Putting the issue(s) of gender inequality into perspective
Gender inequality has been an especially hot topic for the past couple years. How do we combat issues of sexism in the workplace, or male dominated professions? How do we combat issues of equal pay? How do we allow our women to speak freely in their own society? These are some of the issues that women, the trans community, and even at times men have been trying to counter for decades, and the fight has continued to this day. However, the new generations have been having a hard time putting real issues of gender inequality into perspective.
Today, the fight for gender equality starts with making a TikTok about encouraging women to use their feminine power and sexuality for sex work to take their “power” back, or tweeting that any woman with different opinions about feminism today or critiquing feminism today has internalized misogyny, or completely excluding male characters from stories/films like Mulan because any sign of women liking or confiding in men is completely anti-feminist. All of these “issues” are completely miniscule compared to the real issues at hand…Issues that if given the same amount of time and thought as tiktoks and tweets, would make a great difference for women, non-binary folk, and the trans community, and even men. In Gender Stereotyping in the English Language by Laurel Richardson, the author speaks of how the English language is quite exclusive of women and even feminine pronouns. Richardson makes the personal observation that “Man, then, suggests not humanity but rather male images.”. Yet, I have to disagree. Now, this is only one part of the article I am presenting, there are more examples and arguments presented throughout Richardson’s reading, needless to say I disagree with the piece in its entirety. However, I want to focus on this particular part of the reading since its central message also connects to the argument I want to present. When I think of the phrase “one small step for man, one giant step for mankind” I do not marinate myself in the phrase and think of how ridiculously biased the phrase is, as Richardson herself states in the reading. What comes to mind when reading Richardson’s writing is: I can’t believe this is what we as humans decide to label as an issue, instead of looking at the bigger picture. In early 2020, The New Arab reported that 47.2% of female Muslim workers have experienced religious discrimination in the workplace. In 2019, the Washington Post reported that more than 1 million discrimination complaints have been filed with the government since 2010, and out of those million 930,000 of those cases were closed, and of those 930,000 closed cases 268,660 cases were sex discriminiation cases where only 19% of those cases received relief, and 2% of those cases had a discrimination finding. In The Not-So-Pink Ivory Tower reading by Ann Mullen, Mullen reports that “currently, young, college-educated, full-time working women can expect to earn only 80 percent of the salaries of men, a ratio identical to that of 1995.”, pay inequality has always been one of the biggest issues and discriminations against women in the U.S., yet, instead of taking these heinous statistics into consideration, we as a collective society have decided to focus on more superficial issues like how particular people can find the word “mankind” to be discriminating against women. Yes, everyone is entitled to an opinion, but I find it rather concerning when certain people decide to take “issues” or opinions such as the one stated above, and blow it out of proportion causing it to overshadow the actual political issues at hand. Even if I were to take Richardson’s reading into serious account, what I truly have to say about the issue she has presented is that in order for the issue of stereotyping in the English language to change, people have to change before the language itself. That’s what it really comes down to. The issue shouldn’t be whether or not the word mankind should be abolished because it has the word man in it, therefore the word suggests male image rather than humanity, or that certain professions are automatically given male pronouns. The issue at hand should be how we as a collective society can help folk like the 37 trans and non-gender conforming people who were killed in 2020, or how to help women in situations of DA that have increased during the pandemic.
I think some activists/feminists have lost perspective of what actually is a priority and what’s really not. Again, we’re all humans living in this world so we all have our opinions, but deciding to be offended over the English language, being offended because Mulan had a boyfriend in the 1998 film, being offended because some chick on TikTok had the guts to say that purely relying on looks to fuel your confidence instead of educating yourself is shallow is really setting us back and allowing for all these tiny details to overshadow the big ones that really do need our attention. I thought that this is something I needed to state before getting into other issues I want to write about, because I really do think this is a critical point that not a lot of people make, or maybe are afraid to make in fear they’ll be outed or labeled as someone conservative, but really, being realistic and putting issues into perspective isn’t a bad thing or doesn’t make you conservative, as long as those ideals aren’t hurting anyone.
Rahman, Sami. “Islamophobia is holding Muslim women back in the workplace. Employers should be doing more.” The New Arab. 20 March, 2020. https://english.alaraby.co.uk/features/employers-must-do-more-empower-muslim-women
Jameel, Maryam, and Shapiro, Leslie, and Yerardi, Joe. “More than 1 million employment discrimination complaints have been filed with the government since 2010.” The Washington Post. 28 February, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/business/discrimination-complaint-outcomes/
Glaad. “Statistics about Discrimination Faced by Transgender People”. Glaad.
https://das.ohio.gov/Portals/0/DASDivisions/EqualOpportunity/pdf/EEO%20Academy%20Matrix/GLAAD%20-%20Info.pdf
Mullen, Ann. “The Not-So-Pink Ivory Tower”. The Meaning of Difference, seventh edition, 2016, pp. 411-414. UNM Learn, https://platform.virdocs.com/r/s/0/doc/553769/sp/180858779/mi/575303741?cfi=%2F4%2F4&menu=table-of-contents
Richardson, Laurel. “Gender Stereotyping in the English Language”. he Meaning of Difference, seventh edition, 2016, pp. 444-449. UNM Learn, https://learn.unm.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-7280413-dt-content-rid-63597660_1/courses/65130.202180/Richardson%2C%20Laurel.%20%20Gender%20Stereotyping%20in%20the%20English%20Language.pdf