My world

My little corner of the world with things that catch my eye. Asks, only, are open. Messaging for mutual. No, I won't change it.

[tklishbunnie]

made this banner hehe

[europeanmanclassic]

[madison--ava--jones]

[frankensteinsm2-deactivated2024]

A Patreon commission

[shadesofsoylu]

[kittykatsplaytime]

(via mfm-stuff, mfm-stuff)

[ballerinababygirl]

😻 Xx 😘

[sometimes-ima-gentleman]

[curvycanadianxxx]

Mmmmm pound my tight little pussy baby 🥵💦😈

[give-me-moree]

[sweetnsassy49]

Absolutely!!

[confessionsofacheatingwife]

That’s when you know the connection is good & the sex will be mind blowing

[kittykatsplaytime]

It is a curse and a blessing... And occasionally used as toeture. 😂😈

[lavender-scorpio-deactivated202]

“Reminder that submissive and masochist are not interchangeable, nor are dominant and sadist”

Can you speak more to this? I don’t quite get it.

People often conflate submissive and masochist, and dominant and sadist. They’re all separate kink identities. Sometimes there can be overlap, but they don’t mean the same thing. Dominant and submissive mean the participants enjoy power exchange, while sadist and masochist mean the participants enjoy either giving or receiving consensual pain 

And it’s not always submissive and masochists and dominants and sadists. Some subs enjoy giving pain (sadists), some doms enjoy receiving it (masochists). And sometimes subs and doms don’t like playing with pain at all. Sadists and masochists can also just not be interested in power exchange at all, just pain

Also, some people are switches so they enjoy either side of a power dynamic, and some people are sadomasochists so they enjoy both giving and receiving pain

For instance, I’m a submissive and a masochist, so I enjoy being on the receiving end of a power dynamic and I enjoy receiving pain in a consensual setting, but they’re not the same identity

[katsdom]

This is a superb answer and explanation. I'll add one more related thought, from my own observations. Masochism comes from multiple roots and takes multiple forms. For some masochists, pain is sexually arousing. For others, it fills a psycho-emotional need and is not sexual at all. And there can be overlap between those and one individual can move back and forth between the two depending on circumstances. It's not a sharp divide. Finally, there are submissives who are NOT masochists but who love a sadist so much that they are genuinely happy to accept pain in order to meet their sadist's needs. They can look like a masochist in that they find pleasure in accepting pain but it's not the pain itself giving them pleasure, it's the knowledge they are pleasing their sadist.

[goodgirlsdoresearch-deactivated]

I wanted to add a point in case anyone out there is dealing with an inability to actively engage their masochism, or submission, or any other part of your identity:

These posts talk about the fluidity and conflation of labels; that submissive and masochist are not the same, that masochism can be about pleasure from pain or pleasure from giving a sadist what they need...

This also applies to the level to which you can enact your masochism. Pain thresholds are unique and can ebb and flow, and the amount of pain you can take at any given point doesn't make anyone more or less of a masochist.

As someone with a chronic pain disorder, I am still a masochist even if my body is unable to receive a spanking. I am still submissive even if I have an inability to kneel. I am all of the labels I choose for myself, regardless of my level of ability to manifest them.

[kittykatsplaytime]

☝️☝️☝️

[masterxdanx]

[kittykatsplaytime]

(via mfm-stuff, mfm-stuff)

[kittykatsplaytime]

Does anyone else not reblog things because someone said something cringe when they did, and now you can't remove?

[thirdevee]

Get you a girl

Who you can take to Disney World and she gets all excited for the magic

But also gags on your dick in her Minnie Mouse ears back at the resort.

[kittykatsplaytime]

👋