If you enjoy this blog, please donate and support archive.org.
$LAYYYTER
Cosimo Galluzzi

Janaina Medeiros
occasionally subtle

@theartofmadeline
NASA

#extradirty

shark vs the universe

pixel skylines

oozey mess
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always

⁂
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
DEAR READER
Claire Keane
RMH
will byers stan first human second

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
@lesbian-archives
If you enjoy this blog, please donate and support archive.org.
The Knight’s Move, Tessa Boffin, 1990
Angelic Rebels: Lesbians and Safer Sex, Tessa Boffin, 1989
Labyris Auto Repair, The Lesbian Tide, 1974
"Ain't I a Woman?," April 1971
FaT GiRL #3, 1996
Dykes & Gorgons, vol. 1 issue 1, 1973
Dykes & Gorgons, vol. 1 issue 1, 1973
Dykes & Gorgons, vol. 1 issue 1, 1973
Dykes & Gorgons, vol. 1 issue 1, 1973
"A feminist silkscreen poster collective founded in London in 1974 by three former art students, the See Red Women’s Workshop grew out of a shared desire to combat sexist images of women and to create positive and challenging alternatives. Women from different backgrounds came together to make posters and calendars that tackled issues of sexuality, identity and oppression. With humor and bold, colorful graphics, See Red expressed the personal experiences of women as well as their role in wider struggles for change." Red Women’s Workshop, 1975
Poster, Fierce Pussy, 1991
Salute to Women, Lily Tomlin, 1970s
clip of Angela Bowen on Tom Bergeron, 1988
Sinister Wisdom #7, 1978
The Joy of Lesbian Sex: a Tender and Liberated Guide to the Pleasures and Problems of a Lesbian Lifestyle, 1977
“In my own work I don’t use [the word ‘queer’] because I think it’s too broad a term. It could encompass everything from pedophilia to heterosexual sadomasochism to you know, any kind of fetish. It is not at all specific. And secondly, I don’t like its negative connotation because it still very much has that, especially in India. And even here [in America], I think it still hasn’t lost its connotation of being really strange and weird. Like my mother for instance, for her to say ‘queer’ and think of anything ‘queer’ as positive it would be extremely difficult whereas gay at least sounds positive in terms of what it means in the language. And I like what it means in the language and I like the history of lesbian, to connect it to Lesbos and so on. Whereas ‘queer’ has nothing positive about it that I can see and except what you put into it but it has nothing in terms of the history or the cultural connotation which you can’t entirely shed.”
—Ruth Vanita, an Indian lesbian academic and activist on why she doesn’t like the term ‘queer’
video time of quote