art blog(derogatory)

No title available
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin
No title available

No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Claire Keane

Janaina Medeiros

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
ojovivo
almost home
🪼
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Origami Around
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Hungary
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Oman

seen from United States
seen from Colombia
@jumperman-blog
Sucker Punch (2011)
Barely two days since its release, Sucker Punch has already gotten its fair share of criticism and has been labeled as a write-off. As of this writing, the esteemed (depends on who you ask) expert crew of Rotten Tomatoes has given this latest Zack Snyder film (the same guy behind 300, Sin City, Watchmen, and the still-in-production upcoming Superman movie among others) a 20% rating, a further drop from the initial 29% it gave prior to the official debut. It has been described to be, among others, “Alice in Wonderland with machine guns, including dragons, B-25 bombers and brothels” and something out of a 14-year old’s wet dream, filled with scantily-clad chicks and lots of gunpowder. In other words, it has received the disdain usually reserved for the Doomsdays, Glitters, and the other films lounging in Hollywood hell. All that, I had already heard and read even before I decided to catch the flick. But for some reason, the nauseating dose of Hatorade didn’t stop me from watching it. Maybe it was the Emily Browning effect (which first got to me in 2004-2005, when she starred in Lemony Snicket’s), or maybe it was the catchy bad-ass trailer. Whatever it was, I found myself lining up at the nearby cinema along with probably the only four or five other people who decided to give it a puncher’s chance, no pun(ch) intended. I was actually half-expecting to be disappointed, especially when the movie started off with dialogue-less scenes that had already been exposed in the trailer. But as the movie went on, I started to tell myself, “It’s not half-bad”. And sure enough, I got hooked. Thus, the review at hand. I’m not saying that whatever the critics said about the movie aren’t precise or true. Yes, it might not really be a movie you’d tell your friends about to showcase your keen intellect and profound and sophisticated taste in movies. Yes, the film features a trio of giant demon/robot-samurai wielding bazookas and heavy artillery (no kidding!) in a fight against a vertically-challenged girl clad in a high-school uniform armed with only a sword and handgun, stuff that if you admit you enjoy watching would probably suggest to the next guy that you are immature and probably a simpleton, not the type of guy the fine, complex girl in your class would want to date. Yes, the film is fraught with a lot of question marks, loopholes and WTF? moments, not to mention that its plot and story-line wouldn’t exactly put “deep” and so-called “mind-f*cking” films like Inception to shame. What the heck, Twilight might even be more thought-stimulating and would demand more of your attention than this one. Those are all true. But sometimes, a movie doesn’t have to be about stacking up to the high standards set by other films, films which have the Academy Awards and universal acclaim as an ultimate goal. It doesn’t have to be all about whether the technical aspect, the production, or whatever else part of the movie was done in a masterful way, or if the plot is deep enough to drown yourself in. When I watch a movie, it’s the entertainment and wisdom/life-lessons wedged between the lines that determine if I like it enough to watch again or not. Just because the movie is flawed doesn’t mean it’s impossible to sit through and actually enjoy. Sucker Punch makes the grade in those regards, at least for me, and that was enough for me to give it a thumbs up. Admittedly, the thrills and the cheers are generated by the gun- and sword-fighting and the pretty faces of the cast. No argument there, that’s the main draw (and there might even be a chance that people who came for the action would leave the cinema quite disappointed). There really isn’t much to say about the plot and the dialogue. But to say that it doesn’t impart a few life lessons here and there would be an absolute fallacy. I’d like to reiterate, while I did suggest earlier that this film only goes as far as the eye-candy takes it, what really struck a chord with me were the ‘moral lessons’ they threaded succinctly into the dialogue. ‘The Wiseman’ (played by Scott Glenn) might not have been featured as prominently throughout the story as the other characters, but his presence actually cast a looming shadow on the film. He wasn't called a ‘Wiseman’ for nothing, what with the sagacious lines (covered with a toughie facade) in every pep talk to send off the girls to the battlefield. And of course Babydoll, being the main protagonist, is expected to give her share of lessons and underdog inspiration as well. But keep an eye out on the other girls and their different traits, with special mention going to the big-sister figure of the bunch, Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish). Seeing how most of the people on my Facebook page reacted negatively to the movie, I guess we can all just agree to disagree. While I shower it with praise, some other person might think it wasn't’t worth even the price of the popcorn they were munching on. I’m not imposing my positive opinion of the movie to anyone else, the futility in the endeavor of changing another person’s perspective to be in parallel with yours isn’t even worth a try. Haters will hate, fact of life. But I will say that maybe you should give the film a shot. You might see the same good things I did. I won’t assure you that you will definitely be enjoying it, but hopefully you will. I’m not ashamed to say that I learned quite a lot from this movie and it in fact has inspired me to channel my energy to study all the way to my Final exams. My personal assessment: 3.5/5 Stars. (Oh and BTW, when I watched it the 2nd time, it was a full house, a far cry from the 4-6 head count of the previous day. I even heard some people clap when the credits were rolling, and the granny who was seated a few chairs away from me was beside herself with apparent glee.) Quote-worthy Lines: “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.” “Never write a check with your mouth that you can’t cash with your ass.” “For those who fight for it, Life has a flavor that the protected will never know.” “You are afraid. Don’t be. You have all the weapons you need. Now fight.” (There are some other lines I wasn't’t able to catch, in particular the one at the end of the movie when Sweet Pea has a sort of epiphany about life and has an inspiring quote. As soon as I can find them on the net I’ll update this post.)
NBA Finals 2010
It's that time of the year for Hoops-junkies, when the two victors (not necessarily the best teams) from each conference of the premiere basketball league in the world clash in a seven-game series to decide who gets to bring home Larry O'Brien's goods and be crowned world champs. As of this writing, the Boston Celtics have booked the first Finals ticket by dispelling the Orlando Magic 84-96, issuing payback on the very team that had eliminated them a year ago and who went on to represent the East in last year's Finals. They await the winner of the LA-Phoenix series, which as of now the Lakers lead 3-2 after Ron Artest's world record-breaking transformation from goat to hero in Game 5. Since the title reads 'NBA Finals', this blog is a little premature, since we don't really know who the antagonists are yet. What we can do, in the meantime, is picture out the possibilities. But before we go to that, let's first try to break down the Western Conference Finals.
We all have our own picks. Personally, the Suns are my sentimental pick because aside from the fact that everyone loves the underdog, I want to see Steve Nash move one step closer to getting a ring by making his first Finals appearance. He deserves it more than anyone, playing through cheap shots and broken bloody noses and injury-plagued line-ups through the years since he returned to Phoenix. He and the Suns are definitely due, and I believe they can pull it off too. In what was expected to be a series of domination by the bigger Lakers, the Suns flipped the script with their bench's torrid shooting. And the leaders of the team, Amare and Nash, have both risen to the occasion. But still, for now at least, the more logical choice is LA, since they currently hold the series advantage and because in case it goes the full route it'll be played on their home floor, also not to mention that they simply have more heft and height and have that Bryant guy on their team, who is one heck of a player. Notwithstanding that perspective, I refuse to make any clear-cut predictions, at least until a Game 7 is forged. I will say this though: the home team has won all of the games in the series so far, and Phoenix lost that last game on an improbable last-second shot, so it's a safe bet that Nash's guarantee of a Game 6 win will stick and that the series will see its end in LA (emphasis on the 'in').
Now that we have that out of the way, I will now bare my armchair analysis on both possible Finals match-ups. In the scenario of a long-awaited return to the Finals by the Suns, they will prove to be an intriguing match-up against Boston. No one really knows how either team will play against the other, no one's really given it much thought. In the regular season, the Suns swept the season series, first by handing the Celtics their first loss of the season 110-103 (after an impressive 6-0 start to the season by Boston), then by shellacking them again in Phoenix 116-98 (though the Celtics were without KG, Pierce, and Big Baby and Rondo was a little limp that time). But then again, the Magic also went 3-1 against Boston and we all know how that turned out. Either way, that series would prove to be an interesting match-up of teams whose championship hopes almost everyone counted out. The Suns and their run-and-gun play are always entertaining, and it will be fun to see how far such an offensive design can go in the Finals against a team that prides itself on a solid defense anchored by the Big Ticket, Kevin Garnett. They've proven that they can beat the Celtics, albeit in the regular season, and it will be curious to see if that winning formula will sell.
On the other hand, if the Lakers take care of business and make another third straight Finals appearance, we all know how that will turn out. The last two NBA champions, two storied franchises trying to knock each other out in a delayed rematch, what else can you say. The Lakers would be given a chance to redeem their 2008 loss against the Celtics and become the first team to repeat since, well, them back in 2000-2002 when they still had Shaq. The Celtics on the other hand will be out to prove that the KG-Pierce-Allen experiment isn't good for only one championship run, and will try to show that heart and veteran experience are indeed vital ingredients for winning in the NBA. We can throw the regular season stats between those two teams out the window.
So who am I picking? While everyone is saying that the Lakers have it in the bag (presuming they even get out of the West), I beg to differ. Regardless of whether it's going to be Amare and Nash or Kobe and Pau on the opposite end of the floor, I'm going with the Celtics. Even at the start of the season, I always saw 2010 as Boston's year. They were inconsistent during the regular season, as injuries caught up with the team. But in the playoffs, with a complete lineup, they showed that they're still right up there with the best of them. They played 3 quality teams in the playoffs, including the two top-seeded teams in the LEAGUE (not just the East) in the Cavaliers and the Magic. They've shown that they can deal with adversity, bouncing back from blow-out losses and criticism after failing to dispatch the Magic with a 3-0 series lead. It's not to say that the Lakers or the Suns are easy pickings, but even if all the numbers and odds are against them, they have the edge in all the other intangibles, the things that don't appear on the stat sheet. If you don't believe in that stuff, don't forget that they don't have just one player who they rely on for points. Any one player can show up, even Nate Dog who provided a spark in the series-clinching win against Orlando. You might argue that the Lakers will have home court, but the Celtics actually have a better road record than their home record, and they've proven solid against two teams that seem invincible at home in LeBron and the Cavs and D-12 and the Magic. I might be wrong, but make mine Boston in 6.
To show that I'm not a fair-weather (wanna-be) analyst, here are some screen shots of what I've been saying throughout the season.
Jason Derulo - Whatcha Say
Amare Stoudemire is the new Bo Outlaw with his goggles.
Unused Compaq Laptop and Epson Printer For Sale
My landlord is looking to sell the said items before he leaves for the States in December. I don't know the specs or the model/name of the unit, but if you're interested please PM me or reply to the post. Or, if you know anyone who might be, please do refer them to this post. Thanks!
UAAP Finals 2009
Long time no blog, but in keeping with my 'tradition' of writing at least one collegiate basketball blog a year, I shall end the drought.
This year's UAAP Finals pits the defending champs Ateneo against darkhorse UE, and it has proven to be an intriguing matchup. The Blue Eagles are a team whose performance is more often than not gauged and ignited by their execution, while this year's version of the Red Warriors is somewhat akin to the run-and-gun (and fun) Phoenix Suns offense where the dangerous Paul Lee is the catalyst.
Ateneo steamrolled their way through the elims and semis, with UP being their lone 'conqueror' (if you'd like to put it that way), while UE felled the upset axe on projected contender FEU in the Final Four to 'steal' the other Finals slot. I don't know how a team with Elmer Espiritu (I've always been a fan of the guy, you can refer to my previous posts), Pari "Pareng" Llagas, Val Acuna, and Paul Lee flew under the radar the whole season, but that's exactly what happened. Yes, on paper the other teams did look more formidable, and the so-called experts were also quick to mention the fact that the Red Warriors were being piloted by a new Head Coach who was implementing a new 'system' (or lack of it). But when it was all said and done, they entered the Finals on a 8-game winning streak (creaming the 'mighty' Tamaraws in 2 straight, albeit a Tams team missing its top gun, Mark Barroca), second only to Ateneo's 11.
In Game 1, Ateneo, personifying their Blue Eagle moniker, swooped in on the Pulang Mandirigma and raced to an early lead in the 1st Q behind Rabeh Al-Hussaini. It also didn't help the Red side's cause that they were throwing up lots of bricks, so many they could've built a small house on the Araneta floor. The Paul-Lee-off-the-bench move by Lawrence Chongson backfired as they bled for their points, but they bounced back in the 2nd canto and seized the lead at the half. The 3rd saw Jai 'Ho' Reyes bringing out the shotgun and blasting away to go 5 for 5 from 3-point country for the entire 2nd half, crucial in keeping the pesky Pulang Mandirigma at bay. In the end, the Blue Eagles held on behind the Rabeh-lution and Jai Ho to draw first blood, 78-71. Watching the game, I had a gut feeling that while UE lost, it wasn't the end of them, and that they would bounce back. You could see that they didn't let the loss faze them, even if everyone was saying it would be over by Sunday. And boy, was I right.
Game 2 saw a lot more of the Ateneo community come out to watch the game, perhaps in anticipation of a coronation, or a "Back2Black" (or, maybe it was just because it was reported that 'Pepeng' had already steered clear of the Metro, or because it was a weekend). The UE crowd made up only about a third of the Araneta populace, but they were loud and proud, and they were rewarded. Early on, UE was on fire, as Espiritu 'haunted' Ateneo with 3's and sweet fade-aways (eventually finishing with a team-high 22). "Pareng" Llagas also showed up for work, and was a terror in the shaded area at both ends. On the other end, the Blue Eagles, as usual, went to their main man Al-Hu who got ample support from Nonoy "for President"/"Block-lao" Baclao. Jai Ho was off target, as was Eric "The Salute-otorian" Salamat, who so far has been missing in the box score for Ateneo (milk carton of the series award). It was practically an all-UE show, with the Pulang Mandirigma in the driver's seat for most of the way, eventually waylaying the defending champs by 20, 88-68. Highlight of the game award goes to the Lee-to-Espiritu connection, which finally made an appearance in the Finals, stunning the sea of Blue while igniting the Warrior wave.
Noteworthy in Game 2 was that the Blue Eagles had "Polly" Paul Lee in check, emphasized with Baclao and Nico Salva delivering sweet erasures on Lee shots. Lee only had 14, but the rest of the Pulang Mandirigma stepped up in a display of balanced team scoring. This was in contrast to Game 1, where it was only Lee and "Pareng" Llagas who figured in the fray. With that being said, I will note some of the factors to watch out for in Game 3.
For Ateneo to win, the Lee-Llagas-Espiritu threesome must be contained, although that's easier said than done. They should lock down Espiritu (they have Baclao), because while they were able to somehow contain or cushion the blow in Game 2, they really don't have anyone who can stay one-on-one with Lee. Kirk Long is too frail while Bacon Austria is too inagile. Workhorse Llagas will always get his points, so they have to cut off at least one of the heads of the UE Hydra like they did in Game 1. They should also hope Val Acuna or perhaps Lingganay or some of the other UE sparkplugs don't catch fire. Of course, the Blue Eagle 3's should fall. If they try to do the "live and die by the 3" gig like they did in Game 2, hell, make sure you make them! My idea is to try looking for other heroes, as Eman Monfort hasn't been consistent with his shooting (2nd runner-up to Salamat for the milk carton award). Perhaps try Chris Sumalinog? I may be biased, but try observing him in the warm-ups, he can straight-up shoot. Plus, he's a junior now, and he should be getting his shine already in preparation for next year. Also, more importantly, the team should stop whining. The way I saw it, all UE did was play good tough defense. Al-Hu, you're a well-built freaking 6' 7" guy, stop complaining when you get bumped here and there.
As for UE, they should race out to a hot start like they did in Game 2. Their offense is very unpredictable, and if they start shooting the lights out like they did against FEU, I don't know how you can stop that. Not even Ateneo's vaunted defense will be enough (How do you stop something that you can't see? Or don't understand?). They have to play defense as well, that's a given. They can't keep hoping that Jai Ho and Salamat continue to miss and struggle. Kudos to Tagarda, who snuck on Rabeh the crybaby to steal the ball. They should continue waiting for Ateneo to lose composure and capitalize.
With all that being said, this figures to be an all-out war between the two contenders for all the marbles. See you on Thursday!
"Po-li, Po-li, Po-li..." -UE Fans calling for Paul Lee
Who would've thought? It's the UE Pulang Mandirigma vs Ateneo for the Season 72 marbles. The curse of the host school lives on!
"What's the matter Beast?! Too kind and gentle to fight back?!"
The 'be(a)st' line - 0:32
"Sa malas kong ito, minsan sinwerte din ako nang makilala ang taong tulad mo." -Bamboo
Anyone know where I can borrow Dorothy's ruby-red slippers? "There's no place like home, there's no place like home..."
Heard Sisqo's classic song "Incomplete" today, after a long long time of not hearing it. Made me look back to the 'Sisqo's Gay' rumors, which he denies. He better not be gay, it's sickening to think he was singing "Thong Song" while thinking of guys in thongs!
There was nothing wrong with Willie's request to have the Cory burial montage removed while Wowowee was airing, it was actually a good point. People shouldn't take it out of context and judge Willie just because he's Willie.
Recent personal discovery: "California Mountain Snake" (Kill Bill) Daryl Hannah was actually Landon Carter's soft-spoken mom in 'A Walk to Remember'. Talk about totally opposite roles!
'Tayong Dalawa' staff need to brush up on their PERSONS knowledge.
I miss eating lechon manok/baboy, dipped in vinegar-soy sauce-calamansi, with puso. Sigh.