HTTCA - Review #6, “Geldbider“ Isa Genzken at Hauser and Wirth Exhibition
The Isa Genzken’s exhibition at Hauser and Wirth in London—Geldbider—is filled with Minimalist and Capitalist representations through painting and sculpture. Genzken’s cross-disciplinary style: sculpture, painting, photography, and installation—as well as a range of materials—is characteristic of the postmodern era. Her work shows progression in architecture and society and changes in art processes such as painting styles that evolved after modernism.
Gerhard Richter represents abstract expressionist artwork of the postmodern era. There is a similarity to his style of painting in Genzken’s Geldbild I (2014) as well as other paintings in the gallery. It can be suggested that Isa’s marriage to Richter had an influence on her artistic approach; her canvases show Richter’s technique of smearing paint using a squeegee. The thickness of paint differs from painting to painting, adding an element of chance to each finished piece. In previous work, Isa Genzken uses geometric shapes, which minimalist artists would use to express the idea of artwork being non-representational. However, Genzken is more expressive in recent work, which is a post-modern approach—reinventing the past. What is interesting is that minimalists are against abstract expressionism because of its abstruse nature.
To this day societal and economical shifts due to war and conflict have impacted upon artists work. This can be seen when Genzken imprints various currencies of different value onto paint: coins and bank notes. Although it is prohibited to deface a note, Ivan Cash and Andy Dao in their piece U.K. Average Income (Occupy Liz) (2014) highlight issues of capitalism by drawing and writing information on the bank notes. The money could have been possibly used in circulation thereby spreading information just as quickly as money can be spent. They have the same idea as Genzken that eventhough they have tampered with the money either by placing it out of context on a canvas or drawing directly onto it; it shows their viewpoints of capitalism on the very thing causing the issue.
Genzken expresses how art is an investment and that the money can be re-used if financial issues were to occur, such as the economical struggles after World War II. Genzken’s many paintings have money stuck onto canvases with the aid of the paint, most likely when it was in the process of drying, as if free for people to take. However, people assume that it’s Genzken’s money, and not theirs. She is turning money into a form of art that ends up losing its monetary value. The viewers wouldn’t want it because it is being used for something else rather than sitting in a purse or bank account. It now has a physical purpose that we are being made aware of. If the viewer were to take the money off of the canvas, it would be as if they were defacing the artwork. Andy Warhol remarks, “Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art”.
Genzken’s paintings are contextualised by gluing everyday found objects to the canvas such as: toy animals, feathers, leaflets where they directly stick out as an extension of the work. It gives us an idea of what is in her surroundings because society differs from place to place. Genzken’s artwork is similar to artist Richard Wentworth’s Making do and getting by photographic series where the objects are re-valued or taken out of context so that a new idea may incur.
Geldbider showcases contemporary artwork that evaluates the past to assess the present. Genzken’s paintings present a strong case of analysing society and how humans encounter and deal with experiences. The paintings still had the money stuck onto them when I left.
Top: Geldbild I (2014) Isa Genzken
Bottom: U.K. Average Income (Occupy Liz) (2014)













