project card souls

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle
Noah Kahan
sheepfilms

Love Begins
Claire Keane
Phantogram Three
One Nice Bug Per Day
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn
Today's Document
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Jimmy Eat World
Show & Tell
EXPECTATIONS
No title available

titsay
RMH
Fieri Frames

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Denmark
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Maldives

seen from Türkiye

seen from Algeria
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Austria
seen from United States
@milliemixxie02
project card souls
i think as a society we underrated how funny and also how cunt dracula saying "perhaps the same could be said of ALL religions" in response to the clearly-intended-to-be-literal "you steal men's souls and make them your slaves!"
does anyone else have parents who suck in objectively funny ways
drawing it made me realize this one might be a unique experience
im going through some bullshit someones homestuck fankid would experience
enter my WAR ROOM.we can discuss such things as STRATAGEMS and TACTICAL MANEUVERS.. and girlsss
The corollary of needing to be willing to frame arguments in terms of moral precepts you don't necessarily share is needing to be aware of subtext. Yes, it's easy to get a certain stripe of hyper-conservative folks to agree with anything you please by framing it in terms of opposition to Big Government, but a large part of that is because when you say "Big Government", what they hear is "Jews". You didn't hack their brain with magic words, you just didn't realise what you were saying!
I don't remember what post exactly I said this in, but I remember I once saw someone doing this and had to be like "sometimes you think you're tricking the racist into agreeing with you when you're actually letting the racist trick you into agreeing with him"
Emergency services, residents and environmental groups say military dropping flares to destroy forests and crops
Firefighters and residents of south Lebanon have accused the Israeli military of lighting wildfires in the region, as forested areas burned down in blazes sparked by Israeli bombing. Environmental groups said the fires in recent weeks were part of a longstanding Israeli practice of targeting Lebanon’s natural environment. On Tuesday, the Israeli military dropped flares in a wooded area outside Khiam, in south Lebanon, sparking blazes. When firefighters attempted to extinguish the flames, a drone struck close by, forcing them to withdraw, said the head of the civil defence in the Nabatieh region, Hussein Fakih. “Most of our missions are now related to fires,” Fakih said. “There are enormous areas of woodland that have burned, I don’t have the exact figures, but in the areas close to the [frontline], around 30-40% of the land has been affected by fires.” The Israeli military has caused fires across south Lebanon, in particular in olive groves and on agricultural land, according to videos and testimony from emergency services, in the nearly two-months since the 17 June ceasefire that mostly ended fighting between Hezbollah and Israel.
[...]
According to environmental groups, the fires are part of a pattern of Israeli attacks against Lebanon’s environment that threaten the country’s woodlands and the biodiversity they support. Hisham Younes, the founder of Green Southerners, a Lebanese conservation organisation, said: “These are long-established woodlands, dominated by productive stone pine alongside oak. They perform critical functions. The wider area is also an important passage and resting ground for migratory birds.” Younes called the Israeli attacks an ecocide. “It is not about any single fire or attack, but a pattern of destruction that progressively erodes the ability of ecosystems to function, regenerate and sustain life. When those cascading effects also undermine livelihoods and people’s ability to return to and remain on their land, environmental destruction becomes inseparable from the wider transformation of the territory itself.”
[...]
It is not the first time Israeli forces have been reported to have set fires deliberately.In the summer of 2024, Israeli troops used trebuchets – medieval catapults – to fling flaming debris over its border wall with Lebanon, while the Lebanese army published photos of Israeli drones that carried hoses that doused forests in flammable materials. Health and environmental experts raised the alarm in February when Israeli planes dropped herbicides linked to cancer on farms in south Lebanon. Besides the environmental and health consequences of these fires, residents of south Lebanon have mourned the loss of the green spaces in the villages where they grew up.
12 August 2026
i fucking love the cock carousel loop by the way it has some of the absolute funniest moments in the game back to back... it gets talked about less than the mr. evrart loop because you have to fail a pretty specific combination of checks to get it but the argument you have with rhetoric in it is hysterical
like dont get me wrong i love pauper i think pauper is awesome. but i think one of the reasons commander is such a big hook for new palyers is the commanders themselves. as someone with no or little pre-existing magic knowledge it is very easy to look at something like kaalia, or gishath, or niv mizzet, and say "oh, that looks cool and exciting, i want to play with that!" and it is a lot harder until you are really deeply invested in magic's rules and systems to see the excitement in a deck based around lembas and glint hawk
there's a lot of things that work against commander as an introductory format: complicated board states, extremely deep card pool, normalized color pie breaks. but you just cannot underestimate the "stickiness" and raw appeal the game for new players gains simply from Having A Guy who's Your Guy
etienne lux is kind of what the worm fandom thinks cauldron is
can I ask, what is the appeal of Magic, to you? I ask because I just never got the appeal or why people would choose it over other games like yu-gi-oh, one piece, pokemon, etc. and I wonder if I'm missing something or if it's just not for me
there are a lot of things about magic that i like. first of all, i think that the way magic handles its rules and balancing is much better than basically all its competitors, the comprenehsive rules are excellently written and the templating / keywording / information economy is generally top-notch (this is what by comparison turns me off hugely to something like yugioh). magic deckbuilding feels hugely open, with all these pieces that interact and play together.
secondly, i like magic's aesthetics. i mean--the reason i got into magic and not another TCG to begin with was because my wife pitched me on it during the release of ONE, a set full of phyrexians--still my favourite faction in the game by far. yugioh, pokemon, etc don't have anything like these cards that first drew me in
of course, there's magic sets with aesthetics i don't think are as interesting. but when compared to something like flesh and blood, which bores me to tears to look at, magic is full of cool interesting striking images and ideas.
and this kind of ties in to my favourite thing about magic, which no tcg has replicated, which is its fully unique method of storytelling. the fact that each magic set is a cross section, a vertical slice of a whole separate world, is in my opinion the absolute best possible use of the medium for storytelling. i love playing draft and limited not just ebhcause i'm playing with fun cards, but because the commons and uncommons are telling me about a world, i am having the story of this specific place and this point in its history told to me through the game pieces. one piece, pokemon, yugioh, etc, don't have this same expansion=world model--yugioh, to my knowlege, has no setting at all, only continuity across specific sets of cards.
and then there's also mark rosewater: no other tcg has a head designer who is so passionate about sharing the design process with the public, who is so passionate about just teaching the world about game design. as well as being very elegantly and well designed, magic has thousands and thousands of words i can read explaining why specific design choices were made, what altenratives were considered, and so on, because of rosewater.
so yeah, i just think magic is an extremely well-designed game with 30 years of hsitory to its name that uses the format of the TCG expansion to tell stories masterfully in a way no other comeptitor has really mastered, and i just enjoy most of its tones and aesthetics (UB excepted) a lot more than i do those of its competitors.
it can't just be "inconsiderate" to listen to tik tok at full volume on a train, it has to be a crime worthy of public execution. alternatively, only a foaming-at-the-mouth fascist would find it annoying to have to listen to, so maybe you should kill yourself for not appreciating it
(letterboxd user reviewing Portal) it's "god forbid women do anything" vibes
(steam user reviewing Kill Bill) Let me make you an analogy. Kill Bill is kind of like cheese. Why? Becausue its good. You like cheese right? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm cheese. Watch this movie. 👍
(ogre crossbowman) me going to use bone bolts after run out of poison ones and then me definitely going to rout
ftr, i’m sending this in good faith because i respect you and i think you’re very smart. this isn’t an attempt to bait you or anything 😭 but i am really curious about your opinion on suicides “caused” by ai chatbots. i’ve always been skeptical of the framing a lot of people have regarding these cases where they describe them using phrases like “chatgpt murdered this person” and such, but i also have No idea how to logically rebuff this type of hyperbole without coming across like i’m minimizing these really tragic deaths and what that person was going through.
i mean, like. you can look at the chats released in these cases, right. it's never someone going "wow my life is going really well and i'm very happy". i think obviously the way that these chatbots are like... designed to engage with people, and indeed to engage with them in these chats, is extremely irresponsible, it's perhaps the place where the sycophancy built into these models has the absolute worst consequences. but, imo, i think it is trivializing these people, and their autonomy, and the ways in which their lives were genuienly shitty, to attribute their choice to evil robot mind control, especially if you're cynically doing it to win an unrelated argument. like, parents of suicidal teens love to blame chatgpt the way they love to blame phones/the internet/video games/dungeons and dragons/secular rock music, because it's a viewpoint that completely exonerates them, the people with the most outsized and totalizing influence on the actual quality of their kids' lives
have you played the Travelling at Night demo yet bc regret to inform it's a banger
i've heard a lot of very good things... despite my skepticism i think i'll have to give it a try...
i have a copyright related question that i was hoping you could help me wrap my head around, because i agree with you basically all of the time on that matter, but something about this specific scenario is giving me a bit of a hangup (not that we should KEEP copyright because of this specific scenario but that i dont know what should be done instead). i also apologize in advance there definitely used to be a post about this that i wish i could link to but i cant find it so this ask is going to be very long. the long and short of it is there used to be a "band" called new jersey weather report. they released an album and some other stuff, there were related side projects too. they sold their stuff on bandcamp one of my good friends has 1 of 12 cassettes ever produced by them. they were part of a virtual festival in minecraft, and the vod got flagged for copyright infringement for a completely different band. as it turns out, all of new jersey weather report's (and all of their side projects') music was completely stolen from other groups - i know white oak and the planet you were 2 of them but there may have been more idr. and by completely stolen i mean absolutely no editing, just changed the names of the songs, and no attribution to the original artists at all. and i know this kind of thing happens legally all the time under the current copyright system anyways and we dont have any recourse for it now either. but it seems like... disingenuous to say that under a copyright-less system that it would be perfectly acceptable to do exactly that? like if we didnt have copyright, and njwr did what they did, but this time just no one ever found out. does that make it ok? and like im framing this around njwr because its something that i know happened but i guess it would apply to anything subject to copyright - if i just started printing like, the shining, or the name of the rose or whatever, but changed only the title and said i wrote it, is that just... fine?
if i just started printing like, the shining, or the name of the rose or whatever, but changed only the title and said i wrote it, is that just… fine?
i mean, i don't think that's fine--because you are lying to people. the copying is not the morally fraught aspect of this--i think it is completely morally fine to print the shining and evne to make money off it; it's when you start lying about the authorship that you start causing harm. i think this sort of deception has three direct and evident harms:
you are denying the original author credit for their work. it is natural, when you have made something, to feel proud and want to be recognized for it--it is hurtful to see people enjoying your work without feeling credited. depending on the context, being denied credits in this way can also be a material harm; in many artistic industries, credits and reputation are crucial to finding jobs and opportunities
you are denying those who enjoy the work the opportunity to understand its actual context. if someone reads the shining, they can go on to find the rest of steven king's ouvre; they can see what he has cited as his influences and go back and read those. the circumstances of a work's production, its position in an artist's broader body of work--all this epitext is shorn off completely when you deceive someone about the origin of a work
you are committing an act of vandalism against the culture more completely; if your version of the work becomes more notable than the original, you build a false citation into the history of the medium. you create a dead end, a cul-de-sac of the rich interconnectness of culture where something is put into a position it doesn't actually occupy. in the worst cases, where this behaviour mixes with e.g. colonialism, racism, etc. you participate in actively writing oppressed peoples and their culture out of cultural memory
but this has nothing to do with copyright; none of these harms are caused by the act of reproduction. an opposition to plagiarism is completely in line with a copyright abolitionist stance, because the harms of plagiarism stem from a particular intentional deception around crediting rather than from breaking copyright laws
Chainsaw Man is a critically acclaimed shonen manga in which the main character's superpower is being molested