the one that got folks real mad on twitter lol
Erm? Is this a drawing of an adult doing nsfw stuff with a child? I’m surprised this isn’t flagged or anything
"a child" and it's a hallucination of a girl who died 25 years ago when she was 18 yo.
Well. She died when she was a child? And I didn’t know she was 18 yet. Also hallucinations you can’t physically touch and it looks like she is so I could only assume it was some odd situation. Henceforth why I asked. Kinda odd you’re critical about it. Like it’s better to find out than assume it’s not. Assuming it’s not is honestly how a lot of bad things are allowed to continue. (If you checked the reblogs tho they clarified and I responded)
Bruh you are literally the one who instantly assumed it was nsfw of an adult and a child, then wish someone's art was flagged. You are the one who made an assumption, and a dangerous one. You could have looked it up yourself before making your post. And you should have known it was a hallucination if you actually watched the show. You are just being dumb on purpose because you got caught being wrong.
…. I did watch the show. Yes. I know it was a hallucination. A hallucination of a girl. A girl who hadn’t even graduated high school that could easily be seen as a minor. Also hallucinations shouldn’t be able to be touched. And clearly Shauna is touching Jackie here. Also, Jackie looks pretty afraid here. When in the actual freezer scene Jackie wasn’t afraid and taunting Shauna. Actually shauna was more intimidated in the scene than anything. Jackie’s ‘I’m the most interesting thing about you’ line will forever be iconic in Yellowjackets minds.
I’m not upset I was wrong. If you bothered ti look at the reblogs you’d see they responded and i understood. Your oddly pissed that I was concerned that this might be pedophelia in some way? A disturbing amount honestly. I completely understand that I was wrong and Jackie just barely was an adult in this scene. But??? Literally any other fucking time a person with no context would look at this and most likely assume it’s an adult and a child. Which is something that should be flagged. It is not wrong for me to be worried, nor want something that would hypothetically contain pedO Art flagged. I’m not gonna apologize for asking.
I asked. They clarified. I understood. That was the end of it. You’re the one dragging it out. Honestly you seem more enraged than they were. Like. Again. A very weird amount of enraged. Like, omg! How dare I want to clarify if something that appeared on my dash that kinda looks like minor nsfw stuff is minor nsfw stuff. The audacity of me wanting to make sure it’s not cause if it was then it should 100% be flagged because Adult x Minor stuff is disgusting and should not be something people make art of???? Like. I’d understand your rage if continually harassed them and called them names and reported them even after they clarified. But no? I didn’t do any of that. I
I’m not even upset at the artist or anything. They’re a good artist. You need a chill pill man
Not reading all of that lol. Both actresses are grown women so it doesn’t matter anyway.
? It doesn’t matter if someone posted pedo art or not??? Imagine excusing that just cause the characters were played by adults. Older people play kids all the time on shows. That had no correspondence to the character or the characters age.
I don’t know how you’re missing just about everything I’m saying. I saw the post. Asked. They replied. And I moved on. I’m not gonna apologize for asking. Because if I happened to be right. You would want that flagged. Have a good day
yep, it doesn't matter if the actors are adults. Even if Jackie was a minor I wouldn't care. Because the actress is a grown woman and the art is hot lmao
"The art is hot" that's still a minor, lmao and a grown woman you pred
"A minor" that's a ghost played by a 28 yo woman dipshit
A 28 year old woman who plays the teenage girl portrayed in the image... dipshit
Ok cool, still not a minor. Learn the difference between fiction and reality instead of calling real people predator over a drawing
Idk if you're just genuinely stupid or defending a weird drawing, but that's JACKIE in the photo a minor in a fictional show with SHAUNA, a grown woman in a fictional show too. if YOU, a real person, enjoy this content with a minor engaging in sex with a major, fictional or not, it sounds like pred behaviour to me.
Jackie, who is 18, therefore, not a minor. Also, it is NOT Jackie. It's a hallucination of Jackie that Shauna had. Of course Shauna would hallucinate Jackie the way she remembered her. If you weren't able to deduce the context I'm afraid you're the one who is quite dumb. Also, no, unless an actual child is being preyed on, it's not "pred behavior". Go touch grass.
can yall like… stop beefing on my post
it’s very clear neither of yall will change your point of view on it, which is fine, but there’s no use beating a dead horse and i would rather not have unnecessary arguments in my notifs thank youuuu
