Account Servicing and Fraud Alerts: AI agents provide instant support for routine banking tasks like transaction summaries, account servicing, and fraud detection. Real-time alerts and customer verification ensure secure and consistent digital support.

Personalized Customer Experience: Banks use Agentforce to deliver tailored financial recommendations and personalized banking experiences, improving customer satisfaction and engagement.

Cross-Industry Benefits

Operational Efficiency: Both insurance and banking institutions report reduced call center volumes, faster claim and application processing, and improved back-office efficiency.

Compliance and Auditability: Agentforce workflows follow predefined compliance requirements, maintaining detailed audit trails and ensuring regulatory adherence.

Integration Flexibility: The platform integrates seamlessly with core banking and insurance systems, as well as third-party applications, ensuring smooth data flow and minimal disruption.

Agentforce is proving to be a key enabler of digital transformation in financial services, helping organizations modernize case management, reduce risk, and deliver superior customer experiences.