Where can I get a set of these cards?
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Cosimo Galluzzi

Origami Around

JVL

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
noise dept.
tumblr dot com
Peter Solarz
No title available

blake kathryn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Kaledo Art

if i look back, i am lost
No title available
dirt enthusiast
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

shark vs the universe
Three Goblin Art
seen from Latvia
seen from Türkiye
seen from India
seen from Sweden

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belgium

seen from Switzerland
@masspoets
Where can I get a set of these cards?
In a new campaign called “For All,” Obama supporters are encouraged to “[c]hoose one of your reasons for voting and write it on your hand, then pledge to vote.”
While some have called the whole hand gesture thing creepy, I see it as a good marketing idea. After all, this is the age of We Are the 99% and Pet Shaming — the whole have-supporters-submit-photos-with-text-following-a-strict-format thing works for online marketing, and it works well. I have no doubt that we’ll see “For All” photos on Buzzfeed any time now (if they’re not there already).
For me what’s creepy is the brazen hypocrisy of the theme of this project: “For All.”
The reference, of course, is to the end of the Pledge of Allegiance — the “with liberty and justice for all” bit. And the implication is that liberty, justice, and other good things like cleaner energy, as the back of Ms. Johansson’s hand declares, will be available for all under a second Obama term…not just the few rich people Mitt Romney invites to his weekend clam bakes.
That’s a great message, but it’s not one which meshes with Obama’s actual record in office.
Glenn Greendwald has a great book out which has an incredibly appropriate title for this discussion: With Liberty and Justice for Some. If you’re not familiar with Greenwald’s work, he’s a civil liberties litigator and prolific writer whose online home was Salon until he very recently departed for the UK’s Guardian.
As one review summarizes,
[The book] is a damning indictment of America’s two-tiered justice system in which political and financial elites are vested with virtual legal immunity while everyone else is punished for the most trivial of legal infractions. Instead of the law being used to protect those most vulnerable, it has instead, especially in the past four decades, turned into a weapon to protect the powerful from prosecution for their many crimes, and these crimes are outlined in the book with shocking effectiveness.
To give an example on which Greenwald spills a lot of ink, one of the defining features of Obama’s promise of change in 2008 was a return to the rule of law in contrast to the Bush era. He specifically indicated in debate with Hillary Clinton that he would investigate Bush Administration officials for potential war crimes. Yet, even before he took office, Obama indicated that he would not actually pursue the matter. “Nine days before Obama’s inauguration,” Greenwald writes, “the New York Times published an article headlined ‘Obama Reluctant to Look Into Bush Programs.’” And, indeed, the Bush torturers have gotten away scott free.
That’s not the only instance in which “For All” has been proven a flat-out lie in an Obama Administration policy vs. Obama Campaign rhetoric match-up. In an interview on the book, Greenwald comments [emphasis added]:
Obama has displayed no interest whatsoever in holding elites accountable for criminality: not just political actors, but financial elites as well.
If anything, it’s even more unlikely that he would hold elites accountable in his second term…by shielding those who came before him, Obama ensures that he can commit crimes with impunity as well. That’s why all elites—political, financial, media—are motivated to defend and preserve this lawbreaking license for their class.
For further examples of the lack of equal treatment under Obama, consider his assassination without trial of an American citizen and his innocent, 16-year-old son.
Consider his endorsement of additional drug war spending, a failed program which disproportionately targets minorities and the poor. (Is Lindsay Lohan in jail? No? Ok, I think the point is made.)
Consider Bradley [Chelsea] Manning, who was held naked and alone in a tiny cell for up to 23 hours a day while the people responsible for the crimes shown in the documents he leaked walk free.
Consider how eager Obama is to retain the power to indefinitely detain Americans without charge or trial.
Consider what would happen if you committed fraud and also what happened to the Wall Street execs who committed fraud (I don’t have a link for that, because nothing happened except that they got tons of free money).
However nice the pictures may look and however well this campaign may work, Obama is not “For All.” Not even close.
— Bonnie
I just happened to run across this post I wrote like two years ago for the Tumblr Election blog. You know what’s always nice? Reading something your past-self wrote and thinking, “I was not totally dumb back then.”
That happened with this piece this morning, and while the specific photo campaign I wrote about is long over, the main point—that our government is hardly “for all”—is just as relevant as ever. If you’re new(ish) around here, check it out.
Ye olde gender fluidity.
Ye olde Photoshop from DeviantArt. Check Google Images if you don’t believe me; I have a copy of the original photo. (It’s not on my phone, or I would post it this minute.)
ETA: Here’s the original picture:
As you can see, the photographer’s name and city of residence are present on the original photograph: Fridolin Arnold of Innsbruck (Austria).
Here’s the link to the OP’s photograph. The creator is called Eves-Rib; she often creates pictures and photomanips in which women are dressed in men’s clothes and men are dressed in women’s clothes. The picture of the couple in each other’s clothing is labeled thus:
Early twentieth century couple
by Eves-Rib
Digital Art / Photomanipulation / Fantasy
PHOTOMANIPULATION. FANTASY. It’s a very good photomanip, but it does not document a real moment in the life of that particular couple.
Okay so, I’ve seen a LOT of people making comments about Australia’s ‘minimum wage’ being at almost $17 an hour all over tumblr, and I’m just going to take a moment to educate you guys on how this works, because this needs to be brought up.
Lets start with what you know:
This here is what...
Artists: Adara Sánchez Anguiano.
wetbehindthears:
Ap lit
side note i'm a christian... Okay so in AP lit class we were talking about Dorian Gray and I wanted to explain the parallels between the world/sin-God/righteousness, Lord Henry Wotton(guy who messes Dorian up in the head)-Basil(nice painter guy who loves Dorian), and finally Norman Snively(evil clown from air bud)-Josh Framm(the good kid from air bud). I'm not the best at articulating so the teacher was like the clown is God and the boy was the world. People thinking God is comparible to some mean Clown man and that the world is like a nice little boy who takes care of you no matter what even when you make messes and stuff is so WRONG. Air bud... it gets deep.
Exercise
Do it!! cause before exercise my brain is like "I wish i din't exist". Then after i'm like i feel like existing isn't super bad.
We found that only one out of six Americans can find Ukraine on a map, and that this lack of knowledge is related to preferences: The farther their guesses were from Ukraine’s actual location, the more they wanted the U.S. to intervene with military force.
That's super annoying
This is definitely me…..
Don't fact check for fun
My ideal mate is extremely beautiful and extremely gross.
Dorian Gray
I think it’s fully possible to have lots of self-esteem and pride but also still feel like you’re not the type of person who gets to be with their idea of the perfect person. I just often feel like I get so close, and then realize it’s nothing. People think I’m smart, and nice, and wonderful, and...
Mark this. You can never find your right "one" until you're their right "one". And even if you did you will wish you were prepared... In fact even when you are prepared you'll wish you were more prepared.
Support for [medical marijuana] ballot measures and similar efforts…transcends political lines. Why? Because cancer, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and other chronic and terminal diseases have no partisan affiliations.
Michelle Malkin, in a somewhat surprising but admirable post about the legalization of medical and recreational marijuana in her state, Colorado.
What’s interesting about this piece is that Malkin, a staunch social conservative, admits that she worries about “the negative costs, abuses and cultural consequences of unbridled recreational pot use”—but she also observes that legalized marijuana has real benefits for people who need it as medicine, and that the legal pot shops in CO are clean, safe, and professional as they fulfill a need demanded in the newly free marijuana market.
This article is a great example of the way social conservatives can take a libertarian political approach to these sorts of issues while not abandoning their own convictions. It’s also a testament to the persuasive value of personal stories in changing people’s minds on the drug war. Definitely give it a read.
(via hipsterlibertarian)
:)
Rand Paul 2016
Libertarianism is most simply defined as a basic hostility to the government and its institutions. A full-fledged libertarian wants few (if any) state-owned enterprises, no constraints on private enterprises by government regulations, extremely low taxes, total individual freedom in the social realm, primacy of privacy rights over governmental intrusion, and the reduction of armed forces and police to a minimum. Libertarians rule out any kind of government-backed social protection such as pensions and unemployment insurance. Much of this appeals to deep cultural roots in the United States. But the full program is so extensive that very few people have been ready to embrace it completely.
Opinion: Libertarian politics in the United States: Has the time come for a shake-up of the U.S. two-party stranglehold? (via aljazeeraamerica)
Yes
Better
It is truly better to die fighting evil then to live in complacency.
-me to every stranger I meet
This is good