Lowest US science spending since WWII âthreatens Americaâs futureâ â MIT
Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have warned of an âinnovation deficitâ stemming from a decline in federal government spending on basic scientific research in areas such as cybersecurity, space exploration, and infectious diseases.
The report entitled âThe Future Postponedâ was released Monday in an effort to highlight steady decreases in the budgets of the US National Institutes of Health and other top research agencies.
Federal spending on research as a share of total US federal government outlays is now at about 3 percent, down from 10 percent in 1968, during the height of the space program.
Federal investment in scientific research is âthe lowest it has been since the Second World War as a fraction of the federal budget,â said MIT physicist Marc Kastner, leader of the report committee. âThis really threatens Americaâs future.â
As a share of the gross domestic product, federal science funding is just under 0.4 percent.
The report begins by listing some of the top scientific highlights of 2014, including the landing of a spacecraft on a comet and the development of the worldâs fastest supercomputer. Yet those two achievements â by the European Space Agency and China, respectively â and the others mentioned all occurred outside the US.
Areas of research that are lacking, the report said, include cybersecurity, space exploration, plant sciences, fusion energy, infectious diseases, defense technology, and robotics.
MIT explained that it chose these fields based on their status as: âopportunities with high potential for big payoffs in health, energy, and high-tech industries; fields where we risk falling behind in critical strategic capabilities such as supercomputing, secure information systems, and national defense technologies; areas where national prestige is at stake, such as space exploration, or where a lack of specialized U.S research facilities is driving key scientific talent to work overseas.â
The report attempted to show how, in the past, research investments like the ones MIT is calling for have been made and later proved to be successful for one reason or another.
âAmericaâs emergence last year as the worldâs largest oil producer has been justly celebrated as a milestone for energy independence,â the report insisted.
âBut the roots of the fracking revolution stem from federally-funded researchâbegun in the wake of the first OPEC oil embargo 40 years agoâthat led to directional drilling technology, diamond drill bits tough enough to cut shale, and the first major hydraulic fracturing experiments. Do we also want the U.S. to be a leader in clean energy technologies a few decades hence, when these will be needed for large scale replacement of fossil energy sources, a huge global market? Then now is when more investment in advanced thin film solar cells, new battery concepts, and novel approaches to fusion energy should begin.â
The report does not offer specific cost projections or policy prescriptions to achieve better funding for these areas.
âItâs fine to talk about research opportunities,â Michael Lubell, director of public affairs at the American Physical Society, told Reuters. âBut the report is long on identifying needs and short on identifying policy that will get us there.â
Past surveys have shown Americansâ knowledge of basic science to be lacking compared to other developed nations. For example, in a February 2014 study, one in four American respondents did not know that the Earth revolved around the Sun. Though that same survey found that more than 90 percent of Americans are of the opinion that scientists are âhelping to solve challenging problemsâ and are âdedicated people who work for the good of humanity.â
kianamaiart
pixelskylines
areudirty
yousharknotpass
germansingergirl
prguitarman
stormborns
