the gender for kuzco
the gender made especially for kuzco. kuzco’s gender.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Cosimo Galluzzi
Fai_Ryy
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
occasionally subtle
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
Game of Thrones Daily
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
art blog(derogatory)
No title available
$LAYYYTER

@theartofmadeline

oozey mess
h
noise dept.

Jimmy Eat World
The Bright Sessions
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from United Kingdom
seen from France

seen from Germany

seen from Japan
seen from Russia
seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Philippines

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Australia
@luxlustravi-blog
the gender for kuzco
the gender made especially for kuzco. kuzco’s gender.
Beware the blorbs of the deep.
Reblog if you would read a post-apocalyptic comic about disabled people
Seriously. Because I have an idea for one, and I want to see whether I can make it work. I don’t know if I can find an artist who’d be interested in collaborating on it, but if I can, I have some ideas on how to fund it. I just want to see enough people would be interested in it.
Surely I can’t be the only one who’s tired of the idea that the apocalypse would wipe out all disabled people because we couldn’t possibly survive.
let me put it straight. disabled people are way way way way WAY less likely to survive in the unlikely event of an apocalypse. it’s already extremely unlikely for ANYONE to survive to begin with. and then someone who already faces difficulties in our modern world with all its accomodations? hard to imagine. so i hope for you that your story is so damn good and clever that it could work. otherwise it’S just garbage that lives on the suspension of disbelief the reader brings with him. and that is no basis for any good story.
Do you even have the first clue what a disability is? I’m asking, because you seem to be a very ignorant sort of person. Allow me to educate you a little.
“…our modern world with all its accomodations[sic]…” Bwahahaha! You silly, silly able-bodied person, you. What accommodations? You think the occasional wheelchair ramp and some IEPs count as accommodations? You have no idea. The modern world is already hugely inaccessible to disabled people. We’re used to it.
I bet you think “survival of the fittest” means survival of the strongest, the fastest, all of that, don’t you? But it doesn’t. It means survival of the most adaptable. You think you’re automatically more capable of surviving than people who have to adapt every single day of their lives to an inaccessible world? Do you even biology, bro?
Life has survived apocalypses on this planet before. The Permian-Triassic extinction event killed 70% of all terrestrial vertebrates and 96% of all marine life. Yet here we stand, because life did survive. And it isn’t the big, strong gorgonopsids that we descend from. They didn’t make it. Nope, it was the tiny diictodon. Diictodon, a creature little bigger than a chihuahua, that could burrow to survive the elements. In fact, it’s possible that diictodon, like modern lagomorphs, could sever tree roots as a source of water. They survived because they could adapt to the harsh changes in their environment. Not because they were the strongest or the fastest.
The Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction (otherwise known as that thing that killed the non-avian dinosaurs) took out three-quarters of all plant and animal life on earth. And yet again, here we stand. And the reason for that is because there was life that could adapt, and once again, it wasn’t the biggest or the strongest. Why do you think avian dinosaurs (more commonly known as birds) are the only ones who survived? Because yeah, birds have some traits that make them very suited to survival, but odds are all dinosaurs had these traits. Yet all of the non-avian ones are gone.
A combination of factors played into this. Many non-avian dinosaurs were far too large and specialized. Their strength and speed were no longer advantages after Chicxulub laid waste and the world began to deteriorate. And yeah, the birds had the advantage of flying, but that wasn’t the only thing. Birds were small, and they’d taken over a very important niche. As pterosaurs evolved, they grew from small flying insectivores to large, ground-stalking carnivores. They overspecialized into that niche, while birds started sitting pretty in the niche the pterosaurs left behind: Small, flying insectivores. Notably, it wasn’t just birds that survived, but most of what did survive was small, and thus in need of less energy than those big strong creatures that are gone now.
And why do you think it’s Homo sapiens that stands as the dominant hominid today? By all accounts, Neanderthals were actually stronger, faster, and smarter than us. Yet here we stand. Of course, modern science shows that to some degree, at least, Neanderthals were bred into Homo sapiens. But we still had an advantage over them. Being smaller, we needed less food for energy. A few bad years food-wise would knock down the Neanderthal population far more than it would the Homo sapiens one. For all we were not as big or as strong or as fast, we had an advantage in hard times.
Now tell me, taking all of that, why able-bodied and neurotypical people, who spend their lives sitting comfortably in their overspecialized niches, should be so very much better suited to survival to those of us who spend each and every day adapting?
Maybe it’s because you think we’re all bed-ridden and helpless? Newsflash: Disabilities come in many, many types. Maybe you think none of us can survive without modern medicine? Newsflash: Not only do many of us already survive without access to care that would make our lives easier, but the standards of modern medicine also illegalize substances like marijuana, which has been shown to be effective on disabilities ranging from glaucoma and fibromyalgia to ADHD and bipolar disorder. Legal narcotics aren’t the only effective ones, they’re just the only legal ones. Maybe you think none of us have any sort of useful skills? Or that we aren’t strong enough to protect ourselves? You go ahead and fuck with this guy after the apocalypse, see how far that gets you.
Yeah, a lot of people wouldn’t survive an apocalypse. That’s part of the point of post-apocalyptic fiction, dude. But we make up one seventh of this world’s population and yet you think all one billion of us would go down simply because of your ignorant preconceptions?
Pfft. Please. We’ve survived you assholes for millennia. We have the same chances of survival as you do and we’re more used to adapting.
I’m highly amused when abled folks think that they’re automatically the ones who would survive the apocalypse. Aka, “The fittest” in “the survival of the fittest”.
Fantastic response to such ignorance, seriously.
BOOYAH.
As someone with fibromyalgia who is surrounded by same extreme survival narratives in the media, culture and entertainment as everyone else, I think about my chances in a post-apocalyptic landscape more than is useful. This is offset by the presence of my partner, who loves to gather survivalist tools, tips and tricks and is very physically able, but has some crucial vulnerabilities in priorities, ie, food, and having it on hand before you need it. (Look, I don’t know what other couples talk about of an evening.)
Further, the normalisation of the able-bodied seems to rest on the assumption that physical ability is not an evolving state. You get old, you can’t walk as far as you used to, run as fast, lift as much. That happens to everyone. You get sick and spend days helpless, or months helpless, or the rest of your life. Or it’s a post-apoc world and sanitation, sterilisation and medication aren’t available as they were, you scratch your ankle, get an infection and have to cut your foot off. You treat your body hard and there is no sports physiotherapy to help you with your knee, no means of getting a replacement and now you can no longer run. You slipped and cut your hand by accident, it healed wrong and you can’t flex it properly anymore. You get food poisoning so often you become weakened, without stamina, constantly falling ill with any passing sneeze. You have allergies and your eyes are watering so much you literally can’t see for days on end and you can’t do anything but sneeze and the world isn’t going to give you a break because you’re having a tough day.
I’m not saying I have a better chance of surviving than any other able-bodied person, only that able-bodied people don’t actually have a better chance of surviving than me.
I’d read the shit out of that comic.
These are the same people who never believe the actual archaeological evidence of disabled people who would not have been able to walk or chew their own food, being taken care of well into late adulthood by other people… back in caveman days. They think that disabled people’s survival is a modern thing, and it’s not. We have always survived to the best of our ability, and our societies have always had people in them who did their best to help us stay alive regardless of type or degree of disability. In fact, the fact that we do this is part of what makes our species function the way it does – we’d be a completely different (and far less effective) species if we simply let disabled people die en masse. (Which, yes, some societies have tried to do, but it’s never been everyone in a society and it’s never been every society.) Also evolution favors genetic diversity, and we’re an absolutely inescapable part of that.
But people always think their biases are universal truths.
I agree wholeheartedly with this, but I am also wary of a specific way in which it might potentially be used and which I want to avoid: that particular strain of ableism evident in people who speak lovingly of bloody revolution, who dream of a world where people no longer take psychiatric meds and learn to suck it up. I am horrified by that kind of rhetoric, and I don’t want these (very important) points appropriated to bolster it, you know?
Okay, this is what I loved about this movie.
Joy was working so hard to keep Sadness out of the way so Riley could be happy.. But this movie clearly shows the negative effects on your psyche if you keep your sadness bottled up. Yes, Joy is a wonderful sensation and we’d love to feel it all the time.. but Sadness is also a necessity. Bottling up feelings CAN do damage.. (I would know, as I’m sure a lot of us would..)
We do deserve to be happy, but we need to experience sadness, too. It only makes the joyous occasions even brighter and more special. If you ARE sad, let it out, don’t bottle it up. Once you’re done with that.. Treat yourself to something like a cookie or donut, enjoy a hot bath, watch a funny video of kittens trying to fit into a shoe .. Or, if the sadness is too much … Talk to a (SUPPORTIVE) family member, a friend, or look into possibly seeing a therapist. There are people that love you and want to stay by your side, in joy and in sadness.
Let’s also remember that our capacity for sympathy and empathy requires us to feel sad. Without sadness, we wouldn’t be able to relate to others; we would rather try to force happiness on people who are upset and tell them simply “don’t be sad” instead of trying to understand what’s causing them pain, which is why Sadness was able to help Bing Bong when Joy couldn’t.
And also, Disney has been killin it with the exploration of mental illness.
Old person: back then, this item was 5 cents!!! Everything has changed so much!
Me: Why did you ruin the economy
encouraging people to fact check would involve:
giving resources like websites that help fact checking,
giving instructions on how to fact check information they see on tumblr themselves
giving tips for spotting false information
giving a list of unreliable sources and satiricle websites that make joke articles (like the onion)
kindly pointing out false information without mocking people or calling them names
encouraging fact checking is not:
“lol tumblr would believe it if you told them that someone wrote gullible on the ceiling above their head”
“lol this is what happens on a website that thinks school is oppressive”
“lol tumblr is so *insert ableist term here*”
Snopes is probably your best source for internet rumors and here’s a list of fake news sites.
Most folks know that Fox News is not reliable despite, somehow, being a genuine news broadcaster but I’m always seeing The Daily Mail articles being passed around so keep in mind that TDM is just as bad as Fox News.
When it comes to science news try to avoid general news, they usually either get it completely wrong or are very misleading. Try to find the journal it was originally published in or, at least, somewhere with the abstract. Science Direct, the U.S. National Library of Medicine, and the Wiley Online Library are good databases.
When you see social media screencaps make sure a link is included, if there’s no link try to find the source for yourself and if you can’t find it than don’t put any stock in it. It’s incredibly easy to falsify facebook, twitter, and even tumblr posts.
I’ll admit to being occasionally frustrated with Tumblr’s penchant for taking a myth and running with it. But to be fair, this is hardly exclusive to this website.
All of these tips are sound, I just want to add a few more:
Donation drives for bloggers in need: check to see if (1) the original blog post still exists, it might have been deleted because the OP voluntarily put an end to the drive, (2) the original blog still exists, (3) the original blog is just a couple days old, in which case err on the side of caution and either move along or investigate a little more (even if they give a reason)
Missing person posts: check to see if the OP gives details such where and when was the person last seen, what clothes they were/might be wearing, whether they have access to a car, etc. Contact info for their relatives or Amber Alert details/police contact info is always a good sign that it is a legit cry for help. Also check to see if the original post/blog still exists, the person may already have been found or it may be a fake post. Double-checking on Google to see if it’s a legit or recent disappearance may also help Please remember that SOMETIMES ABUSERS TRACK DOWN THEIR VICTIMS RESORTING TO FAKE MISSING PERSONS POSTS and that there are people with legitimate reasons to want to not be found!!!!
Lifehacks: Snopes it before you reblog – most of them are bullshit or ineffectual. Still, reblogging bogus lifehacks is not as serious as reblogging fake missing persons posts. Some lifehacks, however, are famously illegal or harmful to a person’s health (eg Oreo mascara)
Rape prevention tips – DO NOT REBLOG. These are 99% of the time just CLICKBAITING SCARE TACTICS who won’t save ANYONE from harm and will only result in contributing to a culture of fear, chiefly among women.
Crime reporting signal boosts – this includes: letters from a company that is purportedly a front for a human trafficking operation, needles infected with HIV scattered around public places, and other chainletter fare. These are most often than not bogus. In any case, Snopes is your best friend. Check to see if they give a date or a place for said crimes being committed – if they don’t, it’s the first sign it might be fake.
Call-out posts with Twitter/Facebook screengrabs – check to see if they provide a link to said postings. If not, it might just mean that the person deleted them but BE AWARE THAT INTERNET TROLLS OFTEN DOCTOR SCREENGRABS to make it look like other people (usually women) have said hateful things that they NEVER SAID. They do this to try and get them attacked by social justice-conscious people.
Please remember that for every bogus missing persons post, fake donation drive and poorly fundamented problematic screengrab you reblog, you’re making it a little hard for people who are actually in need to get the visibility and help that they need. I don’t blame you for being trusting, but it would be in everybody’s best interests to exercise some caution in what you signal boost. <3
ED: someone mentioned this and it’s very much worth adding: also please be warned that the internet is full of assholes, and sometimes if you ask for assistance (especially technical assistance) in some less reputable forums and internet communities you might get people intentionally feeding you bad info that will damage your property, because they’re dickheads who get off on tricking gullible people into breaking their own stuff. Do NOT immerse your iPhone in water or put it in the microwave to “charge” it!!!!
These are modern day lynchings
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/louisiana-police-officer-shoots-kills-14-year-old-honor-roll-student/
THAT WAS SOMEBODY’S FUCKING BABY. I’M ACTUALLY CRYING RIGHT NOW, THEY WERE PLAYING IN AN ABANDONED HOUSE BEING FUCKING KIDS AND NOW THIS LITTLE BOY IS DEAD.
waroncops.tumblr.com
his name was cameron tillman and he was murdered on september 24, 2014 please do not let him become just another black boy who’s name will be forgotten amongst the countless other murders please do whatever you can to raise awareness about this situation, please donate, keep protesting, keep all these stories alive, do not let them get away with this.
this is what i just picked up from the grocery store. it cost $32. Thirty. two. dollars. for 1 pineapple, 2 bags of grapes, a small container of raspberries, 1 soft drink and 2/$1 nuts….
do you know how much junk food i could have for $32? do you have any clue how much McDonald’s you can get for $32?
stop shaming fat people poorer than you or people poorer than you in general for not eating healthier. stop lying about how cheap it is or how it’s comparable to fast food. just stop.
!!!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!
Veganism is cool but there’s a sense of ableism, classism, and racism that kinda comes off of some vegans and it’s gross.
One of you wanted me to elaborate on this and I’m gonna try and be quick and concise.
Some people physically cannot survive off of a plant-based diet. Congratulations if you are not one of them, but don’t go shouting at people. You are essentially guilt-tripping them into dropping nutrients/vitamins they need, that come from animal products.
Not everyone can afford the vegan lifestyle, let alone support a family on it. You would need the advice and close attention of health care professionals to raise a child on a vegan diet. Let’s also talk about the, underpaid, PoC who are farming your plant-based diet. Why do you advocate for animals and not bat an eye at injustices faced by people of colour?
Food and culture go hand in hand and a lot of you WHITE vegans think it’s so damn easy for people to leave meat. I’m lactose intolerant and I don’t eat red meat at all so it’s pretty difficult going to family parties and not being able to eat what is there. You can’t look at cultural dishes and say “why the fuck are you eating a dead animal” that’s very ethnocentric and bigoted of you. Let PoC eat their cultural dishes.
I respect your lifestyle, but don’t be so god damn condescending and forceful with your ‘movement’.
Elle Woods was hollering back before the movement. This is why i love this movie. It’s so progressive. Elle is a femme feminist who comes by it the hard way. She doesn’t change for the bookish people, the elitists, or for the feminists. She just does what she needs to do, and what she wants, even when at first it was chasing a boy. Then the movie drops the romance. IT DROPS THE ROMANCE. chick flicks don’t do that. Emmett asking her out is a footnote at the very end. And this whole time, she is classy, and lady like, and has pride in herself and her work. She’ll go to a costume party as a playboy bunny, but like hell will she sleep with her professor for an internship. Elle is my feminist role model
Elle Woods 4ever
I remember listening to my DAD defend Legally Blonde. An uncle was saying “Oh look, it’s that stupid movie again.” as he flipped through the channels. My dad responded with “Oh yeah, that movie where the blonde girl with great grades works really hard to get into pre-law, studies hard and proves herself to her peers and bosses while maintaining her integrity and not sleeping with her boss? What a terrible message to send girls.”
Also, I love this movie because Reese Witherspoon.
And don’t forget that she has serious female friends and wins the case by way of her specialist knowledge of so-called “feminine things” that no one else takes seriously enough to even bother with.
The movie also passes the Bechdel test.
LET’S NOT FORGET that even though it starts with a situation where two girls are rivals for the same guy, they BOTH choose to ignore the social codes (and hollywood bylaws) that tell them they should be cat-fighting and trying to one-up each other, and instead they realize that they make good working partners and better friends and screw rivalry, AND ALSO HAVE EACH OTHER’S BACKS RE: WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT. And that it portrays sororities as places where women can learn to work together and respect each other and help each other out, which sets the stage for the way Elle treats everyone she meets for the rest of the movie. OH AND IT HAS A FAT SIDE CHARACTER WHO OVERCOMES EMOTIONAL ABUSE, IS NEVER FAT-SHAMED OR USED AS THE BRUNT OF A FAT JOKE, AND LANDS THE HOTTEST MAN IN THE ENTIRE FILM.
This movie annihilates the Bechdel test.
It also has an older female professor who is not portrayed as frumpy or secondary to the male professors and who completely has Elle’s back when she overhears about the aforementioned professor sexually harassing Elle, while simultaneously giving Elle the boost she needed to keep going and win the case herself.
More fashion fun with Steven but this time with more fusions~
finally got Sardonyx done yayyyy!!! she’s lookin fierce!!!!
See the sketches on my Patreon!
dystopian novel premise:
A high flying Silicon Valley startup has invented Good Dollars, debit cards which can be restricted so that the money can only be spent “ethically” - that is, on products that have been whitelisted by the person who set up the card. Employers start paying their employees in Good Dollars instead of regular dollars so they can control how their workers spend their paychecks.
Most employers blacklist alcohol and cigarettes, because they don’t feel it’s appropriate for you to spend your paycheck on those. Some employers, being especially socially conscious, blacklist movie theatres and swimming pools, while others make it impossible to spend your money on potato chips or soda. The CEO of Walmart really hates lobsters so Walmart paychecks are restricted so you can’t buy lobster. The CEO of Amazon has a beef with steak, so if you work for Amazon your Good Dollars won’t let you buy any.
Plot twist: like all great dystopian novels, this one is just “what if we treated everyone the way we treat poor people”. Kansas lawmakers have banned welfare recipients from spending their money on movies and swimming pools. Missouri tried to ban food stamps recipients from spending the food stamps on steak, seafood, and cookies. Wisconsin is debating a ban on buying “unhealthy” food with food stamps.
So if you’re in the mood to be a brave teenage protagonist, boy have I got a system for you to take on.
This is why I love dystopia as a genre and this it will never be “overused”. We LIVE IN ONE. When I was in college studying English Literature, I had one Science Fiction class. This is where I first heard the terms “speculative fiction” and read Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. My professor explained that Atwood didn’t use anything that doesn’t already exist to write her sci-fi. She just pushes it to its logical extremes. That really resonated with me an it’s something I have tried to apply to all my speculative fiction, but in particular to my dystopia writing. Dystopia isn’t writing about a bleak hypothetical world as it’s often portrayed. It’s writing about OUR world. The things in it that we fear and are unfair and pushing it all to the surface so it cannot be ignored any more. So write your dystopias like you’re on a mission to change the world. ______ And vote and speak out against things like this.
There is a HUGE difference between the money you earned by working being restricted and the money you are being handed for not working being restricted. Why should people on welfare eat better than I do, working 40 hrs/wk? Welfare shouldn’t be somewhere you want to stay; it should encourage you to find a job.
“People who can’t find jobs should be miserable!” Is all I hear here.
oh look, it’s the old ‘welfare makes you lazy’ chestnut! jeez, gengineer-fangirl, couldn’t you at least express your bigotry in a more original fashion?
also the ‘good dollars’ thing isn’t limited to public assistance; check out the related concept of company scrip, which is essentially fake money only accepted at the payee’s place of employment.
at last, political campaigning has achieved its purist form: meme fights
the founding father are all high-fiving each other right now, in hell
here u go crunchbuttsteak
If you played with Barbies,
Polly Pockets,
Beanie Babies,
Tamagotchi,
Slip N’ Slide,
And Furbies,
Listened to the Backstreet Boys, Britney Spears, NSync and the Spice Girls
On Hit Clips, a Boom Box, or a Walkman,
Collected and traded Pokemon cards,
Wrote with Gel Pens,
Wore butterfly clips,
And Snap Bracelets,
And remember watching these guys:
reblog
still listen to the same bands/ singers above. still have some beanie babies
okay but those beanie babies are all wrong for this kind of post
if you want ‘90s nostalgia you need some of these motherfuckers:
What an adorable little doot doot.
WHAT IS THAT OMG
The most precious doot
even the scientists are trying to give it the name adorabilis. Because its so adorable.
Polish doctor that refused to perform abortion named a “hero”
Dr Bogdan Chazan was visited by an expecting mother (32 weeks into pregnancy), who already had 5 miscarriages before and was worried about her health. It turned out that the fetus had hydrocephalus, undeveloped brain and was missing many bones from its skull. The Doctor refused to perform an abortion and didn’t send the woman to another hospital which could do so (according to polish law, if a doctor doesn’t want to perform an abortion, he has to choose another hospital which will agree to do so). Chazan was named a “local hero” and “true warrior of Jesus in the name of life of the unborn” by many polish politicians and catholic activists. He used conscience clause as an excuse for his actions.
The woman gave birth to the child through a C-section. She and her husband spent 10 painful days watching their deformed child die a horrible death. When she finally decided to speak out, she said:
“During these 10 days, no priest, no pro life activist or even dr Chazan came to see the child, to ask if they can help. It was really hard to look at our child. We knew what was coming, but it was still very hard to cope with”
Congratulations, pro-lifers - another “life” saved, another “happy” child and “happy” family.
This is why they get called “pro-birth.”