I guess it's appropriate that I'm doing these two together, as they are both a personal favorite. The Graffigna is a 2007 Cabernet Savignon, and A Game of Thrones is, well...it's a Game of Thrones. As a side note, a started drinking Graffigna because it comes from San Juan, as opposed to most Argentinian reds (which usually come from Mendoza). I prefer wines from San Juan because I've been there, and I have some good friends in the industry there. That put aside, this is a very good red. It's smooth, yet robust. I know that sounds kinda trite, but it is simply delicious. I'm not a sommelier, so I can't tell you what sort of undertones there are, but they're good. If you're not big on wine, I have an analogy that will make it a little better. A merlot is kinda like a hammer, where a Cab is sort of like a sword. Graffigna would be like a good sword, perhaps a sword of Valyrian steel? (See that transition, where I went from talking about wine to talking about a book?)
As much as I like this wine, I'd have to say I like this book better. It was truly a joy to read. I'm not going to pretend that I started reading the books on my own though. I'm a bandwagon fan, to be sure. I saw the show and I figured the general rule of book adaptation applied. Namely that whenever something is adapted from a book, the book is always better. Since the HBO series was excellent, I figured that the book would be exemplary. I wasn't disappointed. I'll try to have any spoilers, since some people are still discovering this series for the first time. As good as the show is, there are some things that are left out. For all the Harry Potter fans out there, it's a lot like the relationship between the books and the movies. The movies are great on their own, and they stay true to the source material. However there are some things that simply get cut due to time constraints. I'd say the same thing happened with A Game of Thrones and it's similarly titled TV adaptation. The show is wonderful, but there are a few details that get lost. Those details are what gives the book a level of richness that are missed in the show. Like the three-eyed crow. I saw the show and I thought "What's all this then?" It was a bit confusing. In the books though, the crow is more fully explained. The only complaint that I have with the whole series is that the narrative structure becomes a little transparent after awhile. I say this after reading all four of the released books of the "A Song of Ice and Fire" septology in the space of a week. I just realized that there are seven books, and the southron god (or God?) in the book has seven facets. Fascinating! (Alliteration!) Anyway you start to notice that all the bad things that will happen to POV characters happens mid-story. By the end of the each book (and each season of the show I guess?) things are going pretty well for each main character. Then at the end there's some huge cliffhanger which leaves the audience spoiling for more. It's a good strategy, and it's wildly effective. I saw it coming, and I'm still waiting with bated breath for "A Dance With Dragons", which is purportedly coming out mid-July. I haven't been this wrapped up in a series since I got into the "Ender's Game" series, which is about the highest praise I can give. As far as the complexity of the flavor goes, I'd put the story at "Above Average". It's not as "out-there" as China Mieville's books are, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Sometimes you want sushi, and sometimes you want a steak. "A Game of Thrones" is like a steak, it's thick, satisfying, and juicy. And after you finish it, you'll be looking forward to the next one. Plus if you want to stay current with the Geek-chic, you need to read it. PvP did an entire week dedicated to "A Game of Thones" jokes, so if that's not reason enough I don't know what is.