Lionel Messi, they could never make me hate you
Phantogram Three
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

roma★
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

izzy's playlists!
Doug Jones
🪼
Interview Vampire Daily
Noah Kahan
Fai_Ryy
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

Love Begins

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms

Kiana Khansmith
cherry valley forever
𓃗
seen from United States
seen from Panama

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Mexico
seen from Vietnam
seen from Vietnam
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Costa Rica
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
@lachemisenoire
Lionel Messi, they could never make me hate you
The Rose Field would have been 110% better without Malcolm Polstead. A dull Gary Stu that hung around Lyra's narrative like a dead albatross and who was so clearly Pullman's self-insert. Cut all that bloat out and there would have been far more time for a better and more holistic ending. Where tf was his editor?
Was David Shore going through a divorce or something in Season 4? Because it's disgustingly misogynistic, House went from being a nuanced anti-hero to an edgy Gary Stu without any internal struggles, and Cuddy has become a spineless sex doll who giggles and lets him get away with everything
The 2000s really were something else
I am almost sure that Amber was created as a stand in for an ex of Shore or something
Also I miss the original trio
Also since I'm in a mood today
I really wonder if there's a way of redeeming Sharon Carter and walking back this Power Broker mess. But something tells me they're going to use this Avengers Secret Wars soft reboot to fix all the characters and storylines they fucked up.
I still get randomly annoyed that Sawyer and Kate never ended up together allllll these years later.
"but their relationship was based on lust and sex" no it wasn't, stfu :(
People claiming the Tortoise Media podcast was behind a paywall and refusing to believe Neil Gaiman's victims, while immediately believing the Vulture article that actually is behind a paywall, is absolutely wild.
Obviously he's guilty as sin but the mental gymnastics that occurred when the story first broke out were insane to witness.
My theory: Neil Gaiman only responded to the accusations now because legacy media (The Vulture) reported on it.
He was likely banking on Tortoise Media – a lesser-known platform – being discredited and ignored by the public and major publications because it wasn’t well known.
I’ll never forget how supposedly left-leading, progressive users here on Tumblr began spreading disinformation about Tortoise being a TERF platform (not true) and the podcast being behind a paywall (not true) and it being some kind of TERF op (also not true).
It’s one thing to be sceptical of someone like Rachel Johnson being involved – another thing entirely to act like a right-winger and simply go on what you’re read on social media and act like reactionaries instead of doing your due diligence and looking at the facts yourself.
The way that people outright ignored Paul Caruana Galizia’s involvement and journalism was downright insulting.
Terry Pratchett wrote one book with Neil Gaiman that came out in 1990.
Before and after which he wrote a total of 41 Discworld novels.
I don't think one streaming show on Amazon being cancelled is going to ruin his legacy 🙄
I think we've reached a certain level of maturity as a society to have learned that we need to stop putting artists on a certain moral pedestal.
Just because they create amazing stories, music, or art that resonates with us doesn't mean that they are good people in real life. For them, spinning stories is the easiest thing in the world. It's their job!
Enjoy their art, admire their talent. But don't hold them up as a sort of moral beacon. Look for heroes amongst your friends and family - people you know and trust.
Idea: sell one Neil Gaiman book you're willing to part with and use the money to buy Paul Caruana Galizia's book, "A Death in Malta".
Read about one of the bravest women you'll ever learn about
What kills me is all this deep analysis of Tortoise Media's reporting and how "problematic" and "shoddy" it is. Suddenly everyone's become an expert in investigative journalism.
I hope to see this level of scrutiny the next time a piece like this comes out with allegations against a famous man, regardless of the platform 🤔
I highly doubt that there's any piece of reporting out there that's not a least bit flawed in some way. And while I don't like Rachel Johnson either, the fact is that we can't control who sources seek out for help, nor whom they approach. And sometimes, the truth is just the truth.
Let's get the facts straight about Tortoise Media
It's NOT a TERF or right-wing platform.
Please be careful about this because Neil Gaiman's PR and legal counsel (should he eventually need to hire counsel) will be 100% using this bullshit description as part of his defence.
Information about the investigators from from Splice Today:
"The investigators. The Slow Newscast belongs to an outfit called Tortoise Media. The lead presenter for the series is Rachel Johnson, a journalist who is undeniably the sister of Boris Johnson and who vocally opposes the idea that trans women are women. Gaiman believes they are and has said so emphatically, but no evidence has surfaced that Johnson’s attempting a hit job. Most of the reporting on the series, and some of the on-air presenting, was done by Paul Caruana Galizia. He’s won an Orwell Prize special award and a British Journalism Award; this information comes from Penguin Books, the publisher of Galizia’s A Death in Malta, which is about his mother’s life as an investigative reporter and her death in a car bombing."
I'm pro trans and anti Tory. You'll never find me going to bat for Rachel Johnson, of all people.
But I'm also Maltese and lived through Paul's mother's death, went to protests about it in my country, and I can vouch for his credentials and ethics.
If you look up his brother's Twitter (Matthew Caruana Galizia) you'll also see that Matthew is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and software engineer. He's also vocally pro-Palestine.
If you want more information about Paul and his family, and his work as a journalist, please feel free to reach out. I'll be more than happy to provide it.
Look, if you want to support an LGBT-friendly piece of media that has elements of horror and fantasy (and that doesnt benefit a rapist) go watch Interview with the Vampire. There are queer characters who aren't - gasp! - all lily white British men and it's actually a way better and far more progressive show.
I promise you that gay characters exist out of Good Omens.
Oh and if you want good fantasy books just literally read anything by Terry Pratchett, who always had more talent in his little finger than Neil Gaiman's entire pretentious body.
Anne Rice is trash and almost destroyed fandom/fanfic completely, she is not a good person. Read literally anything else, I can promise you theres more (and way better) queer shit out there
yeah which is why I'm not recommending her books. I'm recommending the show which is actually far better than the source material, and which she had ZERO to do with.
And even with all the shit she pulled it is nowhere near as bad as rape and assault, like are you kidding me...
I think that many don't seem to understand the true meaning of "innocent until proven guilty".
That applies in a legal context and in a court of law. Yes, Neil is technically innocent until proven guilty and as things stand he can't be thrown into jail or sentenced accordingly, because it may or may not be brought to trial, he and the victims may choose to settle privately, and We Live in a Society where due process is involved.
However, this does NOT apply to the court of public opinion. We as free agents are free to speculate and make up our own minds as to whether we think he actually did these things or not. Tumblr posts and Tweets aren't going to send him to jail ffs.
Look, if you want to support an LGBT-friendly piece of media that has elements of horror and fantasy (and that doesnt benefit a rapist) go watch Interview with the Vampire. There are queer characters who aren't - gasp! - all lily white British men and it's actually a way better and far more progressive show.
I promise you that gay characters exist out of Good Omens.
Oh and if you want good fantasy books just literally read anything by Terry Pratchett, who always had more talent in his little finger than Neil Gaiman's entire pretentious body.
Anne Rice, the writer of the books, was a notorious racist btw. In her writings she'd describe non-white characters as lesser and even primitive. Most of her works were laced with racist connotations.
Also she was pretty nasty towards her fan base and often attacked fanfic writers with legal action. She would often prompt her more diehard fans to harass and threaten fanfic writers as well.
Nice try, but Anne Rice had died before the show came out and she had absolutely nothing to do it.
Also, the show conscientiously made an effort to upgrade the story and remove all the problematic elements, which is why Louis is no longer a white slave owner but a Black business owner in the 30s. It would be one thing if the show was directly benefitting her or if it were regurgitating her less than savoury views, but it's not on both counts.
And while I'm not defending what she did to writers, if you think that's even half as bad as Neil raping and assaulting women, I suggest you seek an appointment with a psychiatrist immediately.
You're losing your shit over nothing my dear. Calm yourself. When we don't like what someone has said, our first response shouldn't be to belittle or demean that person. That's just plain shitty behavior.
All media is going to have some connection to a problematic person. People, in general, are problematic. Add fame and money to the equation and it's even more true.
My point, is that attacking a fan base for enjoying a certain piece of media is not an appropriate response to finding out said media's creator is a piece of shit. Dead or not.
This has happened over and over and over again in fandom. And it'll continue to happen.
Media exists. People enjoy said media. Many creators of said media turn out to be shit people. Liking said media does not inherently make someone a piece of shit. One's actions and treatment of others is what does or does not make one a piece of shit.
Yeah no - you tried to equate a writer's hobby for libel with a writer who's been accused of rape and assault. That says it all. I'm done here.
Look, if you want to support an LGBT-friendly piece of media that has elements of horror and fantasy (and that doesnt benefit a rapist) go watch Interview with the Vampire. There are queer characters who aren't - gasp! - all lily white British men and it's actually a way better and far more progressive show.
I promise you that gay characters exist out of Good Omens.
Oh and if you want good fantasy books just literally read anything by Terry Pratchett, who always had more talent in his little finger than Neil Gaiman's entire pretentious body.
Anne Rice, the writer of the books, was a notorious racist btw. In her writings she'd describe non-white characters as lesser and even primitive. Most of her works were laced with racist connotations.
Also she was pretty nasty towards her fan base and often attacked fanfic writers with legal action. She would often prompt her more diehard fans to harass and threaten fanfic writers as well.
Nice try, but Anne Rice had died before the show came out and she had absolutely nothing to do it.
Also, the show conscientiously made an effort to upgrade the story and remove all the problematic elements, which is why Louis is no longer a white slave owner but a Black business owner in the 30s. It would be one thing if the show was directly benefitting her or if it were regurgitating her less than savoury views, but it's not on both counts.
And while I'm not defending what she did to writers, if you think that's even half as bad as Neil raping and assaulting women, I suggest you seek an appointment with a psychiatrist immediately.
Look, if you want to support an LGBT-friendly piece of media that has elements of horror and fantasy (and that doesnt benefit a rapist) go watch Interview with the Vampire. There are queer characters who aren't - gasp! - all lily white British men and it's actually a way better and far more progressive show.
I promise you that gay characters exist out of Good Omens.
Oh and if you want good fantasy books just literally read anything by Terry Pratchett, who always had more talent in his little finger than Neil Gaiman's entire pretentious body.