💌 ── I Love Amy graphics !
f2u w credit ── like / rb if using
untitled
Fai_Ryy
occasionally subtle
Claire Keane
No title available
EXPECTATIONS
d e v o n
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
official daine visual archive
cherry valley forever

blake kathryn
h
Interview Vampire Daily
sheepfilms

Origami Around
Phantogram Three
ojovivo

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ecuador

seen from Malaysia
seen from Portugal

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Morocco

seen from United States
@mikasasrippedtoenail
💌 ── I Love Amy graphics !
f2u w credit ── like / rb if using
thinking about how when i came out as lesbian in the 6TH GRADE my male classmates immediately tried to strike up a conversation with me about their favorite pornstars. YOU ARE A PREPUBESCENT ELEVEN YEAR OLD. WHY ARE YOU WATCHING WOMEN GETTING ABUSED AND TELLING ME ABOUT IT. pornography destroys their minds so young there is no hope omfg
Sutematsu Oyama (1860-1919): Japan’s First College-Educated Woman
Full entry (with footnotes) here. Patreon here. Art notes behind the cut.
Keep reading
A great start to Women’s History Month
"I support women's wrongs" you cry when a woman raises her voice against your 35 year old uwu gay babies
i’m going to kdxjdhdjhddjjdhs
There are so many male billionaires that most people don't even know the name of that have a thousand time worse ecological footprint yet it's Taylor that's always targeted. I do not at all support her actions but her being targeted everytime is nothing but misogyny.
or it's because she's a public figure who positions herself as a Liberal and is worshipped by her fans.
Criticizing the bourgeoisie is ofcourse the right thing to do but if you cease to keep it constructive and attack her dignity as a woman along with calling her a cunt or a bitch, you're just perpetuating misogyny. If you give men the right to ridicule women solely for the "greater good", it would inevitably give them the room to attack women of middle and poor social classes as well. The moral necessity of being misogynistic to cruel women does not exist.
Having two x chromosomes saves women from a myriad of diseases. Genetic disorders are usually inherited from the sex chromosomes of a child's parent. They can be either expressed as dominant or recessive, albeit the boundary between the definition is quite thin. In case of X linked recessive disorders, only males are affected at large. This is because if a babygirl recieves one normal and one affected x chromosome from her parents, she would be a carrier instead of a bearer of the disease while for a boy, the chances of being affected are 50%. Some X linked recessive disorders are colourblindness, muscular dystrophy and haemophilia. In particular, Haemophilia B was known as the "royal disease" and passed down across the European continent through Queen Victoria's lineage who was believed to be the first carrier of this disease. Here are a few punett squares to the difference in risks of having affected children of both gender:
In all of the above cases, the total % of colourblind daughter is 25% while that of a son is 50% In real life. There are 8.3% male colourblind people while only 0.5% women are colourblind. What's interesting is that in case 5, while daughters have a 0% chance of being colourblind sons have a 100% chance. In addition to this, for Y linked diseases the chances of men being affected is also 100%:
I am eternally grateful to my supreme biology and my two x chromosomes that make me the complete human. Women are the more advantageous species for nature thusly we have a better immune system as compared to men. My biology teacher commented that x linked recessive disorders like balding are a curse from women for men to reciprocate the suffering we endowed. Next time you see a bald man, just remember it's a reward from his mother for being a piece of shit♡
Mind you these men are saying these things while showing their faces. Now imagine what those are saying who do not show their faces. Actually you don’t have to imagine that, you can look at https://dieunsichtbarenmaenner.wordpress.com/menu/
It's missing 2 of the men in Bettina Flitner's photo series. Here they are:
"I first went to a brothel at 17. The chicks are clever, there's no chatter. I was in a relationship for 4 years but it always comes out. Now I'm making an Internet platform for sex buyer alibis: accidents, hospital - everything's possible." - Ralf, 28, computer scientist, single
"I've been happily married for 50 years. But my wife, she's very different, a good catholic... The chicks are nice and clean. I meet business friends here, so you can talk about internal stuff in the steam room." - Rudi, 73, businessman, married, 1 daughter.
These men were all interviewed in the Paradise brothel in Stuttgart, a place that has since shut down because its owner, Jürgen Rudloff, has been jailed for sex trafficking.
Here's Bettina Flitner's page with the original, and also her series with women in prostitution. I don't like that the women are photographed in underwear too, but the quotes are worth reading.
and this is what they say with their names and faces attached
The apathy of men is confounding. Buying sex from a women reduces them to a commodity to be bought and sold. Violence against prostitutes is undermined as a service that is to be paid for. Men can coerce women into subjugating themselves further by offering more and more money. The laws surrounding prostitution are not thorough enough to properly protect women in brothels. It's because lawmakers themselves are sex buyers, and so are the businessmen that fund their campaigns, and the workers beneath them. If sex work is empowering, then why don't women get the material benefit from it? It's pimps that recieve the money not the women. These pimps are their abusive partners or their dealers. Prostitution is modern day slavery.
i’m going to kdxjdhdjhddjjdhs
There are so many male billionaires that most people don't even know the name of that have a thousand time worse ecological footprint yet it's Taylor that's always targeted. I do not at all support her actions but her being targeted everytime is nothing but misogyny.
Prompt: Can a person with an eating disorder be a radfem?
Ch1: Yes
Ch2: Yes but only if they are in recovery
Ch 3: No
Ch 4: Nuance/Unsure
This is one of those polls I'm not sure if I should filter out or not, but in the end I've decided to include it assuming good intentions from Nona
Radfems, can a person with an eating disorder be a radfem?
Yes
Yes but only if they are in recovery
No
Nuance/Unsure
I'm not a radfem
I never considered most of radblr would agree on this. I always felt like an impostor because I do not practice what I preach. I have been well deep in ed spaces of both tumblr and twitter and have seen the pure hatred against other women that arises from these spaces. You can't call yourself a radfem if you actively participate in behaviours that are a product of standards set by the patriarchy.
I wYou learn to put women's worth on the number on their scale and consider yourself superior to those heavier than you. Everything's a competition to a person with anorexia. One might think they're insecure(and they are) but arrogance also runs deep inside them. Engaging with ed spaces is not only detrimental to your mental health but also shows your passive support to their toxicity. Reading radical feminist texts are a pathway to recovery, I can attest to that. Semi-recovery is always better than no recovery, if you are trying to recover take it slowly and do it at your place.
Disordered habits and a full blown eating disorder are two very different things. Disordered habits are more of an extreme subset of diet culture while an actual eating disorder is misery incarnate. Most women with actual eating disorders are not doing it for maintaining beauty standards but for "control" or some autonomy over their lives. I don't think being bmi 11 is in the beauty standards. They can ofcourse be excused from this debate. However, it can also be argued that since they focus on being percieved as "skinny" by everyone, they perpetuate the focus on thinness by society. At the end of the day, your desire to be skin and bones, and to be the thinnest person in the room come from a patriarchal train of thought.
Yes, recovery is very hard. It takes a lot of time to unlearn the hatred against women that ed fill you with. Despite this, if you choose to willingfully ignore the misogyny that surrounds eating disorders and paint them as a neutral mental illness free of criticism, you cannot be a radfem. What should differ is your approach to eating disorders : "Yes, I am engaging in a patriarchal behaviour and I acknowledge that my actions harm women around me along with myself. It's very difficult to break free of these behaviours though I actively try to do so and encourage other individuals to do the same."
Fyi, this an attack for no one but myself. I have the deepest sympath for other people with eating disorders though i don't think you can truly be a radfem while also anorexic. This post just points out my own hypocrisy at calling myself a radfem while maintaining bmi 15 and not having had period since last year.
Women used to dominate the beer industry – until the witch accusations started pouring in
Exiling women from the industry
So if you traveled back in time to the Middle Ages or the Renaissance and went to a market in England, you’d probably see an oddly familiar sight: women wearing tall, pointy hats. In many instances, they’d be standing in front of big cauldrons.
But these women were no witches; they were brewers.
They wore the tall, pointy hats so that their customers could see them in the crowded marketplace. They transported their brew in cauldrons. And those who sold their beer out of stores had cats not as demon familiars, but to keep mice away from the grain. Some argue that iconography we associate with witches, from the pointy hat to the cauldron, originated from women working as master brewers.
Just as women were establishing their foothold in the beer markets of England, Ireland and the rest of Europe, the Reformation began. The religious movement, which originated in the early 16th century, preached stricter gender norms and condemned witchcraft.
Male brewers saw an opportunity. To reduce their competition in the beer trade, some accused female brewers of being witches and using their cauldrons to brew up magic potions instead of booze.
Unfortunately, the rumors took hold.
Over time, it became more dangerous for women to practice brewing and sell beer because they could be misidentified as witches. At the time, being accused of witchcraft wasn’t just a social faux pas; it could result in prosecution or a death sentence. Women accused of witchcraft were often ostracized in their communities, imprisoned or even killed.
Some men didn’t really believe that the women brewers were witches. However, many did believe that women shouldn’t be spending their time making beer. The process took time and dedication: hours to prepare the ale, sweep the floors clean and lift heavy bundles of rye and grain. If women couldn’t brew ale, they would have significantly more time at home to raise their children. In the 1500s some towns, such as Chester, England, actually made it illegal for most women to sell beer, worried that young alewives would grow up into old spinsters.
Did you know in the eighteenth century, a good portion of brewers in America were women?
Strict gender norms and fears of witchcraft pushed women out of a centuries-long tradition.
Today, beer is marketed to men and the industry is run by men. It wasn’t always that way.
Rigid gender expectations and norms forced them out of centuries-long tradition.
Most of the government's women empowerment schemes are just misogyny in disguise. Poor women in the name of empowerment work in trades of sewing, embroidery, cooking, farming etc. Their labour is exploited for very little pay in return.
They are not given access to esteemed universities or taught high paying skills. It's because men in power don't actually want women to flourish. They do the bare minimum and manipulate women into believing they have been given the world. Their schemes are only a vote hoarding tactic, never meant for women's actual interest.
Some people here care more about being called a terf than a radfem.
The infantilization of women…will we ever be free?
Disclaimer!!! This is just my opinion and so if I said something wrong, or untrue please let me know and we can discuss it together , just don’t hate. Then in this essay, I talk about sexism, pedophilia, sex and porn, child exploitation, and rape, plus most of this is based on heteronormativity, so if these make you uncomfortable please don’t read it. Also when I talk about women I also intend non-binary, female presenting individuals, and AFAB (assigned female at birth)That’s all, I hope someone will read this and like it, bye <3
The other day I was doing some research on the beauty standards for women and AFAB, what men are attracted to, and all of that jazz because I wanted to see where we are now, and after my snooping around on the internet I honestly had a pretty clear vision.
Big eyes, small nose, thin body, big chest, heart shaped face and the most requested age is 22. Then you need to be well groomed(shaved), have good hygiene, be docile, good at sex, and be submissive. We can already start to see a clear pattern; not only does society make women's life even more difficult with its unrealistic expectations, but they also are pretty much predatory.
I decided to start my research on one of the most used websites, Pornhub, so that I could better understand what people seek and are attracted to sexually. This way you can start to touch with your fingertips, an enormous iceberg full of sexism, pedophilia, racism, trauma responses, and so on. Starting with the most searched tags:
- Teens and I don’t even think it needs an explanation. People just go out of their way to find adult content that has a resemblance to children; the fact that the words ‘adult content’ and ‘children’ are even near each other says a lot. In these videos we can find very young or barely legal looking girls, with usually pigtails, long socks and childish but also extremely revealing clothes, doing sexual activities with big, masculine and old looking men…it’s really easy to understand how this phenomenon is purely paedophilic. This way people can fulfill their sick fantasies without actually consuming child pornography, so at least they are legally ok.
- Japanese, and about this tag there’s a lot to talk about: the school uniform; the racism; fetishization; etc… but here I wanna briefly discuss the Ahegao face. So that we are no the same page, the Ahego or O-face dates from the early 1990s, and it was the expression that a female actor made during an orgasm. But if we were to do more research, we can find out that, the first appearance of this face dates from 1980, in the comic ‘ Shoto Tubaki’, written by Suehiro Mauro. The origins of it come from the sick fantasies of said man, where he portrays a 12 y/o girl during a rape scene. Not only does that continue to push the dangerous stereotypes of submissive Japanese women, but it also dehumanizes, fetishizes, and exploits them.
- Hentai is the western way to say anime pornography and it derives from the Japanese word for ‘perverted’. It is becoming more and more popular in the porn world, some say because it isn’t a human-acted scene so we don’t need to worry about consent and morals, but is it the reason?
Personally,I don’t think so. In hentai the majority of them, if not all, there are numerous imagines of little girls with extremely big chests and butts; they look both mature and childish, so they can give the ‘sexy innocent’ look. Anime porn is also filled with violent and non-consensual scenes, continuing to spread the message that women are just objects for men’s pleasure. Obviously , this aren’t realistic characteristics to find on a children, so if they want to completely live their wet dreams, hentai is the only legal resource. We can also find a lot of porn content that contains kidnapping, rape, and incest, that said, we can understand that it is a pretty much recurring and popular problem.
So if we were to put all of this information together we would have a clear image. People want innocent ‘women’ because when we talk about innocence we also think about children, and children are naturally submissive, docile, and compliant subjects; Using and manipulating them is far easier than doing it on a grown adult; because men (take men really lightly)want a body to use without any inconvenient in their way.
Still talking about the representation of young girls in pop culture, one of the most famous and begin talked about, even after all these years, is the novel ‘Lolita’, written by Vladimir Nabokov. It talks about the relationship between a 12 years old girl named Dolores, and her step-dad Humber, that refers to her as Lolita, thus the title. This novel is also narrated by said step-dad, that sees nothing wrong in what he’s doing and doesn’t view Dolores as a victim, making the reader's experience even more disturbing.
We say that this book is one of the ‘best’ representations of young girls' over-sexualization and their exploitation because there are so many re-make of it on the internet. We have two films, where both actors were minors, musical adaptation, fashion sub-cultures, and signature items such as the heart sunglasses that Dolores wears and her red lipstick.
Just with these pieces of information, we can start to see how many people want to see and hear about stories like this, whether because they wanna educate themselves or because it’s their guilty pleasure it’s pretty much a mystery.
We can also find references to her in a couple of Lana Del Rey songs and her descriptions of her persona.
Lolita went from a disturbing to a sexual icon for young women, but not for the women perse, more for old men. Also, in the film adaptation, Dolores it’s an elegant and gracious figure, and all of her steps seem carefully planned so that she can always look desirable. While in the original book, Nabokov, highlights her tomboyish figure, the fact that she picks her nose and wedges, and repeatedly says that there’s nothing beautiful about her. In fact the meaning of this book was to make the public feel uncomfortable and disturbed, so that he could finally be memorable to them, since the rest of his novels were severely ignored. It was all Humber's sick views that made it that way, but still, that didn’t stop the directors of both films from making specific scenes, where she looked both ‘desirable’ and mature. Not only does this way the main point of the novel gets lost, the point is that we are talking about a normal child who wears and does normal children things, but they are also hinting that she asked for it and it was bound to happen. This way we can better understand how this industry works and the fact that they were trying to make us sympathize and understand the step-dad, whose a rapist and pedophile, in case it wasn’t clear enough, because who wouldn’t? (note the sarcasm)
But the image of seductive and ‘mature young children’, is extremely easy to find in general. So many underage actors are continuously begin called promiscuous and put in inappropriate situations.
From the Britney Spear… ‘Baby one more time’ music video, filmed when she was only 16 years old showing her dressed in a very school uniform that managed to show her bra; to Bjorn Andrésen who became famous at the age of 14 thanks to the film ‘Death in Venice’, representing the role of Tadzio.
The film director called him ‘the most beautiful boy in the world’, gaining international attention from the public and turning him into a sex symbol. Quoting the casting director, Margareta Kramtz : ‘I was standing next to Visconti(the film director) when this blonde guy turned up. It was plain to see Visconti’s body come to life. The boy was exquisitely beautiful, with a truly photogenic face. He was a real find. He was a boy with a special charisma. He seems frail. And that’s really beautiful in a film. You need to be very careful in dealing with children like that’. Or the infamous photoshoots for magazines, even really famous one like Vogue, capturing imagines of women in certain poses that want to resemble innocent looks, usually paired with a childish item; whether it’s a teddy bears or strings and bows in the hair, while still, being logically severely underdressed.
At the start, I also mentioned how men usually want a shaved woman that has good hygiene, with this we can briefly mention the body hair debate.
Every day people go out of their way to shave, wax, and put an extreme amount of creams on their skin so that they can preserve their young looks, just to have to go through the same process after a couple of weeks, spending so much money and time in something that maybe they don’t really wanna do. If we reflect on this, we will notice that society makes women and AFAB, embrace false womanhood. Because we know that once we start to enter it, hairs start to grow, mature features start to appear, and overall we stop being children; what they want us to embrace is in fact girlhood: Flawless skin, no stretch marks, a supposedly thin body, and a childlike personality. At the same time, we have also to be careful and show only selected parts of the grown woman's body; by that, I mean boobs and butt, then, we have to show them off. If we pay even a minimum of attention, we would also notice that all of these rules don’t apply to men and AMAB. They are in fact, always praised and complimented for their mature, ‘silver fox’ looks.
‘The association of femininity with docility and dependence relays the infantilization of women and the hair removal plays on the conception of women as childish and/or immature’
Travisha Sood on ‘verdict’
That said, we can see how gender roles play the biggest role I would dare to say in this debate; because if men/AMAB can have bushes, furs, and insects on their bodies overall, nobody would bat an eye, but if women/AFAB tried to have body hair, a bigger body, strong personality, and different style, society would call them men wannabes, because these are traits that only men can have, or lesbians, because lesbians aren’t for men, and so they aren’t relevant (if not for the fetishization obviously).
I think that now we can understand we aren’t liked because we do not resemble young girls, and so we aren’t naive enough to be used as just a body. Overall, saying that the society that we live in profits on children’s bodies and vulnerability it’s not enough. Infantilising ourselves for public pleasure( aegyo in K-pop from grown adults, the questionable expression on social media, participating in age-play during sexual interchange) only feeds into it, even more, so please, stop.
But has it always had a pedophilic end to it? Obviously not; to explain it better let me re-introduce the patriarchy and its beliefs that men are the only ones that can, and hold the power. So it’s also a sexist ideology used to show that women are simply not mature enough to do basically anything. For example, hugging a woman while shaking hands with a man, giving them nicknames even though you just met each other, explaining a topic in an overly sweet voice if the disadvantaged gender asks for help; from a psychological standpoint, treating someone like a toddler set dominance because it strips them of their autonomy and authority, objectifying them with its unfair power dynamics. So men that want to continue the stereotypical dynamic between genders, whether it’s purposely or not, tend to baby women.
To wrap it all up, we can understand that the infantilization of women, is used both to assert dominance in dynamics(not only used towards women and AFAB, but to all the other minorities), feeding into sexist, patriarchal, racist deas, and so gender stereotypes; and to feed into the pedophilic ideas and dreams of really sick people. By saying this I can conclude my essay, I really hope it was interesting, these were all of my sources: The base for my entire essay, https://study.com/learn/lesson/infantilization-of-women.html Article about hentai https://www.covenanteyes.com/2015/09/04/3-reasons-anime-porn-is-bad-for-you/ Article about the ahegao face https://animemotivation.com/the-history-of-ahegao-face-racism-asians/ Briefly video about the romanticization of Lolita https://youtu.be/G1gOhewhjbw Britney Spears music video https://youtu.be/C-u5WLJ9Yk4 Mentioned article on infantilized women https://www.theverdictonline.org/post/the-infantilization-of-women-in-mainstream-media-and-society Article about the infantilization of femininity https://thewaynestater.com/21922/opinion/the-infantilization-of-femininity/
This is a short YouTube documentary that I really recommend. The topics that it talks about are: children abuse, pedophilia, sex abuse, children market, non-con sex work, and so on. I’m a western woman, and the situation here is different , but that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t educate ourselves about what goes on in other countries where women are still treated like they’re not humans. Feminism is about uplifting the minorities and putting everyone on the same page, we shouldn’t be self-centered and selfish, please don’t feed into white feminism or rad-feminism beliefs, always educate yourself on what is going on around the word.
Learn 10 ways you can help end human trafficking.
Children account for 27% of all the human trafficking victims worldwide. Learn what you can do to help victims of child trafficking and expl
Sex-selective abortions created a lucrative market for traffickers.
Sex Trafficking in Asia: The Impact of Policy, Economic Opportunity, and Globalization
"One reason for the attrition of young women in STEM is “B phobia.” Girls are more likely to drop subjects for which they earn a B, which disproportionately affects STEM subjects given their relatively lower grade levels. The same concept ladders up to the workplace. Unlike many men, women are often afraid of making mistakes or taking on assignments for which they feel underqualified. This risk aversion can undercut career success—necessitating we show women, in STEM careers in particular, that trial-and-error fosters, rather than hinders, learning and innovation. Some of the greatest ideas and most impactful companies were founded “by mistake.” "
Blair Blackwell
Insecurity hinders so many women from achieving greater heights. Since society puts them on a pedestal, they internalize this desire of perfection and only seek opportunities that they know they will excel at. The risk of failure comes with an added risk of mockery that will often be attributed to their womanhood. In my school, girls are less likely to ask questions and interact with teachers despite outperforming their male peers by miles. On top of that, men will never fail to vocalize that girls do not belong in stem and women cannot do math etc. This hidden tactic ofcourse develops an inferiority complex that women carry throughout their life. Dignity and pursuit of perfection are curses that bind women. While men will always chime their opinions (rather) confidently, women will waste their time assessing whether their opinion is "worthy" enough to be put on the table. Patriarchy manipulates women into conforming to low paying jobs and dissuades them from pursuing success. This is why ambitious women are hated and ridiculed so much. They know women's desire to rise above their station is a threat to their regime. For the patriarchal empire to meet its fall, women must be ambitious and do whatever is necessary to achieve their primal success. Selfish women devour patriarchy.