Broke College Student Oasis

Welcome to my Hobbit Hole I Multifandom I They/Them I 24 | 🏳️‍🌈

[my-flying-sister]

I love rebloging. It’s the adult equivalent of showing everyone the cool rock I just found.

[the-dandy-liar]

[barblaz-arts]

Pick up lines

[pricklyhawthorn]

Never deny her cuddles.

[yenvengerberg]

#michaela: i know what you are francesca... autistic

[alicent-florent]

duuuuuuh John keep up 🙄🙄🙄🙄

[r-eady-4-u]

Cuteness overload

Well aren't you spoiled guys, two post in one day and it's fluff... I accept gifts, cards, video games money 🫴

*with no time limits. Eh told yall I can't escape mistakes

Didn't know what to draw and my mind kept drifting towards a specific fanfic and - well it got out of hands. But I couldn't help myself they were so freaking cute.

@northwindready I don't know if I should thank you for the fluff ideas, or hate you for giving too much fluff. How am I supposed to write angst fanfiction now.☹️

Velvette when Verella outsmarted her:

[allsortsofthingsmpov]

💔

TikTok - Make Your Day

[shipsa-hoy]

Everybody needs to see this

[sillygoosery46-deactivated20260]

and when the franchaela season drops i better not see no hypermasculinization of micheala that woman is femmed down and i will take no argument ill assume ur racist and cant handle soft black women

[daggersandarrows]

you know, the more i think about it, the angrier i get about how mainstream media and even people in general treated marie kondo when the life changing magic of tidying up got big. it's just so unnecessary and sad to me and i think the vast majority of people would love what she has to say if they just actually looked into it instead of maliciously memeing her to death? i'm not talking about the cutesy does it spark joy stuff but all the things portraying her as some bizarre evil cleaning dictator.

i actually read her book when i was about twelve years old, in the most shocking and probably only example of me ever being ahead of a trend, and even at twelve i really loved everything she said. at that point in time i lived in fear of my mother's threats that she would come and throw everything away while i was school, and my small and very adhd mind simply could not grasp the concept of "have less stuff". have less of WHICH stuff? how? i'd never actually been taught how to clean my room besides being told "pick up stuff" and "be organized", and as she points out multiple times, cleaning is not an intuitive thing. it's a learned behavior and skill.

anyways. her entire philosophy centers on surrounding yourself with things that you love, and only things that you love (or things that you absolutely need). she explicitly says over and over again that it is not about throwing things away, it is not about minimalism, it is not about "what is the smallest amount possible that you can survive on". she literally has a whole section where she talks about how hard it can be to throw things away when you've lived in poverty all your life and you don't have absolute confidence that you can replace something that you really needed if it gets thrown out, even though you're not likely to ever really need it--you've just been conditioned to think that because that's literally how you survive, when you're poor. she talks about how that mindset can serve and how it can damage. she talks about how minimalism is sort of a rich people thing, cause they can afford to throw everything away.

this woman really came out here and said "i want you to be surrounded by things you love and i'm going to validate your fears and your difficulties in getting to that place" and people somehow got mad at her. i don't understand it

[stevishabitat]

👆👆👆

[fandomsandfeminism]

The idea of hers that helped me the most was one of the more...shinto-y ones.

That we are the caretakers of the objects we keep and have an obligation to not only care for them, but also to *use them for their purpose.*

If you don't wear that jacket, no matter how cute it is, it is a disservice to let it rot away in your closet. Let it go on to be worn by someone else. It's not that you didn't love it enough- it's that you love it enough to let it serve its purpose, even if it's not with you.

And I think that's very freeing. It helped me, at least, with the guilt of letting go of "still usable" objects that I just wasn't using.

[butterflywordsmith]

Love how all Benedict had to do was mention the word "love" with regard to Sophie and Violet activated like a sleeper agent to help make it happen.

[hadesisqueer]

When you're an ally to the LGBTQ and you both marry a queer Bridgerton sibling

[lawful-good-lesbian]

i know that there is some period accurate homophobia and misogyny in bridgerton but it is so so meaningful that john, michaela’s cousin and best friend, KNEW about michaela being a lesbian. not only that, he accepted it and did his damn hardest to actively protect her in a society where women only had value in marriages to men. additionally, with john being the earl, he is likely the main source of michaela’s financial support and gladly allowed her to be herself and didn’t try to force her into the marriage mart. in fact, i think the only time we see john angry is when fran tried to set michaela up with a suitor.

john and michaela truly the doomed cousins/surrogate siblings of all time

[barblaz-arts]

Mind you, I used to hate drawing kisses

(full image below. CW sexual content)

[hadesisqueer]

John assuring Francesca that there is nothing wrong with her, and that what they already have is perfect. John speaking against introducing Michaela to male suitors because he knows she is a lesbian and he supports her. The last time we see John being him staring at both Michaela and Francesca hanging out, happy that they have each other now. The man of all time.

[barblaz-arts]

Charlie coping in between S2 Ep 5 and Ep 6

[guesswedoinghazbinhotelnow]

I love her