Bronte has foregrounded the meeting with Arthur in a conversation just prior to the ball, between Helen and her aunt, which is full of
warnings and admonishment:
'I want to warn you, Helen ... and to exhort you to be watchful and circumspect from the very commencement of your career, and not to suffer your heart to be stolen from you by the first
foolish or unprincipled person that covets the possession of it.'
Not only her aunt's words, but the evidence of her own experience in the early stages of her relationship with Arthur, suggest to Helen that he is not what he seems. But it remains her conviction that the worth of her piety and good influence are what Arthur needs: indeed, that it is her 'mission' to be his 'angel'. Helen is consistently identified as an 'angel', both in the language of the text (her ability to quote the Bible at will is one example of this) and by Arthur himself, in phrases like 'sweet angel' and 'I know she is an angel'. Her aunt's words about Arthur, that he is 'a bit wildish', which she defines as 'destitute of principle, and prone to every vice that is common to youth' , fail in sufficiently warning Helen of the true nature of what she is undertaking; first, because she believes herself to be a good judge of character and therefore that she understands Arthur's faults, and second, and more significantly, because it reinforces her sense of her 'mission' as a reforming 'angel' in Arthur's life:
'Do you imagine your merry, thoughtless profligate would allow himself to be guided by a young girl like you?'
'No; I should not wish to guide him; but I think I might have influence sufficient to save him from some errors, and I should think my life well spent in the effort to preserve so noble a nature from destruction ... sometimes he says that if he had me always by his side he should never do or say a wicked thing, and that a little daily talk with me would make him quite a saint. It may be partly jest and partly flattery, but still-'
'But still you think it may be truth?'
This conversation is a crucial episode, establishing both the focus of the novel and Helen's absolute conviction that, whatever Arthur may be now, being confronted by her love and moral worth on a daily basis will 'influence' him to become a good man. The fact that Arthur is playing this role precisely for the purposes of seduction is apparent both to Helen's aunt and to the reader, and discloses the trap into which Helen is walking, but the language of redemption becomes stronger as the passage continues. Helen states, 'if I hate the sins, I love the sinner, and would do much for his salvation', and 'I shall consider my life well spent in saving him from the consequences of his early errors, and striving to recall him to the path of virtue - God grant me success!" These are almost the words of a preacher, rather than a woman in love, yet Helen is, apparently, fulfilling her role as potential domestic angel to perfection. She is intending to utilize good intentions and virtuous love, not to 'guide' Arthur (which would suggest too much dominance) but to 'influence' him: she is placing his happiness before her own, is willing, at this time, to make any necessary sacrifices, forgive any sins already committed, and call on God to aid her in becoming his 'angel'. With such firm commitment to her correct role, and such eagerness and energy to carry it out, Helen must, surely, achieve some measure of success.
But Helen fails - dismally. Bronte's account of her marriage to Arthur is one of the most savage indictments of both the legal and economic constraints which supported Victorian marriage, and the mythical ideology which deceives Helen into it. Maria H. Frawley has analysed the way in which the language of' angelicness' is used by Arthur to entrap Helen and convince her that she will act as his redeemer:
it is important to note his means of attracting her - his use of language that appeals to her desire to function as a saviour -and the power that he maintains over her because of this language.
Bronte states, without equivocation, that the Angel in the House may exist, but her worth and influence are meaningless and succeed only in deceiving young women into marriage.
Siv Jansson, The Tenant of the Wildfell Hall: Rejecting the Angel's Influence