Origami Around
taylor price
tannertan36
Janaina Medeiros
Acquired Stardust
Misplaced Lens Cap
AnasAbdin
art blog(derogatory)
@theartofmadeline
Stranger Things
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
Sade Olutola
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
Today's Document
★
blake kathryn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Not today Justin
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Argentina
seen from Peru
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from Philippines
seen from South Africa
seen from Italy
seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands
@jay-wasreblogging
This blog and my main blog is:
veryyyy LGBTQIA+ • Pro-Choice • Pro-nonreligious and religious freedom • Anti-ableism/sexism/ageism etc • Anti-monarchy • Pro-refugees/asylum seekers rights • Pro-Trade Unions • Pro-sex workers rights • Pro-Land back
*.✧♡｡*ﾟ+ *.✧♡｡*ﾟ+
Welcome to my blog!!
SUPPORT POST
Ko-Fi | Masterlist
*.✧♡｡*ﾟ+ *.✧♡｡*ﾟ+
now tumblr added the transgender flag colour onto the inclusivity flag but separated.... interesting
happy pride! 🌈☀️
Mercedes getting her daughter was cool but she still should've taken her shoe off and beat her mum for what she did to her with the gym and denying her when she begged
The ECHR's updated Code of Practice is going to cause irreparable harm to trans and gender non-conforming people in the UK.
What the Code actually does
The Code is the EHRC’s interpretation of the April 2025 Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers. That ruling redefined “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 to mean biological sex. The EHRC was always going to update the Code. The question was how. The answer arrived on 21 May, and the answer is: badly. The Code defines “woman” as “biological woman.” It defines “man” as “biological man.” For the purposes of the Equality Act, sex means sex at birth. End of. That definition then cascades. Single-sex spaces, the Code says, must be operated on the basis of biological sex. Trans people “should be offered” a third or gender-neutral space. Trans women can be excluded from women-only associations. Trans people are excluded from single-sex competitions for the gender they live in. If a women-only service chooses to admit trans women, it may legally cease to qualify as a single-sex service at all. That last bit goes unsaid in most of the coverage. Read it again. A women’s group that has been trans-inclusive for twenty years, run by women who voted democratically to be trans-inclusive, can now lose its legal protection as a single-sex service because of who its members chose to include. A small group of self-styled women’s rights campaigners can threaten a much larger women’s organisation with court action for being too welcoming. That is the policy. It is being sold as protection. It is, in practice, a way of bullying women out of running the kinds of services women have chosen to run. The Code does not stop at toilets and refuges. It limits access to healthcare. To housing. To social care. To gyms, pools, spas. And then, quietly, it rewrites what “lesbian” and “gay” mean in law. Paragraph 2.50 of the Code says, in plain text: “a trans man with a GRC is a woman and a trans woman with a GRC is a man, for the purposes of the Act.” Paragraph 2.92 then defines sexual orientation: “a person’s sexual orientation towards persons of the same sex (the person is a lesbian woman or a gay man).” And paragraph 2.96 closes the back door: “Gender reassignment is a separate protected characteristic and unrelated to sexual orientation.” Stitch those three together and the consequence is unavoidable. A trans woman in a relationship with a cis woman is legally, under this Code, a man in a relationship with a woman. Heterosexual. Not a lesbian couple. Not protected as one. I had to read that twice. It is in the document the government has just laid before Parliament. You can read it yourself on gov.uk.
Taken from: https://biminibabes.substack.com/p/write-the-letter-babes
I don't tend to write posts like this, but this is something that is going to harm me and so many others in the UK.
Please share this link around if you're not from the UK, and if you are - click on it. It'll give you the link to a petition and it will help you send a letter to your MP asking them to vote against this.
EDM 240 / prayer motion is live. Your MP needs to sign it. Two taps via the coalition tool.
tags: @satan-offical @negativelegend @lostinthewrongfandom @villain-offical @skylar-helsing @unyieldingsilence @no-one-offical @explosions-are-funny @what-even-is-thiss @pukicho @ghostofafruitmain @thatdamhobbit @ihavemanythoughts @thisisexorsexism @thisistransphobia @hi-just-existing @sometimes--i--exist @failed-verification @a-lua-da @yourlocalfandomfriendo @zeenahasarrived @thisisallcameronsfault @em-duckie @ilov3b00kss0much @the-manifesto-of-lily
The ECHR's updated Code of Practice is going to cause irreparable harm to trans and gender non-conforming people in the UK.
What the Code actually does
The Code is the EHRC’s interpretation of the April 2025 Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers. That ruling redefined “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 to mean biological sex. The EHRC was always going to update the Code. The question was how. The answer arrived on 21 May, and the answer is: badly. The Code defines “woman” as “biological woman.” It defines “man” as “biological man.” For the purposes of the Equality Act, sex means sex at birth. End of. That definition then cascades. Single-sex spaces, the Code says, must be operated on the basis of biological sex. Trans people “should be offered” a third or gender-neutral space. Trans women can be excluded from women-only associations. Trans people are excluded from single-sex competitions for the gender they live in. If a women-only service chooses to admit trans women, it may legally cease to qualify as a single-sex service at all. That last bit goes unsaid in most of the coverage. Read it again. A women’s group that has been trans-inclusive for twenty years, run by women who voted democratically to be trans-inclusive, can now lose its legal protection as a single-sex service because of who its members chose to include. A small group of self-styled women’s rights campaigners can threaten a much larger women’s organisation with court action for being too welcoming. That is the policy. It is being sold as protection. It is, in practice, a way of bullying women out of running the kinds of services women have chosen to run. The Code does not stop at toilets and refuges. It limits access to healthcare. To housing. To social care. To gyms, pools, spas. And then, quietly, it rewrites what “lesbian” and “gay” mean in law. Paragraph 2.50 of the Code says, in plain text: “a trans man with a GRC is a woman and a trans woman with a GRC is a man, for the purposes of the Act.” Paragraph 2.92 then defines sexual orientation: “a person’s sexual orientation towards persons of the same sex (the person is a lesbian woman or a gay man).” And paragraph 2.96 closes the back door: “Gender reassignment is a separate protected characteristic and unrelated to sexual orientation.” Stitch those three together and the consequence is unavoidable. A trans woman in a relationship with a cis woman is legally, under this Code, a man in a relationship with a woman. Heterosexual. Not a lesbian couple. Not protected as one. I had to read that twice. It is in the document the government has just laid before Parliament. You can read it yourself on gov.uk.
Taken from: https://biminibabes.substack.com/p/write-the-letter-babes
I don't tend to write posts like this, but this is something that is going to harm me and so many others in the UK.
Please share this link around if you're not from the UK, and if you are - click on it. It'll give you the link to a petition and it will help you send a letter to your MP asking them to vote against this.
EDM 240 / prayer motion is live. Your MP needs to sign it. Two taps via the coalition tool.
tags: @satan-offical @negativelegend @lostinthewrongfandom @villain-offical @skylar-helsing @unyieldingsilence @no-one-offical @explosions-are-funny @what-even-is-thiss @pukicho @ghostofafruitmain @thatdamhobbit @ihavemanythoughts @thisisexorsexism @thisistransphobia @hi-just-existing @sometimes--i--exist @failed-verification @a-lua-da @yourlocalfandomfriendo @zeenahasarrived @thisisallcameronsfault @em-duckie @ilov3b00kss0much @the-manifesto-of-lily
Does anybody remember that time when 096  had a kid 
Rest In Power, Rest in Peace.
I wanted them to live. To live in power. In peace.
the package drama is surely coming to an end but then you realise that its raining 100% tomorrow and it still hasn't been updated out of the origin state
People, it's so fucking important to eat properly. Eat. now. I have wasted so many fucking days not doing anything because I was too hungry to do anything. And I have become annoyed at too many small things because I was hangry.
I am begging you. Eat. Do it so you can have the energy to do something in your day. Do it to achieve anything throughout the day. Eat so your day won't go to waste.
and remember, something is better than nothing.
that nibble or bite of whatever is something your body takes in.
its energy your body is fuelled by and even the littlest bit still goes a long way.
ALL. OF. THIS.
pov: you're the post man delivering my package
pov: you're watching me get my package from the post man
pov: you're the post man delivering my package
Happy pride month!! Reminder that trans rights are human rights & theres no LGBT without the T 🏳️🌈🫂🏳️⚧️
Mycroft working out that Holmes and Watson are together years before he would officially meet Watson on the newspaper.
Mycroft reading Watson's publishing in the newspaper and being uncomfortable with the amount of study and praises towards his younger brother's features.
Mycroft reading Watson voluntarily gave up his chequebook to be in Holmes' posession, giving him total financial control over it, so he could be helped for his gambling addiction.
Mycroft reading Watson carrying his revolver on cases to shoot anyone and anything when Holmes prompts him to.
Mycroft reading Watson and his younger brother spending every day together, having breakfast, attending the opera and reading books in the comfort of their home.
Mycroft reading Watson admiring his younger brother in every new edition of the newspaper as if its the first time they met all over again.
#it's probably such a trip for him#like here's my morning news#and here's a nearly pornographic description of my brother's hands#just a normal day for Mycroft Holmes#he's probably so happy for Sherlock
Oooohhhh, such an amusing thought!!
I imagine he goes to his table to have breakfast and his daily reading of the newspaper just to be like,
'why yes, I would enjoy a tea cake with my morning tea....what the fuck? oh my....well...good for him.'
