a. Marine Conservation Institute (Web)
This site had moderate activity, including a few highly relevant blogposts and some interesting articles.
b. Marine Conservation Institute (Twitter)
This site had very high activity throughout the course of the WCC, especially significant updates about events and motions at the Congress.
This site had moderate activity during the WCC, but most of the information was regarding information not from the congress.
d. NOAA- Sanctuaries (Twitter)
This site had very high activity and was consistently posting about relevant sessions during the WCC. Every update dealing with the WCC was significant.
This site did not post often, but when it did the information was highly relevant.
This site posted quite often, but it usually was not relevant to marine issues at the WCC. During the WCC there was frequent posts about their planned movements.
g. The Nature Conservancy (Twitter)
This site posted very rarely and almost never about the WCC.
This site had limited posts, but seemed to be involved at the WCC.
i. Blue Solutions (Facebook)
This site posted moderately and seemed to have quite a bit of community between other groups.
j. Blue Planet Society (Twitter)
This site posted quite a bit during the beginning of the WCC, but seemed to lack in posts towards the end of the WCC.
k. Earth Law Center (Twitter)
This site had fairly moderate activity during the course of the WCC, including interesting updates about the rights of nature and indigenous rights.
l. Mission Blue (Facebook)
This site had very high activity and significant coverage of events, speakers, and motions that occurred during the Congress.
m. Ocean Optimism (Twitter)
This site had moderate activity that did not meet the expectations I had based on prior tweets that promised frequent updates and coverage of the WCC.
This site had very little activity throughout the WCC, with only a few new blogposts added during the 10-day period.
o. Okeanos - Foundation for the Sea (Facebook)
This site had minimal activity, with many posts generally focused on its other interests and concerns, rather than the IUCN Congress.
p. Maui Ocean Center (Twitter)
This site had fairly moderate activity, with much of that focused on promoting it’s booth at the Congress.
q. IUCN Global Marine Community (Facebook)
This site had the lowest amount of activity, which defied expectations, with only one post shared during the entire 10-day period of the Congress.
r. Conservation International (Twitter)
This site had significant activity throughout the course of the WCC and consistently offered unique content each day.