A brief opinion on "Tropes Vs Women in Video Games"
Anita Sarkeesian's video series on Tropes in Video Games is over a year old, but continues to be a topic of heated criticism and hatred usually reserved for talks on religion. Recently, Anita was on The Colbert Report to talk about Gamergate, which is an issue I don't even want to touch right now. I feel like the issue of Sarkeesian's videos is mostly cooled off, but after my girlfriend mentioned watching the videos in a media class, and how angry she was at sexism in video games. While I don't hold it against her, she often doesn't play games, and to a less informed person the videos are very persuasive, it did get me thinking about the videos again. Here is the link to the first video in the series.
In this video, Sarkeesian professionally explains her opinions. She explains how the trope reduces women to objects, and takes away their importance as anything other than a cheap plot device. At times, she does try to appear even handed, such as when she briefly mentions how Zelda can be helpful in the LoZ series.
I feel that while much of the negative reaction is the result of angry, stupid, insane, immature, and ignorant people, a lot of it comes from people feeling offended by how she explains specific female characters.
Back to Zelda, I have played many of the games in this series, and I have developed my own thoughts and opinions on the characters in the game. Anita claims that games describe Zelda as weak and unimportant, but to a lot of people, they feel the opposite.
In many games (spoiler), Zelda is through much of the game, a huge help and ally. She often aids with knowledge the player could never know, helps fight the final boss (the literal personification of evil), and possesses 1/3 of the most powerful relic in the entire world (the Triforce). To me, Zelda was always an awesome person to have around, whether she was helping defeat Ganondorf or helping point to where to go.
Anita describes Zelda differently from other damsels, but she does say that Zelda is at her core, a damsel. For me, this is the most frustrating part. For my gameplay, she was often an equal. She would exhibit many "honorable traits," and she was at times more important than even the main character of the series (that most people don't know the name of), Link.
Here, the incredibly inappropriate Amazing Atheist refutes Sarkeesian's part 2 in her series. The main argument I find important is from about 5:40 to around 6:30, but the whole video (for the most part) makes good points. But that specific time frame explains how she demands we keep the real world context in mind when thinking critically of games, but also removes the context in said games. She takes select scenes out of context to prove her point. The Amazing Atheist feels her argument suffers from confirmation bias, and I agree.
I feel like her videos are inaccurate, and that a lot of what she did was a little off. She did steal footage from let's players, but in the end, her opinion is her opinion. And while her videos do annoy me because they can give a very inflammatory opinion to people who aren't really into the community, that's fine. There's no reason why she should have received the insane backlash from a foolishly inflamed community.
AngryJoeShow in this video starting at 24:35 takes a suitably angry moment to retaliate against the people who threaten her and say horribly sexist comments to her. It is truly repulsive the response she received to her videos, and even if you disagree with the message of her videos, you have to agree that she doesn't deserve that.
So, yeah. This is an ancient story, but I've never tried to type out my opinion before so I wanted to get this out there. In summation, I don't like her videos, and I think she did a few unfair things, but she can say what she wants. Anyone can. She shouldn't feel threatened for making well produced videos describing her opinions.
Sarkeesian's most recent video on her channel is from August 15, and has ratings and comments disabled. It honestly does have a few good points on women as Background Decoration, and I agree with some of her points even though I disagree with others. I just want everyone to try to view inflammatory material objectively, and NOT THREATEN TO RAPE AND MURDER THE WOMEN FOR HER OWN DAMN OPINION HOLY F***ING SH*T.
Note: Edited twice. First to add pictures, then to add the note.