maufungi

Hi, I am new on tumblr and have to learn a lot and make a massive amount of mistakes. Good Omens brought me here and won't let go of me thanks to all the awesome and entertaining metas, theories, artworks and Neil interacting with the fans. Unhinged metas and 2D animations are my metier~ Patreon

[noneorother]

I wrote an essay about the ending of Good Omens, and you can read it now.

You can't bite the apple twice.

How I learned to love the finale of Good Omens for what it is (and maybe you can, too).

It got so long I had to find another home for it, but if you're feeling sad, confused, lonely or even ambiguous after the finale, maybe reading some hopeful analysis will ease the way. I haven't written an essay in 12 years but this is what this show has done to me so here we are.

[notablogto]

they were never going to be free to love each other

I think part of why the S3 ending works for me, despite how painful it is, is that Aziraphale and Crowley never actually had free will in the original universe.

Not really.

We, as the audience, experienced their relationship through a very human lens, so we kept imagining they could eventually just “run away together” and finally be happy as an angel and demon. But the finale reveals something much darker: their entire existence existed inside an authored system.

God admits She kept putting them together because their love amused Her. Crowley was “given” to Aziraphale. Their meetings across history were not random. Their longing was observed, nudged, cultivated, but never actually allowed to fully resolve.

That’s horrific.

Not because their love wasn’t real. Their love was probably the most real thing in the universe. But the framework surrounding it was fundamentally manipulative.

They were never safe. Never free. Never truly allowed to choose each other completely.

Which is why the ending ultimately requires a new universe.

Not because Aziraphale and Crowley “failed” to make it work. Because the original cosmology itself was abusive.

The tragedy is not that they loved each other and lost. The tragedy is that they finally realized the game itself was rigged.

And once they understood that, there was no ethical way to continue existing inside it.

[callirhoesposts]

Good Omens 3 Spoilers

I’ve seen so many comments about the ending of Good Omens and I honestly don’t really understand why so many people seem to dislike it.

Because to me… it makes perfect sense.

Crowley chooses humanity.

Crowley chooses a universe where there is no Hell, no Heaven, no cosmic machine grinding people down, no divine bureaucracy deciding what people deserve, no eternal system built on punishment and obedience. And that is so consistent with who he is. With who he has always been.

This is the angel who created stars at the very beginning and was already furious at the idea that all of it might be destroyed in only 6000 years. The angel who always asked too many questions. The angel who never fit neatly into the categories he was assigned. The angel who couldn’t stop caring.

And in the end, he becomes what he always was: someone who refuses to accept that the world has to be cruel just because the rules say so.

So yes, he makes the ultimate sacrifice, not just of his existence, not just of his immortality, but of the life he could have had with Aziraphale. He gives up his own eternity, his own love, to give humanity a chance to exist freely. Not “good” according to Heaven, not “bad” according to Hell. Just… human.

And Aziraphale’s choice is just as consistent.

Because Aziraphale has always wanted to do the good thing. Not the lawful thing. Not the thing that makes him a “proper angel.” The good thing. The kind thing. The thing that protects people.

He already sacrificed Crowley once and we know how much it costs him. We know how much Crowley means to him. (“Crowley make him complete.”) So when he chooses humanity again, when he chooses the world over his personal happiness again… it hurts, but it’s logical. It’s what he has always been moving towards.

They both choose love.

Not just romantic love, but love as a moral stance. Love as an act of rebellion.

And that’s why, even before the ending makes them human, it feels so Terry Pratchett to me.

Because Pratchett’s stories aren’t about destiny being noble or grand. They’re about how the universe is messy, people are messy, and yet somehow the small choices still matter. They’re about doing the right thing not because it’s heroic, but because it’s necessary. Because someone has to.

Pratchett always believed that what matters is not what you are, but what you choose.

And the ending is exactly that.

It’s not “angel and demon saved the world.” It’s “two beings who were never supposed to care chose to care so much they broke the entire structure of reality to give humans a chance.”

And the final touch, them as humans, finding each other again, is such a Pratchett ending too.

Bittersweet. Gentle. Hopeful.

Not a grand triumph. Not a perfect fairytale. But the quiet suggestion that love and goodness have a way of surviving even the end of the world. That if you take away Heaven and Hell, you don’t erase meaning, you finally give it back to people.

God doesn’t “reward” them with a neat happy ending. God simply lets the most human thing happen:

They find each other again. And maybe they will again, and again, and again And honestly… I think that’s beautiful.

[theastrophysicistnextdoor]

The Ineffable Detective Agency presents: Decoding 1941 Hell – The Hidden Morse Messages

The Good Omens team never fails to surprise us: In the Hell scenes set in 1941, there are subtle beeps in the background that many might have missed: morse code messages! 

We took the time to decode these messages from about 5 minutes of the show – some parts are easy to identify, some parts are really hard due to overlying sounds or noises. 

We used the 5.1 audio and selected only the channel with the morse signals. Check out an easy snippet – which line is it? :)

Then, we applied high- and low-pass filters to emphasize the code’s pitch around 1360 Hz. Some of us have pretty sharp ears, some of us worked with the frequency spectra to mark short and long signals as well as pauses in between. 

Here is what we have heard or seen, together with some facts and thoughts on the lines. Let us know what you think!

S2E4 06:19 to 08:23 “Have a miserable eternity”

Here are the pieces we have successfully decoded: 

HAVE A DREADFUL ETERNITY

We are wondering why this is different to the text via loudspeaker as well as Furfur’s “have a miserable eternity”...

TOMMY’S A LEGEND

Do we know a Tommy?

1) There's the Welsh magician/comedian Tommy Cooper (his magical act specialized in magic tricks that appeared to fail), who was the inspiration for the red fez in the magic shop. Cooper died live on television suffering a heart attack. :(

2) There's also the lead character Tommy in Brigadoon, the plot of which feels seriously GO-coded. There is a magic village hidden outside time that only appears in Scotland once every 100 years and is connected to the rest of the world with a bridge, outsiders who find "clues about the village and its people that make no sense", and a plot about unlikely lovers who are separated (because one "can't just leave everything in the real world behind"), and an ending that reunites the lovers against all odds because of the strength of their love ("I told ye, if you love someone deeply enough, anything is possible ... even miracles.")

PAUL’S OUR MIXING HERO

Could that be the Re-Recording Mixer PAUL McFADDEN?

ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION ABAN

The phrase "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here" is a quote from Dante’s Inferno, Prelude to Hell, Canto III, Vestibule of Hell: Dante passes through the gate of Hell, which bears an inscription ending with the phrase "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate". So, the minisode is THE place where we get quotes from the two most famous literary accounts of Hell – with Furfur's quotation of Paradise Lost in the dressing room at the Windmill Theater: "In dubious battle on the Plains of Heaven". 

S2E4 09:16 to 10:09 “Processing the Nazis”

ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION

S2E4 11:07 - 13:12: “The offer to return as Zombies”

These two minutes are very tricky: while in the first half it is ok-ish to identify the signals in the spectrum, the second half is overlaid by so much noise… – yes, we are calling the dialogues and sounds in hell noise now :D – that we chose a different approach. 

It looked as if the sequence starts from the beginning, so we compared both parts, and now we are quite sure that it is the same pattern. 

DO NOT LICK THE WALLS HEAVEN LOOKS DOWN ON YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE PATHETIC ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION DO NOT LICK THE WALLS HEAVEN LOOKS DOWN ON YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE PATHETIC ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE CHEER UP IT’S ONLY ETERNAL DAMNATION DO NOT LICK THE WALLS HEAVEN LO …

So those are the sections we are pretty certain we have correct. However, there is one section we are still unsure on - maybe you can help?

Back to S2E4 06:19 to 08:23

We have been fighting hard with the first six seconds, before “HAVE A DREADFUL ETERNITY” and we think it is:

SHE’S IN MA PHONE

Who are we talking about now?

Do you have any other ideas of what this could be? If it is “She’s in ma phone”, what does that mean? Or is the S just noise and it starts with an H? Or even with a B – BE’S IN MA PHONE?

So, what are your thoughts on all of these messages? Why go to the effort of putting morse code here? Is it a fun easter egg, or something more? And why say “dreadful eternity” in morse when the quote used in the show is “miserable eternity”? We have so many questions!

Spoiler: There is more code hidden throughout the series.  Let us know what you see or hear!

-... .    -.- .. -. -..    - ---    . .- -.-. ….    --- - …. . .-. 

An amazing joint effort with @noneorother, @kimberleyjean, @thebluestgreen, and @embracing-the-ineffable at the @ineffable-detective-agency

See more of our posts, plus a collection of Clues and metas from all over the fandom, here.

[kimberleyjean]

Good Omens is Weird - camera angles, discontinuity and perspective

I'm picking up my series on discontinuities again, because I have a lot more to add. Part of what makes Good Omens so mysterious is how the team are making purposeful "errors" all over the place. Everything is a bit "weird" as Nina would put it.

While a lot of discontinuity in Good Omens has already been documented, there's still so much to uncover. So, let's look at some of the curious editing and continuity decisions that have been made.

As has been pointed out before, some camera cuts in season 2 are just plain odd. But there isn't just one weird camera cut in S2, there are a lot and often the weirdness happens as we switch between camera angles.

Episode One

What do I mean by weird cuts? Well, take Crowley's first scene, on the park bench with Shax.

The way it's been edited, we see Crowley put down his newspaper more than once - once in the mirror that Shax holds, and once in the normal shot (credit to @ineffable-detective-agency):

But there's more! In this same scene, the way its been stitched together, Shax's bag is all over the place (credit to @leftduck9986 for spotting this one). Take a look at where Shax's bag is from one shot to the next. The screenshot below are in the order they're shown:

Timestamps ~11:57 and 11:58:

~12:11 and 12:15:

So, from the camera closest Shax, her bag is down, from the other angle, it's up.

It's The Minisodes Too...

It's not just the current day that's wonky. In 1941, as Crowley is dropping off the whiskey to Mrs H, from one camera angle you'll notice a black top hat (complete with a toy white rabbit) on the stage table. Here it is by her left shoulder:

From the other angle, and the distance shot, the hat is gone:

Likewise, in the magic show itself, we have a mysteriously appearing and disappearing blue object. In front-on shots it's on the floor next to the table, but from other angles it's not (credit to @maufungi for finding this one):

Now, if you're thinking "well, all of these are easy mistakes to make", consider that these last two examples require leaving props around that aren't required for the scene. Also consider that this is a show which makes many other purposeful "mistakes".

Mistakes like Gabriel's statue missing its cross, the shop signs losing their names, and sideburns and wigs that don't know what length to be, and of course, the suddenly appearing Honolulu Roast board. They are plentiful. And that's just scraping the surface.

But then - what are we to make of these differences? I'm open to a lot of different theories, but overall I'm inclined to think we are being shown a woven together story. Is it woven from different perspectives of the same events? Woven from repeating events like some sort of extended Groundhog Day? And if so, WHY? What does this mean for our story?

The next time you're watching Good Omens, take a look at a scene which was filmed from multiple angles (nearly all of them are) and compare between each angle. Do you spot anything different?

I have more to share in future, so please stick around for future posts. If this show hasn't gotten weird for you yet, it will...

[noneorother]

So were Neil and Douglas ever going to tell anyone that there were two suns at the end of episode 6…?

The ineffable detective agency has been busy lately with codes and signals, so I thought I’d just pop on and howl into the void with a few things.

Like the fact that if these two shots were supposed to be happening simultaneously for real, then SoHo’s got a little physics problem.

The southeast end of the street AND the north west end of Whickeber Street have a sun rising/setting behind them at the same time. Look at the direction of the light and shadow on the cars and the road, and how the sun is always the both of their backs. While they look towards the other. On opposite sides of the road.

I’m not saying that it’s impossible that it’s an error or an artistic choice, but with the amount of clues and hints that have been dropped by the creators about light I think it’s pretty unlikely. But it gets worse.

look at the bookshop during the angel and demon conference, and during the final 15 argument.

The sunlight starts streaming in both both sides while they’re still in the bookshop while they’re still in it. Compare with when we see the bookshop at other times throughout the earlier episodes. It does not look like this.

So are we playing 4D chess with the sun now?

Members who want to share our confusion with the Good Omens fandom include: @bbbitchvibbbez @embracing-the-ineffable @kimberleyjean @maufungi @noneorother @theastrophysicistnextdoor @thebluestgreen

[ineffable-detective-agency]

DAVID WHAT HAS HAPPEN TO YOUR HAND?!

Welcome to AI hands and fingers hell!

Does Crowley have a third hand?! An extra finger? Two left arms?!

He looks as surprised by it as we are!

This hilarious, reality-defying PSA is brought to you after a collective brain meltdown among the entire Ineffable Detective Agency.

Members who want to share our confusion with the Good Omens fandom include: @bbbitchvibbbez @embracing-the-ineffable @kimberleyjean @maufungi @noneorother @theastrophysicistnextdoor @thebluestgreen

See more of our posts plus a collection of Clues and metas from all over the fandom, here.

[opscuritas]

I want to share some of my AziraCrow studies in case anyone finds them helpful!

✨ Reblog to help fellow artists ✨

If you find this helpful (and if you're able to) come support me on Ko-fi 💜 (you can also enter and see my stuff since everything I post there is free!)

Instagram | Ko-fi

[maufungi]

They are out of order

My dear Good Omens meta enthusiasts..

He did it… Neil did the ultimate confusion trick to get us occupied until season 3 is finished…

Dialogues that appear to be one continuous scene are ripped apart and stitched together out of order.

The color grading changes, the music stops from one cut to another. Some have already suspected something like this, due to the suddenly changing clock hands and changing lighting moods within some scenes.

But now I found proof.

I was on my (not counting anymore) rewatch of season 2, when I encountered this strange dialogue scene between Crowley and Shax in episode 2 (timestamp 7:27).

The street it wet at the beginning. The color grading more on the yellow side. And Crowley seems to be in a good mood.

Then there is the cut to Shax inside the Bentley. We hear a miracle sound (implying that Shax miracles herself into the Bentley, but maybe it means something different). The music from before stops. The colors are more blueish. Crowley is more serious.

After the dialogue Crowley drives away. An guess what? The street is dry now.

And the Bentley starts off from another spot on the street:

The Bentley passes the trash bin (from episode 1), which wasn't there at the beginning of this scene:

My conclusion from this observation:

Not only are the scenes out of order, but individual cuts within dialogue. As long as characters aren't in the same camera shot.. I have to doubt if they are in the same dialogue/scene at the given time…

I think there are a lot more of these scenes. And it is a lot of work to go trough all of them. But "luckily" we have a ton of time till season 3 arrives.

It's insane… and I am ready for it.

[maufungi]

Hey, I found the missing Loki statue: in the Thor Ragnarok movie (at the same timestamp).

I love these meta nods to the movies. 💚

[maufungi]

It's about who.

Pretty sure he looked at something he wants at minute 39:09 (Season 2 episodes 6 and 5, Season 1 episode 6)

Also:

Thor movie at minute 39:09.

[maufungi]

Someone on Twitter mentioned, that Mobius isn't answering B-15's question "You okay?" at the end of the series finale - So I searched for a matching timestamp somewhere else.. and I found a fitting answer.

Comparison S2E6 and S1E4 (title sequence)

Minute 23:27= "You okay?" The title Sequence shows "Access denied" on the display.

The lyrics are what I think are Mobius' thoughts about Loki = Shall I catch a shooting star? Shall I bring it where you are? If you want me to, I will

So the answer is, no, he is not okay 💔

[maufungi]

This time he chose his own prison.

(comparison of Loki S2 finale and The Avengers movie)

[maufungi]

A comparison of Loki S2 episode 6 and The Avengers movie played from minute 39:24 onwards

[maufungi]

Something Dark or Death

So there is that scene in episode 5 where Crowley says to Nina:

"Give me coffee or give me death. Funny name for a coffee shop."

It's a strange time in the series to mention that now.

So I did what I always do when it comes to Good Omens at the moment… I look at the timestamp of the episode, when a suspicious line is spoken, and search for a fitting Bible verse with that number.

Here it is at minute 22:10. And this is the Bible verse (Revelation 22:10):

"Then he told me, “Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this scroll, because the time is near."

It's from the Book of Revelation, you know, the prophecies of the last days before Christ’s return. The Second Coming.

So this sentence is important. I'm sure there is more to find and possible links to other metas. But for now, I want to focus on the funny name of the coffee shop.

Give me coffee or give me death. I say Neil loves words and their meanings. And Bible-related numbers.

So let's focus on the word "coffee". Why coffee? There could be any other shop, but without coffee, the hints that Neil wants to give us wouldn't work, I assume.

Coffee -from Arabic قَهْوَة‎ (qahwa, “coffee, a brew”) -The "coffee" sense is ultimately of disputed origin. (…), the original meaning could have been "dark stuff," related to Hebrew כָּהָה‎ (“dull, weak, dim”)

This post https://www.tumblr.com/gallup24/732418097410146304/the-clue-behind-them by @gallup24 introduced me to "The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible" by James Strong. In short: it's a word index to the Bible. (It was used in season 1 for the room number of the hellhound = 2549, which is Strong's Number for "kakia" - meaning "wickedness", "evil").

According to Strong's Concordance, the Hebrew word כָּהָה (dark stuff) has the number 3543. You want to see what's going on at minute 35:43 of each episode in season 2?

Here you go:

Episode 1 = BEELZEBUB: No, it exists. Extreme sanctions.

Episode 2 = JOB: Our children are dead?

Episode 3 = CROWLEY: Yes, whatever happened to him? AZIRAPHALE: He left Edinburgh in disgrace. And then he killed himself.

Episode 4 = (The Nazi Zombies leave the backstage room. Also their last scene in this season.)

Episode 5 = The sentence starts at 35:42 but the second half is on point with the word "humans".

CROWLEY: (I'm gonna get the) humans out of here and then I'm coming back.

(This scene is about saving the humans from death, because Shax was ready to "(..)hurt them indirectly. We can definitely hurt them whilst battling angels. They'd be civilian casualties.")

Episode 6 = AZIRAPHALE: You brought me a coffee? METATRON: Are you going to take it?

And this.. reads to me as a death threat. I don't think Aziraphale had a choice.

Maybe he thought that by accepting the Metatron's coffee and his offer to come back to heaven, he could prevent the "give me death" part. But he gets both.

The coffee means death. And not taking the coffee also means death.

Nina should rename her shop to "Give me coffee AND give me death."

[maufungi]

[maufungi]

The Missing Song

I think I found the missing song from the Crowley and Aziraphael wine date in 1941.

Everything about that is explained in this awesome meta post:

https://www.tumblr.com/noneorother/731212031467896832/all-the-music-you-didnt-hear-the-good-omens?source=share by @noneorother

I have to go a little further to explain how I found the song.

There are 3 parts to this:

Part 1 - Finding the song Part 2 - Does it fit? Part 3 - Am I going crazy?

Part 1 - Finding the song

I don't remember exactly when it happened, but sometime shortly after the second season aired, I read somewhere that the new title sequence had hidden clues. I didn't know what clues these might be, so I looked closely at everything (and yes, by that I mean I watched it frame by frame).

Actually, I was focused on the characters and wanted to figure out who was which figure. But then I noticed things in the background. And especially this:

I wondered what kind of cool record cover that could be. So I retouched it a bit. Maybe it reads: IT WAS ALL A Dream.

The picture was too blurry for Google to search for it in reverse. So I just googled "It was all a dream song", hoping to find that neon sign somewhere as a title cover (that's my description of what I found at that time, some weeks ago. At the end of this post in "Part 3", I explain how this search ended today for me and why I have to lie down after writing this…). But there was no fitting title cover (at that time).

I found nothing so I searched for "It was all a dream neon sign". It might be a famous picture I don't know about.

Oh cool, just a common neon sign. I used one of these to do a Google reverse image search. Im 99.99% sure that this song cover was one of the results at that time (but I am unable to recreate that search and I don't know why, and I am beginning to doubt my memory…):

"It Was All A Dream" by Rahul Gohli.

Oh. The title. Ugh.

First, I looked up what kind of song it was. Maybe it had lyrics that led me to some cool meta. But no. There are no lyrics. I didn't find anything interesting about the artist Rahul Gohil. So I saved this clue as a side note for now.

The title "It was all a dream" could have something to do with the fact that the minisodes/flashbacks don't seem real, or that Aziraphael is an unreliable narrator. There are some cool metas (SPOILERS):

https://www.tumblr.com/ineffable-suffering/729446128795402240/why-aziraphale-is-an-unreliable-narrator?source=share by @ineffable-suffering or https://www.tumblr.com/indigovigilance/729908186775158784/every-single-minisode-is-aziraphales-memory by @indigovigilance .

Part 2 - Does it fit?

But then I read @noneorother’s post (mentioned at the beginning. Don't scroll up. Here it is again: https://www.tumblr.com/noneorother/731212031467896832/all-the-music-you-didnt-hear-the-good-omens?source=share)

A whole song is missing? Let's take a look at the wine scene in 1941 (episode 4, about 36:29). For a brief period of approximately 1 minute and 3 seconds, there is no background music. So the missing song must be of the same length.

"It was all a dream" by Rahul Gohil is 1:10 on YouTube.

Well…I played both the 1941 scene and the song at the same time.

And it fits.

The length. The atmosphere. The card dropping from Aziraphale's hand fits to the ringing bell sound in the song.

I think that's a huge clue… for something…

Rahul Gohil has more songs. The whole album is called "It was all a dream"on his Spotify and YouTube. But I am really bad at analyzing music… Perhaps someone else finds something interesting.

Wouldn't that be a nice ending for a little music meta that I found unintentionally?

Well…

Part 3 - Am I going crazy?

For the sake of this post, I wanted to recreate my steps in finding this song. So I did it again. The same steps. Searching for "It was all a dream neon sign". I found this free to use-photo on pexels.com that looked like the original motive for the song cover:

It's by Marani Ceja: https://www.pexels.com/photo/neon-text-at-cellar-bar-entrance-4509351/ called "Neon text at cellar bar entrance", uploaded on May 29th, 2020 and taken At Nov 23, 2019. I don't know if this is a famous location.

I thought maybe I could skip the Google reverse image search this time. It's possible that Rahul Gohil's song cover shows up directly in the image search. I googled "It was all a dream song".

But it didn't show up. This came up instead:

What the hell is this?

"It Was All A Dream" by David Wright.

I am 99.99% certain that there was no such song/album in my results a few weeks ago! Because I would have stopped looking for another. I would have thought: "Oh cool, a British musician with a fitting song title. Too bad I can not play it on Spotify because it's grayed out. Maybe it's not available in my country. What a pity." And I would have moved on.

This song was not there. But now it is and I am confused. What is happening?

David Wright is an English keyboard player and composer. He released his first album 1989. And in 2022 he released his latest album. But where the hell is this Spotify album called "It was all a dream" which has the same cover art as the Rahul Gohil song?

I can't find it. It's not on his or his music label's website. Not on Soundcloud, not on YouTube.

It's only on Spotify… Grayed out (for me), and it's written by Elizabeth Pine and released on October 2, 2020: https://open.spotify.com/intl-de/album/4TmldBSkaHIlV5s7IwstaI

I don't know if the dates are always correct on Spotify (there are some reports for release dates of albums being insanely incorrect). But I think you can edit the release date after uploading an album…

The Rahul Gohil song was released on Spotify on December 2, 2020. But on YouTube it is uploaded on December 1 but in the description: "Released on: 2020-12-02". Provided to YouTube by Ditto Music.

October 2 and December 2, 2020? What a weird coincidence.

Here is another funny date I found: November 2, 2021 Good Omens Season 2 began filming.

The other spelling is this:

2.10.2020 David Wright song was released 2.12.2020 Rahul Gohil song was released 2.11.2021 Good Omens Season 2 began filming

Wasn't there something with the number 21 in Good Omens? 21 minutes? Earth's birthday on 21st of October?

I don't know anymore.

Maybe someone can find that David Wright song. Or maybe… there is a third song with the same album cover and title on YouTube:

"It Was All A Dream" by One Dream & UnMasked Tommy (release March 30, 2023).

But now we have 3 songs… and there was something about the number 3 and magic and something…

I may have dreamed that there was no David Wright song, but for now my mind is empty.

I love the music of Good Omens, so I'm just gonna listen to the OSTs for now and lie down~