Process- REFLECTION
Going through the creative problem-solving process so thoroughly was a surprisingly impactful journey for me personally. I’ve always known that the process is multi-step and iterative, but I can’t say I’ve ever given each step it’s due diligence. That said, I don’t believe I would remove any of the steps outlined in this coursework. Our group project evolved in some way or other because of each measured step-- everything from “Accept” to “Evaluate” played a role.
I think the most important step for our group was “Define,” and I think for all future projects this will be the one that I really hone in on. As we moved through the rest of the steps, we continually referenced our definition of the problem to make sure our solutions were appropriate. This step for me is like the thesis of your research paper where each progression towards conclusion has to ladder up to the original, main goal. Being able to clearly define our problem/solution allowed us to focus and be strong in our understanding of the product, making it much easier to support.
The other step in the process that I now know I need to spend much more time in is the “Ideate” phase. I am typically not one to entertain divergent activities while trying to complete a project because to me it feels (or at least it used to) like it was taking too much time and moving us away from the final goal. After this class as well as the residential, I see this as an essential step to improve the quality of the end product or idea.
One self-reminder to improve the “Ideate” phase, but also the whole Creative Problem-Solving Process, in general, is to make sure that I stop trying to analyze and create at that same time. My first instinct is to create an idea and then over analyze it. Instead, I see the merits of making space to continue creating so that new, potentially better iterations are not stifled.











