A Critique on Modernization: The Royal Ontario Museum vs The Royal Conservatory of Music.
These two renovation projects are both historical Canadian structures, each is a Royal institute of Ontario, and both share proximate site locations. In spite of that the Architects who modernized these buildings have gone in separate directions with their design solutions creating oppositional pieces of architecture. The two pieces that are explored below were additionally selected for their relationship with their corresponding periodical agenda’s (the publishers typical style of content). The first is the focal article in Canadian Architect entitled ‘Instrumental Composition’ which explored the Royal Conservatory of Music. “Canadian Architect is a magazine for architects and related professionals practicing in Canada – and - has been in (monthly) continuous publication since 1955” (sourced from website). My feeling has been that CA is predominately used for the purpose of documenting architecture and doesn’t often present a bias or opinion on the work. Harmoniously the modernization project for the Royal Conservatory also has a style un-biased and passive. In juxtaposition, the other choice decided was on the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) from Architectural Design’s 4D Social issue, interactive design environments with guest editor Lucy Bullivant. Copied from their site Wiley Academy self describes “Architectural Design, launched in 1930, is an influential and prestigious publication with an almost unrivalled reputation worldwide, consistently at the forefront of cultural thought and design. Time and again it has proved stimulating and provocative – inspiring theoretical, creative and technological advances, and providing space for topical architectural issues in a way that is impossible in other publications” (sourced from sleeve). Published bi-monthly, AD is as stated above provocative and focuses on both design and thought. Thought was key to my selection, it was necessary to me that I compare the ways that design is being not only documented for utilitarian purposes, but to also explore the idea of the project beyond structural elements and materialistic surfacing. In that way architectural theory and writing is constructing the opinions and views of the observer. So below I take the definition of architecture to explore the words used to construct it. What stood out strongest for me was the ‘regard to a specific period, place, or culture’.
1 the art or practice of designing and constructing buildings.
• the style in which a building is designed or constructed, esp. with regard to a specific period, place, or culture : Victorian architecture.
2 the complex or carefully designed structure of something : the chemical architecture of the human brain.
• the conceptual structure and logical organization of a computer or computer-based system : a client/server architecture.
ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: from Latin architectura, from architectus (see architect ).
As already been established there are varying levels of objectivity in the written communication between AD and CA. I personally feel it is important that both these exist for the reasons to document the historic information and also the content of emotion by which we as a society are currently in. Our opinions will inevitably evolve and it is essential that these thoughts also be documented. Information and theory in architecture is a growing element in the design process and as architecture evolves beyond the modernist theories of function it is essential we follow novel avenues.
The article on the Royal Conservatory starts off by providing the historical context of the "century-old Romanesque" building that is being modernized. It provides the reader with all the essential information related to the project including programs, commissioner, project scope, location and architect/designer. Significant information is a consistent template used for the paragraphs to follow. Each paragraph builds from the previous assembling the article in a manner to how one may experience the space. With additional information box’s on the sides of the article provides a directory with information relating to the corresponding images and text. This is very useful in gathering data about the structure along with understanding specific elements of the design throughout the article. The writer uses a high level of architectural knowledge to articulate features of the building to attract educated readers. This presents a mild level of exclusivity to whom may read these stories, which feel adds to the legacy of CA.
However the writer for AD uses an entirely different approach. Opening with a quote: “Toronto can be characterized by a fusion of culture, attitude and a desire to discover and explore. Yet for the past two decades the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) seemed more of a forbidding fortress - the massive stone edifice and blackened windows largely impenetrable - rather than a welcoming institution of experience, knowledge and exploration.” (Sean Stanwick, opening statement) Immediately Stanwick has positioned himself strong and opinionated which reflects both the rest of the article and Libeskind’s renovation itself. He follows up by stating “our perception of the city's cultural grande dame and ultimately the city of Toronto is about to be forever changed - the massive expansion initiative asserts itself as a key protagonist in the city's architectural renaissance.” This not only juxtaposes the way Lam opened his article with direct information but furthermore the way each writer describes the architecture. Stanwick acknowledges how new solutions carry consequences; he does not prescribe their effects. This differs from how Lam lavishly compliments each design phase with terms like ‘masterfully executed addition’ and ‘world-class performance venue’. Despite the fact that most of these statements are companioned with arranged imagery and verbal depictions I tend to be made aware of her feelings above all. Though, through research I found she is thoroughly educated in Architecture starting with her degree at Waterloo, Masters at McGill and PhD at Columbia which makes it a valuable view for the reader.
In the first assignment of academic goals I professed what inspired me to become a designer using a quote from Lady Morgan. “Architecture is the printing-press of all ages, and gives a history of the state of the society in which it was erected”. This to me is were I justify new abstracted structures like Ghery’s Disney Music Hall or Libeskind’s Crystal. In this article, Sean Stanwick reinforces this idea professing 4D experience with the built environment has ability to inspire change. Using a direct quote from an interview, Libeskind states “Architecture at its deepest sense is about creating space that has never been there, and giving people a kind of vista ... as if one would see the city in a very different way through this new space” (interview with the author, June 2006). Before looking at the quotes context, some key words immediately stuck out. These were words Stanwick used early in his text that I felt was a great feature and tool to accord his work directly to Libeskinds words. Additionally I give the author credit because he didn’t re-appropriate a quote to suit his text, but instead had one first hand specially for the article.
In understanding architecture there is a set language through drawings and diagrams, a currency exchanged between designers and architects alike. Here is where Lam provides value to here article. Using a series of elevations, sections, plans and detailed images she quickly expresses the projects style and engineering. Without these images it would be difficult to understand the level of complexity the music conservatory embodies. This is also more then a method for writers, but a tool for keeping a captive audience. As the reader progress’s throughout the article they maybe become inspired. In the current state of society it is much easier to Google images and quick search information about projects so for magazines like Canadian Architect it is important to have additional content that may not be so quickly found online. Unfortunately Stanwick’s article only provided the reader with two images; one of the current construction phase (the article was published before the completion of the ROM) and the other of a larger rendering from above. In defence this article was not about the program of the spaces, the construction methods or even the galleries, it was about the shift in design and the possible effects to emerge from radical solutions.
So in the end these two articles have both positive and negative elements to them. It strongly depends on what the reader is interested in and what kind of project is being analyzed. In this case the legacy of the Royal Ontario Museum is not going to be it’s functional layout and accommodating gallery spaces but instead the structure as a catalyst bringing attention to the museum and additionally depicting the state of our society as a pop-consumerist nation. Stanwick did a great job at presenting how architecture is much more then a structure for human habitation, but a means for form space and create moments. The strong juxtaposition of this would be the Royal Music Conservatory which captures the moment of history when music was a popular cultural art form and creates a nostalgic space where guests are transported back in time. Lam literates this through details of texture and materiality, memory and instants.