The Folly of Youth
To Love an Arthur, Pt 1
Those of my acquaintance who have read Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Bronte quite often express astonishment at Helen’s ability to act civilly, even graciously, toward Arthur Huntingdon despite the harrowing trials through which he drags her during their relationship. His deplorable actions continually hurt his wife emotionally and sometimes physically. He makes light of and often infantilizes her and her feelings, often purposefully distressing her for his own amusement. Any comfort or happiness he allows her is typically a result of his own manipulation, a necessary state in which she must be so that he may delight himself by destroying her peace a moment later. His character, as we see plainly, is dastardly and narcissistic, and he himself a plague on humanity.
 How, asks one often questions, could Helen bear this treatment? How could she even fancy herself to love such a creature whose vagaries are displayed openly and plainly for the world? How could she not see him for the villain he is and leave him the moment she saw or heard of the things he had done? It seems to be that, among other things, three primary elements are at work against our heroine; the folly of youth, the peril of gradual revelation, and the innocence of a happy childhood and good breeding. The analysis of these elements shall be divided into multiple parts for ease of reading, as I have, it seems, many things to discuss on this matter, and no one to temper my natural verbosity by expressing myself in this manner.
Firstly, we have the folly of youth. I cannot vouch for the age of my dear reader, but I myself have accumulated a number of years sufficient to exclude myself from the category of “child”, nor by the standards of the era in which Wildfell Hall is set may I regard myself as “young.” Helen Lawrence, at the time she meets Arthur Huntingdon, has only recently attained her eighteenth year. She is a girl blooming into young womanhood and onto the social scene. As a well-bred lady of good social standing, the importance of marrying quickly and well has doubtless been impressed upon Helen from an early age. In the modern day, despite the vast differences in values and social convention from the time in which Helen lived, many young women can relate to the feeling that she must marry sooner rather than later, lest she see her friends marry and bear children around her and leave her to stand isolated in the increasingly-lonely sphere of “single womanhood.” Attaining as a single woman the age at which her parents married or had their first child is a jarring experience for many, regardless of the increasing emphasis from modern societal influences in which women are encouraged to chase success rather than families and to reject men in favor of a career and peace of mind.Â
Helen, no doubt, has been thinking of finding a husband and becoming a wife in a respectable household since she was a child. This is the topic of the first conversation in which we witness Helen engage with her aunt before the young lady is permitted to step into the bustling social scene of London. She admits to her aunt, when asked, that she thinks about marriage “often.” Yet her strong character is revealed in her determination to reject the much-older gentlemen her aunt attempts to foist upon her in favor of a man nearer her own age whom she can love and respect. It is of particular note that she never declares an intention of remaining single, nor does she demonstrate any hopes to avoid what was considered by those around her as her social obligation to marry, but precisely the opposite; she declares to her aunt her desire to marry, along with her skepticism that she could even find an unattached man of the caliber which she desires in a marriage partner, which is perhaps a lament sung by many a discerning woman of the present age. Rather than a resolution never to marry, Helen insists on choosing her own partner and refusing to be pressured by her aunt. She demonstrates good principles and a determination to maintain them, qualities she retains throughout the harrowing ordeal of her life to come. Yet she is still young, and many young people—perhaps even yourself, my reader—can relate to the prevalent sentiment among the youth that “I know what’s best for myself,” whether it be from an overinflated estimation of one’s wisdom or a desire for self-sufficiency in matters most personal to one’s self. Â
What I have termed the “folly of youth” is the idea that Mother and Father—or in this case, Aunt—may have good intentions but do not understand the young man or woman in question. It is a belief that the elders in one’s life are not as truly aware of the substance or experiences of the aforementioned young individual, and therefore could not know what is truly best for them. Thus, with such a mentality, the only person best equipped to make determinations and hold opinions on one’s life is the individual to whom it belongs and to whom the experiences and situations occur. Children who are of an age to no longer feel themselves children yet have not quite attained adulthood often align with such a manner of thinking, giving rise to the theme of “teenaged rebellion” which prevails in many societies and households of the modern era. Helen herself does not, as we see by her thoughts and actions she records in her own diary, intentionally rebel against her aunt’s guidance as an act of obstinance for the sake of obstinance, yet there is an overthrow of her aunt’s authority in her choice to not only reject the aged suitors launched in her direction but to pursue Arthur Huntingdon and accept his proposal despite repeated warnings about the unsuitability of his character. Helen’s determination to love Arthur regardless of his displayed deficiencies of character and manner manifests a similar fallacy related to, and perhaps engendered by, the folly of youth, which is the “I can fix him” fallacy. This I shall discuss in a later section, as it relates more specifically to the third element of Helen’s long suffering of her worthless husband. At the present, it is sufficient to recognize that her inexperience and desire to do well on her own merit causes Helen, contrary to the advice of her guardian and the evidence occasionally spread before her own eyes, to submit to Arthur Huntingdon’s attentions.
Helen’s youth and inexperience convince her that, although those in her life who know her character and situation as well as the man in question are wholeheartedly against the match, she has the wisdom and ability to navigate a situation sufficiently precarious to cause readers, should they be not armed with some element of foresight, to predict the union to bring nothing but strife and misery. She believes that all will be well, as she has not had the benefit of years and experiences to inform her of the usual manner in which such situations involving villains of the caliber of her paramour typically resolve. She retains the hope of childhood, trusting that a “happily ever after” must result from a match that she is led to believe is based on a strong love and good intentions. Helen may be excused for believing this on the grounds of her youth, yet such things, as those who have lived beyond the years of childhood often discover, rarely come to pass in this manner.





