No title available
Cosmic Funnies
official daine visual archive
noise dept.
Cosimo Galluzzi
Keni
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
Interview Vampire Daily
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
ojovivo
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
YOU ARE THE REASON
Fai_Ryy
bliss lane
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
h
No title available
todays bird
NASA
No title available
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@littlesisterlily
I stand in unconditional solidarity with all anti-imperialist struggles. The struggles against imperialism and against racism are inherent to the struggle for socialism.
Dm me if you are looking to get organised with communist politics in Britain
đ”đžđšđșđ»đȘđźđȘđłïžââ§ïž
I actually disagree with the oft repeated sentiment that the "middle class are not your enemy" because they absolutely can be.
"prolitariat" as a class is good because it is unifying, the class interests of every member within the prolitariat are within the prolitariat.
the "middle class" is not a good phrase because there is no middle class interests or solidarity. the "middle class" includes many like members of the labour aristocracy, it includes small business owners, it includes workers who are just lucky with work. there is no class solidarity between these layers.
the labour Aristocracy are inherently reactionary and so will be counter revolutionary, the petit bourgeose will always turn right when the workers are looking left. it was the Petit bourgeosie who allowed the rise of hitler, and who over through Allende. these people are your enemy, they want monopoly capitalism and the imperialist endeavours that follow, and they will fight to maintain it.
I find that often when this sentiment is presented, then it in a way proposes that the call to action is to not dismiss organising amongst the labour aristocracy, when the immediate task should really be to organise amongst the most oppressed layers of the working class, who have the least to gain from Imperialism and are the most open to revolutionary politics.
When will socialists in Imperialist nations realise that the people in the comunas are aware of the contradictions within Venezuela? Perhaps instead of trying to conjure up meticulous plans for revolution in every other country, they could actually seek to build links with people in Venezuela, understand the communal movement, and show genuine solidarity and fight back against their own Imperialist state, and not reach for any opportunity to denounce the Bolivarian Revolution and the PSUV.
On the question of trans people using the appropriate bathrooms, when there is a development in transmisogynistic legislation that seeks to prevent trans women from accessing women's toilets and similar spaces, there is regularly a "counter-argument" to the supposed logic of the policy, put forward by transmasculine people, suggesting that they would thus be required to use the women's toilets, and that the policy fails to "keep men out of women's spaces" after all. But this position does not challenge the fact that segregation of spaces such as toilets is misogynistic, it is a reinforcement of gender, it uses a paternalistic notion that women must be kept away in their own space, and bathrooms act as a site of gendered labour through only women's bathrooms having childcare facilities.
Do not legitimise the concept of "The United Kingdom", do not validate the occupation of the north of Ireland by the British state, the 6 counties are occupied land. Do not call it the "UK".
why the fuck do people care so much about Che being homophobic or not
Because it is in bourgeois interests to disconnect the struggle of gay* people from the struggle for socialism, and obscure the material progress Cuba has made on gay rights that has been made possible due to its socialist revolution
hiiii! why do u call yourself a radfem and not a marxist feminist? genuinely curious
hi there! the reason i call myself a radfem and not a marxfem is that when i understand womenâs issues, i usually critique them from an anti-patriarchal standpoint on how women are oppressed. my mom is a marxfem and i do have a lot of material and marxist analysis mixed in because i am an ML, but i prefer to go off of my lived experience as an afab and how myself and people like me are oppressed by patriarchy. so basically, when it comes to womenâs issues i understand the impact of male supremacy on said issues. thank you so much for the ask!
Inherently contradictory and Idealist position, if you claim to be a Marxist-Leninist then why do you not analyse women's oppression under capitalism materially and instead out of your "lived experience as an afab", this is just identity politics. If you put patriarchy as primary over class then you clearly have no understanding of historical materialism. Women's oppression under capitalism cannot be separated from a class analysis of the family structure and gender as a division of labour
Additionallyâ understanding misogyny as the oppression of "afabs" is a transmisogynistic, and therefore reactionary, position
Well yes because that is a position brought forth from that idealist understanding of gender. Positioning gender as an innate biological identity that is oppressed on that basis, rather than a material relation to the family somewhat independent of cagab, is hand in hand with a lack of understanding of misogyny as a societal force that feminises both cis and trans women
it's a cliché by now but there's only so much history you can learn before you either become a Marxist or a liar. there's a reason that so much of liberal propaganda is explaining prejudice as a mysterious personal failing, and poverty as a not so mysterious personal failing, while so much of Marxist propaganda is explaining that both these things result from systems of exploitation that we can demonstrate through research and data
Do you have to claim to believe this to get tenure?
Because likeâŠ
MolotovâRibbentrop Pact - Wikipedia
Soviet invasion of Poland - Wikipedia
The genocides seem kinda⊠racist.
Mass killings under communist states - Wikipedia
LGBTQ history in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia
Persecution of Uyghurs in China - Wikipedia
Plus this shit
đŹ 0  đ 1  â€ïž 12 · What does the oppression Muslims faced has anything to do with ukronazis? Fuck you. I presume this is an irate Russiaboo/
It's incredulous that every single source you use is wikipedia, including in your own post you link to. This is your extensive historical investigation is it?
I know I'm late to the party but people are really out here celebrating mamdani for saying stern things about netanyahu, like he hasn't also helped zionists like brad lander win elections in the US, or kept a zionist on as nyc police commissioner. if you really think that performative nonsense beats materially aiding zionism, your politics support genocide and ethnic cleansing
His supporters continue to forgive him for not having any actual principles, such as on this topic, such as upholding the 24 hour work day, etc. since he's "Just a mayor" and he's "trying his best" as if it doesn't directly expose the limitations of reformism and his inherent structural position in serving the interests of the bourgeoisie. His fake anti-Zionism appeals to the sections of the Labour Aristocracy that align themselves with progressive ideas but who have an interest in maintaining their own privileges
hiiii! why do u call yourself a radfem and not a marxist feminist? genuinely curious
hi there! the reason i call myself a radfem and not a marxfem is that when i understand womenâs issues, i usually critique them from an anti-patriarchal standpoint on how women are oppressed. my mom is a marxfem and i do have a lot of material and marxist analysis mixed in because i am an ML, but i prefer to go off of my lived experience as an afab and how myself and people like me are oppressed by patriarchy. so basically, when it comes to womenâs issues i understand the impact of male supremacy on said issues. thank you so much for the ask!
Inherently contradictory and Idealist position, if you claim to be a Marxist-Leninist then why do you not analyse women's oppression under capitalism materially and instead out of your "lived experience as an afab", this is just identity politics. If you put patriarchy as primary over class then you clearly have no understanding of historical materialism. Women's oppression under capitalism cannot be separated from a class analysis of the family structure and gender as a division of labour
When 1780 babies in Cuba die due to the measurably heightened effects of the blockade on the medical system, you must understand this as the United States murdering 1780 Cuban babies. Despite having one of the world's most advanced medical systems, and the highest doctors per capita compared to any other country (over 2.5x that of the United States) 10s of 1000s of people are unable to access medical treatment in Cuba because of the strangulation of the Cuban healthcare system. The defense of Cuba is a litmus test for socialists, you must condemn Imperialism, not the revolution, the blockade is an act of genocide
i saw a video today that mentioned the learned helplessness that a lot of liberals turned leftist do and tbh itâs a problem
like yeah weâve been fucked royally by the system but not doing anything and being all doomer about our current circumstances ainât gonna change shit
like letâs take the literacy crisis as an example: yes, there are systemic issues that caused the literacy crisis, but sitting there with your ass in your hand isnât gonna do anything
you need to start to actually trying to improve if youâve been screwed over by the education system. hell, if youâve been screwed over by the system in general, acknowledge it, and make steps to change it
sitting there doing nothing isnât gonna help. stop yelling, start acting
Illiteracy was dramatically reduced in Cuba in just a year because of socialism, from 20% illiteracy to 4% through 1961, and Cuba continues to have an excellent literacy rate today. The course of action to combat illiteracy is thus socialist revolution, and the only socialist movement of the future is the one that you start building today
how can anyone pretend a country is democratic when its economy is run according to the the interests of a small fraction of the population? the interests of the overwhelming majority in any capitalist country barely factor into deciding where society's resources are invested, which jobs are created, and where. even government led investments of tax money are decided by political parties that are paid for by capitalists, represent their interests, and can be destroyed by businesses removing investment in the economy whenever they disapprove of government policy
being allowed to vote for which representative will manage the system on behalf of powerful capitalist interests is a limited, narrow form of democracy, and is used to fool us into thinking that society is run by the mass of the population
there's no democracy for the workers when you live under a dictatorship of capital
Cuba has done so much for the world. What has the world done for Cuba? Why do you denounce everything Cuba does, regardless of the material reasons and conditions in Cuba, regardless of what the PCC and the Cuban people at large say and the data they collect. How can you do this when you have failed to challenge your own state that upholds the blockade, failed to stand in material solidarity with Cuba, and failed to wage your own revolutionary struggle
You can reclaim the flags of the US or Britain if you make it LGBTQ, it'll be the butcher's slay-pron. They are trying to do this, it's not possible to know what their class positions are.
If you are anti-AI in the sense of rejecting the concept of the technology entirely, and you also consider yourself a Marxist, then you have an inherently contradictory position. How can you reconcile the need for the development of the productive forces to mechanise and automate production under socialism with a rejection of this technology. If you reject "AI" principally on the basis of environmental impact, the increase in the reserve army of labour, or the intensified exploitation of the proletariat, then you are not anti-AI you are anti-capitalist
