Final Post and Tumblr Reflection
The conclusion of Weller’s book History in the Digital Age discusses some very important topics regarding many of the things discussed within class. First, historiography, or the writing of history, has been changing often. In regards to the digital age, Weller argues that historians do not need to be computer experts in order to write, study, and analyse history. Rather, he thinks they should be aware of the changes made and see how this is affecting our studies. We encounter this all the time as students while doing research. Some of these aspects are positive, while others tend to be distracting. As discussed, historians develop a respect and value for the physical documents we encounter. Its rarity is important and teaches us something more than the amateur historians reads about online. While the digitization of these documents may indeed save these texts, Weller brings up a good point about how a document created on a text processor is easier to lose track of than a physical hand written document. With the physical, we can see the changes made over time. Regarding the topic of education, this directly relates to course in general. We have thoroughly discussed these types of trends in class and are discussing the issues surrounding all types related materials. For example, through our Wikipedia assignment we have seen first-hand the issues associated with quality of information being presented. There are many instances of manipulation and should be aware of the possible pitfalls historians could fall into with those types of sources. Weller writes “the traditional skills of the historian will continue to remain as potent as ever”(199). I agree with this statement because our skill set as historians are unique in their own way, as shown through our ‘mock job interview’ exercise. As a class, we pointed out how valuable the skills we develop in this field can be. Just because the use of the internet may seem to make things simpler in many ways, does not mean we will abandon or forget the traditional lessons we have learned. The projects completed within the class outline this point including Wikipedia, Building Stories, and Tumblr.
The use of Tumblr as a medium to present, share, and discuss history actually turned out to be fairly manageable and interesting. Through the website, it was easy to follow other classmates and professors and keep track of what people were posting. If one took the time to explore Tumblr and browse the numerous blogs to discover what was being presented about history, you could find some really interesting sites. Not only that, but one could customize what you followed by choosing blogs that suited the historical interests of the individual. The variety of tools and document types available for posting can made a very interesting experience for the class. We discovered that some blogs were better than others based on what background information was being shown. While some posts provided links and possibly sources, others were just straight pictures, which could have easily been faked or altered. Some of the aspects of using Tumblr for the class, however, for me often got pushed aside due to the many assignments in the class. There were times I wanted to dig deeper into the use of Tumblr for historical presentation, but often got overwhelmed because of my other classes and assignments.













