Mediation in Action: a hop-and-skip through MANIFESTA 10 with Olga
Olga with a group in front of Otto Zitko's work Dedicated to K.K (Käthe Kollwitz) 2014
In order to illustrate the experience of a mediated tour I have selected a few of my favourite works that Olga choose to show us, in fact we saw about 8 other works but he’s a snippet to help you to understand how mediation works and how Manifesta 10's mediated tours are not just your typical guided tours.
In a mediated tour the focus is also on the group, who are encouraged to be active participants in the discussions that are raised around the art work in front of them. The main point is to have an experience with the work rather than listen to rigid facts about it.
Olga on her experience as an M10 art-meditator so far:
"Working as an art-mediator has been a great experience for me. The best thing about it is that it provides a lot of freedom and space for creativity. As an art-mediator I'm able to change my tours depending on my mood and the group. In addition, during the tours, the visitors offer interesting interpretations and open our eyes to things we haven't yet seen, giving us ground to think about the artworks differently and find new connections throughout the exhibition. Working on MANIFESTA 10 as an art-mediator has given me a very close relationship with all the artworks and with contemporary art in general, which in turn has given me a new look on life." Olga Tsyganova
Olga starts by introducing us to the General Staff Building, its renovation process and purpose as the ultimate destination as the new contemporary art wing of the Hermitage Museum. Importantly she raises Manifesta as a biennial which was initially intended to create a dialogue between the East and West, a theme which will become apparent across the artists’ projects.
Now come some of the works, Olga astutely introduces two larger themes of the show with her words on the first two artists we encounter:
Should art be for everybody?
‘Hans Peter Feldman believes that art was for everybody’ – she asks how do you think he is showing this?
We look closer at the work: a painted sculpture which looks like it could be a classical Venus but for the garish, kitsch like colours- toy-ish- why?
Olga suggests that Feldman is trying to break down high art to something which is more accessible, something that we can identify with.
What is art and authorship?
Then with Olivier Mosset’s work - another key issue in the exhibition is raised- that of authorship, his canvas is a monochromatic green with no signature and no brush strokes or marks that reveal the artist’s personality. This prompts the group to question whether authorship is important at all or whether the context of art history and of the work itself in fact more than the artist himself.
Vadim Fishkin A Speedy Day 2003. Electronic clock, room construction, light by A.J. Vaisbard. Courtesy Galerija Gregor Podnar, Ljubljana, Slovenia / Berlin, Germany. Installation view, MANIFESTA 10, General Staff Building, State Hermitage Museum
Next our first Russian artist on the tour Vadim Fishkin and his Speedy Day a window of light which puts 24 hours in 2.5 minutes. Olga explains that the artist is interested in physics and science and art. ‘We all feel the effects of light- and have our own associations. She tells of someone on a previous tour who ran out of the room shouting: ‘I don’t want to get old!
What associations are we making to certain types of light? How does it make us feel?
Members of the group experience sleepness nights so the night-time light is evocative of this, we are made to directly engage in our specific perceptions of the changing light. Olga suggests that the work is like a time capsule- forcing us to reflect that time is passing. “We are used to saying we don’t have time for things - what if the actual day was only this long?”
Fun Fact: If you stayed in this installation for 46 days, via Fishkin’s concept of time you will have lived though a whole lifespan of a person on earth.
Wolfgang Tillmans’ rooms are not just a display, but rather an installation- Olga makes us experience this by asking us to notice how we move closer and further away from various works depending on their scale. Olga remarks that Tillmans uses photography like painting drawing our attention to his images of clothes that work like how the Renaissance used draperies. What other themes can we see? The subject of absence and presence, the incomplete is also referred to and we search for this theme around the room. Olga shows us two works I would not naturally be drawn towards, one a black square as though it had been punched- what could this mean? The other a light blue square (significantly or not ‘light blue or goloboi’ in Russian is slang for homosexual’) and the paper edge of the light blue square’s is folded outwards, we reflect on why Tillmans has deliberately folded it this way - Olga wonders whether this edge is suggestive of pushing against society’s norms.
Installation views of Wolfgang Tillmans' rooms at the General Staff Building
According to Tillmans he himself said that he was in no situation to comment on the current political situation but that if his art said it for him then ‘let it be’. This brings up the relevance of mediation. If Tillmans wants to allow his art to speak to us it is often vital that a mediator helps us to really look and think about what Tillmans is trying to express.
Indeed some of the work’s titles are more than suggestive of political meaning- below Device Control with an image evocative of a system which tries to keep things going without addressing what is in fact wrong- End of Broadcast’s blank black and white imagery suggestive of media censorship.
Wolfgang Tillmans End of Broadcast
Wolfgang Tillmans Device Control
Henrich Oleson’s new work Hysterical Men 3, 2014 is a large work with blown up cut outs of newspaper clippings like a giant newsstand. Why this newspaper spread feel? Olga explains Oleson is interested in the idea that art can reflect the times. The work shows faces and objects that one can recognise and associate with. Who and can we see in the images?
Is the razor, the shoes, the comb we see printed are a man’s or a woman’s? How can we tell?
She tells us that Oleson is interested in the idea of the projected labelling of the masculine and feminine, labels which we use everyday even on objects. We look at the faces, who can we recognise – how do we describe them? One is Versace - whom one labels perhaps as a gay designer, another is the man from wikileaks again often labelled as ‘transgender.’ Labelling is very much an omnipresent problem of our times as we are constantly putting people and things into different groups or categories.
Part of Hysterical Men 3, 2014. Canvas, inkjet print on proof paper ZP 55 (newspaper), 55 gouache/m2, Amsterdam gel medium matt glue, 210 x 1,000 cm.
Courtesy Galerie Buchholz, Berlin/Cologne.
There are more subtle references in the work too, Olga suggests that the iron in the work is a reference to Freddy Mercury and the famous Queen video where he and the band are dressed as woman as he does the ironing. The title too is questing in terms of emotional stereotypes, Olga asks us is it usually woman who are labelled as hysterical, but here it is ‘hysterical men’ what might this allude to?
Gianni Versace in Hysterical Men 3, 2014. Canvas, inkjet print on proof paper ZP 55 (newspaper), 55 gouache/m2, Amsterdam gel medium matt glue, 210 x 1,000 cm.
Courtesy Galerie Buchholz, Berlin/Cologne.
Chelsea Manning in Hysterical Men 3, 2014. Canvas, inkjet print on proof paper ZP 55 (newspaper), 55 gouache/m2, Amsterdam gel medium matt glue, 210 x 1,000 cm.
Courtesy Galerie Buchholz, Berlin/Cologne.
The perhaps most familiar artist to many in the show is Matisse who hasbeen re-hung in the General Staff Building on Kasper’s insistence prior to the full collection of art from the twentieth and twenty-first century which will all permanently move from the Hermitage later on. Olga first outlines Matisse’s intensions as part of the ‘Fauve’ group or ‘wild beasts’ as it translates – dubbed this due to the group’s preoccupation on vibrant colours and forms rather than the more traditional focus in figurative work on shadow and light for depth.
Henri Matisse The Dance and Music 1910
Olga asks us to find the differences between The Dance and it’s red outlines and Music with its black outlines- why does this difference do to the painting? The latter’s figures appear more static and solitary in comparison to the unifying darker red line which fills The Dance with movement.
She asks us what difference it would make if the figures were green rather than bright orange? Matisse’s use of colour is reminiscent of the inner vibration of colour that Kandinsky theorised about. This links perfectly with the next room, yet more square monochromatic canvases by Mosset. Olga asks us to go close to the image and feel the inner vibrations of the colour.
Olivier Mosset Untitled. 2014. Acrylic on canvas. Each: 300 × 300 cm. Courtesy Galerie Andrea Caratsch, Zurich, Switzerland; Campoli Presti, London, England
Even though I knew a lot about many of the works before and had been amongst them and the process for months, I came away from the tour feeling much more enlightened and comfortable with the works that we’d seen together, many of which I had not previously chosen to concentrate on myself. Everything was suddenly much more accessible, the questions raised in the tour contemplative, the links made between the artists helping to bring the show all together.
One of the ladies on the tour thanked Olga for allowing her to ‘see more’ and that’s exactly what she did.
Free mediated tours of the General Staff Building take place everyday in both in English and Russian at 12.00, 14.00 and 16.00 (except for Monday when the museum is closed) and Wednesday when the museum is open until 21.00 and there is an extra tour at 18.00.