Kaden

Nature Interpretation

[kcenvs3000s24]

Disclaimer

This blog was created for ENVS*3000, University of Guelph. 

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of the University of Guelph. 

The University of Guelph is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by this blog.

[rmenvs3000f24]

Final Blog Post

The beliefs I bring to nature interpretation are that it is all around us and it is for everyone. Nature interpretation does not just have to be historical reenactments, guided hikes, museum tours, or any traditional in person experience that I had once summed nature interpretation up to. Nature interpretation can be asking your parents why fish live underwater and then explaining it, using an identification app to share the plants you saw on a hike, reading a blurb about the history of an area on a plaque along a trail, and so much more. Due to technology, nature interpretation is more accessible and can be a YouTube video, nature documentaries, animal photography, and so on. As I have learned in this course, it is not currently as accessible as I had thought which can prevent people from experiencing nature interpretation. However, this is not what I mean by nature interpretation is for everyone. I believe there is something in nature interpretation for everyone despite what peaks the most interest or any previous experiences with nature. There is so much to learn and experience from nature that it is truly limitless. Interpretation can be done through history, technology, firsthand experiences, etc. Using what I have learned in this course about making nature interpretation accessible for a wider variety of people, I will adjust my work so that it really can be for everyone.  

As a nature interpreter, we are responsible for sharing our knowledge and our passion for nature in hopes of inspiring others. I want to set an example for children and adults that shows a healthy and strong connection to nature. I believe being in nature is a healing experience for everyone, but more importantly I want people to care about our Earth on a deeper level. When people care about the plants, animals, and other organisms that make up our natural world they will also care about conservation, habitat restoration, and climate change. Global warming gets more serious with every day that passes, and we are faced with increasing ecological issues. Inspiring children to care about nature encourages them to care about these serious issues, hopefully creating a future generation who are vigilant in changing our planet’s fate. I see a lot of nature interpretation targeted to children; however, adults can make changes effective immediately. It is never too late to inspire someone as learning takes place throughout our whole lives. Even if my nature interpretation does not inspire change in future or current generations, I would be perfectly content with just sharing an interesting fact or inciting curiosity in someone young or old. 

I also believe that my job as a nature interpreter is to preserve the natural environment while I carry out my work. There is a fine line of acceptable disturbance to the environment during nature interpretation that should be strictly followed. If I refuse to interact with the surrounding environment during a program, I lose an opportunity for connection between participants and nature. If I disturb the surrounding environment, then I am setting a bad example for how people are supposed to treat their natural surroundings. For example, at my previous nature interpretation job we were not allowed to handle any wild animals for more than 5 minutes, remove items such as plants or fungi from the forest, teach about foraging, or allow visitors to go off trail to explore. However, we were able to pick a small sample of a plant to demonstrate the smell (wintergreen) or interesting properties (jewel weed), carefully pick up small animals such as frogs to discuss the different life cycles, and bring props such as beaver pelts to give a hands on experience in a safe and controlled way. 

This was a 36 pound snapping turtle we were releasing back into the park after an unfourtunate interaction between the turtle and a fishing lure. Luckily he made a speedy recovery and after showing him to some visitors in the area to encourage people to be aware of turtles while fishing, he was set free into his home.

Something I struggle to believe in when it comes to nature interpretation however is the use of captive animals or interfering with wild animals. I would never interfere with wild animals just for the sake of “showing them off” or using them for demonstrations because I believe it is unethical and an ineffective approach to encouraging people to appreciate nature. There are so many resources today that can replace hands on experiences with wild animals as photography and literature about animals is extremely advanced. Zoos are a very controversial topic when it comes to animal rights activists and people with a general love and appreciation for animals. While I do not believe in taking animals from their homes in the wild, I believe interpretation with zoo animals can sometimes be a helpful tool to create deep connections between people and animals. I believe that captive bred animals with their needs fully taken care of can be ethically used in some nature interpretation practices, but I do not think I would ever personally choose to do this. However roadside zoos or corporations such as SeaWorld and Marineland are highly unethical due to their blatant disregard for animal welfare. 

While there are many different approaches suitable for nature interpretation, the approaches most suitable for me would include sharing my firsthand experiences and using demonstrations to peak interest in nature. I have vast experiences with nature from my childhood and from this past summer working immersed in the outdoors. I took on a role that included assisting with a research project searching for endangered turtles. I got to experience parts of nature that most people do not get to see. Using this knowledge, I created several programs about carnivorous plants, wetlands, and reptiles using props and pictures to demonstrate how amazing nature is. I interpret best using a tactile and visual approach because this is how I learn most effectively and therefore can transmit my passion surrounding these subjects. I have previously only interpreted through in person experiences but in the future, I plan to create digital content while interpreting so I can reach a larger audience.  

[kcenvs3000s24]

Hi Rayah!

Your blog post thoughtfully explores the expansive and evolving field of nature interpretation, highlighting the ways in which it can inspire a deeper connection to the natural world. Your belief that nature interpretation is for everyone resonates deeply. By emphasizing diverse approaches—from historical and tactile experiences to technology-driven content like videos and apps—you underscore the inclusivity and adaptability of this field. This perspective is particularly compelling as it acknowledges that interpretation isn't confined to traditional settings but thrives in innovative and accessible formats. 

Your commitment to ensuring nature interpretation remains ethical and environmentally conscious is equally commendable. Striking the delicate balance between fostering engagement and preserving nature's integrity is a challenge that requires mindfulness, and your examples of thoughtful practices—such as brief handling of animals or using non-invasive props—are excellent guidelines for responsible interpretation. 

The discussion on the ethics of using captive animals adds a nuanced layer to your reflections. Your stance—that captive-bred animals with proper care can serve an educational purpose, while practices at exploitative facilities are unacceptable—demonstrates a balanced and thoughtful approach. This ethical consideration enriches your vision of nature interpretation, aligning it with conservation and animal welfare. Your insights reflect a genuine commitment to fostering connections between people and the natural world, offering hope for a more conscientious and connected future.

[amenvs3000f24]

Blog Post 10

While we have discussed an array of factors contributing to effective environmental interpretation this semester, I think the most important aspect is ensuring that interpreters allow everyone to have equal access to nature. There are many aspects that can get between humans and nature, be it financial, physical, or simply time management.

Financial barriers are a factor that many of us may not have considered before our readings in this class. When we think of nature, we see it as one of the few general resources that is accessible to anyone just outside their door. Except one of the most unique aspects of nature is that there is always more to explore. Of course, sitting on a porch and bird watching is one way to interact with nature, as well as going on a hike on a local trail. Yet some may want more! A yearning for adventure and exploration is not something that should be attributed to children, and I believe it is an inherent trait in all of us. As stated by Rodenburg (2019), financial liabilities have dwindled the opportunities for children to be outside in an educative setting from few to nearly none. Opportunities such as field trips are integral to nurturing the sense of adventure and wonder in young children. These trips are also important for families who are unable to provide trips for their children, as they allow for a low-cost adventure with transportation and supervision provided while they are at work throughout the day. I remember one of my favourite field trips as a child was going to a lodge during a very snowy January. We were taught how to snowshoe through the thick layer of snow that was on the ground and trekked all throughout the forests and fields on the property. I remember seeing a field of long grass with a deer that got up and jumped away when it heard the group of kids come by and being told that they liked to stay warm by sleeping close to the ground in the grass!

In addition to financial barriers, I believe that how busy we are in our daily lives makes getting out and enjoying nature a chore for some people. As we get older and begin working, we become engrossed in our daily lives and start to get used to our routines. If someone is supposed to get up early enough to get their children up and ready in the morning, take them to daycare or school, go to work, come home and make dinner, and then put their kids to sleep, where could they possibly find time to enjoy nature? This doesn’t only apply to parents with young kids either. I think we are engrained to think that we simply never have enough time! When our society is built around the absolute need to gain financial capital, it in intertwined into our daily lives, both through the week and on weekends. While it may be easy for us to consider nature a simple resource that is available all around us, many people may see things differently. Every activity needs to be learned, even the simplest activities like hiking or IDing plants takes time to warm up to. People may see this as time that they simply don’t find themselves having!

Finally, the accessibility of interpreting nature is something I had yet to consider before taking this course. One of my favourite chapters was chapter 7, which touched on the diverse array of audiences that interpreters should familiarize themselves with, and how to communicate effectively with them. One of the most beautiful things about nature is the fact that it can potentially be experienced by anyone, and interpreters have the gift to make that happen. The first step in understanding your audience is knowing why they’ve chosen to participate in nature programs to therefore understand the proportion of those who do not (Beck et al, 2018). This is particularly important for audiences who are underserved by interpreters, due to economic, cultural, and communicative barriers (Beck et al, 2018), and it is the responsibility of the interpreter to identify these barriers and tackle them to the best of their abilities. The full enjoyment of nature should be offered by interpreters, especially to those with disabilities that may hinder the enjoyment of traditional interpretation techniques. Offering accessible alternatives for those with mental or physical disabilities is vital for interpreters to serve a diverse audience, especially in a learning environment.

As we begin to wrap up the course, I think I have had a great opportunity to develop my own personal insight on communicating nature in a way that is stimulating, nuanced, and inclusive. I believe it is the responsibility of interpreters to ensure that the information they offer can reach the widest audience possible, including those who initially may shy from the outdoors and natural history. I feel that my beliefs regarding natural history and our environment have greatly broadened as I’ve moved through this course, and the most important aspect that I would emphasize as an interpreter is the ability to communicate what is important to the communities that I am speaking for. Interpreters have the responsibility to speak of the historical significance of many landforms and sites. To accurately represent the communities we speak of, I believe it is important to integrate as many first-hand experiences as possible. When we are unable to offer first-hand experiences, brainstorming with those belonging to marginalized communities and ensuring their stories are heard accurately is extremely important, especially when it comes down to us!

Sources:

Knudson, L.B.T.T.C.D. M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore Publishing LLC. https://sagamore.vitalsource.com/books/9781571678669

Rodenburg, J. (2019, June 17). Why environmental educators shouldn’t give up hope. | CLEARING: PNW Journal of Environmental Education in the Pacific Northwest. Retrieved November 17, 2024, from https://clearingmagazine.org/archives/14300

[kcenvs3000s24]

Hi Amelia!  

Your blog post eloquently discussed the need for inclusivity and accessibility to be integral parts of environmental interpretation. Financial, temporal, and physical barriers are important to discuss in great detail, with a deep sense regarding the issues people have with attempting to connect with nature. These unnoticed barriers suggest a multilayered dimension in making natural experiences accessible and learnable for all.

This emphasis on financial barriers carries a special poignancy when it involves children. Programs such as the field trips are invaluable not only in developing curiosity and adventure but also for filling gaps that perhaps a family could not provide for their children. I enjoyed your anecdote about snowshoeing—it was such a powerful example of this type of opportunity and how it leaves a lifelong impression even after just one interaction in nature. Your exploration of time management challenges is equally compelling. Society is often structured in a manner that emphasizes productivity at the expense of leisure, leaving little time for people to reconnect with nature. A less obvious but insidious kind of access barrier is the realization that time is required for the development of such activities as hiking or plant identification skills. It is an access barrier interpreters must keep in mind when creating programs.

The emphasis on accessibility for diverse audiences, particularly those with disabilities, is critical. I like how your reference to Chapter 7 incorporates insights in how to understand and engage underserved audiences. Indeed, interpreters are in a special position to reduce barriers for equitable access in the beauty and lessons of nature. Lastly, your insistence upon weaving in experiences and coalition-building with people from the margins face is enriching to the general Greater Good of interpretation. Representation matters, and your vision for the amplification of voices and perspectives align with core values inherent in environmental education. Your insights are a great foundation to base inclusive, impactful interpretation on.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Growing Into My Ethic as a Nature Interpreter

Image: me (2024). Myself (& Casper the Barn Owl) assisting with interpretation for my job with Wye Marsh this summer.

My approach to nature interpretation draws from a broad network of mentors, teachers, guides, and friends. It is humbling to think of the threads that weave through my understanding of conservation and storytelling. It is influenced by the ecosystems I have immersed myself in and the communities I hope to inspire. My ethic as a nature interpreter is a living, evolving philosophy—a blend of intellectual curiosity, personal identity, and deep-seated responsibility to the natural world. Some threads come from my formal education—earning a diploma in Ecosystem Management from Fleming College instilled a technical understanding of ecological systems and their management. Others come from lived experience: volunteering with the Canadian Conservation Corps introduced me to community-driven conservation initiatives, while the Askari Wilderness Conservation Program in South Africa expanded my worldview by exposing me to global conservation challenges and solutions. Yet the deepest learning has often been less formal, emerging in quiet conversations on hikes or during shared moments of awe in a forest. These interactions taught me the importance of humility, listening, and fostering connection. They align with the textbooks emphasis on the collaborative and relational nature of interpretation. My ethic is not something I built alone—it is the culmination of shared experiences, collective struggles, and mutual hopes for the future.

As an interpreter, I see myself as a bridge between the natural world and those who experience it. This role comes with immense responsibility. Conservation is not simply about preserving ecosystems; it’s about inspiring others to value them. It is my duty to make nature feel tangible, urgent, and deeply personal to my audience. I am tasked with sparking curiosity, building emotional connections, and leaving people with a sense of empowerment to take action. At the heart of this ethic is the recognition that nature interpretation is inherently about people as much as it is about the environment. I believe strongly in the need to honour Indigenous knowledge and practices, particularly in Canada, where Indigenous communities have stewarded this land for millennia. Learning from Indigenous approaches to ecology has taught me the importance of interconnection, reciprocity, and respect—values that I strive to incorporate into every program I lead. Furthermore, as a queer individual, I feel a responsibility to represent and advocate for diversity in the environmental field. Nature belongs to everyone, but not everyone feels equally welcome in natural spaces. I aim to create safe, inclusive experiences that encourage people of all backgrounds to see themselves as part of the conservation movement. My responsibility extends beyond education; it encompasses creating spaces where people can feel both a deep connection to the environment and a sense of belonging within the environmental community.

My personal struggles with traditional education have shaped how I approach nature interpretation. The classroom was rarely where I felt most inspired or engaged. It was out in the world—kayaking through marshes, rock climbing against rugged cliffs, or sleeping under stars—that I found learning transformative. These experiences taught me that nature education thrives when it is hands-on, adventurous, and connected to lived experience. To inspire others, I incorporate these elements into my interpretation style. Whether leading a canoe trip or guiding a hike, I aim to create programs that are not only informative but also exhilarating. I believe in meeting people where their curiosity lies, blending environmental education with activities that ignite their sense of wonder. The textbook talks about the power of interpretive storytelling to make facts meaningful and memorable (Knudson et al., 2018). For me, this means weaving environmental lessons into the fabric of the experiences themselves. By grounding education in tangible, visceral moments, I hope to make it resonate long after the experience ends.

I am aware of the privilege that has allowed me to build such a close relationship with nature. Not everyone has the same access to wilderness spaces, and barriers such as cost, location, and systemic discrimination often limit who feels welcome in outdoor activities. Recognizing this privilege motivates me to advocate for greater equity and inclusion in the environmental field. I could address this by designing programs that are accessible and welcoming to diverse audiences. This means not only lowering physical and financial barriers but also being thoughtful about representation and storytelling. Nature interpretation should celebrate the diverse ways in which people connect to the environment, from Indigenous traditions to urban gardening movements. By highlighting these stories, I hope to show that conservation is not the domain of a select few but a shared responsibility and opportunity for all. As a queer person, I also reflect on the relationship between queerness and nature. For many, nature has historically been a refuge—a place of freedom, self-discovery, and solace. This resonates deeply with me, and I strive to honour this connection in my work. I want to encourage others in the community to see themselves reflected in environmental narratives and to feel empowered to engage in conservation. Representation matters, not only in who tells the story but in how the story is told.

When I think about my audience, I envision them as co-creators of the interpretive experience. My time with them is limited, but my goal is to make it impactful. Whether leading a school group through an urban park or guiding adults on a wilderness trek, I aim to leave participants with not only knowledge but a sense of connection and responsibility. I want them to leave with more than memories—I want them to leave with questions, passions, and ideas to explore further. This philosophy ties back to the textbook’s assertion that effective interpretation must resonate on both intellectual and emotional levels. Facts alone are not enough; the heart must be engaged (Knudson et al., 2018). By sharing stories, creating interactive experiences, and encouraging reflection, I hope to kindle a spark that continues to burn.

As I develop as a nature interpreter, my ethic is a work in progress—something that grows and shifts with each new experience. At its core, it is driven by a desire to connect people to the natural world and to each other. It is shaped by the mentors who have guided me, the communities I serve, and my own identity as a conservationist. It is a commitment to equity, inclusion, and the transformative power of nature. Ultimately, my ethic is about hope: hope that by sharing my love for the environment, I can inspire others to protect it. Hope that through education and connection, we can build a more inclusive, sustainable future. 

—

Knudson, L.B.T.T.C.D. M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore Publishing LLC. https://sagamore.vitalsource.com/books/9781571678669

[kcenvs3000s24]

Ecosystem Engineers

Photo credit: myself (2023). Juvenile Loxodonta africana- Hoedspruit, South Africa

There are some animals that have minimal impact on their surroundings, and there are some, whose habitats adapt entire ecosystems. These animals are often called ecosystem engineers, and can have enormous impacts on landscapes. Think about beavers here in Ontario, building dams that turn streams into wetlands. The beaver fells trees and obstructs streams, which slows the flow of the water. After building the dam, the pond starts to take shape, and it eventually forms wetlands that support life in all its richness. Beaver wetlands are also commonly thought of as biodiversity hotspots, where fish, amphibians, birds, and plants thrive in these wet environments (Baker & Hill, 2003). The standing water they provide helps to recharge groundwater and reduces flooding further downstream, impacts far beyond their immediate area surrounding their dams. Basically, beaver ponds serve as a natural water filter. While running through their dams, sediments settle out, and the pollutants get caught. Improvement of water quality downstream is observed. This has had an impact on the water systems through which beaver is able to show its ability in shaping 'landscapes' for the benefit of the whole ecosystem, ranging from microorganisms down to microscopic organisms (Naiman et al., 1988).

Where some people regard beavers for their home improvements, other ecosystem engineers, such as elephants, can be more controversial. When I was in South Africa, it was a big challenge to control the movement of elephants between reserves. Some reserves did not want elephants as they were prioritising their trees and other vegetation. The reserves that did have elephants were visibly trampled. While this is often viewed as devastation by the African tourism and reserve industry,  elephants have a critical role in their savannah ecosystems. By knocking over trees, elephants prevent wooded areas from taking over the grasslands. They maintain open landscapes upon which many species rely for life. This gives more light to the ground and attracts grasses that feed herbivores like zebras and antelopes. Strong predators benefit in turn from abundant prey. Additionally, trails made by elephants through thick vegetation set natural pathways that other animals will use. Waterholes, formed by the involvement of elephants digging into dry riverbeds during droughts, give lifesaving sources of water to smaller animals. So, it looks really destructive, but in reality, it maintains a balance, soils the ecosystem, and makes it diverse and resilient (Pringle, 2006).

A less known example of an ecosystem engineer that I like, is the prairie dog. They are small rodents native to the grasslands of North America. Through their instinctive digging, they create extensive burrow systems that alter soil aeration and water infiltration. These burrows offer a refuge for a large variety of other species, including burrowing owls, snakes, and insects. These prairie dog colonies have been known to increase plant diversity since their grazing habits do not allow any particular species of plants to become dominant in the area where they are located (Bangert & Slobodchikoff, 2006). 

Ecosystem engineers remind us that in nature, complexity is essential: each population contributes to a grand balance that allows life to thrive across habitats. 

Next time you observe an animal, I encourage you to reflect on the ripple effects of their presence. These aren’t just animals going about their routines; they’re vital builders of nature’s resilience. Their presence underscores how interconnected life is, with each species playing a unique role in sustaining the diverse environments we all depend on.

—

Baker, B. W., & Hill, E. P. (2003). Beavers (Castor canadensis). In Wild mammals of North America: Biology, management, and conservation (2nd ed., pp. 288-310). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.sierraforestlegacy.org/Resources/Conservation/SierraNevadaWildlife/North%20American%20Beaver/Beaver-Baker%20and%20Hill%20Beaver%20Chapter%202003.pdf

Bangert, R. K., & Slobodchikoff, C. N. (2006). Conservation of prairie dog ecosystem engineering. Journal of Arid Environments, 67(1), 100-107. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/envncon/4/

Naiman, R. J., Johnston, C. A., & Kelley, J. C. (1988). Alteration of North American streams by beaver. Bioscience, 38(11), 753-762. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-abstract/38/11/753/294302

Pringle, R.M., (2006). Elephants as agents of habitat creation for small vertebrates at the patch scale. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7(7), 510–523 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18376543/

[kcenvs3000s24]

Where is music in nature? Where is nature in music?

Photo of young Barn Swallows by me (July, 2024). Photographing was for conservation and monitoring purposes only

From the melodious songs of birds to the thunderous crash of rock slides, elements of our natural world carry sounds that create a rich, interconnected symphony. These sounds link us to nature, yet how they’re perceived varies widely across species. For humans, sound is closely tied to emotion and memory, often bringing forth powerful feelings or nostalgic reflections (Juslin & Västfjäll, 2008). But for animals, sound—and what we might think of as “music”—is often experienced in intriguingly different ways. Reflecting on the idea of nature’s “music” invites us to explore these differences, offering fresh insights into how both humans and animals connect with the natural world around them.

Imagine a forest alive with a diversity of sounds—the whisper of trees swaying in the wind, birds calling to one another, and the babble of a nearby stream. Together, these create a soothing natural orchestra, full of meaning for us. For birds, however, this soundscape serves a different purpose. With their keen hearing, birds distinguish individual calls and subtle changes in pitch and tone that we might miss (Wright et al., 2010). They interpret these sounds as signals—warnings, invitations, or territorial claims. For birds, nature’s “music” is not merely relaxing; it’s vital for survival and communication. This adds a fascinating layer to the soundscapes we share.

Harmony is essential in shaping how humans emotionally respond to music. Major and minor keys tap into a broad range of feelings, making music a potent tool for expression and healing, creating emotional bridges between us, others, and our environment (Thompson et al., 2013). Yet, animals interpret sound in ways that stretch beyond human comprehension. Elephants, for instance, communicate across vast distances using infrasonic frequencies that our ears cannot detect (O'Connell-Rodwell et al., 2000). Bats and dolphins, meanwhile, use echolocation to navigate their surroundings, experiencing sound as a vital connection to their environment.

Each sound and echo offers information about food, terrain, and other creatures, showing the diverse meanings “music” holds for different animals. Understanding these differences expands our knowledge of animal communication and perception, providing a foundation for learning. Activities like analyzing recorded bird songs or comparing them to music inspired by nature can help us appreciate how humans translate natural sounds into music, deepening our sense of the intricate bond between sound and life.

Reflecting on the interconnections between music and nature encourages us to rethink how sound shapes our world. When we take time to truly listen, our connection to nature deepens, enriched by the way sound weaves together human and animal experiences.

—-

References Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293

O'Connell-Rodwell, C. E., Wells, R. S., & Ristau, C. (2000). Elephants can detect infrasonic calls from neighbors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(3), 1349-1353. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1284180

Thompson, W. F., Graham, P., & Duffy, K. (2013). Music and emotion: Theory and research. In Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 41-71). Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263963905_Handbook_of_Music_and_Emotion_Theory_Research_Applications

Wright, T. F., McKinnon, E. A., & McCormick, S. (2010). Birdsong as an evolutionary model. BioScience, 60(8), 683-691. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.5

[kcenvs3000s24]

Integrity of Past, Present, and Future

Photograph by me, (May 2023). Bay of Exploits, Newfoundland

“There is no peculiar merit in ancient things, but there is merit in integrity, and integrity entails the keeping together of the parts of any whole, and if these parts are scattered throughout time, then the maintenance of integrity entails a knowledge, a memory, of ancient things. …. To think, feel or act as though the past is done with, is equivalent to believing that a railway station through which our train has just passed, only existed for as long as our train was in it.”  (Edward Hyams, Chapter 7, The Gifts of Interpretation)

We live in a world that encourages constant forward motion—pursuing progress, new experiences, and leaving the past behind. But as Edward Hyams points out, there’s no inherent value in something just because it’s old. The real value lies in integrity—keeping the parts of a whole together across time, where the past continues to shape the present and future. This idea is beautifully illustrated in nature, where nothing is ever truly lost, and the past constantly feeds into what comes next. Take a forest, for example. The trees are ancient, their roots intertwined with countless generations of life. The forest floor is layered with fallen branches and decaying leaves, where what was once alive now nourishes the next cycle of growth. This forest isn’t just alive in the moment we experience it—it is a living record of time, each layer of growth and decay a testament to seasons long gone. Hyams’ metaphor of a railway station captures this perfectly. Just because we pass through a place doesn’t mean it disappears when we leave. Nature, too, continues its story regardless of our presence. The trees in a forest are connected to their past, shaped by years of change, growth, and death. The soil beneath is rich with nutrients created by centuries of fallen leaves and decaying matter. In nature, everything is connected, and each part of its history feeds into its future. 

This reminds me of an aesthetic I love portrayed in media (such as: The Last of Us series): nature that has been given the space to reclaim the human-made world. In this future, the remnants of our built environments don't simply vanish. Instead, they’d be absorbed into nature’s cycles, slowly becoming part of an ecosystem that had once been paved over and pushed aside. Think of skyscrapers and highways overrun by greenery, with trees breaking through concrete and vines creeping up the sides of once gleaming glass towers. Crumbling buildings would eventually give shelter to wildlife, while grasses and wildflowers would break through the cracks in city streets. In this imagined future, human structures would become part of a new landscape, layered with history but alive with new life. This vision ties directly to Hyams’ idea of integrity. Even if human life moved on, the places we once inhabited would continue to exist and transform. They would be part of a living cycle, just as the decaying leaves of a forest floor nourish new plants. The cities we once built wouldn’t simply disappear, but they would evolve, folded into the ecosystem, with nature’s processes of decay, renewal, and rebirth taking over. What we left behind would not be erased, but absorbed into the natural order, much like the way a forest recycles everything that falls to its floor.

In a future where nature could eventually reclaim human spaces, the past would not be forgotten. Instead, it would become part of the continuous process of renewal that is always happening in nature. The ruins of our civilization would be like ancient trees in a forest—evidence of what came before, but also vital components of what is growing now. The future wouldn’t be about starting fresh, but about integrating the past in ways that allow for new growth, just as nature has always done. Hyams’ reflection on integrity offers a powerful perspective on both nature and our own lives. We tend to think of the past as something to move beyond, but in reality, it is always part of us. Just as nature builds on its history to create a thriving ecosystem, our future is built on the foundation of our past. Nothing is truly lost. In nature—and in life—the future is about maintaining the integrity of the whole, where the past, present, and future are interconnected, constantly nourishing each other. Integrity of Past, Present, and Future

[kcenvs3000s24]

Inspiring Environmental Action in a World on fire

Photograph by me (June 2023), I was living in Montreal at the time. Due to wild fires, had the worst air quality in the world (228 AQI).

I have always been interested in weather patterns and natural disasters. As I currently track Hurricane Milton, the second storm to hit the southern U.S. badly within a couple of weeks; it's hard to ignore the growing list of catastrophic natural events this year (NASA, 2024).  While you and I may have known this was coming for a while, to the average person it’s becoming impossible to ignore the urgency of climate change. It’s no longer a distant threat but a present reality. From wildfires to floods, heatwaves to droughts, people around the world are feeling the impacts (Vernick, 2024). As a result many people, even some in the environmental field are starting to believe the situation is beyond repair, while others are paralyzed by eco-anxiety, unsure of what to do. This defeatist mindset is something we, in the environmental field, must confront. Climate change is an enormous challenge, but we cannot fall hopeless. Instead, we must ask: How can we inspire meaningful action in a world overwhelmed by this crisis? And how can we, as future environmental professionals, rise to meet it with practical solutions?

We must recognize that we have the knowledge and tools to drive change. We are, or will be, the advocates, scientists, policymakers, and innovators. With this expertise comes responsibility, not just to understand the problem but to actively contribute to solving it. Education and awareness are critical: we need to communicate climate science clearly, helping people understand factors that affect the environment. An important aspect of this I have dealt with while interpreting, is climate change deniers. Instead of arguing or dismissing their views outright, we need to engage them with respect. Focus on the overwhelming scientific evidence, and relate the issue to personal values like health, safety, and economic well-being. Find common ground by highlighting how sustainable practices can benefit communities, improve jobs, or reduce pollution. Patience and empathy can go a long way in shifting perspectives over time.

Beyond education, policy reform is essential. Individual actions matter, but structural changes are needed to address the root causes of climate change. We must advocate for policies supporting renewable energy, reducing emissions, and protecting biodiversity. Environmental justice is also critical, as marginalized communities often face the greatest impacts of climate change. Community engagement is vital too, real change often starts locally. We need to collaborate with communities to help them adapt, support grassroots conservation efforts, and promote sustainable practices. We must look out for ourselves and each other. Eco-anxiety is so valid, seeing the damage from one disaster after another is hard, and confronting the climate crisis can feel like fighting a losing battle. Building resilience: both in our ecosystems and within ourselves, is essential for long-term progress.While it may seem like the world is on fire, we are not powerless. By educating ourselves and others, pushing for policy change,  driving innovation, and engaging with communities, we can make real progress. The climate crisis is a defining challenge of our time, and as environmental professionals, we are uniquely positioned to lead the charge in building a sustainable and hopeful future.

—

Vernick, D. (2024, October 2). *Is climate change increasing the risk of disasters?* World Wildlife Fund. https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/is-climate-change-increasing-the-risk-of-disasters

NASA Earth Science & Remote Sensing Unit. (2024). *International disaster charter activations*. NASA. https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/esrs/Disasters/ShowIDCTracking.pl

[raenvs3000f24]

Blog 4: Who are you to interpret nature through art? How do you interpret “the gift of beauty”? (Your readings – specifically Chapter 5 of the textbook – will be helpful for this!)

We as humans always have a tendency to express our emotions, feelings and perceptions (interpretation). They can be expressed by either speech, body language, and art. When we discuss regarding perceptions being expressed by art, it is usally found to be very under rated in comparison to speech and body language. Just because speech and body language are more easily understood to the public rather then art. Many of my friends at high school specially did not like to draw or analyze art just because they found it irrelevant. Although I always spoke about the benefits of art to them as being a great tool for self expressing our perceptions on any given thing. Once my friends actually implemented the performance of art in their life, they actually agreed with me that art does have a great place in expressing our perceptual interpretations. This is why I make the case that art can depict interpretations in a more convenient manner in comparison to speech and body language. Alluding to the emphasis of art in comparison to nature interpretation, the course textbook of ENVS3000 states “there is a natural connection between the arts and interpretation of our culture and landscape”. This makes the case that there is indeed a big connection between our art work and interpretation of nature.

As the course textbook of ENVS3000 alludes to art being counted among the tools of interpretation. When I analyze the photo above, I can easily notice that there are red trees and mix color shades of water. This can be there to reflect the mood of the artist in comparison to the rest of the picture (light red shades and grey shades of color depicting the pond). This is where I can easily reflect upon this art work as showing us that the world is very lively after a rainfal has taken place. This is just one of the many countless examples of art work I can analyze just by looking at the color and style of the art work.

The gift of beauty for me is everything that artwork has to provide in terms of it’s affectionate nature. Art is a very beautiful thing which humans do not give much credit for. In terms of interpretation, art is like a gift for us in which we can interpret our feelings in a more convenient manner. As the textbook says “Interpretive programming extends beyond walks, talks, and evening campfire programs”, this alludes to the fact that art work also has a big place in terms of the interpretive world. And what is the best place for a person to witness art? It is definitely art museams! Whereas the textbook mentions that art museums can play a role in interpretive philosophy in which art can typically interpret itself. This typically gives a lot of credit to art museums as bring a great place of interpretive agenda. We are totally blessed to have art in our life, art has also been proven to cure depression in many people because of the effect color has on giving joy to the mind, which is just another reason to why it’s beautiful.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Thanks for sharing! This post brings up a crucial point about how art is often overlooked as a powerful tool for interpretation, especially compared to speech and body language. I completely agree with your argument that art has unique potential to convey emotions, perceptions, and ideas in ways that other forms of communication cannot. While speech and body language are more immediate and accessible, they often lack the depth and nuance that a painting could provide. Art offers a more layered experience, inviting viewers to engage emotionally and intellectually, which makes it a highly effective medium for interpretation.

Your example about your high school friends is relatable and reinforces the idea that people often dismiss art because it seems abstract or irrelevant. However, once they engage with it, they realize its potential to communicate in ways that words alone cannot. This is particularly important in nature interpretation, where emotions and personal connections play a huge role in how we relate to the environment. Art can bridge that gap, offering visitors a way to experience nature on a more visceral level. I also appreciate your reflection on how colour and style in artwork can mirror natural processes, like rainfall, and how that can influence our emotional responses. Art has the power to interpret the natural world in ways that inspire and uplift, making it an invaluable tool for interpretation.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Who am I to interpret nature through art?

As a kid I spent a lot of time at summer camps or scouts gatherings where we would watch theatrical tellings of stories,  around a campfire that transformed animals, trees, and rivers into characters with emotions, struggles, and personalities. These campfire tales weren’t merely for entertainment; they were a way to bring the wild into focus, to make nature relatable and, in many ways, magical. Storytelling and theatre brought nature to life in a manner that allowed us to experience it emotionally, not just visually. As Beck et al. (2018) point out in their work on the intersection of art and interpretation, stories can weave human emotion into the natural world, making it more accessible and meaningful. 

Interpreting nature through art is, in many ways, about building a bridge between knowledge and emotion. Scientific facts alone cannot fully capture the beauty of a landscape or the elegance of a plant’s structure. What brings nature alive is the emotional response it evokes; like a sense of peace, wonder, or awe. Creative expression, whether through storytelling or visual arts, allows us to convey those feelings. Art, in this way, becomes a tool for interpretation that helps us connect with nature on a deeper level.

In college I was often in the field, tasked with identifying various plants, fungi, geological formations, etc. I was encouraged by mentors to draw them, not only to further break down the structure of the subject, but also to sit still and quietly connect with nature. Sketching required stillness, patience, and deep observation. As Beck et al. (2018) argue, visual arts can encourage a more deliberate interaction with the natural world. Those sketches went from being simple drawings to study from to an expression of my relationship with nature.

I interpret the gift of beauty in nature as both generous and fleeting. Nature doesn’t just gift us with awe-inspiring landscapes, vibrant ecosystems, and intricate life forms, it also gifted the very materials we use to capture and interpret its essence. The canvas, the brush, the ink, the colours —all of it comes from nature, a reflection of the world's interconnectedness. Every piece of art we create is, in a sense, nature interpreting itself through our hands. Yet, inherent in this gift is the understanding that nature has the power to take everything away. This balance reminds us that there is beauty in the temporary, urging us to appreciate each moment we have with it. In recognizing the gift, we also accept the responsibility to cherish and protect it, knowing that nature’s offerings are not just temporary but irreplaceable.

—

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore Publishing LLC. https://sagamore.vitalsource.com/books/978157167866

[sacenvs3000f24]

Extra Post - The Coyote "Problem"

The content covered in Unit 03 reminded me of an ongoing debate that seems to arise every Spring/Summer season across many cities in Ontario… What to do about coyotes encroaching on urban areas?

Every year there are reports of people walking their dogs in ravines and forested areas, particularly in Toronto’s west-end, and getting attacked by either individual coyotes, or even large groups of them (Maharaj, 2024). It’s an issue that doesn’t seem to be going away, since I remember us dealing with this public uproar 3 years ago when I was working at the Toronto Wildlife Centre (TWC) as a wildlife rehabilitation intern. Back then there was a similar news story which went viral, with the only differences being that it was a child out walking and the size of the dog being much smaller – the attack was nearly fatal that time (CBC News, 2021). Working in the veterinary field, I’ve been asked countless times about this topic from concerned pet owners, and I’ve also seen first-hand the gruesome injuries caused by these attacks when they roll through the door into our emergency department. Despite having an immense amount of compassion for pet owners in these situations, my combined experience from working directly with sick and injured coyotes at TWC results in my opinion on the matter being something that many owners don’t want to hear… Which is that these animals have lived on this land for thousands of years before we decided to build cities and homes right in the middle of their habitat. If we are hearing reports of these attacks increasing in frequency every year – why are not taking some responsibility in the decisions we make to put ourselves, our children, and our pets directly in harm’s way by choosing to walk our dogs in heavily forest areas and secluded ravines where we know coyotes have been reported? Why are we taking this risk?

The Precautionary Principle refers to the idea that “prevention is wiser and less costly than repairing damage” (Hooykaas, 2024). This is a direct reflection of my own opinions regarding the possible solutions to this issue – I believe that increasing public/community education efforts to learn about these animals and how we can safely co-exist with them is key. There are many concrete steps we can take such as cracking down on people feeding wildlife in their backyards and promoting garbage storage solutions that actively deter wildlife. In addition to teaching people what to do when they encounter coyotes: make yourself appear as large and loud as possible, being assertive and yelling, waving, shining flashlights, and even throwing things at them if needed to scare them off (Maharaj, 2024). It doesn’t seem responsible to me for us to take extreme measures that the fearful public often propose such as mass extermination or removal, especially if it means disrupting local ecosystems that could have lasting consequences on urban biodiversity. These fear-based responses, in my opinion, is the result of the privilege that many of us have in relation to nature – we expect that our needs, desires, and safety should be placed above that of any other plant or animal. Which begs the question – are the coyotes really the problem here?

---

CBC News. (2021, July 26). Coyote sightings, fatal dog attacks up in Toronto this year. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-coyote-sightings-increased-1.6116929.

Hooykaas, A. (2024). Unit 03: Risk versus Reward in Interpretation. CourseLink. https://courselink.uoguelph.ca/d2l/le/content/898489/viewContent/3863605/View.

Maharaj, S. (2024, July 10). ‘We have a problem:’ Ontario man recounts his beloved dog being in grips of coyote. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/10613861/toronto-man-recounts-coyote-attack-dog/.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Hi Sophie! I love the perspective shared in this additional post, especially when considering the privilege we often unknowingly exercise in relation to nature. As a society, we have a tendency to prioritize our comfort and safety over the natural order, often forgetting that we’ve encroached on spaces that were not originally ours. The reality is that coyotes, like many other wildlife species, were here long before our cities expanded into their habitats. Yet, we often frame their presence as an intrusion, rather than acknowledging that we are the ones who have built over their homes.

It’s easy to get caught up in fear when we hear about attacks on pets or children, and these incidents are undeniably disturbing. But as you’ve pointed out, our responses are often driven by fear rather than understanding. We act as though we are entitled to safety in any environment, forgetting that we share this space with countless other species, all of whom play vital roles in maintaining our ecosystem.

The concept of privilege doesn’t just apply to social or economic contexts—it extends through our relationship with the environment. We need to shift from seeing coyotes as a problem to be eradicated to recognizing them as part of the ecosystem we benefit from. By taking responsibility for our choices, educating ourselves, and promoting coexistence, we can find solutions that respect both our safety and the rightful place of wildlife.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Privilege in Nature Interpretation

Privilege shapes the way we navigate the world, influencing our opportunities, freedoms, and experiences. It refers to the unearned advantages or resources we possess by virtue of our identity, often invisible to those who hold them. This concept, famously described by Peggy McIntosh as an “invisible backpack” filled with unrecognized assets, highlights how certain individuals move through life with tools that others lack.

In the context of nature interpretation, privilege dictates who has access to outdoor spaces, who feels safe in them, and whose stories and perspectives are centered in environmental conversations. The ability to access and engage with nature is not distributed equally across society. Privilege manifests in the simple fact that some people have the freedom to explore nature without barriers, while others face significant obstacles. For example, growing up with easy access to parks, the financial means to participate in outdoor activities, or living in areas with minimally dangerous wildlife. 

Reflecting on my own experiences, I can see how privilege has shaped my relationship with the natural world. Having access to natural spaces within walking distance of my home, having the means to take trips for the sole purpose of nature and the freedom to roam without fear. However as a queer person there have been times when outdoor spaces and nature programs have been unwelcoming, highlighting how privilege intersects with other aspects of identity. It’s through acknowledging both the privileges I’ve enjoyed and the challenges I’ve faced that in the position of a nature interpreter I can begin to understand the complex dynamics guests may experience with nature and myself. 

Historically, privilege has shaped the environmental field in ways that exclude certain communities. For instance, discriminatory policies have long kept communities of colour out of outdoor spaces, contributing to a lack of representation in the environmental movement today. This lack of diversity extends to nature interpretation, where the voices and stories of marginalized groups; particularly Indigenous peoples, are often left out. In Canada, much of the land where nature interpretation occurs is Indigenous land, yet colonialism disrupted the deep, long-standing relationship Indigenous communities had with these environments. Recognizing the role privilege plays in whose stories are told and whose knowledge is valued is crucial if we aim to create a more inclusive approach to nature interpretation.

Privilege also plays a significant role in the systemic issues that affect nature interpretation on a broader scale. For many low-income individuals, the financial costs associated with nature; whether for transportation, gear, or park entrance fees- are very restricting. Additionally, the proximity of green spaces is often a luxury, particularly in urban areas where marginalized communities may not have access to parks or wilderness areas. Privilege, therefore, not only affects who can engage with nature but also who can afford to immerse themselves fully in these experiences.

An inclusive model of nature interpretation requires acknowledging privilege and actively working to dismantle the barriers it creates. This includes amplifying the voices of marginalized communities, such as Indigenous peoples, and incorporating their traditional ecological knowledge into mainstream environmental narratives. By doing so, we honour the original stewards of the land and create a more holistic and inclusive approach to understanding nature.

Ultimately, privilege shapes not only who can access nature but also whose stories and perspectives are centered in nature interpretation. To create a more inclusive and accurate representation of the natural world, we must recognize and address these disparities. This means expanding leadership roles in the environmental field to include underrepresented groups, ensuring that nature interpretation reflects the diverse experiences of all communities, and fostering environments where everyone feels welcome and respected. Nature, in its essence, belongs to everyone, but for too long, privilege has restricted who gets to fully engage with it. By confronting privilege head-on, we can create a future where nature interpretation is inclusive, accessible, and reflective of all.

[krenvs3000f24]

Blog post 2

My ideal role as an environmental interpreter would involve creating a deeper connection with nature and people while educating them on environmental sustainability and protection methods. This role would entail critical responsibilities such as explaining the importance and historical context of the environment. Depending on where this interpreter works, the process of engaging the audience and the level of information they would need to provide will be determined. Despite children having shorter attention spans, I believe they could grasp the same amount of information as adults listening to a podcast. Still, the method of delivery would have to be catered to a younger audience. This could be done by explaining various ecosystems and what wildlife lives in the environment instead of going into extreme detail about certain plant species. 

Not everyone can be an environmental interpreter. To truly engage the audience, an interpreter must be experienced and have extensive ecological knowledge to foster deeper connections with the audience and the nature they are learning about. I would prefer to be an interpreter in the outdoors rather than through an online delivery method so that I can be encased in what I am learning about and deepen my learning through an experience rather than trying to visualize it in my head. Alongside being outdoors, I need to broaden my communication skills to get all points across to the audience while ensuring the terminology being used is understandable and simple enough. Ideally, I would love to take my audience on actual hikes where I’d have the routes memorized and be able to point out various aspects of the environment, for example, pointing out species that are being heavily affected by climate change and methods of preserving the respective species or being able to tell the history of the hiking trail. This would help me engage the audience by giving them things they can relate to. 

As an interpreter working outdoors, I’d stress the importance of respecting the wildlife’s habitat, as we would not want to harm or scare the animals we encounter. Alongside the animals we encounter, just in general, being respectful to the environment would be one of the key takeaways I’d aim for the audience to leave with, as this will help create new habits for people that do go out in public and litter or pick things off of plants without knowing if any harm is being caused to them. As an interpreter, I help the audience foster a deeper appreciation for the environment. By pointing things out and advising against things such as littering, I can help create a more significant environmental impact. I do not have any preference on what kind of trails I take my audience on. Ideally, it would be a path that I have taken before or somewhere I could do some research before engaging with the audience to create the best possible presentation for them.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Great post Krishna!

I completely agree with the importance of teaching environmental sustainability, especially through the role of an environmental interpreter. Educating people on the intricacies of nature is vital in fostering a connection between individuals and the environment, helping them realize how their actions impact the world around them. As you mentioned, it’s important to tailor the message to the audience; whether it's simplifying complex ecological concepts for children or highlighting pressing issues like climate change to adults.

Outdoor learning is an excellent method for deepening this connection. By taking people on hikes or immersing them in the environment, you allow them to experience firsthand the beauty and fragility of ecosystems. This hands-on approach not only enhances learning but also helps instill a sense of responsibility. It’s crucial to emphasize respect for wildlife and the broader environment, as even small actions, like littering or picking plants, can have significant consequences.

I also appreciate your focus on making the content accessible through clear communication and relatable examples. When people can see and understand the real-world impacts of their behaviors, they are more likely to develop habits that promote environmental sustainability. Interpreters like yourself play a key role in driving this change, helping to cultivate a generation that values and protects the natural world.

[kcenvs3000s24]

My Ideal Environmental Interpreter Role

My ideal role as an environmental interpreter would be to lead small groups on immersive hiking or paddling expeditions into remote natural settings. This wouldn’t be a scripted or pre-planned tour focused on a single theme, timeline, or precise destination. Instead, it would be more spontaneous, rooted in what we encounter as we move through the landscape, and can be catered to what the group is drawn towards. If a particular plant catches someone's interest, we might stop to identify it, discussing its role in the ecosystem, its medicinal uses, or how it's affected by climate change. Coming across an animal in its habitat, we could quietly observe, learning about its behaviour, its connections in the food chain, and how it interactively exists with the surrounding environment. Through this kind of spontaneous exploration, participants would gain a deeper understanding of the interconnections within ecosystems without viewing ourselves as a disconnected component. 

For such a role, a wide range of skills would be necessary. First and foremost, a high level of physical fitness, outdoor survival, navigation and wilderness first aid skills would be required to lead groups across difficult terrains and ensure safety for all participants within different situations. All participants in the group would also be required to meet a standard physical ability: to carry their own gear, live without modern amenities and would likely have some outdoor experience.  I would also need to build a deep understanding of local history, terrain, climate, flora and fauna; as the only backup resources would be field guides and maps. 

Strong interpersonal skills are crucial not only for teaching but for fostering a collaborative and welcoming environment. I would need to explain ecological concepts and involve the group by using close up or direct examples and observations. I would encourage the group to look for information in field guides and from their own observational skills to identify plants, animals, or geological features. This will help the group feel more confident in being able to explore on their own. There is also additional focus on creating a sense of community within the group, fostering open dialogue and shared experiences, where participants learn not just from me but also from each other. This approach would help deepen their connection to the natural world while strongly promoting teamwork, mutual respect, personal reflection and growth. 

The ideal setting for this kind of work could be in any protected natural areas of the world: national parks, wildlife reserves, or remote wilderness regions. These locations provide a wealth of biodiversity and ecological processes that serve as living classrooms. Ultimately, the goal would be to create transformative experiences like I've gotten to experience on expeditions: led by amazing mentors and creating strong bonds with the people and places around you. Striving to leave participants with lasting memories, new outlooks on nature and a desire to engage in environmental stewardship in their own lives.

[tlvenvs3000f24]

Unit 1 blog: Describe your current relationship with nature. How has this developed/evolved? Who offered you “a sense of place,” as described in our textbook?

My current relationship with nature is very positive I have always loved nature since I was young. I mostly associated nature to vacation with my family – so time away from the busy city and a time for relaxation. Everyone was happy when we were camping, and we would get to swim and go on hikes. Having all these positive core memories in nature is what sparked my interest in it and I do not think I would be where I am now without those vacations from a young age. Having nature only associated to positive memories from such a young age gave me a sense of place in it as I’ve experienced part of my own story in it, as well as have learned about it through different experiences.

Another major element in my relationship with nature is that I grew up in Toronto which is a big city full of cars and noise and buildings, the neighbourhood I grew up in was away from all that but it was still side walks and gray, I remember associating nature with colour and the city with grey and cloudy. I believe this place of peace with nature along with my interest in science in high school is what lead me to where I am today in wildlife biology and conservation program.

After starting school in a program largely based on nature I now know much more about nature, and at the beginning of my undergrad I think it affected my relationship with nature a little as I heard a lot about it and it was in an academic context which made me forget to also take it in for reasons other than for school, but once I started having courses where we actually get to go the field my interests grew and I got to enjoy nature more and also find pleasure in nature in the context of school.

Along with starting school in Guelph I got to live in a completely new city where there is more nature in proximity, so this helped me experience nature more regularly which I really benefit from as there is more places to go and enjoy the outdoors. It also made me discover more nature reserves in the area and more greenspaces in Toronto which I hadn’t know about before – because although Toronto is a big city, I do believe that there are a few nice green spaces within the city.

Although I do not think I am always out in nature enough, I have always enjoyed it and felt refreshed after experiencing it. I find it easy to find a sense of place in nature.

[kcenvs3000s24]

Hi Théa!

Great post, I can really relate to your experience, especially as I’m also in the wildlife biology and conservation program. Growing up in a big city, like you, nature often felt far away. Outdoor spaces were mostly parks tucked between busy streets and grey sidewalks. Wilderness always seemed like something you had to travel to experience – a break from the routine rather than part of daily life. For me, nature was tied to those rare family trips out of the city, and those moments felt like a breath of fresh air, a chance to escape and recharge.

Since starting in the environmental field, I’ve developed a deeper understanding of nature – not just from lectures or textbooks, but by getting out into the field. That hands-on experience has shifted my perspective, reminding me to not always view nature through an academic lens, but to also appreciate it for the simple joy it brings. Spending time outdoors now feels like a way to reconnect, to balance the pressures of school, and find peace. Nature has gone from being an occasional escape to a place of grounding and relaxation. I hope you can also take the time this semester to relax in nature.

[kcenvs3000s24]

My Relationship with Nature

My relationship with nature is one rooted in respect, humility, and curiosity. I’ve always known that no matter how much I learn about nature, there will be an endless amount that I don’t know, especially as it continuously adapts and evolves in ways we can’t always predict. This understanding has shaped how I approach the natural world- not something to control or to fully comprehend, but as something to continuously learn from, appreciate, and help where I can. This concept inspires me to stay open to new experiences and knowledge, while reinforcing my commitment to conservation.

I’ve been working in the environmental field for three years, but my love for nature began long before that. Growing up, I was very exposed to being outdoors. My family often took us hiking, fishing, and on camping trips. I was also part of groups like Scouts and Earth Rangers. However my passion became more focused on ecology during my education at Fleming College, where I completed the Ecosystem Management program, introducing me to the intricate science that exists within natural environments and how every organism plays a role in maintaining that balance.

I have been fortunate to work in a variety of environmental branches that have allowed me to interact closely with nature. From park services to animal rehabilitation and environmental stewardship, every role has provided me with a deeper understanding of how humans and nature can (though often don't) coexist. In parks, I learned about land management and how crucial it is to preserve natural spaces for future generations, specifically through an Indigenous perspective. My time in animal rehabilitation and land stewardship taught me about the delicate relationships between wildlife and their habitats, and how human activity disrupts these bonds. This disruption can even include human involvement in conservation. It requires constant reflection and adjustment to ensure that efforts to protect one aspect of nature don’t inadvertently harm another.

Some of my most profound experiences that shaped my relationship with nature and offered a ‘sense of place’ was my time volunteering; with the Canadian Conservation Corps and the Askari Wilderness Conservation Program in South Africa. These programs gave me incredible opportunities to engage in hands-on land and animal conservation in tight knit groups- stemming from all different backgrounds with one common goal. They also introduced me to the power of interpretation and environmental education. In South Africa, I worked alongside local conservationists, and witnessed how community-based education and interpretation were vital in addressing issues like poaching and habitat destruction. The more people understood the value of the ecosystems they were living within, the more motivated they became to protect them. This experience profoundly shaped my thinking about conservation, making me more aware that the future of environmental protection depends not only on scientific knowledge but also how we communicate our knowledge. Sharing information and creating connections between people and nature through various forms of guiding, education, art, and storytelling are essential to inspiring others to take action.