shark vs the universe
ellievsbear
$LAYYYTER
Today's Document
Xuebing Du
No title available
oozey mess
The Stonewall Inn
tannertan36
KIROKAZE
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cosimo Galluzzi
trying on a metaphor
No title available
Jules of Nature
One Nice Bug Per Day
if i look back, i am lost
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
@theartofmadeline
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States
@missmisandrytabletalk
still can’t believe that time I wrote an essay about sexism and someone told me it was “bio essentialism”. like, excuse me, do you think women have been oppressed for however-many years based on vibes? or do you think oppressors walked up and asked their pronouns first?
sydney sweeny selling soaps presumably manufactured using her bathwater is exactly why liberal feminism needs to be ousted at all costs. the manosphere is already elated over her announcement and would give you million reasons as to why it's a clever marketing strategy. in an age where even a minor girl's body is subjected to fetishization, she thought it was completely alright catering to the male fantasies for some paycheques. weaponizing your objectification and honey trapping moids isn't the kind of revolution you thought about in your head.
she’s 27 so not exactly a minor
never implied she is. you missed the whole point of this post.
good job explaining, 10/10. please continue being abrasive and saying nonsense
you could've just said u have poor comprehension skills and moved on. you come off as more nonsensical and passive aggressive to me rn. weirdo.
sydney sweeny selling soaps presumably manufactured using her bathwater is exactly why liberal feminism needs to be ousted at all costs. the manosphere is already elated over her announcement and would give you million reasons as to why it's a clever marketing strategy. in an age where even a minor girl's body is subjected to fetishization, she thought it was completely alright catering to the male fantasies for some paycheques. weaponizing your objectification and honey trapping moids isn't the kind of revolution you thought about in your head.
she’s 27 so not exactly a minor
never implied she is. you missed the whole point of this post.
people with DSDs (aka literal medical conditions) being used as a 'gotcha!' to prove that gender and sex aren't binary is like, really weird. One thing about people who ascribe to trans ideology is that they'll use vulnerable scapegoats.
Like, xenogenders being justified because 'its for autistic people who can't understand gender.' You make us look like how we were viewed in the 30s, incapable. Most of these people are also high functioning, or self diagnosed. Those with severe enough autism to truly not comprehend gender aren't the ones that are using pronouns like bunny/bunnyself. They're being put into inhumane institutions, but you dont hear about it.
God the more I look at men nearing 30 the more I realize why they dog on women's age so much: pure projection. I'm only 26 and most men my age are already balding and repulsive. They took one look at themselves in their mirrors and assumed any woman would age just as poorly.
I'm so sick and tired of girls my age making jokes that pander to men. "haha it doesn't matter if I fail my exams I'll just become a stripper." Number one, you're 15. The fact that you're already thinking in such a way proves that men's views of women are so pervasive and have shaped even young people. Number two, due to this male centric world view you believe that becoming a stripper is fine, safe, normal. It isn't. The average stripper has been assaulted near to 5 times. Oftentimes they're forced to strip due to dire circumstances. Its not a choice for many, and to insinuate so is absolutely disgusting. On top of this, the rise of anti intellectualism. "I dont want to go to university! Im just a girl, i just wanna be a trophy wife!" A trophy wife with financial dependence on her probably cheating husband, who has no backup options if the marriage falls through (which it will, divorce rates in the elite are sky high) and a decade long gap in your resume. I dont care if you're joking, men truly believe that women should serve them and your "Joke" will probably make an idiot man think that you're agreeing with him. Even more benign jokes such as "Girl maths is when I buy 45 quid worth of makeup, but i used a 10 quid voucher so i actually made money" are harmful because if girl maths is so trivial, what is man maths? Is it degree level maths? Is the maths that Maryam Mirzakhani did not "Girl maths" even though it was done by a woman simply because its not inane enough?
I go to a school where many girls are intellectually bright, and yet they keep saying they want to get married at 20, or 18. I've heard some lamenting the fact its no longer legal to get married at 16. Its infuriating and depressing. They claim what they say are "Jokes" but it gets old.
It’s so annoying when people hate on the “all men” sentiment because “what about queer, non white, or disabled men” like yes them too. They all have the capacity to be just as misogynistic as white, straight, able bodied men. Simply being a certain minority doesn’t take away their systemic power over women idgaf who they are.
we need to start putting more eyes on mothers with male children. we need to start criticising how they are raised to prevent it before they're adults.
oh we love to omit the role of fathers out of these discussions who are primarily the reason why these boys turn out to be incels. the absent fathers or the fathers at home who are condescendingly abusive towards their wives and daughters in front of their sons.
i never denied it was more the fathers' fault - i just meant to insinuate that mothers are partially responsible as well. "toxic boy moms" are a great example of this.
no i understand what you meant but i still wanted to add that since in a lot of instances only mothers are held responsible for their sons' upbringing.. which is frankly unfair and is another depiction of our patriarchal society.
when ur listening to ur fave music and u start rockin out
we need to start putting more eyes on mothers with male children. we need to start criticising how they are raised to prevent it before they're adults.
oh we love to omit the role of fathers from these discussions who are primarily the reason why these boys turn out to be incels. the absent fathers or the fathers at home who are condescendingly abusive towards their wives and daughters in front of their sons.
i find it really annoying when people only choose to talk about the pipeline of serial killers harming animals before they go and actually kill people but refuse to talk about how serial killers will also often watch violent porn and have kinks related to violence. the hatred of women is just as much as a link to male murderers as animal cruelty is but if we start to have that conversation means that we’d also have to finally realize that every single misogynistic man is most likely on the edge of going on a killing spree
“He’s not a rapist” but he is friends with one.
“He’s not a rapist” but he doesn’t care that another man is.
“He’s not a rapist” but he thinks every accusation is probably a false one.
“He’s not a rapist” but he believes rape isn’t the worst crime.
“He’s not a rapist” but he asks what clothes was she wearing.
“He’s not a rapists” but he says “She was drunk, what did she expect”.
“He’s not a rapist” but he makes rape jokes.
“He’s not a rapist” but he is into CNC.
“He’s not a rapist” but he watches porn.
“He’s not a rapist” but he IS a rapist.
everyone loves to demonize radical feminism.
I open any app and there’s someone talking out of their depth and the worst part? people eat it up. they don’t read. they don’t think. they just parrot whatever makes them feel comfortable within the system.
radical feminism isn’t trending because it doesn’t cater to men. it doesn’t soften itself for approval. it names the violence. it names the structures.
if your feminism is easy to digest, easy for men to agree with, easy to brand ask yourself why.
if your feminism isn’t constantly being undermined in a patriarchal society, it’s not radical. it’s not liberation.
"misandry isn't feminism blah blah blah" you know what? women have earned the right to hate men. women deserve to hate men. after all the suffering we've been put through our entire existence, we are not standing here to merely be told we aren't fucking feminists for loathing who we've been subjected to. let women hate men, let women be free, and above all let women have fucking voices.
our resentment and hatred towards them is absofuckinlutely justified. what on the other hand isn't justified are the femicides and felonies committed against women and animals. moids can weep and throw tantrums about misandry all day long but wouldn't budge a muscle if a rape case pops up on their TL. that's where they draw the line and become completely indifferent. so fuck them and i pray they remain miserable for the rest of their fucking lives.
sydney sweeny selling soaps presumably manufactured using her bathwater is exactly why liberal feminism needs to be ousted at all costs. the manosphere is already elated over her announcement and would give you million reasons as to why it's a clever marketing strategy. in an age where even a minor girl's body is subjected to fetishization, she thought it was completely alright catering to the male fantasies for some paycheques. weaponizing your objectification and honey trapping moids isn't the kind of revolution you thought about in your head.
