Blog Post 4:Â Sexuality Perspectives on Social Media/The Lesbianâ on Sho.Comâs The L Word Site
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United State of America guaranteed same-sex marriage, allowing same-sex couples to exercise the right to marry in all states. Although this was a great accomplishment, considering the modern western culture that we still live in, such ideologies for perpetuating a heteronormative sexuality. Â
In a society where we are so technologically advanced, our identities whether gay, straight, bi or trans is based through an online identity, where we engage in a public space to connect with alike individuals and form bonds that may led to social justice and creating an identity for an act of resistance. This resilience seems daunting as marginalized individuals are not only fighting for equal rights and destigmatizing the role of âqueerâ individuals. As Queer Theory suggest, individuals must not only challenge the heterosexual order, but also the power relations it produces and how it structures our reality.
Most of those siting in positions that produce our content for television, radio, and movies are those of white high-class Americans who are not from a marginalized group that Identifies with race, disability, sexual orientation, and even those who are not from America. This becomes problematic simply because these companies are instead producing what is familiar to them, or creating âstockâ characters that are not a reflection of our own reality. Companies have utilized this market strategy to further allow viewers to internalize these ideologies and stereotypes, which soon creates a consumerism market for the marginalized â specifically those of the LGBTQ community.
We eventually begin to seek for the âempire of imagesâ shown in our queer television shows, apps, and social media sites to reinforce a packaged community. Sites apps such as Grindr, Jackâd, and even shows like âThe Lesbianâ and the L Word Site produces a culture that is completely visually and mechanically designed to embody a particular mainstream image, which is heteronormative and unrepresentative of an inclusive community.
âInstead of welcoming such promised inclusiveness, however, its complex and limited interface and money reliant culture ultimately reinforced qualities critiqued about the show and embraced the characteristics of the âgood gayâ â attractiveness, youth, wealth, leisure, and educationâ (Kessler 604).