After the Charleston shooting which took the lives of several African Americans controversy sparked regarding the use (and overuse) of the confederate flag. As debate sparked on social media platform regarding imagery of the confederate flag found on several state flags news giants began to take notice. Being such a social conscious issue reporters may have felt moral obligated to deliver the facts and analysis regarding the use of the Confederate flag and its possible dismissal. Exactly this was done my Christopher Ingraham when he wrote an article that described the situation. In addition to the report the writer included state flags that possessed imagery of the confederate flag. It is important to note that both positions regarding the removal of such imagery were included: controversy, and heritage; leaving the reader ample possibility to decide his stand. After the publication of this original piece minor news pages followed the Postās lead. These include John Oliver, ABC news, Chanel 16 News, and finally the Huffington Post. However, once this story reached the Huffington Post it had been greatly altered and new events had occurred. An election had taken place in Mississippi that had voted the confederate imagery in their flag to stay. In the article by the Huffington post the writing was much more subjective, and aggressive in the way it attacked suppoters of the flag. Overall, the story, the context, and the overall quality of the piece that was originally published by the Washington Post decayed greatly into a small puff piece covering the news.Ā