The first scene of the movie isn’t a scene at all – it’s a black screen with a simple dictionary definition in a boring font for the word pulp. It has two meanings but when I think of how the two meanings can relate to one another, I think on the deeper level. The first definition has to do with how pulp is a shapeless mass of matter, and the second is a book or something vibrant but written on something unfinished and rough. They’re both able to be beautiful things yet seen as not (shapeless, rough). Since the title is “Pulp Fiction” I assume it will be more regarding the second definition about a book or magazine, but if both are listed, both are most likely to be intended and important.
Now into the actual movie, the camera is set at the angle meeting with the table at a diner. We’re able to see the entire conversation these two characters are having at a level below them, able to see their every move. The lighting is also significant since it is so light outside and so dark inside, showing a large contrast on the people’s faces. This can be seen in a deeper light as good and evil, especially since the topic of conversation is robbing places. The movement of the camera doesn’t much change –the viewer is an outsider – until they begin the hold up and it is tilted upwards to the people with all of the control with the gun.
The title sequence begins and fun, exciting music that the Black Eyed Peas will once sample begins to play and you get a feeling that the movie is going to have a lot of action – perhaps following these two people robbing places across the country. The title itself is large across the screen but fades into nothingness as the important roles are listed, maybe showing that the characters are more important than the movie ideas itself? Just as the music supervisor is on screen, the music statics out and “Jungle Boogie” begins to play; a different, more funk inspired song that is continued into the car of the next scene with two different characters.
In the car, their faces are seen very close up as they speak on about something so meaningless – burgers – only to enter a new scene with guns as though we’re sitting in the trunk of their car. They’re above us, more powerful, and are acting as though dealing with guns is no big deal – black guns, black suits – against the bright blue sky. The viewer seems to always be a step ahead of the characters (we know where they’re going next), wherever they end up and are able to view them from the side, never knowing we’re there, especially when we view them from the top of the empty room, giving the thought that no one else is there. While in the elevator, the rule of thirds comes into play with the rectangle background and the two men standing right between the lines.
There is a lot of contrast within the movie; the black suits against the white walls, the intense jobs versus their nonchalant conversations, the characters themselves, the depth of field compared to hearing their conversations as they walk away. The characters walk in and out of the door frame, and also in and out of the actual frame, keeping us moving and changing scenes. The door is shut in the viewers face, only to flash us into the room (the scene changes are not smooth, something also contrasting) and there are two men sitting below the stronger men in black suits. Faces are often a close up, in focus showing expression and when the character is speaking; when the man had the monologue from a part of the bible, it created more contrast since he was committing sin shortly after (where the picture then zoomed out to both men in suits shooting the man sitting).
Scenes have changed, and there are new characters introduced yet again. I’ve noticed color in this movie: yellows, reds, tans, they’re in every scene. Blood, heat, passion – this can represent a lot. Marcellus’ face hasn’t been shown yet, but he’s been in focus for the majority of his monologue, color and contrast returning with the background and lighting of other characters.
Scenes change with a black fade and the next scene is bright and white – and now regarding cocaine. More contrast. The cocaine is close up as he’s placing in the bag, etc., there are a lot of close ups while other conversations and things are going on, as though we’re not supposed to be seeing everything. The entire drug scenes are focused on the car while the road is hazy like the driver is seeing. Things are zoomed, trippy, and the music is also jazzier. Now he’s arrived at his destination and the letter is zoomed in to show its importance; he then magically enters the house as though it’s futuristic, and then her having a loud speaker throughout the house also represents this all-knowing, powerful figure, along with her red lipstick. Her face isn’t shown until they’re in the car (which uses the rule of thirds). She’s somehow magical, even a rectangle appears when she draws it – putting the fiction in pulp fiction. In the restaurant they’ve chosen to go to, everything is fake as well adding to that – but what also is notable is the ‘bloody’ burgers they’ll be having, as well as the same table seen but this time the camera isn’t below the table.
Fast forward and they’re now in the dealer’s home; the camera is shaky as the scene is shaky and the life of Marcellus’ is shaky as well. It’s interesting that there is so much chaos going on, yet the camera is focused on the corner of a wall – the viewer is calm beside hearing the yelling, observing all that is going on.
I think this movie has many beautiful scenes; it’s kind of like any screenshot can be taken and it would be able to be analyzed – so thoughtfully carried on. What doesn’t really seem as important as all of the video shots taken are the words the characters say. Just like mentioned in the movie “it’s all bullshit, trying to cover up uncomfortable silence,” and that’s just what the characters are doing, carrying on about tomatoes, the past, burgers, anything to eliminate something uncomfortable. Eliminating uncomfortable scenes in this movie is a theme as well seeing as people are killed to make things uncomfortable. All in all, I get a “The Stranger” feeling about this movie and have an existential crisis. Pulp is simply a soft, wet, shapeless mass of material, just like us as humans.